Abbey Clancy shows off her incredible bikini body in sweet family holiday snaps with husband Peter Crouch
The mother-of-four, 39, looked incredible she posed for a mirror selfie in a white bikini top and sarong.
Other snaps featured Abbey with her husband Peter Crouch, 44, and their four children - Sophia, 14, Liberty, ten, Johnny, seven, and Jack, six - as they lounged on what appeared to be a private boat.
In another snap, the children could be seen seemingly taking a go of steering the boat.
The model simply captioned the pictures 'Summer' with a heart emoji.
While Abbey did not specify the location of the sweet family snaps, last week she said that they were enjoying the sunshine in Almancil, Portugal.
Fans were quick to compliment Abbey and her family's holiday snaps, with one joking of Peter's legs: 'Legs for days on that boat.';
'Stunning family.'; 'Amazing photos happy memories to keep.'
The sweet snaps come after Abbey opened up about the secret to her rock-solid marriage to Peter Crouch.
The English model tied the knot with the former footballer in 2011 and they are celebrating their 14th wedding anniversary this year.
Abbey has now revealed how they have kept their relationship thriving over the years.
She admitted the key was 'growing together' throughout time with Peter and always staying 'in sync' with him.
'When we look back at our wedding day, some of the choices we've made, some things we've done in the past, we're like ''Bloody hell, who were we then?'',' the TV star told The Mirror.
Fans were quick to compliment Abbey and her family's holiday snaps, with one joking of Peter's legs: 'Legs for days on that boat'
Abbey continued: 'We're still in sync, we've got the same interests and the same things that make us laugh. It's really a happy time for us at the moment.
'We honestly do everything together, except work - actually even work, because we have our podcast.'
But Abbey barely defines it as work, adding their successful podcast - The Therapy Crouch - is filmed at home with her brother and cousin and simply 'feels like we are having a chat'.
She stressed the importance of being authentic and remarked she 'loves' to have the opportunity of sitting down with her husband to cherish their memories.
The happy couple also recently revealed the strict rule they've placed on their four children to improve their behaviour.
They implemented an iPad and phone ban at Christmas, insisting it's led to a more positive attitude in their household.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
9 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Word ‘Jewish' ripped from comedian's posters at the Edinburgh Fringe
A comedian has claimed the word 'Jewish' was burned from posters advertising her Edinburgh Fringe show. Earlier in the festival Rachel Creeger had one show cancelled over alleged staff concerns about potential security risks. Ms Creeger was offered the chance to perform at another venue, Hoots, and posters were put out advertising her show, Ultimate Jewish Mother. The word 'Jewish' appears to have been deliberately burned on outdoor posters, rendering the 'Jew' illegible. She posted on Instagram: 'Overnight, vandals burned out the word Jew out of the signage outside my lovely venue. I am not going to let this break me, but I am not going to lie, it's a tough day.' The vandalism marks the latest in a string of controversies at the Fringe, amid the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict. In July, Ms Creeger and Philip Simon were set to perform at the Whistlebinkies venue in Edinburgh. However, they claimed they were informed that their gigs would be cancelled after bar staff at the venue expressed fears of feeling 'unsafe'. It was claimed that the concerns were raised after an announcement that the venue would receive extra police supervision amid continued worries over the safety of Jewish acts. Days later, having found an alternative venue, Mr Simon was cancelled again, barred from the Banshee Labyrinth pub because of alleged 'rhetoric and symbology' linked to Israel. One reason cited by the venue for cancelling his show, Shall I Compere Thee in a Funny Way?, was his attendance at a vigil for people killed in the 2023 Hamas terror attacks. He said of the incident: 'I am still processing the concept that in 2025 I can be cancelled just for being Jewish. In the meantime, I will still be at the Fringe for my one remaining children's show and continue to investigate possible alternative venues for both of my cancelled shows.' It is understood that the alleged vandalism has been reported to Police Scotland.
