Mains answer practice — GS 2: Questions on India–US agricultural trade negotiations and unified welfare state (Week 115)
🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for July 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at manas.srivastava@indianexpress.com🚨
Discuss how a federated, rights-based and digitally integrated social security model can address systemic inefficiencies and transform welfare delivery in India.
Discuss the strategic considerations and political challenges surrounding India–US agricultural trade negotiations.
Introduction
— The introduction of the answer is essential and should be restricted to 3-5 lines. Remember, a one-liner is not a standard introduction.
— It may consist of basic information by giving some definitions from the trusted source and authentic facts.
Body
— It is the central part of the answer and one should understand the demand of the question to provide rich content.
— The answer must be preferably written as a mix of points and short paragraphs rather than using long paragraphs or just points.
— Using facts from authentic government sources makes your answer more comprehensive. Analysis is important based on the demand of the question, but do not over analyse.
— Underlining keywords gives you an edge over other candidates and enhances presentation of the answer.
— Using flowcharts/tree-diagram in the answers saves much time and boosts your score. However, it should be used logically and only where it is required.
Way forward/ conclusion
— The ending of the answer should be on a positive note and it should have a forward-looking approach. However, if you feel that an important problem must be highlighted, you may add it in your conclusion. Try not to repeat any point from body or introduction.
— You may use the findings of reports or surveys conducted at national and international levels, quotes etc. in your answers.
Self Evaluation
— It is the most important part of our Mains answer writing practice. UPSC Essentials will provide some guiding points or ideas as a thought process that will help you to evaluate your answers.
QUESTION 1: Discuss how a federated, rights-based and digitally integrated social security model can address systemic inefficiencies and transform welfare delivery in India.
Note: This is not a model answer. It only provides you with thought process which you may incorporate into the answers.
Introduction:
— The International Labour Organization's Director-General recently praised India's 'cash and non-cash' social security programs. The latest ILO-Phase II survey for India revealed that its schemes benefit more than 100 crore people. This milestone is the culmination of various initiatives initiated by both the federal and state governments.
— The ILO's World Social Protection Report (2021) first assessed India's coverage at 24.4%, but revised it to 48.8% after the government highlighted the scope of state-level programs.
Body:
You may incorporate some of the following points in your answer:
— The pressing task is to optimise distributed plans. This includes removing duplications, identifying the appropriate beneficiaries, and investing in capacity development and market-ready skill sets for our workforce.
— The G20 New Delhi Declaration demands for 'sustainably financed universal social protection coverage'. 'One Nation, One Social Security Governance' offers a promising road forward. It can fix current inefficiencies in order to make the greatest use of limited budgetary resources while sparing citizens the discomfort of running between government departments. For example, E-Shram registrations are intended for unorganised workers, whereas EPFO registrations mostly cover formal employment. They compete with one another and generate troublesome boundaries when they overlap.
— Central legislation such as the Employees' Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, Employees' Compensation Act, ESIC Act, BOCW, and Maternity Benefit Act provide security to workers beyond federal borders. Our Constitution permits states to create comparable schemes in their respective jurisdictions.
— These institutions can be improved to transition to a 'one government' welfare system, in which states work together to add value rather than recreating the wheel.
Conclusion:
— Our collective resolve to be 'Viksit Bharat' by 2047 depends upon several factors. One of them is financial security in old age. Cash transfers planned by any unit of the government can be routed through the UAN of the EPFO. A certain percentage of such 'transfers' can be used for Provident Fund, pension and insurance.
(Source: Why India needs a unified welfare state)
Points to Ponder
Read more about 'sustainably financed universal social protection coverage'.
Read about ILO's World Social Protection Report
Related Previous Year Questions
'The USA is facing an existential threat in the form of China, that is much more challenging than the erstwhile Soviet Union.' Explain. (2021)
'Indian diaspora has a decisive role to play in the politics and economy of America and European Countries'. Comment with examples. (2020)
QUESTION 2: Discuss the strategic considerations and political challenges surrounding India–US agricultural trade negotiations.
