Silentnight-owner to end controversial tenure with sale of bed manufacturer
The owner of Silentnight, one of Britain's biggest bed manufacturers, is preparing to end a controversial 14-year tenure which included settlements with regulators worth tens of millions of pounds.
Sky News has learnt that HIG Europe, which bought Silentnight through an insolvency process in 2011, has appointed bankers at Rothschild to sell the company.
City sources estimated on Monday that the company could be worth in the region of £100m.
A deal is unlikely to be concluded with a buyer until next year.
When the sale does take place, it will end HIG's association with a company which found itself at the centre of one of the most contentious private equity deals in the UK for decades.
HIG Europe, which specialises in buying mid-sized companies, acquired Silentnight in 2011 after identifying an opportunity to generate a handsome return if it could strike a deal without the bed-maker's pension liabilities.
The private equity group bought a chunk of Silentnight's debts, put in place new restrictions on its borrowing facilities and then forced it into a restructuring process.
As a consequence of the ensuing cash crunch, KPMG, the accountancy firm, put Silentnight into administration and immediately sold its assets to HIG Europe without its pension scheme.
The deal triggered an investigation by The Pensions Regulator, which used its anti-avoidance powers to pursue the buyout firm for substantial compensation.
The watchdog issued two warning notices, in 2014 and 2016, with HIG Europe seeking a judicial review of the latter.
Its request was rejected, and in 2021 it agreed a £25m settlement with the pensions watchdog.
Although those funds were injected into Silentnight's pension scheme, the injection was not sufficient to prevent its responsibility for paying pensioners being transferred into the Pension Protection Fund, the industry-funded lifeboat.
"Our case was that HIG used the control that was available under the lending facilities to bring about the unnecessary insolvency of otherwise viable companies that were supporting a [defined benefit] pension scheme," TPR said at the time of the settlement.
"We would not expect lenders to bring about unnecessary insolvencies, and so we would not ordinarily anticipate targeting them with our powers.
"However, we will be alert to any instance where we believe an unnecessary insolvency is brought about to sever a scheme from its employer and will pursue those cases to appropriate outcomes in accordance with our statutory objectives."
HIG Europe was not the only party which was hit in the pocket over its conduct in relation to Silentnight.
In 2021, KPMG was fined nearly £13m by the Financial Reporting Council - at the time a near-record sum - for its role in facilitating the bed manufacturer's pre-pack sale to HIG Europe.
An FRC tribunal also fined the KPMG partner who led the deal, David Costley-Wood, and banned him from holding membership of the accountants' professional body for 13 years.
KPMG's restructuring arm in the UK was sold - also in 2021 - to HIG Europe, and rebranded as Interpath Advisory.
The private equity firm is now in the process of initiating a sale process for the business which could value it at about £800m.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ukraine believes Putin has just ‘one card left to play' in ceasefire talks – and it gives Kyiv an upper hand
Vladimir Putin has 'only one card' left to play - to prolong the killing in Ukraine, according to a senior source in Volodymyr Zelensky's presidential office as Europe conducts top level talks ahead of the Alaska summit this week. Zelensky has not been invited to Friday's meeting between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. And there are deep concerns that the US president will emerge from the encounter taking an even harder line on Ukraine. Europe's leaders, including Sir Keir Starmer, have been corralling US officials and White House insiders, and are meeting virtually with the Oval Office to persuade Trump to use the leverage he has over Putin to get him to agree a ceasefire. 'The main thing for Putin is to try to trade land for ceasefires,' the source close to Zelensky told The Independent. 'The ability to kill and to prolong war is the only card Putin has. So, he's trying to play this card.' In February, Trump lost his temper with Zelensky, yelling at him that he didn't 'have the cards' in the conflict with Russia during an infamous press conference in the Oval Office. Now, Ukraine insists, it's Putin who has the weaker hand. Europe's leaders are trying to reinforce that message to Trump so that he feels confident threatening further economic sanctions against countries that import Russian oil - and even to renew arms shipments to Ukraine - to get Putin to suspend military operations. 'Trump does want to finish the killings, it's true, and he has the power to do it. So the question is for him how to do the right thing,' the Ukrainian presidential advisor said. So far Putin has said any ceasefire would have to come on the condition that Ukraine agrees to cede four provinces - Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia - to Russia along with the Crimea. He also wants Ukraine not to use any pause in the fighting to rearm. Ukraine has long agreed to a minimum 30-day unconditional ceasefire and insists that it is willing to discuss grounds for peace. As speculation mounts over what Friday's summit will achieve, Trump has already indicated that he agrees with Russia and that Ukraine should be prepared to agree 'land swaps' of Ukrainian territory. Europe, the UK and Ukraine have ruled out such concessions – especially as part of any deal struck between Russia and America without Ukraine present. Despite the fanfare over the meeting in Anchorage, the US actually has less power, and therefore influence over the outcome of talks, as a result of forcing Kyiv and Europe into taking on more of the burden of the defence of Ukraine. Trump cut all military aid to Ukraine earlier this year. The total US military spend there is €114 billion, which is dwarfed by the EU and UK's current pledged contribution standing at €250 billion. Ukraine's Nato allies now have to buy US weapons to supply Kyiv, but there are now signs that the US could ban that revenue stream. Russia has seen its second largest oil client, India, hit with a total of 50 per cent US tariffs. Twenty five per cent of that was imposed to get Putin to respond to Trump's ceasefire proposals. And if the US decided to open the taps of free military aid again it could tip the tactical balance rapidly in Ukraine's favour. The UK and Europe want Trump to spell this out to Putin. 'Zelensky supports the ceasefire,' the Ukrainian source said. 'The problem is that Putin rejects it and the majority of Ukrainians want to see peace, it's true, but at the same time the majority of Ukrainians reject Russian claims on the territory.'
The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Is Keir Starmer just one crisis away from a Labour coup?
On the Whitehall grapevine, Wes Streeting is seen as a rare success story for the government: a good communicator who is starting to deliver the change Keir Starmer promised. The chatter in Streeting's health department predicts his next stop will be 10 Downing Street. However, the health secretary might face an uphill battle to win over the Labour grassroots in the 'one member, one vote' ballot that chooses the party's leader. Even some of his admirers suspect he might be too right-wing, or 'Blairite', for many of them. Whitehall officials are less flattering about other cabinet ministers. Rachel Reeves 's autumn Budget is described by some as her 'last shot'. In other words, if she can't break out of the doom loop of 'one-off' tax rises to meet her fiscal rules, followed by exactly the same medicine in her next Budget, Starmer might be looking for a new chancellor next year. The prime minister is not immune to speculation about his future. Even his allies admit he cannot afford a repeat of his bad first year on the domestic front. 'Another crisis like the welfare climbdown and it would surely be curtains,' one Labour MP told me. Angela Rayner told last month's meeting of Labour's national executive committee that 'announcements are not enough: people have to see real improvements in their lives, soon.' Significantly, the deputy prime minister added: 'The next 12 months will decide whether Labour wins a second term.' She wasn't talking behind Keir Starmer's back; he was in the room. Few ministers would disagree with her 'one more year' theory. Starmer's problem is that first impressions of a government, prime minister or party leader usually stick, and Labour and his party's dire ratings are getting worse. Although Rayner didn't say it, the logical consequence of her statement is that if Starmer hasn't turned things round by next summer, the question of whether he should lead the party into the next general election will become a live one. The spark might be poor results in next May's mid-term elections, when Labour could lose out to the SNP in the Scottish Parliament, to Reform UK in the Welsh Parliament, and to the Greens and Jeremy Corbyn's new socialist party in English local authorities. Indeed, there's already gossip in Labour land about Starmer's future, which is fully in line with Labour's traditions. The party doesn't kill its leaders like the Conservatives, but makes up for that by debating endlessly in private who would take over if their leader fell under a Number 12 bus in Whitehall. Labour has more in common with the TV series Succession than it would admit. Despite Streeting's Whitehall fan club, the current strong favourite to succeed Starmer is Rayner. Although she insists she doesn't want the top job, it would be very hard to stick to that if it were likely to land in her lap. Rayner is performing a delicate balancing act well. She has carved out a position slightly to the left of Starmer, which is where Labour's heart beats. At the same time, she is publicly loyal to the PM; rocking the boat could damage her succession prospects. In theory, jittery Labour backbenchers, fearing they will lose their seats, could mount a coup against Starmer. In practice, they would need cabinet-level support. How loyal would the cabinet be if the PM came under real pressure? One largely forgotten factor is that only eight of today's 22-strong cabinet nominated Starmer in the 2020 Labour leadership contest – in other words, he was their first choice. They were: Hilary Benn, Yvette Cooper, John Healey, David Lammy, Ed Miliband, Bridget Phillipson, Steve Reed and Jonathan Reynolds. That doesn't mean other ministers would dump Starmer in the event of a leadership crisis. When a leader is in real trouble, any politician is bound to consider self-interest. If Rayner still looked a shoo-in, it would suit those who don't want her to succeed Starmer to rally behind him rather than pull the rug. 'Wes [Streeting], Yvette [Cooper] and other big beasts would bolster Keir rather than let Angie [Rayner] take over,' one Labour insider told me. Despite that, it is no longer certain that Starmer will lead his party into the next election. Starmer will soon reflect on his planned fightback during a much-needed holiday, which, knowing his wretched luck when it comes to taking a break, will probably be interrupted by the need to talk to other world leaders about Ukraine and Gaza. The first test of whether Starmer can turn the domestic tide will come in what is becoming an increasingly important speech to the Labour conference in Liverpool next month. 'It's going to be a hard slog from now on,' one close ally admitted.
