Investing in Napier Port Holdings (NZSE:NPH) a year ago would have delivered you a 37% gain
So let's investigate and see if the longer term performance of the company has been in line with the underlying business' progress.
AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early.
There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.
Napier Port Holdings was able to grow EPS by 25% in the last twelve months. This EPS growth is reasonably close to the 30% increase in the share price. This makes us think the market hasn't really changed its sentiment around the company, in the last year. We don't think its coincidental that the share price is growing at a similar rate to the earnings per share.
You can see below how EPS has changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image).
We know that Napier Port Holdings has improved its bottom line lately, but is it going to grow revenue? This free report showing analyst revenue forecasts should help you figure out if the EPS growth can be sustained.
What About Dividends?
When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. As it happens, Napier Port Holdings' TSR for the last 1 year was 37%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. This is largely a result of its dividend payments!
A Different Perspective
It's nice to see that Napier Port Holdings shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 37% over the last year. Of course, that includes the dividend. That gain is better than the annual TSR over five years, which is 1.7%. Therefore it seems like sentiment around the company has been positive lately. In the best case scenario, this may hint at some real business momentum, implying that now could be a great time to delve deeper. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Napier Port Holdings that you should be aware of before investing here.
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of companies we expect will grow earnings.
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on New Zealander exchanges.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Errore nel recupero dei dati
Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio
Errore nel recupero dei dati
Errore nel recupero dei dati
Errore nel recupero dei dati
Errore nel recupero dei dati
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rate cuts could be weeks away. Here's how much history says stocks could rise as the Fed eases policy.
Investors expect the Fed to resume rate cuts next month. Historically, rate cuts have led to strong S&P 500 gains, but there have been exceptions. Here's what history says about how the market behaves once rate cuts start back up. After a weak few months of job growth, investors are banking on rate cuts from the Federal Reserve at their September meeting, and history shows cuts could be like rocket fuel for stocks in the months that follow. LPL Financial recently conducted an analysis of how stocks have performed from the first rate cut in a rate-reduction cycle until the eventual start of a new hiking cycle. On average, the S&P 500 has returned 30.3% during the nine periods when rates have been on the decline since 1974. The median return during those periods was 13.3%. Returns have been positive in six of those nine cycles. "Using history and prior Fed cutting cycles as a guide, some upside potential may remain for the second half of 2025," Jeff Buchbinder, LPL's chief equity strategist, said in the August 5 report. "But of course, past performance does not guarantee future results, and a new tariff regime not seen since the 1930s could slow earnings growth and fuel volatility." The largest market surges came in the lead up to the dot-com bubble, when the S&P 500 rose 161% from 1995 to 1999, the analysis showed. Other big gains included 62.8% from 1984 to 1993, and 38.2% from 2019 to 2021. But rate cuts aren't always a tailwind, especially during recessionary periods where the Fed acts too late. The market fell 23.5% during the 2007-2009 rate-cutting cycle, and from 2001-2004, the S&P 500 dropped 9.6%. This time around, Buchbinder said it's not a sure thing that rate cuts will be a boon for stocks, with ebullient investor sentiment having pushed up the market to new highs despite uncertainty remaining about the health of the economy. The market has also risen 12% already since the Fed's first cut of the cycle last September. "The delayed effects of trade policy are likely to weigh on the economy in the second half, leading to weaker labor market demand," Buchbinder wrote. "Recent market complacency toward trade policy and an economic narrative dependent upon strong economic data has caught our attention in recent weeks as a potential point of weakness." It's also not a guarantee the Fed continues to ease policy in the months ahead. Economists at Morgan Stanley and Bank of America both see the central bank keeping rates steady for the rest of 2025 despite CME FedWatch data showing investors pricing in 93.2% odds that the Fed cuts in next month. Given the apparent heightened levels of risk at the moment, Buchbinder said a conservative approach could be the best way forward in the near term. The firm likes growth stocks, large caps, and the financials and communication services sectors, he said. "Bottom line, investors may be well served by bracing for occasional bouts of volatility given how much optimism is currently reflected in equity prices," Buchbinder said. The firm's short-term asset allocation committee "advises against increasing portfolio risk beyond benchmark targets currently and continues to monitor tariff negotiations, economic data, earnings, the bond market, and various technical indicators to identify a potentially more attractive entry point to add equities on weakness," he added. Read the original article on Business Insider Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Super warning for everyday Aussies over new 'cashflow tax': 'Less desirable'
