logo
Missing EU climate targets could leave Ireland facing a €26 billion bill

Missing EU climate targets could leave Ireland facing a €26 billion bill

Euronews04-03-2025

Ireland could face a 'staggering' bill of between €8 billion and €26 billion to other EU member states if it doesn't act now to reduce emissions.
This stark warning about the cost of missing its goals comes via a joint report from the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (IFAC) and Climate Change Advisory Council (CCAC).
It says the country's government needs to 'act now' or it could be in line to pay significant compliance costs further down the line. Plans to cut emissions that have yet to be enacted could reduce the potential costs by between €3 billion to €12 billion.
Why does Ireland have to pay for missing emissions targets?
The EU's Effort Sharing Regulation sets binding national targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Member states have to meet climate targets for five key sectors: road transport, buildings, small industry, waste, and agriculture. Each goal is adjusted based on a country's GDP, with wealthier nations having stricter requirements.
Countries that underperform will have to buy 'emissions allocations' – essentially carbon credits – from those that are overperforming in order to bridge the gap.
But the price of these allocations depends on the extent to which other EU member states achieve or overachieve on their targets. A report from Transport & Environment (T&E) last year warned that, with so many countries set to miss their goals, the scarcity of allocations could lead to a bidding war in 2030.
This makes the price of each credit challenging to predict, leading to the massive variation in the predicted cost.
'Ireland can take actions now to offset potential costs down the line,' explains Seamus Coffey, chair of the IFAC, adding that it can do so in a way that 'doesn't threaten the wider sustainability of public finances'.
In the past four years, the report also notes that Ireland has missed out on around €500 million in revenue from carbon credits it is entitled to sell. Two other pieces of national legislation on land use and forestry and the share of energy from renewable sources could also pose smaller yet significant costs.
How far is Ireland from meeting its emissions targets?
The latest data from the country's Environmental Protection Agency projects that Ireland will reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 29 per cent by 2030. That is a long way off of its agreed target to cut emissions by 51 per cent by 2030.
While we have made some progress in reducing emissions, our pace of change is not enough to meet our national and EU climate targets.
Marie Donnelly
Chair of the Climate Change Advisory Council
It isn't alone, however, with just Luxembourg, Greece, Portugal, Spain and Slovenia overachieving on emissions cuts. Though many other EU member states are also on track to miss targets agreed under the Effort Sharing Regulation, Ireland is among the worst.
The country had the highest emissions gap per capita of any EU state at 8.7 tonnes of CO2 per person. This leaves it as one of the least likely to meet its 2030 emissions reduction target under current climate policies.
'While we have made some progress in reducing emissions, our pace of change is not enough to meet our national and EU climate targets,' says Marie Donnelly, chair of the CCAC.
Can Ireland cut its greenhouse gas emissions in time?
If Ireland's government implements its 'more ambitious' Climate Action Plan by 2030, this course of action could reduce costs by between €3 billion and €12 billion. But, the report warns, this plan is not being delivered at the 'scale of the speed required' and urges officials to 'act now or risk substantial costs later'.
Around a tenth of the country's planned capital spending to 2030 could be enough, it says. This would cover the cost of upgrading Ireland's electricity grid, reducing the cost of 700,000 new electric vehicles to less than €15,000, improving EV charging infrastructure, and supporting forestry initiatives and the rewetting of the country's wetlands.
Not doing so would be a massive missed opportunity to cut emissions, the report's authors say.
'The government must take clear and decisive action now to transition to a climate neutral economy,' Donnelly explains.
'It is better to make the investments into Irish households, communities and businesses now, rather than paying significant compliance costs in the years ahead.'
Taoiseach, Micheál Martin, has defended the government's emissions progress to the Irish press, saying the country has made 'very significant progress' over the last four years, adding that emissions have come down in the last 12 months.
While Martin admitted to not having read the report in its entirety, he pointed to a 'big wave' of upcoming spending on the electricity grid and an upcoming push for offshore wind. He also added that the government was 'determined' to continue progressing on climate.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Italy forges on with world's largest suspension bridge
Italy forges on with world's largest suspension bridge