The Sun
8 minutes ago
- The Sun
How to unlock thousands of pounds of cash just from your garden – and you don't need to raid your pension or savings
YOU could unlock thousands of pounds in extra cash without dipping into your pension or savings. It won't be for everyone, but if you have a large garden or a plot of unused land that you're willing to give up you could make money off it. 1 Developers are often searching for space to build new homes and that demand has gone up even more as the Government has plans to build 1.5million homes in five years. Alternatively, your extra land could be used for business or farming, or your neighbour may even want to buy it off you. So if you don't mind letting go of the land (or just a portion of it), there's plenty of money to be made. It can free up cash for you to spend on you and your family, or be put towards your retirement, without you needing to move to downsize your home. Plus, it can also save you time and money on garden maintenance. You should be aware that some properties are more suitable than others for this. For example, post-war homes built in the 1940s and 1950s often sit on generous plots of land - but you might be more restricted if the land is of historical significance. A study by The Grass People of 50 locations across the UK found the average price per square metre of gardens was £1,526. That means you could stand to make tens of thousands of pounds potentially. But this can vary a lot depending on where your land is located, its condition, the value of any house next to it and whether there's parking space. We made our boring new build garden a Love Island style haven with bar & hot tub, but trolls say detail 'ruined our day' There isn't a land value calculator available online but you could get a valuation or look at how much similar plots of land sold for. What should you check first? First you should check whether selling all or part of your garden is actually viable for the purpose you're selling it for. If you're selling to a developer, it would need to be big enough for purpose and you'd also need to consider whether it would be suitable for a building plot or to be farmed. For example, you could consider whether it's easily reachable and whether it would have access to essential services like electricity, gas and water. There isn't an actual restriction on the minimum amount of land you can sell but it should be big enough for at least one property similar to other homes in the area. So if the housing is small or dense near you, the size of the land you're selling can be smaller. You should also check the deeds to your house for any restrictive covenants, which are restrictions or conditions on land attached to a property. Your land might be located within a conservation area, for example, and so you might need to follow extra regulations. Or your buyer might need approval from your local authority. If you have a mortgage on your house, you'll need to get permission from your lender before selling part of your garden. You won't be able to sell otherwise. Mortgage lenders might turn you down if they believe the sale will decrease the value of your property. They might ask you to provide evidence, such as a formal valuation, that demonstrates the sale won't decrease your home's value. How you could sell your land If you've decided to try selling, you could advertise through a land agent. Some bigger estate agencies have specialised land services that will value your land, apply for planning permission on your behalf and connect you with developers. Of course, the agent will likely take some commission for this. Another option is to look online for developers who build in your area and contact them directly. Or - if you have the time - you could scout around for sites under development in your area to see who is building. The HomeOwners Alliance strongly recommends using a conveyancing solicitor, so you'll need to factor this cost in. You don't need planning permission to sell your garden but if you have permission already sorted it can increase its value. If you sell without permission, you can get hold of your money quicker and with less hassle but you'll likely get a lower offer. You could agree with the developer that they will buy your garden for a higher price on the condition they can get planning permission to build on it. If you opt for this, the process will take about a year and you'll have to sign a legally binding contract with the developer. The third option is to obtain full planning permission yourself. This means you take on all the risk and expense of getting the planning permission, but you'll get the highest price for your land if you're successful. Bear in mind that planning costs can range from £50,000 to £100,000 for a one to two-acre site.