The big idea for Australia right now is a whole new tax. One different to any we've seen before, and one with potentially big impact for normal people, their investments and their superannuation. But what is the so-called 'cashflow tax'? Who will get whacked by it? Which businesses will thrive and which will suffer? If it comes in, should you change how you invest or where you keep your money? The idea comes from the Productivity Commission. The Treasurer asked them for ideas to fix the economy and this is one of their big ones. It came out in a report released last week and has been like a grenade rolled into our national tax debate. RELATED Hidden way Aussies are cutting $20,000 from their tax bill every year Little-known Centrelink perk offers Australian students free flights Push for new levy to boost tradie apprentice numbers amid major 'collapse' What is the 'cash flow tax'? One thing the Productivity Commission is arguing for is cutting the company tax, which, ho-hum, that is an idea as old as the Sydney Harbour Bridge. The explosive new idea is to make up for any lost revenue with this cashflow tax. The big difference for firms is that they would get to deduct capital expenditure straight away from the money they pay tax on. Currently, a company would make $100 million in profit, pay 30 per cent or $30 million in tax and then spend $20 million on a new warehouse. Under the new proposal, a company would make $100 million, pay $20 million for the new warehouse, and pay the 5 per cent cashflow tax on the remaining $80 million. It's a tax cut that is supposed to make companies invest more, which should, in theory, raise our national wealth and living standards. Is the cashflow tax dead in the water - like most tax reforms? Surprisingly … no. Not totally dead. This cashflow tax has a chance of becoming real. Partly because it's not a terrible idea, and partly because it is bundled with the company tax cut from 30 per cent to 20 per cent. Companies pay taxes on their profits, so the company tax cut means they get to keep more of those profits. 'Rather than deducting the cost of capital over time through depreciation, companies can deduct their capital costs immediately when calculating their net cashflow tax liability," the Productivity Commission said in its report. "That makes their capital cheaper and their propensity to invest greater." The company tax cut acts as a carrot, but for big companies the carrot would be a mirage. There is an asterisk in the Productivity Commission's plan – the tax cut would only apply to companies with under a billion dollars in revenue. So the most powerful companies in Australia would miss out. Wesfarmers has over $40 billion in revenue, JB Hi-Fi makes $9 billion. Even a smallish firm like Myer makes $3 billion in sales. One possibility is that big conglomerates could divest business arms that have under a billion in revenue. Myer could spin off its clothing brands (David Lawrence, sass & bide, etc) into a separate business, for example. There's a possible implication here for everyday people and their money. If the tax change became law, index investing in Australia could become less desirable. Index investing is a passive strategy of owning a group of companies, most often the top 200 listed firms ('the index'). Super is often invested in the index. But those are the exact firms that don't get the tax cut, in fact they get only a tax hike (the cashflow tax would apply to them). Smaller firms – the kind that are not in the ASX200 - would be the ones who get a boost.
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Investing in Bintulu Port Holdings Berhad (KLSE:BIPORT) five years ago would have delivered you a 46% gain
Explore Bintulu Port Holdings Berhad's Fair Values from the Community and select yours Stock pickers are generally looking for stocks that will outperform the broader market. And the truth is, you can make significant gains if you buy good quality businesses at the right price. For example, long term Bintulu Port Holdings Berhad (KLSE:BIPORT) shareholders have enjoyed a 29% share price rise over the last half decade, well in excess of the market return of around 2.2% (not including dividends). Now it's worth having a look at the company's fundamentals too, because that will help us determine if the long term shareholder return has matched the performance of the underlying business. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement. During five years of share price growth, Bintulu Port Holdings Berhad achieved compound earnings per share (EPS) growth of 2.6% per year. This EPS growth is slower than the share price growth of 5% per year, over the same period. This suggests that market participants hold the company in higher regard, these days. That's not necessarily surprising considering the five-year track record of earnings growth. You can see how EPS has changed over time in the image below (click on the chart to see the exact values). Before buying or selling a stock, we always recommend a close examination of historic growth trends, available here. What About Dividends? It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. As it happens, Bintulu Port Holdings Berhad's TSR for the last 5 years was 46%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return. A Different Perspective While the broader market lost about 0.2% in the twelve months, Bintulu Port Holdings Berhad shareholders did even worse, losing 13% (even including dividends). Having said that, it's inevitable that some stocks will be oversold in a falling market. The key is to keep your eyes on the fundamental developments. On the bright side, long term shareholders have made money, with a gain of 8% per year over half a decade. It could be that the recent sell-off is an opportunity, so it may be worth checking the fundamental data for signs of a long term growth trend. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Bintulu Port Holdings Berhad that you should be aware of before investing here. If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of companies that have proven they can grow earnings. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Malaysian exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