France 24

time3 hours ago

  • France 24

Italy forges on with world's largest suspension bridge

The 13.5-billion-euro ($15.3-billion) project would carry trains and six lanes of traffic, allowing cars to cross the Strait of Messina in 15 minutes. Giorgia Meloni's hard-right government hopes to boost the economy of the impoverished region, although critics say there are better ways to do this -- and many believe that after decades of false starts, the bridge will never actually happen. The choppy waters between the eastern tip of Sicily and the western edge of the region of Calabria are legendary as the place where monsters Scylla and Charybdis terrified sailors in Homer's epic poem "The Odyssey". These days the challenges are more prosaic, from winds of more than 100 kilometres an hour (62 mph) to the real risk of earthquakes in a region that lies across two tectonic plates. The government says the bridge will be at the cutting edge of engineering, with the section suspended between its two pillars stretching 3.3 kilometres, the longest in the world. But critics point to a long history of public works announced, financed and never completed in Italy, whether due to corruption or political instability, resulting in enormous losses for taxpayers. "The public does not trust this political class and these projects that become endless construction sites," said Luigi Storniolo, a member of protest group No Ponte (No Bridge). Infrastructure Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini, one of the main champions of the project, insists it will be a game-changer for the local economy. "The bridge will be a catalyst for development," he said on a recent visit to Reggio di Calabria, the city where the bridge will begin. 'A senseless project' The government hopes to boost trade in Sicily, which currently suffers from an "insularity cost" of around 6.5 billion euros a year, according to regional authorities. Meloni's ministers are expected to give their final approval to the project -- which Rome will fund -- later this month, and Salvini insists construction will begin this summer. But work had already been announced for the summer of 2024, before being postponed -- a common theme in the history of the bridge, the idea of which dates back to the unification of Italy at the end of the 19th century. The first law for the project was passed in 1971. Since then, successive governments have either revived it or cancelled it. In 2012, the idea appeared to be definitely abandoned amid the eurozone debt crisis, only for Meloni's government, which took office in 2022, to return to it once again. Salvini has repeatedly stated that the bridge would create 120,000 jobs in Calabria and Sicily, which have the fourth and the 13th highest unemployment rates respectively in the EU for young people under 29. However, the left-wing CGIL trade union estimates around 2,300 workers a year will be hired during the project, and critics say the jobs created will be offset by long-term losses from the closure of ferries. Mafia risk The project has sparked local protests, with critics warning of the impact on a protected marine zone and an important bird migratory route. Storniolo told AFP it was a "senseless project" which used up valuable funds when "our regions already suffer from many problems... healthcare, schools, and infrastructure." The Italian Court of Auditors has also criticised the extent of the debt-laden Italian state's investment in this one project in its assessment of the 2024 budget. "They want to make an entire territory believe that its only hope is this bridge -- but then the bridge never arrives," protester Storniolo added. There is also the question of mafia infiltration. The attorney general of Messina recently warned of the risk that organised crime would benefit from the project, noting that "the power of the mafia is hidden... behind public contracts". The government has proposed placing companies relating to the project under control of an anti-mafia structure reporting to the interior ministry. But Italian President Sergio Mattarella blocked this, saying it should only be used for one-off events such as earthquakes or the Olympics. Salvini argued that the bridge can help tackle the mafia, saying: "You do not fight the mafia... with conferences and protests, but by creating jobs and giving hope to young people."

