Rep. Kam Buckner: Springfield should think twice before giving the Bears a property tax break
This is not a new act. Kevin Warren didn't invent it. In the 1970s, Mayor Richard J. Daley faced a Bears organization threatening to leave Soldier Field for the suburbs; Arlington Heights in fact. The details change, but the script is familiar: big declarations, bad math, sudden reversals, and a hope that taxpayers will somehow pick up the tab. The current version started with the $197 million purchase of 326 acres in Arlington Heights without a real plan. Then came the announcement they were leaving Chicago. Then the walk-back. Then the 'Chicago is our home' press event, staged like a new iPhone launch, without ever having talked to the state about financing. When they finally came to Springfield, they were laughed out of the room. And now, after more flip-flops, they're back to Arlington Heights, with the focus dialed up.
The Bears' pitch now hinges on 'property tax certainty' for their proposed Arlington Heights stadium, with the claim it wouldn't cost anyone anything. That's simply not true. Property taxes are what fund a community's schools, libraries, parks, police, fire departments and infrastructure. A $8.8 billion company moving into town would normally be expected to contribute to all of that. If the Bears get a break, the revenue those services could depend on disappears. Moving to Arlington Heights will raise property values, put more students in classrooms, and increase demand on local roads, utilities and first responders. Under Illinois' funding formula, the Bears should be paying more into the system, not less. What they are asking for is the same free ride they've had in Chicago, where they've never paid property taxes for 104 years and taxpayers are still paying off the 2002 Soldier Field renovation. If they don't pay their share in Arlington Heights, the gap doesn't vanish, it gets passed on to someone else, and that someone will be the state of Illinois and therefore people throughout the state. Saying otherwise is disingenuous.
This is not just a Chicago problem. Every lawmaker in Springfield should look at this proposal and ask themselves how they will explain it back home. Why should an $8.8 billion franchise get a property tax break that the people you represent will never get? In Rockford, Elgin, Aurora, Peoria and the south suburbs, families pay some of the highest effective property tax rates in the country, often out of proportion to what their homes are worth. They do not get to opt out of paying for schools, police, fire protection, parks and infrastructure. Why should the Bears?
Chicago legislators should be asking themselves additional questions. If we help the Bears leave, what is the plan and the price tag for keeping Soldier Field from becoming a costly, underused relic on the lakefront? After the city has already sunk hundreds of millions into making the venue NFL-ready, how do you justify letting its primary tenant walk away? What about the game day dollars that flow into Chicago hotels, restaurants, bars, ride-share trips and retail shops?
What precedent does it set if Illinois bankrolls a franchise's departure instead of holding it accountable to the city it has represented for a century? And beyond the dollars, how much does Chicago lose in tourism pull, national exposure and civic identity if the Bears brand moves permanently to the suburbs?
The Bears are touting the supposed spillover effect to Chicago's economy, saying visiting fans will stay downtown and eat in local restaurants. We already get that now with the team playing here, and that impact will diminish the moment they leave. In their news conference, the Bears even tried to offer comfort by pointing out that Arlington Heights is still in the same county as Chicago. Should the people of Ford Heights take solace in knowing that, despite their struggles being on full display, they share a county with Winnetka? It is out of touch and off base.
Around the country, voters are wising up to these stadium financing sleights of hand. Kansas City recently rejected public subsidies for new venues. Illinois should lead in this space, not follow others into the billion-dollar abyss.
The Bears are free to make whatever business decision they think is best for them. But once they ask the legislature to make it easier, it becomes a public issue. And right now, Springfield has bigger priorities: transit reform and funding, pensions, education funding and closing gaps left by federal budget cuts.
Editorial: Chicago will survive the Chicago Bears of Arlington HeightsI implore the Bears' ownership to come to Springfield and make their case in person and have open, transparent conversations about what they want from us and why; in front of the people and their representatives. Talk about the real benefits to the public, not inflated numbers economists will tell us are overstated. Explain why you deserve a tax break when families are struggling to pay their own. Explain your urgency. As my math teachers used to say, show your work.
It is not unprecedented. In 1997, Minnesota Twins owner Carl Pohlad came before his state's lawmakers to get his stadium built. In 2006, Minnesota Vikings owner Zygi Wilf did the same. Mark Davis, owner of the Raiders, personally lobbied Nevada's legislature in 2016 for Allegiant Stadium. And in 2024, Jerry Reinsdorf came to Springfield in person to talk about his team's future home.
