Scheduled Tribe panel notice to Rajasthan government over school roof collapse deaths
In a statement, the constitutional body said it had taken suo motu cognisance of the incident based on media reports, adding that several of the deceased and injured students belonged to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities.
Notices have been issued to the Chief Secretary of the State, the District Collector, and the Superintendent of Police in Jhalawar district. The Commission has directed the officials to submit a detailed report along with an action taken report within three days.
'The Commission has taken this matter very seriously,' the NCST said in its public statement.
On Friday morning, seven children were killed and 28 others injured - nine of them seriously - when a portion of the roof in one of the classrooms collapsed. The incident occurred in a government school located in Piplodi village of Manohar Thana block, as students were preparing for the morning assembly. About 30 students were trapped under the debris and later pulled out by rescue teams.
Jhalawar District Collector Ajay Singh Rathore stated that the school building had not been identified as structurally weak in the recent survey carried out by the Education Department.
According to student accounts reported by The Hindu, the 40-year-old building had shown signs of deterioration, including persistent water seepage and tree branches growing into the walls. Some students had reportedly noticed plaster falling from the ceiling prior to the collapse.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
20 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
Untouchability: A collective failure
Even 75 years after Independence, a damning truth confronts the country: the chains of caste oppression remain unbroken. The Justice H N Nagamohan Das Commission's report on internal reservations lays bare an uncomfortable truth – untouchability remains deeply entrenched in our social fabric. This is not merely discrimination; it is a brutal system of oppression that has adapted to modern times while retaining its medieval cruelty. The Commission's findings shock the conscience: 75 per cent of Scheduled Caste (SC) members still face untouchability, with the Madiga community suffering the worst. The manifestations are barbaric: denial of entry to temples, exclusion from community dining, segregation in schools, separate drinking glasses, and bonded labour. Most shocking are the complaints of sexual violence and forced consumption of human excreta. All 101 SC castes in the state experience some form of discrimination, ranging from severe to moderate oppression, proving that no Dalit community is untouched by this social report also flags a disturbing pattern in reporting these atrocities. Only relatively empowered Dalit communities are reported to have filed complaints. While ten communities accounted for more than 100 atrocity cases in the last five years, 45 registered none. This is not because they were spared but due to their dependence on the dominant castes for livelihood, fear of retaliation, and the absence of a supportive environment. The abysmal single-digit conviction rate under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, caused by police apathy, witness intimidation, and protracted trials, only emboldens perpetrators. Three urgent reforms must guide Karnataka's response. First, education must be the equaliser. Second, economic empowerment should reach the poorest of Dalits, not just a privileged few within the community. The committee's identification of the most marginalised subgroups can help targeted welfare policies. Third, the justice system needs an overhaul – exclusive special courts, a witness protection mechanism, and time-bound trials are report is not just a document – it is an indictment of our collective failure. Karnataka, which is home to India's IT revolution, cannot claim progress while such dehumanising practices persist. The state must launch a comprehensive mission that combines education, economic justice, and legal reform. More importantly, civil society and political leadership must demonstrate the courage to confront this shameful reality. Until every Indian can drink from the same well, eat at the same table, and worship in the same temple, our freedom remains incomplete. Only decisive action can redeem the promise of our Constitution.
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
ECI summons West Bengal Chief Secretary to Delhi over State's refusal to act against erring officials
The Election Commission of India has summoned West Bengal Chief Secretary Manoj Pant to the Commission's headquarter in Delhi by 5 p.m. on August 13. The summon came a day after the Chief Secretary in his letter to the Commission stated that the Government has removed two of five personnel off active duty but not suspended or registered FIR against the officials as directed by the ECI. Sources at the State Secretariat said that the Chief Secretary will be travelling to Delhi on Wednesday (August 13, 2025) morning. The summon to the top bureaucrat of the West Bengal government to Nirvachan Sadan, the headquarters of ECI, indicates a deadlock as far as the action against five personnel including four officers of West Bengal Government is concerned. On August 5, the ECI directed the West Bengal Government to suspend four officials — two Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) and two Assistant Electoral Registration Officers (AEROs) — and a casual data entry operator for allegedly committing irregularities while preparing electoral rolls in Baruipur Purba and Moyna Assembly constituencies in South 24 Parganas and Purba Medinipur districts respectively. The five officials were charged with fraudulent registration of 127 voters using forged documents in the Baruipur Purba and Moyna Assembly constituencies. The Commission has put a deadline for the Chief Secretary to respond by 3 p.m. August 11. The Chief Secretary wrote to the Commission on August 11 stating that two of the five officials against whom the Commission has directed action for alleged irregularities have been withdrawn from electoral revision and election related duties. The State government, however, did not suspend or register FIR against any of them as asked by the poll panel. In a letter to the Election Commission of India, State's Chief Secretary Manoj Pant said that the West Bengal Government has started an internal enquiry into the issue. Mr. Pant in his letter said disciplinary measures on state government officers who have 'consistently demonstrated sincerity and competence' would be 'disproportionately harsh'. On August 6 West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee had questioned the ECI directive to punish the officials and said that she will not allow any State government official to get punished at the directions of ECI. Ms. Banerjee had argued that only after elections are announced the ECI takes over the State's administrative machinery. After the summon to the Chief Secretary by the ECI, the Chief Minister reportedly urged the officials to work without any fear.
NDTV
a day ago
- NDTV
Pulling Woman's Hand Not Offence If Criminal Intent Not Proven: High Court
Chennai: The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has acquitted a man convicted in 2018 for allegedly molesting a mentally challenged woman, holding that merely pulling a woman's hand - without clear proof of intent - does not automatically constitute the offence. Justice RN Manjula made the observation while allowing the appeal of Murugesan, who had been sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment by a lower court under Section 354 IPC. The prosecution alleged that on May 4, 2015, the accused, from the Hindu Maravar community, pulled the hand of a Scheduled Caste woman grazing cattle near Nedunkulam Channel and abused her by her caste. The trial court had acquitted him under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act but convicted him for outraging modesty. On appeal, the High Court pointed to contradictions in witness accounts and the inability of the victim to testify due to her mental condition. The key eyewitness gave inconsistent statements, sometimes claiming she saw the incident, and at other times admitting she arrived after the accused had left. Citing Supreme Court precedents, Justice Manjula said that to attract Section 354 IPC, the act must be accompanied by the intention to outrage modesty, proven through clear and credible evidence. Pulling a woman's hand could shock the sense of decency, the court noted, but without proof of intent, vague or generalised statements cannot sustain a conviction. The court extended the benefit of doubt to Murugesan, overturned the conviction, and ordered the refund of any fine paid.
