
‘How Long Do We Have?' Nithin Kamath On AI Threat To India's White-Collar Jobs
Last Updated:
New information shared by Zerodha co-founder Nithin Kamath shows a clear warning: Artificial intelligence can now handle longer and more complicated tasks than ever before.
Artificial intelligence isn't merely progressing; it's accelerating at a breakneck speed, posing a significant challenge to India's service-based economy. According to new insights from Zerodha co-founder Nithin Kamath, AI systems are increasingly capable of managing longer and more intricate tasks than ever before. This rapid evolution means many jobs traditionally performed by humans could soon become obsolete. It raises urgent questions about what the future holds for employment in the country.
On X (formerly Twitter), Nithin Kamath posted two images – one chart shows that the length of tasks AI can complete at a 50 per cent rate is doubling every seven months. Just a few years ago, earlier models like GPT-2 were limited to handling only brief, simple queries lasting seconds.
Today, GPT-4o can sustain performance for nearly an hour. The most advanced systems, such as Sonnet 3.7, are already managing complex, multi-hour assignments like training image classifiers—tasks that have moved beyond experimental phases and are becoming true substitutes for human work.
A second, more concerning chart tracks AI's accuracy across different task lengths and complexities. For short and simple tasks, leading models now achieve over 90 per cent accuracy. Even more complicated and ambiguous challenges, once thought to be beyond AI's capabilities, are now seeing significant improvements. Only the most difficult category—long, complicated tasks—still lags with less than 30 per cent success.
However, that gap is steadily closing.
One user remarked, 'It's hard to predict, but it feels like we're nearing a major turning point."
Another added, 'Not much time left, but ultimately this progress will improve our lives. It could lead to sustainable abundance and even communism—after all, capitalism is paving the way."
A different commenter emphasised the importance of adaptability, saying, 'As long as people keep reskilling and adding value to their organizations, they'll stay relevant."
Meanwhile, someone else reassured others by pointing out, 'There's still plenty of time because AI relies heavily on human knowledge as middleware."
The discussion highlighted a mix of concern and cautious optimism about the future impact of AI.
First Published:

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
31 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump vs Musk: Call the breakup poetic justice. Call it karmic crypto-collapse. Just don't call it surprising
Some alliances hum like clockwork. Others tick like time bombs. This one? It was always a countdown. When two men believe the world revolves around them, it's only a matter of time before their orbits collide. And when they do, the explosion isn't quiet. Rather, it's a full-blown Twitter meltdown with echoes loud enough to rattle both Wall Street and Mar-a-Lago. And boy, we are watching the best cosmic collision since Pluto got downgraded. Welcome to the spectacular implosion of the Trump–Musk bromance. What began as a mutual admiration society of billionaire chest-thumping and red-hat flirting has now devolved into the kind of public breakup even the Real Housewives would find a bit too messy. Let's rewind. Once upon a time, in the golden age of post-truth politics, Elon Musk, the tech messiah, meme lord, and part-time Mars enthusiast, decided to dip his toes into political kingmaking. A neat little $277 million was funnelled into the Donald Trump campaign machinery. In any other part of the world, this would be called oligarchic meddling. In the United States, it's called 'Super Tuesday'. Trump, ever the transactional romantic, reciprocated by giving Musk a cosy seat at the regulatory table named DOGE, where he could quietly dismantle watchdogs, neuter climate policies, and make capitalism great again (for Tesla stock). Love was in the air. Or maybe, it was just the fumes from Musk's Boring Company flamethrowers. But like all ill-fated love stories, this one came with red flags. Musk's reputation, once burnished with visions of space colonies and clean energy, began to crumble under the weight of layoffs, lawsuits, and livestreamed tantrums. Turns out, being the adult in the room is hard when you're too busy rebranding Twitter into an unpronounceable algebra problem. Enter phase two: Reputation rehab. Suddenly, Musk was 'distancing' himself from the Trump administration. He quit councils, tweeted