If it's such a great idea, Bears ownership should stand where those owners stood, on the record, in the open, in the people's capitol and have the conversation where it's meant to be had.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Apple Stock Is Gaining Momentum, Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Apple's (AAPL) stock performance this year hasn't been worth noticing. For much of the year, the iPhone maker lagged behind the broader market, weighed down by trade disputes and tariff-related uncertainties. Year-to-date, AAPL shares are still down roughly 7%, while the S&P 500 Index ($SPX) has climbed about 9.7%. However, the stock is gaining momentum. Apple has risen more than 9% in the last five trading days. The turnaround has been driven by two key developments. First, Apple delivered a solid third-quarter performance, showing resilience and the capacity to generate growth even in a challenging environment. Second, the company expanded its U.S. investment and announced a new American manufacturing program, a move widely interpreted as a step to ease tariff concerns. By boosting its U.S.-based production, Apple is addressing tariff risks and aligning itself more closely with domestic policy priorities. This is particularly important given President Donald Trump's past criticism of Apple's reliance on overseas manufacturing. More News from Barchart Warren Buffett Warns Investing At 'Too-High Purchase Price' Even for 'an Excellent Company' Can Undo a Decade of Smart Investing BitMine Immersion Now Holds 1.15 Million Ethereum Tokens. Should You Buy BMNR Stock Here? Why Archer Aviation's (ACHR) Post-Earnings Tailspin Looks Like a Favorably Mispriced Opportunity Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now! Apple's recent steps have been seen as a careful balancing act, strengthening its manufacturing footprint in the U.S. while maintaining a global supply chain that has been key to its margins. The market's positive reaction suggests investors are encouraged by Apple's ability to adapt to political and economic pressures. With market sentiment improving for Apple stock, will the momentum sustain? Apple's Growth Drivers Remain Intact Despite the macro challenges, Apple's products see solid demand, and its services business continues to post robust growth. This is evident from its latest quarterly results. Apple reported a record June quarter revenue of $94 billion, up 10% from a year ago, with growth in every geographic region. On the hardware front, product sales climbed to $66.6 billion, an 8% year-over-year increase, powered by robust demand for the iPhone and Mac. The company's ecosystem remains a key strength, with the active installed base of devices hitting all-time highs across every product category and region. The iPhone generated $44.6 billion in revenue, 13% higher than last year, reflecting strong sales of the iPhone 16 lineup. Growth was broad-based, with every region contributing and many emerging markets posting double-digit increases. The number of iPhones in active use set a new record, and Apple achieved its best-ever June quarter for customer upgrades. Mac sales also impressed, surging 15% to $8 billion. The segment witnessed gains across every region, with particularly strong growth in Greater China, Europe, and the rest of the Asia Pacific. Like the iPhone, the Mac installed base is now at its highest level ever, supported by strong demand from both new and upgrading customers. Not every category was in growth mode. iPad revenue came in at $6.6 billion, down 8% due to tough comparisons with last year's product launches. Still, the iPad's installed base reached another record, and more than half of buyers were first-time customers, which is a promising sign for future growth. Wearables, Home, and Accessories saw a 9% decline to $7.4 billion, also reflecting difficult year-ago comparisons. But here too, Apple continues to expand its reach, with the Apple Watch installed base hitting a new high and more than half of new watch buyers coming from outside the existing customer base. The services segment was once again a star performer, delivering revenue of $27.4 billion, up 13% year-over-year. This growth was broad-based, with significant gains in cloud services, thanks to rising iCloud subscriptions. Customer engagement remains on an upward trajectory, with both transacting and paid accounts hitting all-time highs, and paid subscriptions growing at a double-digit pace to surpass 1 billion across Apple's platforms. Looking ahead, Apple expects momentum to continue into the current quarter. Management projects total company revenue growth in the mid- to high single digits year-over-year, with services likely to sustain their double-digit growth pace. Is Apple Stock a Buy Right Now? Apple's iPhone and Mac remain highly desirable, setting the stage for solid growth. Moreover, Apple's tight-knit ecosystem and the rising contribution of its services division provide a solid base for revenue growth that can help in navigating the broader economic uncertainty. However, trade tensions and tariffs remain a potential headwind and could continue to impact its margins in the short term. On Wall Street, sentiment toward the stock is cautiously optimistic, with analysts maintaining a 'Moderate Buy' consensus rating. However, with shares trading at a forward price-earnings ratio of 31x and earnings growth projected at just 6.7% for fiscal 2026, much of the positives are already reflected in its current price. On the date of publication, Amit Singh did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