Note: This is not a model answer. It only provides you with thought process which you may incorporate into the answers.
Introduction:
— The Indian Prime Minister's remark that India will never compromise the interests of its farmers, livestock rearers, and fishermen is the most direct representation of the red lines his government has drawn in the now-stalled trade discussions with the United States.
— There were difficulties in opening India's domestic market to US farm produce, including GM maize and soybeans, fuel ethanol, and dairy products.
Body:
You may incorporate some of the following points in your answer:
— The imposition of a 50 per cent duty on Indian imports — inclusive of a 25 per cent levy as 'penalty' for purchase of oil from Russia — has narrowed the Indian government's space for give-and-take that is part of the process to clinch any trade deal.
— The US also wants India to allow imports of ethanol for use as a biofuel. Currently, only ethanol derived from domestically cultivated sugarcane, maize and rice is used to blend up to 20% with fuel.
— Unsurprisingly, Indian farmer associations are concerned that allowing imports of GM maize and soyabean from the United States may cause a drop in domestic pricing. They believe that such an openness is unfair, given that the cultivation of genetically modified crops (other than cotton) is not permitted in India.
— The Indian dairy industry is strongly opposed to the import of milk powder, butter oil, and cheese under any free trade deal, whether with the United States, the European Union, New Zealand, or Australia.
— There is also a requirement, which the US asserts is solely based on religious and cultural considerations, that all imported dairy products be sourced from animals that have not been given any composition including animal internal organs, bone meal, or tissues.
— The threat is primarily about exports rather than imports. India's seafood exports to the United States were valued at $2.48 billion in 2024, with a 32.5% increase recorded in the first six months of the year. This is especially true given that rival countries such as Chile, Ecuador, Indonesia, and Vietnam have substantially lower tariffs ranging from 10% to 20%.
Conclusion:
— India has significant potential to increase exports of seafood, basmati rice, spices, and essential oils to the United States, and it may need to import maize and soyabean for poultry and cattle at some point.
— The two countries' farm produce trade is increasing. Based on trends from January to June, both exports from India to the US and from the latter to the former are expected to reach new highs in 2025. The dramatic increase in India's purchases of Californian almonds and pistachios, as well as frozen prawn shipments from Andhra Pradesh and Odisha to the United States, demonstrate the benefits of comparative advantage that both countries may receive in agriculture.
(Source: Why PM Modi spoke of farmers, livestock rearers & fisherfolk amid US trade talks, For India and US, agricultural trade could be a win-win option)
Points to Ponder
Read more about India-US trade
Read about recent tariff on India by the United States
Related Previous Year Questions
'Development and welfare schemes for the vulnerable, by its nature, are discriminatory in approach.' Do you agree? Give reasons for your answer. (2023)
Besides the welfare schemes, India needs deft management of inflation and unemployment to serve the poor and the underprivileged sections of the society. Discuss. (2022)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 3 (Week 114)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 3 (Week 115)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 2 (Week 114)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 2 (Week 113)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 1 (Week 114)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 1 (Week 113)
Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week.
Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bailey bridges set to bring year-round connectivity to 14 Gadchiroli villages
Nagpur: From next monsoon onwards, over a dozen villages in Gadchiroli will no longer remain cut off from civilization due to floodwaters, as the government is set to start construction on advanced modular versions of the 'bailey bridge' in two talukas. Since time immemorial, every monsoon has seen over a hundred villages in remote parts of the district get marooned for either days or weeks, bringing life to a complete standstill in the hard-to-access regions. One of the bridges will be built on the Laheri-Hodi-Lashkar road in Bhamragarh at a cost of nearly Rs 20 crore. The second bridge will be built on the Permili–Yermanar–Kodsepalli–Mandra–Damrancha road in Aheri taluka and is slated to cost around Rs 18 crore. Both projects will be handled by the state Public Works Department. Avishyant Panda, district collector of Gadchiroli, said, "The two bailey bridges will be built in Bhamragarh and Aheri talukas. After completion, these bridges will provide year-round connectivity to 14 villages, out of the 112 that get cut off during monsoon-related flooding." Gadchiroli district sees the confluence of three rivers and has a hilly terrain, with road connectivity seeing improvement only in the last decade. District collector Avishyant Panda said that the projects were approved in 2018 by then chief minister Devendra Fadnavis, but were delayed due to design changes, cost escalations, and the need for revised estimates. Panda said, "All approvals have now come, and we expect the construction to be complete before next monsoon." For the people of these far-flung tribal villages, the bridges would mean an end to arduous boat crossings and treks through forested floodplains during the rainy season. The improved connectivity will also boost the delivery of government welfare schemes and encourage economic activity in a region often held back by its difficult terrain. WHAT IS A BAILEY BRIDGE? Bailey bridges are modular, prefabricated truss bridges developed during World War II for quick assembly without the need for heavy equipment. Made of lightweight steel panels that can be bolted together on-site, they are ideal for remote areas or emergencies — a perfect fit for Gadchiroli's challenging monsoon conditions. With the advancement in technology, they are now more sturdy than its WW-2 original version. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Nitish announces special packages for investors
Patna: CM Nitish Kumar on Saturday announced a four-point economic package aimed at encouraging entrepreneurs to set up industries in Bihar. Alongside this industrial push, he reiterated his govt's target of providing jobs and work opportunities to one crore young people through govt recruitment, private sector employment and self-employment initiatives over the next five years. The economic package, he said, would specifically benefit investors willing to establish industrial units in the state, supplemented by a range of existing incentives. The announcement was made on the CM's social media handle. Detailing the package, Nitish said, "The four-pronged economic package includes capital subsidy, interest subsidy and the doubling of the incentive money payable under the goods and services tax (GST). The arrangements would be made to provide land to the investors in every district, and the land would be given free of cost to them who will give more jobs." "If there is any dispute on the land allotted for establishing an industrial unit, it would be resolved. All these facilities would be given to those who establish industrial units in the next six months. Several other provisions besides these have also been made, which would be quite helpful for the investors and detailed notifications would be made separately," he said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Could This NEW Collagen Blend Finally Reduce Your Cellulite? Vitauthority Learn More Undo The CM added, "Our govt has already given govt jobs and created work opportunities covering 50 lakh youths in tune with the Saat Nishchay-2 framed in 2020," he wrote. "Now, our govt has fixed the target of covering one crore youths through govt jobs and work opportunities over the next five years (2025-30). The govt has been incentivising those interested in establishing industrial units, or deciding to work on self-employment, by providing them various kinds of facilities. Now, the govt will give a special economic package to entrepreneurs to open and establish industries in the state," he added. Explaining the larger objective, the CM said, "The aim of the govt behind making these initiatives is to promote setting up of more industries in the state and to see that youths acquire skills to become self-dependent and also get jobs for their better future." The announcement came a day after his Independence Day address at Gandhi Maidan in Patna, where he had reaffirmed his government's decision — already approved by the cabinet — to provide jobs and work opportunities to one crore youths between 2025 and 2030. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Krishna Janmashtami Wishes ,, messages , and quotes !
The Wire
4 hours ago
- The Wire
Explainer: The Trump–Putin Summit and its Immediate Consequences For New Delhi
New Delhi: For India, the Trump–Putin summit in Anchorage was more than a geopolitical spectacle in the frozen north. Rather, it carried immediate consequences for New Delhi's economic future. With the US having slapped punitive tariffs on Indian goods for Russian oil purchases, New Delhi watched the meeting closely, weighing whether Trump's diplomacy might ease the pressure or deepen its bind. Here is The Wire's explainer on what unfolded in Alaska on Saturday (August 16), and what it could mean for India. What exactly happened at the Trump–Putin summit in Anchorage? The day began with a carefully staged welcome at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage. US President Donald Trump's plane landed shortly after 10:20 a.m., and Russian President Vladimir Putin followed about half an hour later. Just after 11 a.m., the two leaders walked out onto a red-carpeted platform marked 'Alaska 2025,' framed by four F-22 fighter jets and a flyover that included a B-2 stealth bomber. After the handshake and photo op, Trump invited Putin into his presidential limousine. The pair spoke privately for a few minutes on the short ride to the venue, a break from protocol that underscored Trump's preference for unscripted encounters. Formal talks began around 11:30 a.m. in a 'three-on-three' format. Trump sat with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and envoy Steve Witkoff, while Putin was flanked by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and adviser Yuri Ushakov. The discussions ran for nearly three hours before concluding in the mid-afternoon. At about 3 p.m., the two leaders appeared before the press to deliver short statements, but they took no questions and announced no breakthrough. Putin departed soon afterwards, while Trump left Anchorage in the early evening for his return flight to Washington. In total, Putin's first visit to US in ten years, lasted less than six hours. Did Trump manage to secure a ceasefire, or did the talks end without progress? While flying to Anchorage, Trump told a Fox News anchor on Air Force One that he 'won't be happy' if he did not get a ceasefire deal at the summit. That set expectations for the meeting, which ran for nearly three hours behind closed doors. Yet when the two leaders appeared before the press, it was clear no such agreement had been reached. Trump nonetheless struck an upbeat note. 'We really made some great progress today,' he said, stressing that negotiations were ongoing and that more meetings would follow. He did not provide details of what that progress involved. 'There were many, many points that we agreed on, most of them, I would say, a couple of big ones that we haven't quite gotten there, but we've made some headway. So there's no deal until there is a deal,' he said. Later in an interview with Sean Hannity of Fox News, he said that the onus was now on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to get a cease-fire deal. Putin also kept up the optimistic narrative. 'We held our talks in a constructive and mutually respectful atmosphere, and they have proved substantive and productive.' The Russian President flattered Trump by stating that the Ukraine war would not have started if Trump had been president. He also restated Moscow's demands for a 'long-term and lasting' settlement on Ukraine war – addressing the 'root causes' of the conflict, ensuring 'all of Russia's legitimate concerns' are met, and restoring a 'fair security balance in Europe and the rest of the world.' He signalled, standing next to the US President, that the roadblock lay across the Atlantic. 'We hope that Kiev and the European capitals will take the current developments constructively and will neither try to put up obstacles nor attempt to disrupt the emerging progress with provocative acts or behind-the-scenes plots.' Does the outcome make Putin the real winner of the meeting? For Vladimir Putin, the Alaska summit represented a clear diplomatic victory, one achieved without compromise. Back in Moscow, the tone was jubilant. 'The very fact of the meeting in Alaska, its tone, and its outcome represent a significant and joint success for both presidents, each of whom made a tremendous personal contribution to achieving the best possible result at this time," Konstantin Kosachyov, a chair of the foreign affairs committee of Russia's upper house of parliament, wrote on Telegram, according to Reuters. Others were more blunt. As one senior Russian policymaker told The Guardian, 'Putin gave Trump nothing, but still got everything he wanted.' The absence of new sanctions, Trump's tacit recognition of Moscow's red lines, and the symbolism of being treated as an equal to the US president all fed into the narrative of triumph. Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev also singled out Trump's refusal to escalate pressure on Moscow over Ukraine as one of the most important outcomes. He described the summit as a restoration of top-level dialogue that was 'peaceful, free of ultimatums or threats,' and noted that Putin had 'presented our conditions for ending the conflict in Ukraine … in person and in detail.' In the United States, however, the verdict was also clear that Putin had scored a PR goal. The Washington Post called the summit ' not a disaster, but it was a US defeat.' The New York Times argued that Putin had effectively achieved a major war goal. ' He has gotten out of the box of sanctioned autocrat, and was greeted by the president of the United States as a peacemaker. He has bought time. He has defused all that talk of sanctions on his oil sector. And he gave up nothing'. How did Europe and Ukraine react to the summit? European leaders, led by Germany, France, the UK, Italy and the EU, issued a joint statement reaffirming their unwavering support for Ukraine's sovereignty and insisting that Russia could not dictate Kyiv's future ties with NATO or the EU. They pledged to tighten sanctions and maintain economic pressure on Moscow until what they described as a just and lasting peace is achieved. While leaders such as UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron praised Donald Trump's initiative in meeting Vladimir Putin, they stressed that any talks must be coupled with strong security guarantees for Ukraine. Kyiv's response was more guardedly optimistic. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy welcomed Trump's proposal for a trilateral format with Ukraine included, but said European participation was essential to ensure binding guarantees. He confirmed he would travel to Washington on Monday after a 'long and substantive' phone call with Trump, noting 'positive signals' about the United States taking part in future security arrangements. Trump's post-summit remarks on Fox News, however, fuelled unease in Kyiv and in several European capitals. In an interview with Sean Hannity, he contrasted Russia's status with Ukraine's, saying: 'Russia is a very big power, and they're not' and added that Zelenskiy 'gotta make a deal.' For many European officials, this reinforced fears that Trump might pressure Kyiv into concessions without securing reciprocal guarantees from Moscow. How did New Delhi react, and what drives that stance? India welcomed the Alaska summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, framing it as a positive step toward dialogue. 'India welcomes the Summit meeting in Alaska between President Trump and President Putin,' Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said, adding that New Delhi 'consistently advocates dialogue and diplomacy as the way forward in resolving the Ukraine conflict.' He noted that India 'appreciates the progress made in the Summit'. 'India welcomes the Summit meeting in Alaska between President Trump and President Putin,' Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said, adding that New Delhi 'consistently advocates dialogue and diplomacy as the way forward in resolving the Ukraine conflict.' He also noted that India 'appreciates the progress made in the Summit.' New Delhi's response can be read as relief that the focus on dialogue creates a potential opening for India, which has been squeezed between its strategic partnership with Washington and its heavy reliance on Russian energy. That pressure intensified earlier this month when the US raised tariffs on Indian goods to 50 percent, following secondary sanctions of 25 percent on Russian oil purchases. India, the second-largest buyer of Russian crude after China, was singled out by the measures. While Trump told Fox News' Sean Hannity that he would hold off on penalising China for now, the uncertainty over whether India will face continued tariffs remains. Could India gain some relief on US tariffs as a side-effect of Trump's diplomacy? Donald Trump's latest push to nudge Moscow towards a Ukraine deal has raised questions in New Delhi over whether India might see relief from the steep US tariffs imposed on Russian oil imports. The additional 25 percent duty, announced in late August, coincided with signs of Trump's growing frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Indian officials viewed the sanctions partly as an extension of that irritation. En route to Alaska, Trump told Fox News that India had been forced to stop buying Russian oil because of the tariffs. Former Indian ambassador to Pakistan Ajay Bisaria described the Alaska meeting as 'reassuring' for India. 'The first good news is that the meeting took place,' he told The Wire, noting there were 'no shock outcomes of trouble' and no sign of 'a complete breakdown in that relationship.' He said Trump appeared to hint at flexibility. 'There was an indication he will either give more time to India for the 25 percent sanctions… or he will reverse them, or he will give that a bigger timeline,' Bisaria said. While there was brewing backlash in Washington that Putin may have gained an upper hand, Trump may still continue to believe that he is on the right path. 'He may be hearing other voices in his ear,' he said, pointing out that while some in Trump's circle are Russia hawks, 'the MAGA base supports him ending the wars. So, there won't be an issue with them.' Bisaria, however, added that conditions in Ukraine could yet derail any opening. 'If there's a major escalation in battlefield violence, that is a danger to the process, because right now it's the most fragile,' he said. In his view, both Trump and Putin are interested in a deal, with Ukraine and Europe seeking at least the optics of being consulted.
