S&P 500, Nasdaq futures at record highs on September rate cut hopes
Signs that U.S. taxes on imports have not fully filtered into headline consumer prices sparked a relief rally on Wall Street in the previous session, with the benchmark S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab marking its first record high close in two weeks.
Despite core inflation marking its biggest jump since the start of the year, investors factored in recent weakness in the job market and a shake-up at the Federal Reserve as they leaned in favor of a potential dovish move by the central bank in September.
Interest rate futures now reflect a 98% chance of a 25 basis points interest rate cut, according to data compiled by LSEG, compared with 88.8% on Tuesday. The central bank last lowered borrowing costs in December.
"A benign CPI report, coming on the heels of weak non-farm payrolls, has strengthened the case for a September Fed cut," said Nikos Tzabouras, senior market analyst at Tradu.com.
"However, market euphoria could be challenged as stagflation risks persist, potentially eroding consumption and hurting advertising - a key revenue stream for many tech giants."
At 7:10 a.m. ET, Dow E-minis were up 132 points, or 0.30%, S&P 500 E-minis were up 13.25 points, or 0.20% and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were up 58.25 points, or 0.24%.
The CBOE volatility index (.VIX), opens new tab, popularly referred to as Wall Street's fear gauge, dropped to 14.46 - its lowest since January.
Rate-sensitive banking stocks such as Bank of America (BAC.N), opens new tab and Citigroup (C.N), opens new tab were marginally higher in premarket trading after the broader sector (.SPXBK), opens new tab logged its biggest daily rise in three months on Tuesday.
Analysts said a steepening yield curve following the inflation report could help bank earnings as lenders could borrow cheap and lend at a higher rate.
Later in the day, investors will scrutinize remarks of a number of policymakers, especially Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee - a Federal Open Market Committee voting member this year.
Earnings are also in focus. CoreWeave (CRWV.O), opens new tab, which is backed by Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab, lost 8.3% after the AI data center operator reported a bigger-than-expected quarterly net loss.
Eyes are also on developments surrounding the China revenue-sharing deal the U.S. government signed with chipmakers like Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD.O), opens new tab, which the White House said could be expanded to others in the sector.
Eli Lilly (LLY.N), opens new tab rose 1.3% after the drugmaker launched the easy-to-use injector pen of its blockbuster weight-loss drug, Mounjaro, in India.
Venture Global (VG.N), opens new tab gained 8.5% after the LNG major won a legal battle against Shell (SHEL.L), opens new tab over its failure to deliver liquefied natural gas under long-term contracts starting in 2023.
Crude prices traded around $60 per barrel ahead of a virtual meeting between Donald Trump and European leaders on the Russo-Ukraine conflict, two days before the U.S. president meets Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
19 minutes ago
- Times
What happened when we let Times readers bet $10,000 on stocks
If you could go back in time to the day of the 2024 US election — armed with $10,000 and everything you know now — how much money could you make in the stock market? That is the challenge we set Times readers last week. Buy and sell any stock in the S&P 500 or the FTSE 100 and jump forward in time, watching how the actions of the Trump administration have affected global markets. You can play it here. So, how did readers get on as stock market traders? The average player managed to turn their $10,000 investment into about $14,000 over the eight simulated months, meaning that they generated $4,000 profit — a return of 40 per cent. This is a pretty good return, even if readers knew exactly what would happen: $10,000 invested in the S&P 500 would have returned $10,787, and the same in the FTSE 100 would have resulted in $11,095 — although $10,000 in bitcoin, turning into $16,931, would have beaten the lot. Trump's tariffs resulted in a frenzy of trading, helping Barclays to a 23 per cent jump in pre-tax profits in the first half of the year. There are, of course, some objectively 'better' stocks to pick. The US AI firm Palantir, co-founded by the Trump ally Peter Thiel, has more than tripled its value since the election. Other US AI firms and computer chip manufacturers (such as Super Micro Computer Inc and Jabil Inc) have also experienced strong growth, as well as companies in AI adjacent sectors, particularly energy stocks such as the General Electrics power spin-off GE Vernova Inc, which has benefited from increased demand from AI data centres. • The cheap and easy way to invest (without the risk) A significant number of readers wisely put all their money into Palantir, yielding returns of 200 per cent. But the highest profits were for those who traded repeatedly at optimum times. Only two players turned their $10,000 into more than $100,000; at the time of writing, the top score was an eye-watering $441,681. The highest possible score, buying the best performing stock day after day, was well over a trillion dollars. Compounding returns, to paraphrase Albert Einstein, really are the eighth wonder of the world. For data privacy reasons, we don't know which stocks the top performer picked. However, on average, those who played did not opt for high-risk, high-reward US tech stocks. In fact, most readers put their money into recognisable UK companies that had a track record of doing well. Readers rightly focused on UK defence stocks such as Rolls-Royce, BAE and also Babcock, the best performing FTSE 100 company during the period. All those stocks boomed after Trump's realignment of global defence. • Bull or bear? Find out what kind of investor you are Other top performers picked out by readers included Airtel Africa, International Airlines Group (which owns British Airways) and the mining firm Fresnillo. For the FTSE at least, readers had a good sense of where the gains have been, with most of the ten best-performing stocks over the period being in the most-bought list. The above looks at which stocks had the most money invested. But the list of stocks that were bought and sold the most — that is, with the highest number of trades — shows a preference towards US growth firms. Top of this list is Coinbase, the cryptocurrency exchange, and Elon Musk's Tesla, both of which have share prices inherently tied to unpredictable and volatile entities. Readers also explored options with oil and steel stocks. Due to tariff changes, these companies were particularly volatile. Many readers bought BP, others looked at Chevron or the US steel manufacturer Steel Dynamics. There were good profits to be had with all these, but you'd need to buy and sell at specific times to really make a good profit. • I want to invest in Europe's comeback. Where do I start? These lists also feature unexpected appearances from 3M, 3i Group, AES Corporation and APA Corporation. Theses companies didn't perform particularly well over the period and their inclusion is likely to be due to their names appearing at the top alphabetically, rather than being selected as part of a broader investment strategy.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Amazon issues final refund warning as major app closes down forever in DAYS – check now before it's too late
AMAZON is preparing to close down one of its biggest platforms after 14 years. But fear not, it's not the main shopping service of course. 2 Another area the tech giant has long tried to make inroads is via its own app store. Amazon Appstore acted as a third party alternative to Google Play, with more than 500,000 apps. But by Wednesday it will be no more on Android devices. It will continue to exist on Amazon Fire TVs and Amazon Fire tablets, where it's the main app store available. Amazon has been reminding users of the imminent closure on Android for sometime, urging people to check if they have any funds on the Amazon Appstore. Amazon Coins - which is also being discontinued - is a virtual currency to buy apps and more. If you've bought any in the past, it's your final chance to spend them or redeem a refund. People were already blocked from buying anymore Coins and the Appstore was no longer downloadable to new users. "Any Coins you have purchased that remain in your account after 20 August 2025 will be refunded." How to check if you have any Amazon Coins Now is the last chance to check if you have any unused Amazon Coins left on your account. You can see in your account by doing the following: Visit Amazon's website and sign-in From the menu at the top with your name, find Your Apps & Devices Select Your Coins Account from the options in the navigation bar August Prime Gaming: 12 Free Games Worth £112 for Amazon Prime Members 2
Geeky Gadgets
an hour ago
- Geeky Gadgets
ChatGPT-5 vs Claude vs Qwen : The Hidden Costs of Picking the Wrong AI Model
What if the future of app development hinged on the AI model you choose? With the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence, developers are faced with a critical question: which model delivers the best balance of speed, reliability, and cost-effectiveness? In the race to build smarter, faster applications, three contenders—ChatGPT-5, Claude, and Qwen—have emerged as frontrunners. Each features unique strengths, yet their differences could mean the success or failure of your next project. Imagine building a tool like 'Newsletter Digest,' a web app designed to summarize newsletters, only to discover that your chosen AI model struggles to deliver functional results. The stakes are high, and understanding these models' capabilities is no longer optional, it's essential. In this comparative overview, Rob Shocks explains how these AI models stack up in real-world scenarios, using the development of 'Newsletter Digest' as a case study. You'll uncover insights into their performance metrics, strengths, and limitations, as well as the hidden costs that could impact your budget. Whether you're a developer seeking reliability, a strategist prioritizing creativity, or someone chasing speed, this breakdown will help you navigate the trade-offs. By the end, you might find yourself rethinking what matters most in an AI partner: precision, adaptability, or efficiency? AI Model Comparison Summary Project Overview: Developing 'Newsletter Digest' 'Newsletter Digest' is a web application that connects to Gmail, aggregates newsletters, and summarizes key stories for users. It also allows users to view individual newsletters in a streamlined interface. The app was developed using a modern tech stack to ensure scalability, responsiveness, and ease of use: A React-based framework for building a dynamic and efficient front end. A React-based framework for building a dynamic and efficient front end. Tailwind CSS: A utility-first CSS framework that enabled clean, responsive design. A utility-first CSS framework that enabled clean, responsive design. Neon: A Postgres database solution for managing user and application data. A Postgres database solution for managing user and application data. Prisma: A database toolkit that simplified schema generation and management. A database toolkit that simplified schema generation and management. Clerk: A user authentication and management tool integrated with Stripe for seamless billing functionality. The core functionality of summarizing newsletters relied on the capabilities of Claude, GPT-5, and Qwen Coder. These models were tested for their ability to deliver a functional app, their speed, usability, and cost-effectiveness. Comparing the AI Models Claude (Opus 4.1 and Sonnet 4) Claude proved to be the most reliable and mature AI model for this project. It excelled in generating a fully functional app with minimal errors, particularly in tasks such as database schema generation and implementing app features. Its workflow required fewer corrective prompts, which significantly reduced development time. However, this high level of performance came at a premium, as Claude was the most expensive model in the comparison. For developers prioritizing reliability and efficiency, Claude offers a robust solution, albeit at a higher cost. GPT-5 GPT-5 demonstrated strong strategic thinking and versatility but fell short in implementation compared to Claude. While it made reasonable progress in building the app, it required more corrective prompts and encountered occasional errors during the setup process. The Cursor CLI, used to interact with GPT-5, is still in beta, which introduced some glitches and limited functionality. Despite these challenges, GPT-5 showcased its ability to handle complex tasks with guidance, making it a viable option for developers who can invest additional time in troubleshooting and refinement. Qwen Coder Qwen Coder stood out for its speed, delivering rapid responses during the development process. However, it struggled to produce a complete and functional app. Its outputs were often incomplete, and it frequently stopped abruptly, requiring significant manual intervention to fill in the gaps. While its speed is promising, Qwen's lack of reliability and functionality placed it behind both Claude and GPT-5 in this comparison. Developers seeking a balance between speed and reliability may find Qwen less suitable for complex projects. ChatGPT-5 vs Claude vs Qwen Watch this video on YouTube. Stay informed about the latest in AI Models Comparison by exploring our other resources and articles. Performance Metrics The three AI models were evaluated based on their overall performance in building 'Newsletter Digest.' The results revealed clear distinctions in their capabilities: Claude: Delivered the most reliable and functional app with minimal errors and a smooth workflow. Delivered the most reliable and functional app with minimal errors and a smooth workflow. GPT-5: Ranked second, offering decent progress but requiring more corrections and encountering occasional errors. Ranked second, offering decent progress but requiring more corrections and encountering occasional errors. Qwen: Ranked third, excelling in speed but failing to deliver a complete and reliable app. Claude's ability to produce a polished and functional app with fewer iterations made it the top performer, while GPT-5's versatility and Qwen's speed highlighted their respective strengths and limitations. Cost Analysis Cost is a significant factor when selecting an AI model, particularly for projects with budget constraints. Here's a breakdown of the pricing for each model: Claude (Opus 4.1): $15 per million input tokens, $75 per million output tokens. $15 per million input tokens, $75 per million output tokens. GPT-5: $0.125 per 1,000 input tokens, $0.10 per 1,000 output tokens. $0.125 per 1,000 input tokens, $0.10 per 1,000 output tokens. Qwen: Pricing varies but is generally more affordable than Claude and GPT-5. While Claude was the most expensive option, its superior performance justified the higher cost for this project. GPT-5 offered a more affordable alternative with slightly reduced effectiveness, while Qwen's lower cost reflected its limited functionality and reliability. Insights on Development Tools The development process also highlighted the importance of the tools used alongside the AI models. These tools played a critical role in streamlining the workflow and making sure a smooth development experience: Clerk: Simplified user authentication and integrated seamlessly with Stripe for billing, reducing the complexity of managing user accounts. Simplified user authentication and integrated seamlessly with Stripe for billing, reducing the complexity of managing user accounts. Cursor CLI: Provided access to multiple AI models but, as a beta tool, had limited features and occasional glitches that impacted usability. Provided access to multiple AI models but, as a beta tool, had limited features and occasional glitches that impacted usability. Neon (Postgres DB): Worked effectively for database management, especially when paired with Prisma for schema generation and maintenance. While most tools performed well, the beta status of Cursor CLI highlighted the need for further refinement to improve its reliability and feature set. Looking Ahead: Future Considerations As of August 2025, the AI landscape continues to evolve, with emerging models like Grok and Gemini showing potential to disrupt the market. Developers should remain vigilant for advancements in AI capabilities and pricing structures. For now, Claude remains the preferred choice for projects requiring maturity, reliability, and comprehensive functionality. GPT-5 offers a strong alternative for tasks that demand strategic thinking and creative input, while Qwen Coder's speed may appeal to developers working on less complex applications. Continued refinement of tools like Cursor CLI and exploration of new technologies will further enhance the app development process, paving the way for more efficient and innovative solutions. Media Credit: Rob Shocks Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