AI startup Perplexity is raising more money at a $20 billion valuation
Perplexity is raising yet another round of funding, Business Insider has learned. The AI search engine is seeking a fresh fundraise at a $20 billion post-money valuation, according to an email sent to prospective investors seen by BI, and a source with knowledge of the raise. It's been a busy year for Perplexity, which has become one of AI's hottest startups with funding from investors including SoftBank, Nvidia, and Jeff Bezos. Perplexity just made a $34.5 billion bid for Google's Chrome browser earlier this week, and it's been contending with analysts urging Apple to buy the booming startup for months. The new valuation represents a $2 billion jump from Perplexity's most recent valuation of $18 billion in its latest fundraising round in July, as first reported by Bloomberg last month. That's up from a $520 million valuation in January 2024. All the while, Perplexity's business has been surging. The startup, which launched in 2022 to combine large-language models with web searches to provide real-time answers to user questions, boosted its annual recurring revenue above $150 million by the middle of 2025. That's more than quadruple its roughly $35 million in ARR a year ago, according to the email seen by BI. Perplexity head of communication Jesse Dwyer said Perplexity is currently doing more than $150 million in ARR. He didn't answer further questions for this story. Perplexity is facing fierce competition from Big Tech giants like Google — the startup announced its own AI-native browser Comet last month — alongside AI leaders like OpenAI, which is reportedly working on its own web browser. It's not clear who's set to lead the latest funding round. Perplexity has raised about $1.5 billion to date, according to PitchBook. The $20 billion valuation Perplexity is seeking, while a meaningful lift for the company, still doesn't come close to the $34.5 billion Perplexity offered this week to buy Chrome from Google. Google hasn't signaled any intent to sell the browser, despite facing pressure from the Department of Justice to divest Chrome over antitrust concerns. Perplexity told The Wall Street Journal it has received commitments from several investors, including large venture capital funds, to fund the transaction, though it didn't disclose the names of those investors. Many have dismissed the bid as little more than a marketing stunt. "It makes them seem like a big player and helps them with fundraising, talent, and user attention by staying in the news cycle," one VC, who is not an investor in Perplexity, said. Perplexity has also sidestepped rumors that it could make a deal with Apple as the iPhone maker falls behind in the AI race. Dan Ives, managing director and equity research analyst at Wedbush Securities, said acquiring Perplexity should be a "no-brainer deal" for the tech behemoth. "For Apple, time is ticking," he told BI. Dwyer said at the time that the team was "unaware of any M&A discussions that involve Perplexity."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Melius Raises Apple (AAPL) PT to $260, Cites Upcoming iPhone Cycles
Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is one of the 10 AI Stocks Making Waves on Wall Street. On August 8, Melius analyst Ben Reitzes raised the price target on the stock to $260.00 (from $240.00) while maintaining a Buy rating. The firm is optimistic about the upcoming iPhone product cycles. It also believes that Siri AI concerns are overblown. 'Apple's stock has reacted nicely to tariff news, but we see focus starting to move toward new products and systematic increases in value for iPhones that drives growth for the next 3+ years. We raise our FY26 EPS estimate 12 cents due to higher gross margins and modestly raise FY27 EPS. Our target adjusts to $260, and we think concerns about the Siri delay are overblown since Apple isn't losing share. Reiterate Buy.' Melius is optimistic that a new iPhone product cycle starting in September will likely improve product mix. This will in turn boost growth in high single digits during some quarters. 'We are optimistic that our iPhone estimates can be conservative based on new product cycles that include an 'iPhone Air' this September, a foldable model in FY26 and the iPhone 20 line-up in late FY27 (20th year anniversary models). Luckily for Apple, its iPhone base doesn't seem to care about the Siri/AI delays, and we see no evidence of real switching.' With more iPhone catalysts, expensive models such as foldables will likely help increase total revenue. 'The iPhone has more catalysts in 2026 with the introduction of a foldable model that should be priced around $2,000 and then the iPhone 20 ('20th anniversary') cycle in 2027. As foldables 'mix in' there can be big revenue growth even on flat units.' Apple is a technology company known for its consumer electronics, software, and services. While we acknowledge the potential of AAPL as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio
