Ford Vs General Motors: Which Auto Stock is the Better Investment After Q2 Earnings?
Specifically, Ford F and General Motors GM are two value stocks that may be of consideration, with both auto giants exceeding their Q2 expectations over the last week.
Fighting to overcome tariff challenges, let's see which of these renowned automakers may be the better investment at the moment.
Ford & GM's Favorable Q2 Results
Releasing its Q2 report on Wednesday evening, Ford's Q2 sales rose 5% year over year to $46.94 billion and impressively topped estimates of $41.72 billion by 12%. However, tariff costs of $800 million dented Ford's bottom line with Q2 earnings of $0.37 per share dipping from EPS of $0.47 a year ago despite eclipsing expectations of $0.34.
Pivoting to General Motors, which reported Q2 results last Tuesday, the company was hit with $1.1 billion in tarriffs, although Q2 EPS of $2.53 comfortably exceeded expectations of $2.39 by 6% but fell 17% from $3.06 a share in the prior period. This came on Q2 sales of $47.12 billion, which eclipsed estimates of $46.24 billion but dipped 2% YoY.
Ford's Reinstated Guidance
Optimistically, Ford reinstated its full-year guidance after previously suspending it due to tariff uncertainty. This includes adjusted EBIT of $6.5-$7.5 billion, revised down from a previous range of $7-$8.5 billion, and takes into account an estimated $2 billion net tariff-related impact. Additionally, Ford forecasts adjusted free cash flow at $3.5-$4.5 billion, with capital expenditures of around $9 billion.
GM Reaffirmed Its Guidance
Reaffirming its full-year guidance, General Motors still expects FY25 adjusted EBIT at $8.2-$10.1 billion. Even better, General Motors reaffirmed its annual net income guidance, which it raised in May to $11.2-$12.5 billion from a previous range of $10.4-$11.1 billion. Notably, General Motors' guidance accounts for an estimated $5 billion tariff-related hit.
Ford & GM Stock Performance
Countering the lackluster year to date performance of their Zacks Automotive-Domestic Market peers (18% Decline), Ford stock is up a very respectable +11% to around $11 a share, with General Motors shares virtually flat at around $53. Notably, Ford stock has also edged the benchmark S&P 500's gains of +8% this year.
However, when looking at a longer view, over the last five years, General Motors' stock is up over +100%, which has edged the broader market and the Automotive-Domestic Market's returns of +73% while Ford's +65% has been subpar.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
EPS Outlook & P/E Valuation Comparison
At current levels, General Motors' 5.5X forward earnings multiple stands out with annual EPS expected to dip 11% in FY25 but projected to stabilize and rise 3% in FY26 to $9.69.
Still, Ford's 9.5X forward earnings multiple is also below the industry average of 12X, even with FY25 EPS currently expected to drop 38% to $1.14 versus $1.84 per share last year. Plus, Ford's annual EPS is forecasted to rebound and rise 13% in FY26 to $1.28.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Dividend Comparison
General Motors has the more attractive EPS outlook and P/E valuation, but Ford's dividend tips the scales with a yield of 5.52%. This towers over General Motors' 1.15% annual yield and the S&P 500's 1.16% average. That said, General Motors' dividend is generous in its own right, as most automakers don't offer a payout, including Tesla TSLA.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Conclusion & Final Thoughts
Following their Q2 reports, Ford and General Motors stock both land a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). Offering sound value to investors, these auto giants are still worthy of spots in the portfolio, especially as it relates to long-term positions.
Regarding which may be the better investment, General Motors' potential is more appealing considering its robust bottom line, although income investors may certainly be more drawn to Ford's stock.
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
Ford Motor Company (F) : Free Stock Analysis Report
General Motors Company (GM) : Free Stock Analysis Report
Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) : Free Stock Analysis Report
This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).
