‘You need a dictionary': SC to probe team as Ashoka prof Ali Khan Mahmudabad gets relief
"You don't require him (Mahmudabad), you require a dictionary," Justice Surya Kant said, according to news agency ANI.
Mahmudabad, associate professor and head of the political science department at Ashoka University in Haryana's Sonipat, got interim bail on May 21 after his arrest by the state police on May 18 over two Facebook posts related to Operation Sindoor.
On Wednesday, the bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi set a four-week deadline for the investigation team, which the SC had formed to probe the two social media posts.
The court also explained that its bail conditions allowed the professor to write articles and opinions online, except on matters that are sub judice.
From the SIT, it enquired why it was expanding its scope beyond the two posts, though, and why it needed his gadgets at all.
"We are asking why the SIT is, on the face of it, misdirecting itself. They were supposed to examine the contents of the posts," Justice Kant told Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, who was representing the state.
'Why take gadgets, ask about foreign trips?'
The court's remarks came after senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing Mahmudabad, told the bench that the SIT had not only seized his devices but was questioning him over his foreign trips of the last 10 years. He has been summoned four times by the SIT, Sibal said.
Sibal said that by its May 28 order, the top court had directed the SIT to confine its probe to the contents of the social media posts.
The bench thus noted that Mahmudabad has cooperated with the investigation and surrendered his devices; therefore, he should not be summoned again.
Mahmudabad is charged with, among other things, endangering India's sovereignty, unity and integrity for his comments on Operation Sindoor.
The State Women's Commission had earlier termed Mahmudabad's social media comments as disparaging toward women officers in the Indian Armed Forces and said it also promoted communal disharmony.
Mahmudabad clarified that his comments had been completely misunderstood.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
27 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Parliament Monsoon Session: Opposition demands two-day discussion on Pahalgam, Operation Sindoor in Rajya Sabha
The Opposition on Wednesday (July 23, 2025) put forth their demand for holding a debate on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor in the Rajya Sabha from next week and Prime Minister Narendra Modi's presence be ensured. The demand was put forth during the first meeting of the Business Advisory Committee (BAC) of the Rajya Sabha during the Monsoon Session of Parliament. The meeting was attended by leaders of various parties and Leader of the House J.P. Nadda, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju. The BAC meeting was chaired by Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman Harivansh. This is the first time that the meeting of BAC is being held, after the same was rescheduled since Monday (July 21, 2025). On Monday (July 21, 2025) evening, the first day of the Monsoon Session, Jagdeep Dhankhar resigned from the post of Vice-President, leading to further postponement of the meeting. "The Business Advisory Committee meeting of the Rajya Sabha was held today under the chairmanship of Deputy Chairman Harivansh. The entire opposition demanded that the discussion on the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor be taken up starting next week. 'The two-day discussion for 16 hours should be taken up a day after the same started in Lok Sabha,' Congress's deputy leader in Rajya Sabha Pramod Tiwari told reporters after the meeting. He also said the Opposition wanted no resolution should be brought up during the debate on Operation Sindoor/Pahalgam attack and a normal discussion spanning two days should be held. Govt Agrees to Debate on Operation Sindoor & Pahalgam Terror Attack "We have demanded that Prime Minister Narendra Modi should be present during the discussion, and we have been assured that by the government," he also claimed. "I am hopeful that the prime minister will be present during the debate on Operation Sindoor," Mr. Tiwari said. Both Houses of Parliament have witnessed repeated adjournments amid uproar by Opposition members over the issue of the Pahalgam attack, Bihar's Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls and other issues.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
30 bulldozers to raze forest overnight? Top court raps Telangana over tree felling