Times
9 minutes ago
- Times
The naked truth? Hot new films leave me cold
The hot comedy of the summer is The Naked Gun, so, obviously, I went to see it, at the cinema, in a heatwave. When people ask, 'So, Hilary, what do you think of the hot film of the summer?', as they surely will, I need to be ready with something pithy yet pertinent. Instead, I'm baffled. It's amiable nonsense, but is it funny? I never even cracked a smile, yet the critics raved. I love the idea that the on-screen romance between Pamela Anderson and Liam Neeson is now real, but the film? I don't get it and this isn't the first time. Barbie irritated me. Oppenheimer bored me. I've struggled with all of George Clooney's films except Ocean's Eleven, even though I've been a true believer since his ER days and know that Amal is only a stepping stone on his road to me. The trailers at the cinema this week left me equally baffled. The Roses, a remake of The War of the Roses, which starred Michael Douglas and Kathleen Turner, looked epically dreadful, so I look forward to critics hailing it as Olivia Colman and Benedict Cumberbatch's finest, funniest work. Another trailer, billed as a comedy, featured someone named Hutch thumping someone else while saying, 'I am on vacation.' To date, no one's asked me what I think of the hot film of the summer. It's probably just as well. • Feeling gloomy? Hollywood has a so bad-it's-good comedy for you! Flip-flops are obviously not the solution to anything except a beach and yet still, inexplicably, people wear them around town, apparently just because it's hot. The fact that there's a market for three-figure designer flip-flops is proof that the heat has gone to your head and the only sensible person around here is me. With Burberry flip-flops costing nearly 500 quid and Balmain's £300, at least my Manolos have sides and a sole. But 2025 is clearly the summer of the city flip-flop because they're on the Tube, in supermarkets and shuffling through airports. You're mad, the lot of you. Naturally, your feet are foul to look at and I bitterly resent that you're flaunting them, but that's my problem, not yours. Your problem is different. Do you want your bare skin touching supermarket tarmac, the filthy floor of a Tube train or a plane? All that clammy rubber, with no cushioning or support, will play havoc with your arches. And if you don't believe me, believe Tom Ford, who is always right about everything. 'Flip-flops and shorts in the city,' he once said, 'are never appropriate.' My eightysomething mother is getting a new car and she's not messing around. Her current wheels are a Smart car so old and asthmatic you have to kick your heels and say 'giddy-up, Dobbin' to get it up hills. I assumed she'd go for something solid, not too fast and high up for ease of access. What she's actually getting is a sporty little low-slung Mini Cooper with a top speed of 146mph that does 0-60 in less than seven seconds. Her very first car was a Mini, she says gleefully, and this Mini will be her last. Not so much 'giddy-up, Dobbin' as 'whoa there, Granny'. Getting to the cinema took me through Borough Market, where the big tourist attraction isn't artisan sourdough because tourists have about as much use for artisan sourdough as they do for a pork chop. I sometimes wonder who buys all the pork chops in that market, but presumably someone does or they wouldn't sell them. What they do sell, in their thousands, are £8.50 plastic pint pots of Instagrammable strawberries covered in chocolatey gloop. The queue for them is around the block, but you would wince if I told you what the lads on the fish stall opposite say about that chocolatey gloop.
Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
JOHN MACLEOD: Sturgeon clawed her way to power but it's the whine of a victim that drips from Frankly's tawdry pages
Had I eagerly shelled out £28 in advance for a copy of Nicola Sturgeon 's memoirs, I'd now be inclined to cut up rough. Frankly's juiciest bits have been sprayed with abandon everywhere this week – interviews graciously granted; studios regally toured – to the point that today, on official publication, must feel like hurtling joyously downstairs of that cold and frosty morning to find someone has opened all your Christmas presents. And such chunks; and such gobbets. As if the sometime First Minister had rolled onto The Jeremy Kyle Show and told all. Like those magazines of the TV ChitChat order you glimpse in passing at the shops. Shrieking headlines like 'My Dad left my Mum – for my boyfriend!!!' Before even the silky dustjacket is in your hands, even before said autobiography falls open with that exquisite whiff of printers' inks, you already know Sturgeon thinks she may be non-binary. Who does not rule out, some day, a relationship with another woman. That, as a quivering Scottish Parliament newbie, some rank man kept sidling up to her to snigger about a coarse – and, indeed, apocryphal – nickname. Yet Sturgeon, heedless of the no-smoke-without-fire brigade, throws it out there again, amidst much other titillation. She has, no doubt, decades ahead of her to look back and wonder why none of her Pan Macmillan editors – eagerly egging her on – raised a hand gently to breathe, 'Whoa…' And thus Nicola Sturgeon is left sprawled out there on the reputational beach. Not in the thoughtful, statesmanlike company of, say, Thatcher or Mitterand, Garret Fitzgerald or Charles de Gaulle. Much more in the tawdry, brackish he-bwoke-my-necklace waters of Harry and Meghan. And even the late Queen, come to think of it, is betrayed by