Zacks Investment Research
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump to sign order easing path for private assets in 401(k)s, Bloomberg News reports
(Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump will sign an executive order on Thursday that aims to allow private equity, real estate, cryptocurrency and other alternative assets in 401(k)s, Bloomberg News reported on Thursday, citing a person familiar with the plans. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI Opens Up With New GPT-OSS Models
OpenAI, backed by Microsoft (MSFT), just stepped deeper into the open-source world with two new open-weight AI modelsgpt-oss-120b and gpt-oss-20btaking direct aim at Google's (NASDAQ:GOOG) Gemini CLI and DeepSeek's (DEEPSEEK) R1. The bigger model, 120b, is designed to run in data centers or on high-end hardware with Nvidia (NVDA) H100 GPUs, while the smaller 20b model works on most desktops and laptops. According to Amazon Web Services (NASDAQ:AMZN), the 120b model running on Bedrock is up to 3x more price-performant than Gemini, 5x better than DeepSeek-R1, and even 2x better than OpenAI's own o4 model. At this scale, giving developers open access is a game-changer, said Atul Deo from AWS, calling it a major step forward for enterprise AI. The models are released under the Apache 2.0 license, so developerseven commercial teamscan use them freely without worrying about copyright or patents. The training data and model code however are not publicly available, so these models are open-weight, but not available through Hugging Face, GitHub, and is signaling it's ready to compete openlynot just behind closed APIs. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-Trump may look like he's winning the trade war, but hurdles remain
By Andrea Shalal WASHINGTON (Reuters) -At a glance, U.S. President Donald Trump appears to be winning the trade war he unleashed after returning to the White House in January, bending major trading partners to his will, imposing double-digit tariff rates on nearly all imports, narrowing the trade deficit, and raking in tens of billions of dollars a month in much-needed cash for federal government coffers. Significant hurdles remain, however, including whether U.S. trading partners will make good on investment and goods-purchase commitments, how much tariffs will drive up inflation or stymie demand and growth, and whether the courts allow many of his ad-hoc levies to stand. On inauguration day, the effective U.S. tariff rate was about 2.5%. It has since jumped to somewhere between 17% and 19%, according to a range of estimates. The Atlantic Council estimates it will edge closer to 20%, the highest in a century, with higher duties taking effect on Thursday. Trading partners have largely refrained from retaliatory tariffs, sparing the global economy from a more painful tit-for-tat trade war. Data on Tuesday showed a 16% narrowing of the U.S. trade deficit in June, while the U.S. trade gap with China shrank to its smallest in more than 21 years. American consumers have shown themselves to be more resilient than expected, but some recent data indicate the tariffs are already affecting jobs, growth and inflation. "The question is, what does winning mean?" said Josh Lipsky, who heads economic studies at the Atlantic Council. "He's raising tariffs on the rest of the world and avoiding a retaliatory trade war far easier than even he anticipated, but the bigger question is what effect does that have on the U.S. economy." Michael Strain, head of economic policy studies at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said Trump's geopolitical victories could prove hollow. "In a geopolitical sense, Trump's obviously getting tons of concessions from other countries, but in an economic sense, he's not winning the trade war," he said. "What we're seeing is that he is more willing to inflict economic harm on Americans than other countries are willing to inflict on their nations. And I think of that as losing." Kelly Ann Shaw, a White House trade adviser during Trump's first term who is now a partner at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, said a still-strong economy and near-record-high stock prices "support a more aggressive tariff strategy." But Trump's tariffs, tax cuts, deregulation and policies to boost energy production would take time to play out. "I think history will judge these policies, but he is the first president in my lifetime to make major changes to the global trading system," she added. DEALS SO FAR Trump has concluded eight framework agreements with the European Union, Japan, Britain, South Korea, Vietnam, Indonesia, Pakistan and the Philippines that impose tariffs on their goods ranging from 10% to 20%. That's well short of the "90 deals in 90 days" administration officials had touted in April, but they account for some 40% of U.S. trade flows. Adding in China, currently saddled with a 30% levy on its goods but likely to win another reprieve from even higher tariffs before an August 12 deadline, would raise that to nearly 54%. Deals aside, many of Trump's tariff actions have been mercurial. On Wednesday he ratcheted up pressure on India, doubling new tariffs on goods from there to 50% from 25% because of its imports of oil from Russia. The same rate is in store for goods from Brazil, after Trump complained about its prosecution of former leader Jair Bolsonaro, a Trump ally. And Switzerland, which Trump had previously praised, is facing 39% tariffs after a conversation between its leader and Trump derailed a deal. Ryan Majerus, a trade lawyer who worked in both the first Trump administration and the Biden government, said what's been announced so far fails to address "longstanding, politically entrenched trade issues" that have bothered U.S. policymakers for decades, and getting there would likely take "months, if not years." He also noted they lack specific enforcement mechanisms for the big investments announced, including $550 billion for Japan and $600 billion for the EU. PROMISES AND RISKS Critics lit into European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen after she agreed to a 15% tariff during a surprise meeting with Trump during his trip to Scotland last month, while gaining little in return. The deal frustrated winemakers and farmers, who had sought a zero-for-zero tariff. Francois-Xavier Huard, head of France's FNIL national dairy sector federation, said 15% was better than the threatened 30%, but would still cost dairy farmers millions of euros. European experts say von der Leyen's move did avert higher tariffs, calmed tensions with Trump, averting potentially higher duties on semiconductors, pharmaceuticals and cars, while making largely symbolic pledges to buy $750 billion of U.S. strategic goods and invest over $600 billion. Meeting those pledges will fall to individual EU members and companies, and cannot be mandated by Brussels, trade experts and analysts note. U.S. officials insist Trump can re-impose higher tariffs if he believes the EU, Japan or others are not honoring their commitments. But it remains unclear how that would be policed. And history offers a caution. China, with its state-run economy, never met its modest purchase agreements under Trump's Phase 1 U.S.-China trade deal. Holding it to account proved difficult for the subsequent Biden administration. "All of it is untested. The EU, Japan and South Korea are going to have to figure out how to operationalize this," Shaw said. "It's not just government purchases. It's getting the private sector motivated to either make investments or back loans, or to purchase certain commodities." And lastly, the main premise for the tariffs Trump has imposed unilaterally faces legal challenges. His legal team met with stiff questioning during appellate court oral arguments over his novel use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act, historically used for sanctioning enemies or freezing their assets, to justify his tariffs. A ruling could come any time and regardless of the outcome seems destined to be settled ultimately by the Supreme Court. Sign in to access your portfolio
