Faith groups call for calm after India strikes
Representatives of different faith groups in Bradford have called for calm after India launched a series of strikes on sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir.
The strikes came two weeks after a militant attack on tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir which saw 26 people killed. Pakistan has denied any involvement in that attack.
Sofia Buncy, a community activist in Bradford who also works with the Council for Mosques, said people felt "understandably very vulnerable and emotional" after the events of the past 24 hours.
"Many of us, especially here in Bradford, have ties to Pakistan, India and Kashmir. We have family members there and friends or family visiting there," she said.
Sofia Buncy said Bradford had strong inter-faith relations [BBC]
Ms Buncy said after the news of the missile and air strikes emerged on Tuesday evening, there had been "a real feeling of panic for the wellbeing of those who are there".
There was also "grief in certain areas - people have not been able to get hold of family members".
"There have been blackouts in communication. So, there's a lot of fear," she said.
However, Ms Buncy added: "We've been very lucky in Bradford that over the decades we've had very strong inter-faith relations, very organic, and the door is always open.
"So, we were able to have those very honest and forthright conversations as Muslim, Sikh and Hindu communities last night and this morning: how do we work through this together, from a point of unity, from a point of understanding, and a point of reconciliation?"
Ravinder Dharni said he was concerned about the possible "ripple effect" of the situation [BBC]
Ravinder Dharni, a voluntary worker, businessman and chairperson for the Bradford Hindu Council, said it was important to show that the different communities in the city stood "shoulder to shoulder".
While Mr Dharni explained that Hindus in Bradford felt "distressed" about the "innocent people that are going to get involved in this crossfire", he said it was also important for communities in the city to show solidarity.
"We are more concerned that nothing happens here in our faith centres, in our groups and in our businesses," he said.
Mr Dharni said he was concerned about the "ripple effect" of the conflict, adding that different communities lived in "peace and harmony" in Bradford and all faiths worked collectively together.
"Bradford is a multi-cultural city and we know how important it is. People might remember us for the riots or being the curry capital of the UK, but we also want people to remember we have different faiths and work together," he said.
Simmy Sekhon said he believed "compromise has to be reached" [BBC]
Meanwhile, Simmy Sekhon, a solicitor, businessman and spokesperson for the Yorkshire Sikh Forum, said it was a time for "compromise", not for "escalating situations".
"If there is one thing we can learn from VE Day, it is the 80 years of peace in Europe that happened after conflict ended," he said.
Mr Sekhon said he believed it was the time to "make new friends".
"The reality is, here in the UK, we live, work and play together and the circumstances in India and Pakistan must be resolved by politicians," he said.
"They can learn from the way we interact and try to understand each other, but compromise has to be reached."
Mr Sekhon added that he wanted people "across the divide line" to "share the love we share here in places like Bradford and in Yorkshire".
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
More on this story
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Trump vetoed Israeli plan to kill Iran's supreme leader: US official
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump vetoed a plan presented by Israel to the U.S. to kill Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to a U.S. official familiar with the matter. The Israelis informed the Trump administration in recent days that they had developed a credible plan to kill Khamenei. After being briefed on the plan, the White House made clear to Israeli officials that Trump was opposed to the Israelis making the move, according to the official who was not authorized to comment on the sensitive matter and spoke on the condition of anonymity. The Trump administration is desperate to keep Israel's military operation aimed at decapitating Iran's nuclear program from exploding into an even more expansive conflict and saw the plan to kill Khamenei as a move that would enflame the conflict and potentially destabilize the region. Asked about the plan during an interview on Fox News Channel's 'Special Report with Bret Baier,' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not directly address whether the White House rejected the plan. 'But I can tell you, I think that we do what we need to do, we'll do what we need to do. And I think the United States knows what is good for the United States,' Netanyahu said. Netanyahu also said regime change 'could certainly be the result' of the conflict 'because the Iranian regime is very weak.' Trump's rejection of the proposal was first reported by Reuters. Netanyahu's office declined to comment on the reports. Trump on Sunday issued a stark warning to Iran against retaliating on U.S. targets in the Middle East while also predicting Israel and Iran would 'soon' make a deal to end their escalating conflict. The president in an early morning social media posting said the United States 'had nothing to do with the attack on Iran' as Israel and Iran traded missile attacks for the third straight day. Iran, however, has said that it would hold the U.S.—which has provided Israel with much of its deep arsenal of weaponry—for its backing of Israel. Israel targeted Iran's Defense Ministry headquarters in Tehran and sites it alleged were associated with Iran's nuclear program, while Iranian missiles evaded Israeli air defenses and slammed into buildings deep inside Israel. 'If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the U.S. Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before,' Trump said. Hours later Trump took to social media again to predict 'Iran and Israel should make a deal, and will make a deal.' The U.S. president said he has a track record for de-escalating conflicts, and that he would get Israel and Iran to cease hostilities 'just like I got India and Pakistan to make' after the two countries' recent cross-border confrontation. India struck targets inside Pakistan after militants in April massacred 26 tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir. Pakistan has denied any links to the attackers. Following India's strikes in Pakistan, the two sides exchanged heavy fire along their de facto borders, followed by missile and drone strikes into each other's territories, mainly targeting military installations and airbases. It was the most serious confrontation in decades between the countries. Trump on Sunday repeated his claim, disputed by India, that the two sides agreed to a ceasefire after he had offered to help both nations with trade if they agreed to de-escalate. Trump also pointed to efforts by his administration during his first term to mediate disputes between Serbia and Kosovo and Egypt and Ethiopia. 'Likewise, we will have PEACE, soon, between Israel and Iran!' Trump said. 'Many calls and meetings now taking place. I do a lot, and never get credit for anything, but that's OK, the PEOPLE understand. MAKE THE MIDDLE EAST GREAT AGAIN!' The growing conflict between Israel and Iran is testing Trump who ran on a promise to quickly end the brutal wars in Gaza and Ukraine and build a foreign policy that more broadly favors steering clear of foreign conflicts. Trump has struggled to find an endgame to the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. And after criticizing President Joe Biden during last year's campaign for preventing Israel from carrying out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Trump found himself making the case to the Israelis to give diplomacy a chance. His administration's push on Tehran to give up its nuclear program came after the U.S. and other world powers in 2015 reached a long-term, comprehensive nuclear agreement that limited Tehran's enrichment of uranium in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. Trump spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Saturday about the growing Israel-Iran conflict. And Trump is set to travel later Sunday to Canada for Group of Seven leaders summit where the Mideast crisis will loom large over his talks with the leaders of Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan and the European Union. Some influential backers of Trump are him urging to keep the U.S. out of Israel's escalating conflict with Iran. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, former Fox News host Tucker Carlson are among the prominent backers of Trump who have argued voters backed Trump because he would not involve the nation in foreign conflicts. Kirk said last week that before Israel launched the strikes on Iran that he was concerned the situation could lead to 'a massive schism in MAGA and potentially disrupt our momentum and our insanely successful Presidency.' Kentucky Republican, Sen. Rand Paul praised Trump for having shown restraint and said he hoped the president's 'instincts will prevail.' 'So, I think it's going to be very hard to come out of this and have a negotiated settlement,' Paul said in an appearance on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' 'I see more war and more carnage. And it's not the U.S.'s job to be involved in this war.' In an interview aired on CBS' 'Face the Nation' GOP South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham said he preferred diplomatic efforts, but if diplomacy doesn't work Trump should 'go all in' on destroying Iran's nuclear program. 'If that means providing bombs, provide bombs,' he said. 'If that means flying with Israel, fly with Israel.'
Los Angeles Times
2 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump believes Israel-Iran may come to deal ‘soon' and warns Tehran not to retaliate against U.S.
WASHINGTON — President Trump on Sunday issued a stark warning to Iran against retaliating on U.S. targets in the Middle East while also predicting Israel and Iran would 'soon' make a deal to end their escalating conflict. Trump in an early morning social media post said the United States 'had nothing to do with the attack on Iran' as Israel and Iran traded missile attacks for the third straight day. Iran, however, has said that it would hold the U.S. — which has provided Israel with much of its deep arsenal of weaponry — responsible for its backing of Israel's military actions. Israel targeted Iran's Defense Ministry headquarters in Tehran and sites it alleged were associated with Iran's nuclear program, while Iranian missiles evaded Israeli air defenses and slammed into buildings deep inside Israel. 'If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the U.S. Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before,' Trump said. Hours later, Trump took to social media again, saying, 'Iran and Israel should make a deal, and will make a deal.' The U.S. president claimed he has a track record for de-escalating conflicts, and that he would get Israel and Iran to cease hostilities, 'just like I got India and Pakistan to make' after the two countries' recent cross-border confrontation. The U.S. was among a multinational diplomatic effort that defused that crisis. India struck targets inside Pakistan after militants in April massacred 26 tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir. Pakistan has denied any links to the attackers. Following India's strikes in Pakistan, the two sides exchanged heavy fire along their de facto borders, followed by missile and drone strikes into each other's territories, mainly targeting military installations and airbases. It was the most serious confrontation in decades between the countries. Trump on Sunday repeated his claim, disputed by India, that the two sides agreed to a ceasefire after he had offered to help both nations with trade if they agreed to de-escalate. Trump also pointed to efforts by his administration during his first term to mediate disputes between Serbia and Kosovo and Egypt and Ethiopia. 'Likewise, we will have PEACE, soon, between Israel and Iran!' Trump said. 