EU, Britain strike deal on Gibraltar's post-Brexit status
EU, Britain strike deal on Gibraltar's post-Brexit status

LeMonde

time9 hours ago

  • LeMonde

EU, Britain strike deal on Gibraltar's post-Brexit status

The European Union and Britain on Wednesday, June 11, sealed a "historic" deal on the status of the territory of Gibraltar, five years after Brexit. The deal will ease the flow of people and goods over the Gibraltar-Spain border, forming part of London's much-vaunted "reset" in ties with Brussels. When Britain left the EU in 2020, the relationship between Gibraltar – historically an important military base for Britain due to its position at the mouth of the Mediterranean Sea – and the bloc remained unresolved. Talks between London, Madrid, Brussels and Gibraltar on a deal had made halting progress during several rounds of negotiations under Britain's previous Conservative government, but the arrival of Labour last summer gave new impetus. EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic said it was "a truly historic milestone for the European Union, including Spain, as well as for the United Kingdom and Gibraltar." "This agreement benefits everyone and will bring legal certainty and confidence to the people and businesses across the region," he said during a news conference in Brussels. He added that he was "absolutely convinced" it would be ratified by the parties because "it's a good agreement." In a statement, the four parties said the agreement would create a fluid border between Gibraltar and Spain, with no physical barriers or checks between the territory and the border town of La Linea. People arriving in the territory by air or sea would undergo dual border checks at Gibraltar port and airport, to be carried out by Gibraltar and Spanish officials. "Spanish officials will be responsible for ensuring the integrity of the Schengen Area," said a UK statement, which likened the arrangement to the system at London's St Pancras station, where French police carry out border checks for passengers bound for the EU. "Immigration and law and order in Gibraltar will remain the exclusive responsibility of Gibraltar's authorities," said the statement from Britain's Foreign Office. 'Delighted' Gibraltar "Today's breakthrough delivers a practical solution after years of uncertainty," British Foreign Minister David Lammy said in a statement. The agreement "protects British sovereignty, supports Gibraltar's economy and allows businesses to plan for the long-term once again," he added. Chief Minister of Gibraltar Fabian Picardo said he was "delighted" about the agreement that will bring "legal certainty to the people of Gibraltar, its businesses and to those across the region who rely on stability at the frontier." The deal, he said, "will protect future generations of British Gibraltarians and does not in any way affect our British sovereignty." Around 15,000 people – over half of Gibraltar's workforce, according to London – cross the land border between Spain and Gibraltar every day. Britain and Spain have disputed control of the tiny territory since it was ceded to Britain in the 1713 Treaty of Utrecht.

3 EU countries start debate about minors' access to social media
3 EU countries start debate about minors' access to social media

Euronews

time10 hours ago

  • Euronews

3 EU countries start debate about minors' access to social media

The European debate on children's access to social media networks has begun, with three EU Member States promoting the idea of a "digital majority" or the age below which it would be forbidden to connect to such platforms. For France, Spain and Greece, the goal is to protect minors from dangerous online content. "Today, in the terms and conditions of use of these platforms, there is already a minimum age of 13," explains Clara Chappaz, the French Minister Delegate for Artificial Intelligence and the Digital Economy. However, Chappaz says: "We've all been children, it's very easy to change your date of birth. And so the current system means that, on average, children are logging on and creating accounts from the age of 7-8." France, Spain and Greece believe that the algorithms used by social networks expose the very young to addictive content that can ultimately lead to increased anxiety or depression. They also argue that excessive exposure may limit the development of certain skills and impair cognitive abilities. The EU currently has legislation in place in the form of the Digital Services Act (DSA), which tackles illegal online content such as hate speech, terrorism and child pornography. The law has been in place for almost two years for larger platforms and search engines, and just over a year for smaller organisations. But for industry representatives in Brussels, new legislation appears premature. "We believe that the new rules must first be properly applied. We haven't yet seen all the effects," says Constantin Gissler, Managing Director of Dot Europe, which represents online services and platforms in Brussels. "I think it's a bit hasty at this stage to be already discussing new rules and I think it's also very important that we take more account of the reality and implications for minors of such a ban," he adds. Paris, Madrid and Athens are also proposing the integration of age verification and parental control systems for devices connected to the Internet. The European Commission is currently working on an age verification application. Last month it published draft guidelines to protect minors, such as measures to verify the age of users or to set children's accounts as private by default. It is also conducting investigations against TikTok, Instagram and Facebook in relation to the protection of minors.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store