vaguely progressive things, and flirted with the idea of centrism, all while pretending he hadn't spent the past four years quietly enjoying deregulation like a raccoon in a trash buffet. But this Thursday? The façade shattered. In a tweet that will one day be studied in both communications courses and FBI depositions, Musk posted: 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files.' He even had the gall to add: 'Have a nice day, DJT!' That wasn't a mic drop. That was a nuke in 280 characters. And let's be honest: If anyone was going to try to cancel someone else using Jeffrey Epstein, it was always likely to be Musk. Trump, unsurprisingly, didn't take it well. His reply was less subtle than a red tie in a wind tunnel: Musk is 'crazy,' and perhaps more worryingly for SpaceX investors, he threatened to cut off government contracts. Suddenly, two men who once shared bromantic photo ops and mutual disdain for accountability were hurling legal threats across a billion-dollar battlefield. Kanye West (of course) tried to play counsellor, tweeting something along the lines of 'bros don't fight, we love you both'. Unfortunately, love is dead and so is Kanye's credibility. And yet… are we really witnessing the final act? Let's not forget: Trump has made up with worse. Just ask Marco 'sweaty little man' Rubio or Ted 'your wife is ugly' Cruz. With Trump, personal insults are just foreplay. It's politics as WWE: Everyone's bleeding, but it's still part of the script. Still, there's something deliciously different this time. This feud doesn't feel like kayfabe. It feels real. Real messy. Real vindictive. Real stupid. And that makes it… kind of beautiful? Because if 2025 is going to be yet another parade of rich men yelling into microphones about how oppressed they are, the least we can ask for is a little entertainment. Preferably the kind that ends in lawsuits and meme wars. So, grab your popcorn. Watch the world's richest man implode on the platform he owns, while being roasted by the guy he helped elect. Call it poetic justice. Call it karmic crypto-collapse. Call it what you will. Just don't call it surprising. After all, in the immortal words of the internet, 'This you?'


NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Two Narcissists Walk Into a Democracy: On The Trump-Musk Saga
In a clash so inevitable it feels like the final season of a prestige political satire, Elon Musk and Donald Trump - two of the most powerful men with arguably the thinnest skins on Earth - are now at war. Not over policy, ethics, or even money (at least not directly), but over the most potent fuel of the 21st century: Ego. What began as a carefully transactional relationship between the billionaire technocrat and the 'reality TV president' has morphed into a Shakespearean fallout, played out on social media and, inevitably, the stock market. This feud is more than a spectacle - it is a glitch in the simulation, exposing how democracy is now shaped less by institutions and more by the whims of exceptionally online, exceptionally powerful men. The Build-Up: Billionaire Bromance The seeds of this high-voltage drama were planted during Trump's first term, when Musk - then still a Silicon Valley favourite - joined the US President's advisory councils. Their relationship was an unlikely duet: One man selling flamethrowers and Mars dreams, the other selling nationalism and golf club memberships. Yet they found common ground in deregulation, disdain for media and an appetite for attention. Though Musk walked out after Trump pulled the US from the Paris Climate Accord in 2017, there was never a clean break. By 2020, Trump praised Musk as 'one of our great geniuses', while Musk returned the favour by cozying up to conservative talking points and positioning himself as a champion of 'free speech' after his takeover of Twitter, now called X. The Feud Begins: One Big Ugly Bill Enter Trump's latest legislative gambit: the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' a $2.5 trillion mashup of tax cuts, immigration crackdowns, and budget slashes to healthcare and environmental programmes. Musk, having presumably read the fine print - or at least the parts affecting him - declared the bill a 'disgusting abomination'. In particular, he balked at the axing of electric vehicle subsidies, a critical driver of Tesla's appeal. Trump, rarely one to take criticism quietly, fired back. He accused Musk of hypocrisy, whining about handouts while living off government contracts, and warned of pulling federal funding from Musk's businesses, including lucrative SpaceX deals with NASA. So here we are - a populist ex-president