'Many calls and meetings now taking place. I do a lot, and never get credit for anything, but that's OK, the PEOPLE understand. MAKE THE MIDDLE EAST GREAT AGAIN!' The growing conflict between Israel and Iran is testing Trump, who ran on a promise to quickly end the wars in the Gaza Strip and Ukraine and build a foreign policy that more broadly favors steering clear of foreign conflicts. Trump has struggled to find an endgame to the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, which show no signs of abating. And after criticizing President Biden during last year's presidential campaign for persuading Israel against carrying out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Trump himself made the case to the Israelis to give diplomacy a chance. His administration's push on Tehran to give up its nuclear program came after the U.S. and other world powers in 2015 reached a long-term, comprehensive nuclear agreement that limited Tehran's enrichment of uranium in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. Trump spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Saturday about the growing Israel-Iran conflict. And Trump is set to travel later Sunday to Canada for the Group of 7 summit, where the Mideast crisis will loom large. Some influential backers of Trump are him urging to keep the U.S. out of Israel's escalating conflict with Iran. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, former Fox News host Tucker Carlson are among the prominent hard-right backers of Trump who have argued that voters supported his election because he would not involve the nation in foreign conflicts. Kirk said last week that before Israel launched the strikes on Iran he was concerned the situation could lead to 'a massive schism in MAGA and potentially disrupt our momentum and our insanely successful presidency.' Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul praised Trump, saying he showed restraint and that he hoped the president's 'instincts will prevail.' 'So, I think it's going to be very hard to come out of this and have a negotiated settlement,' Paul said in an appearance on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' 'I see more war and more carnage. And it's not the U.S.'s job to be involved in this war.' Madhani writes for the Associated Press. AP writer Gary Fields contributed to this report.
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Western Supply Chains Tainted By Uyghur Forced Labor
On June 11, 2o25, a non-governmental organization, Global Rights Compliance, published findings of their investigation into the issue of Western companies linked to the People's Republic of China's (PRC) critical minerals industry in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR). The report examined titanium, lithium, beryllium, and magnesium supply chains in particular, analysing PRC policy documents, government shipping records, in addition to academic articles, and other documents. As the report indicates, 'China's critical minerals sector is the latest industry to face scrutiny over alleged links to forced labour by Western companies, following the BBC's damning report on tomato purée supply chains at the end of 2024 and also a recent report by The Bureau of Investigative Journalism focusing on the use of Uyghur state-imposed forced labour in China's economy.' The alleged Uyghur forced labor concerns the dire situation of the Uyghur community in the region. The ethno-religious minority community is said to have been subjected to forced incarceration in camps, followed by their forced labor across factories in the region. In 2021, the U.S. State Department determined the atrocities to amount to genocide and crimes against humanity. The research of the Global Rights Compliance revealed the coercive and abusive nature of forced labor transfers Uyghurs endure, but also loss of income, harassment, violence or detention. The UN Special Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Slavery identified the XUAR's labor transfer system as a state-mandated form of forced labor, which in some instances 'may amount to enslavement as a crime against humanity.' The use of Uyghur forced labor in the supply chain is not a new allegation. However, the report produced by the Global Rights Compliance is the first investigation to examine Western links to forced labor in the critical minerals sector in the PRC's Uyghur Region. China's critical minerals are essential for the components, infrastructure, and advancement of modern economies, technologies, and national security. The global economy relies on a stable and sufficient supply of minerals and metals. According to U.S. government data, in 2024, the PRC was the leading producing country for 30 of 44 critical minerals. According to the findings of the Global Rights Compliance, 77 critical minerals sector companies and downstream manufacturers of minerals-based products operating in the XUAR are at risk of participating in labor transfer programs, in the titanium, lithium, beryllium, and magnesium industries. The report identified 15 companies documented as sourcing directly from the XUAR region-based companies in the last two years. The report found 68 downstream customers of those Chinese suppliers with sourcing from the XUAR, indicating a risk that inputs may have been sourced from the region. Among others, the report identified Wujo Group's trading company, Wujo International, as one of the companies sourcing in XUAR. Wujo International is responsible for the import and export of Wujo Group products worth 60 million USD to over 100 countries annually across North and South America, Europe, and Asia. Wujo Group's verified Alibaba page indicates that its 'cooperative partners' include Avon, Gibson, Carrefour, Metro, Auchan, Walmart, Disney, Quaker, Coca-Cola, Nescafe, Starbucks, Kaufland, and Costa Coffee. The company indicates explicitly that it is the 'supplier of global commerce chains,' Auchan, Walmart, Kaufland, and Carrefour. The report provides recommendations to Western companies sourcing from the Uyghur Region, who must urgently trace their supply chain and address any points of exposure to Uyghur forced labour at every tier of the supply chain. Additionally, Western governments should address their relationship to the ongoing atrocities in the Uyghur Region and the deepening reliance on the PRC's dominance of the critical minerals supply chain with immediate and decisive action. It stresses that Western countries and companies must address the PRC's increasing domination of critical minerals and supply chains which exploit Uyghurs. The issue is currently being looked into the UK Parliament's Joint Committee on Human Rights.