The Supreme Court expressed sharp disapproval over the use of bulldozers to clear forest land in Kancha Gachibowli, Telangana, stating that such overnight operations cannot be justified as sustainable development. Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai, who is heading the bench hearing the suo motu case, remarked during the proceedings that while he supported the cause of sustainable development, the nature and speed of deforestation in this case were am myself an advocate for sustainable development but that does not mean that overnight you should employ 30 bulldozers and clear all the jungle,' the Chief Justice said during the matter relates to the clearing of approximately 400 acres of green cover in the Kancha Gachibowli forest area by the Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (TSIIC) for the development of information technology infrastructure. The rapid felling of trees, reportedly over a long weekend, had led to widespread public concern and judicial intervention. Senior Advocate K Parameshwar, appointed as the amicus curiae in the matter, informed the Court that certain private intervenors intended to respond to the state government's affidavit. The bench agreed to grant time for these responses and re-listed the matter for detailed hearing on August an earlier hearing, the Supreme Court had strongly criticised the actions of the state authorities, warning them of contempt proceedings and even suggesting that erring officials could be held in temporary prisons constructed at the site if they failed to comply with Court orders. The Court had directed that restoring the status quo at the site was of utmost priority and had asked the State Wildlife Warden to take immediate steps to protect wildlife impacted by the also granted the state government time to respond to the Central Empowered Committee's spot inspection report and ordered the submission of an action plan to restore the forest to its previous background of the case traces back to a government order issued in 2024 by TSIIC, which sought to alienate forest land for IT development. Although TSIIC claimed to have acquired the land in 2012, the tree-felling gained momentum recently, prompting the filing of multiple public interest litigations before the Telangana High Court. Petitioners argued that the government's actions were in blatant disregard of Supreme Court rulings in TN Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India and Ashok Kumar Sharma v. Union of India, which had directed all states to identify forests and forest-like areas as per the dictionary definition of 'forest'.advertisementThe petitioners further contended that the state had not conducted any environmental assessment as required under the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006, and alleged that the land was being auctioned off for the construction of an IT park without due defence, the Telangana government maintained that the land in question was already classified as industrial and dismissed the petitioners' claims as being based merely on Google Earth April 2, the Telangana High Court had initially stayed the felling of trees until April 3, with the matter being adjourned to April 24 in view of the Supreme Court's intervention. The top court is now set to hear the matter in detail on August 13.- Ends IN THIS STORY#Telangana
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
At BAC meeting, opposition demand two-day discussion on Pahalgam, Op Sindoor in RS
The meeting was attended by leaders of various parties and Leader of the House J P Nadda, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju. The BAC meeting was chaired by Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman Harivansh. The demand was put forth during the first meeting of the Business Advisory Committee (BAC) of the Rajya Sabha during the monsoon session of Parliament. New Delhi, Jul 23 (PTI) The Opposition on Wednesday put forth their demand for holding a debate on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor in the Rajya Sabha from next week, and Prime Minister Narendra Modi's presence be ensured. This is the first time that the meeting of BAC is being held, after the same was rescheduled since Monday. On Monday evening, the first day of the Monsoon session, Jagdeep Dhankhar resigned from the post of vice president, leading to further postponement of the meeting. 'The Business Advisory Committee meeting of the Rajya Sabha was held today under the chairmanship of Deputy Chairman Harivansh. The entire opposition demanded that the discussion on the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor be taken up starting next week. 'The two-day discussion for 16 hours should be taken up a day after the same started in Lok Sabha,' Congress' deputy leader in Rajya Sabha Pramod Tiwari told reporters after the meeting. He also said the opposition wanted no resolution should be brought up during the debate on Operation Sindoor/Pahalgam attack, and a normal discussion spanning two days should be held. 'We have demanded that Prime Minister Narendra Modi should be present during the discussion, and we have been assured that by the government,' he also claimed. 'I am hopeful that the prime minister will be present during the debate on Operation Sindoor,' Tiwari said. Both Houses of Parliament have witnessed repeated adjournments amid uproar by opposition members over the issue of the Pahalgam attack, Bihar's special intensive revision of electoral rolls and other issues. PTI SKC SKC NSD NSD This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