threatening to crush a private space programme because the CEO called his bill ugly. American governance, ladies and gentlemen. Power By Proxy: The Digital Battleground It didn't take long for the digital proxies to join the fray. Musk, in his characteristically chaotic style, called for Trump to be impeached. At one point, he endorsed a tweet suggesting Vice President JD Vance should replace Trump. He even lobbed the Epstein grenade, accusing the Trump administration of withholding damning files. Trump, on his part, fired salvos from Truth Social, painting Musk as a spoiled billionaire who turned on America when he didn't get his tax breaks. Meanwhile, Tesla stock plunged - at one point shedding over $150 billion in market value. Investors who once praised Musk's audacity are now wondering if he's steering the ship with a joystick made of memes. The feud is no longer just political theatre. It's economic reality. The Psychology Of Power (And Platforms) Let's pause and examine the architecture of this mess. Trump and Musk are not mere individuals. They are brands, platforms, and echo chambers in human form. Each commands a devoted following, not because of what they build (a country, a car, a spaceship), but because of what they represent: disruption, defiance, dominance. Both men operate under the gravitational pull of narcissism, a trait frequently observed in high-functioning, high-profile personalities. Trump's public persona is built on dominance, loyalty, and retribution. Musk's identity, meanwhile, is rooted in genius worship and contrarianism. They thrive on attention, and when they don't get it, they manufacture it. The difference lies in their methods. Trump weaponises grievance. Musk weaponises intellect - or at least the perception of it. Trump's power comes from populism and politics; Musk's from code, contracts and stock markets. But the endgame is the same: control the narrative. When two narrative-controlling narcissists collide, democracy doesn't just get squeezed - it becomes secondary. Policy becomes performance. Governance becomes spectacle. This isn't just another high-profile clash of egos. It's a cautionary tale about how democracy is morphing into a personality contest played out on digital colosseum. The Trump-Musk feud is both deeply personal and frighteningly structural. It shows how fragile modern power really is when concentrated in the hands of a few men who consider humility a software bug. In ancient Rome, emperors clashed with senators over war and law. In 2025 America, the emperor and the rocket man are feuding over subsidies and social media likes. Perhaps the real question isn't who wins this fight, but what's left of governance when they're done.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Google Gemini now supports scheduled actions, introduces new swipe gesture for Live
Google was one of the few companies that jumped on the AI bandwagon early on, but the tech giant still seems to be playing catch-up with startups like OpenAI. Earlier this year, in January, the Sam Altman-led company introduced a new feature that enabled users to schedule tasks in ChatGPT to run automated prompts. Now, in a blog post, Google has announced that it is bringing 'Scheduled Actions' to Gemini. Announced at this year's I/O, Google says the new functionality is 'designed to proactively handle your tasks.' Similar to ChatGPT's schedule tasks, Gemini users will now be able to streamline their routine tasks and even get personalised updates from the AI chatbot. The tech giant says users can now ask Gemini to do things like completing a task at a specified time, or changing the prompt you are already using for a recurring task. Moreover, Gemini can now show you a summary of your calendar, unread emails, and fetch information and give updates about your favourite sports team on the go. However, the scheduled actions feature is limited to users with a Google AI Pro or Ultra subscription and eligible Google Workspace business and education plans. Also, it is still unclear if Gemini, like ChatGPT, has limited scheduled action to ten active tasks and if they can pause or delete an old task if they hit the limit. Google also said that Gemini will soon get an 'upgraded preview' of Gemini 2.5 Pro. The new large language model builds on the company's recently unveiled 2.5 Pro model, which is better than its predecessors in coding. The company is also making it easier for users to access Gemini Live. Instead of tapping on the dedicated Gemini Live action from the bottom of the screen, you can now simply swipe from the right side of the screen to the left to open Gemini Live.