Sturgeon. There is an unwritten rule that conversations with the Sovereign are not repeated. Especially her exchanges with ministers. All in Elizabeth II's circle knew that she only welcomed tittle-tattle from her closest personal servants – pages, her dresser and that; those she saw every day. Yet Ms Sturgeon quotes the Queen at some length, declares – improbably - that Her Majesty 'loved a bit of a gossip' and wanted details of the racked Alex Salmond. Some, too, have wondered aloud why, given the fraught state of Scottish publishing, Sturgeon rolled all the way down to London town to spill such beans. Surely money was not a consideration for our sometime National Mammy? And there are oddities. Sturgeon, it seems, cares far more about the rights of trans-identifying men in her deathless prose - she devotes pages and pages to it - than about the cause to which she has supposedly devoted her life. Scotland's independence, meriting nothing like as many paragraphs and barely a tenth of the passion. The pages of Frankly, too, are strewn with factual errors: silly mistakes, easily checked. One instance will suffice. Recalling when Covid-19 rolled in like a tsunami, Sturgeon hyperventilates, 'We moved more quickly than the other governments to ban mass gatherings and close schools.' Actually, Sturgeon's general approach was slyly to ascertain what ministers in Whitehall were about to do – and then announce it first. And Scotland's schools closed their doors on Friday 20 March 2020 – the same day as every other school across the United Kingdom. Almost the saddest aspect of Sturgeon's autobiography is her obsession with Alex Salmond – longtime friend, a colleague through decades, a mentor at critical moments. Until they fell so spectacularly out, from 2017, like jostling barons at a Shakespearean court. Bloated and bitter, Salmond died last October at some conference in the Balkans. That recent demise – and broken hearts left behind – might, you think, have signalled some Sturgeon caution. On top of three incontestable facts: Salmond in 2019 won a civil court case, with costs and damages, against the Scottish Government. M'luds concluded that it had treated Salmond 'unlawfully,' in a manner 'tainted with apparent bias.' A year later he was acquitted of all charges – by a majority in each instance – of criminal offences against womn, this by a majority-women jury under a presiding female judge, Lady Dorian. And, a year after that, the relevant Holyrood committee concluded that Nicola Sturgeon, First Minister, had in the course of this tacky episode misled the Scottish Parliament. Indeed, giving evidence to that committee, there were extraordinary lapses in the Sturgeon memory: one can but congratulate her, half a decade on, how much her grasp of events has improved. In Frankly, she now goes after her late patron like a studs-up Emily Maitlis. As early as 1989, Sturgeon confides of some internal party episode, she had 'doubts.' During the independence referendum, she now and then questioned Salmond's judgement – though privately, of course; always 'privately.' Which did not prevent Sturgeon's 2004 plot with him to trick Roseanna Cunningham out of the SNP's deputy leadership, joyously leading the Nationalist charge at Holyrood (Salmond then was marooned in the Commons), holding high office under him for seven years and great prominence in that independence campaign. Salmond was buried on October 29 yet she is yet fixated on him, even after his two-nil triumph in the courts, her own censure by her Holyrood peers and when, as a woman far more important once murmured, some recollections may vary. Like Holmes and Moriarty, and as far as Nicola Sturgeon is concerned, she and Salmond must be roped together for always, tumbling down the Reichenbach Falls of history. The sometime First Minister gives little thought to the other women, Roseanna Cunningham apart, slighted or brutalised as Sturgeon surged through the decades to become great. She has always howled down the obvious comparisons with Margaret Thatcher, apt as they are. As to what her surrogates did to, for instance, Johanna Cherry and J K Rowling – well, silence is golden. Or, perhaps, just yellow. And then, working the phones in 2023, briefing her useful idiots in the Scottish media, watching complacently as the Scottish Greens joined the pile-on against Kate Forbes. Twisting her faith and background – a Free Church launched, you know, in a radical stand against despotic landlordism – till leadership-candidate Forbes was suitably painted as the sort of crazy Pentecostal from the Appalachians who dances with snakes. But saddest of all is how self-demeaningly, Nicola Sturgeon does down herself. This was our most cultured and best-read First Minister since Donald Dewar. A girl without advantage or contacts from an Ayrshire new town who spurned the most obvious (and the laziest) vehicle for ambition – the Labour Party – and who refused to sit at the back of the bus and shut up. By hard, hard work and against daunting odds – it took her four draining bids to win Glasgow Govan – Sturgeon clawed her way to power. Was not ashamed to reinvent her image. Impressed civil servants in every brief she held. A fearsome debater; a tough political operator. Swept to the SNP leadership, at the last, unopposed. A woman with a delicious sense of humour, at her peak beset everywhere for selfies. Who sold out the SECC Hydro faster than Beyoncé and would win eight national elections on the trot. Yet all, inexplicably, that drips through the pages of Frankly is the whine of a victim.
