Japan-U.S. Alliance: Correct Trump's Factual Error, Strengthen Defense Cooperation
If U.S. President Donald Trump continues to bloviate about his dissatisfaction with the Japan-U.S. security framework, it could have a negative influence on the alliance and its deterrent power could be diminished.
While he may aim to get the upper hand in negotiations with Japan, Trump's assertion that 'we pay hundreds of billions of dollars to defend them [Japan], but they don't pay anything' is clearly wrong.
There is an urgent need to correct this factual error and deepen Japan-U.S. defense cooperation.
Regarding the Japan-U.S. intergovernmental talks on U.S. tariff measures, Trump initially insisted that the cost of military assistance would also be a subject of negotiations. However, in the end the issue has been set aside.
Nevertheless, the Trump administration's assertions that the United States is forced to shoulder many defense burdens for its allies are likely to continue.
The Japan-U.S. Security Treaty stipulates the U.S. obligation to defend Japan, while Japan provides bases to the United States.
In addition, the Japan-U.S. Status of Forces Agreement stipulates that the U.S. side bears the cost of stationing U.S. troops in Japan, excluding land rent and other base-related costs. However, in the 1970s, as the U.S. side demanded that Japan bear a greater burden, the two sides concluded another agreement to increase expenditures by the Japanese side.
As a result, the Japanese side's share of the cost of stationing U.S. forces in Japan for the five-year period from fiscal 2022 has risen to over ¥1 trillion.
The Japan-U.S. security framework cannot be called a one-sided setup, and it can be said that it balances the obligations of both Japan and the United States.
Furthermore, Japan enacted the security-related law in 2015 to make it possible for the Self-Defense Forces to protect U.S. naval and other vessels.
The Japanese government should persistently explain to the U.S. side the actual situation in which Japan supports the activities of the U.S. military.
At the same time, as the security environment around Japan is deteriorating, it is also essential to deepen Japan-U.S. defense cooperation.
A possible option would be for Japan to enhance its response capabilities through joint development of defense equipment with the United States and increase Japan's purchases of U.S.-made equipment. Cooperation in ship-building and other areas is worthy of consideration.
However, there have been many cases in which Japan purchased equipment from the United States, but the delivery has been delayed. A total of six state-of-the-art F-35 stealth fighter jets, which were scheduled for deployment in Japan in fiscal 2024, have yet to arrive.
This will make it difficult to gain support from the Japanese people if Japan intends to buy more equipment from the United States.
Japan also needs to enhance its defense capabilities. The government is in the process of increasing defense spending to a total of about ¥43 trillion over the five years from fiscal 2023. But the government reportedly may not be able to procure equipment as planned due to soaring prices. Increasing the spending will be an important issue to consider.
(From The Yomiuri Shimbun, May 8, 2025)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NHK
an hour ago
- NHK
National Guard troops deployed in LA on Trump's order
National Guard troops have been deployed in the western US city of Los Angeles upon the order of President Donald Trump in a bid to quell protests over crackdowns on immigrants. On Friday, the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency conducted a series of large-scale crackdowns on undocumented immigrants in the city. The move triggered protests, resulting in some demonstrators turning violent. ABC News and other US media outlets reported that around 120 protesters took to the streets in downtown Los Angeles overnight from late Saturday. Eleven of them were arrested for allegedly failing to obey authorities' orders. In response to the situation, President Trump ordered the deployment of 2,000 California National Guard personnel. Some of them arrived in the city center on Sunday. The National Guard is normally under the command of a state governor. But the president has the power to call them up in emergencies. Trump said on social media, "If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem." Governor Gavin Newsom hit back, saying Trump's move will only escalate tensions. Mayor Bass denied the need for such deployment. The Associated Press and other news outlets said it is unusual for the National Guard to be mobilized without a request from a governor. The development has highlighted a rift between the Trump administration and Democratic-run California and Los Angeles, which take a more accommodative policy toward immigrants.
The Mainichi
an hour ago
- The Mainichi
Chinese carrier sails near Japan's easternmost island for 1st time
TOKYO (Kyodo) -- The Chinese aircraft carrier Liaoning has been spotted in the vicinity of Japan's easternmost island in the Pacific, the Japanese Defense Ministry said Sunday, noting that it is the first time that a Chinese carrier has sailed in those waters. The carrier, along with two destroyers and another vessel, was seen in waters about 300 kilometers southwest of Minamitori Island, which is approximately 1,900 km southeast of Tokyo, at around 6 p.m. Saturday. The area is within Japan's exclusive economic zone. The Liaoning then moved southwest and conducted landing and takeoff drills involving its fighter jets and helicopters on Sunday. The move comes as the Chinese navy is expanding its activities in waters around Japan. The Japanese government is stepping up its information-gathering and surveillance activities.
The Mainichi
an hour ago
- The Mainichi
What is the controversy surrounding Japan's Yasukuni shrine?
Amid calls that Self-Defense Force members be honored at Tokyo's Yasukuni Jinja shrine if they die in war, some have questioned the legitimacy of such a move in light of the Japanese Constitution, which stipulates the separation of religion and state. The Mainichi Shimbun answers some common questions readers may have about the controversial shrine where Class-A war criminals are enshrined. Question: What kind of place is Yasukuni shrine? Answer: Located in Kudankita in Tokyo's Chiyoda Ward, Yasukuni shrine's origin goes back to the "Tokyo Shokonsha" (Tokyo soul-inviting shrine) founded in 1869 to honor the pro-imperial loyalists of the Meiji Restoration and government soldiers who died in the Boshin War in the late 19th century. It was renamed Yasukuni Jinja in 1879. Approximately 2,466,000 people who died in conflicts including the First Sino-Japanese War in the 1890s and the 1904-1905 Russo-Japanese War, as well as the Pacific War in the 1940s are collectively enshrined there as "eirei" (heroic spirits of the war dead). Q: What does it mean to collectively enshrine eirei? A: Eirei is an honorific term for the spirits of those who died in war. At Yasukuni shrine, the names of the war dead are written in a registry called a "reijibo" (spirit ledger), and through a formal ritual, the multiple spirits are enshrined collectively. Q: Who are enshrined there? A: The shrine primarily enshrines military personnel and civilian military employees, but it also includes mobilized nurses, student workers killed in air raids on military factories and conscripted Koreans, on the grounds that they "participated in combat under military orders." Because they are enshrined regardless of the wishes of the individuals or their families, some bereaved relatives object. Q: What is the controversy about? A: Before and during World War II, Yasukuni shrine was closely tied to militarism and was used to encourage the public to support the war. Many soldiers died, saying to each other, "I'll see you again at Yasukuni," as their final words before charging into the enemy lines. The major point of controversy is the enshrinement in 1978 of 14 Class-A war criminals, including former Prime Minister Hideki Tojo, who were held responsible for planning and directing the war. Q: Visits by Japanese politicians often make the news too, right? A: Yes. Since then Prime Minister Yasuhiro Nakasone's official visit in 1985, prime ministers' visits to Yasukuni shrine have frequently triggered diplomatic issues. China and South Korea criticize the visits, calling Yasukuni a "symbol of militarism" and accusing Japan of taking a wrong stance on historical issues. In Japan, too, such visits have been brought to court as violations of the separation of religion and state. Q: There was talk about establishing an alternative memorial facility. How's that going? A: Yasukuni shrine became a religious corporation after WWII. It maintains that "once a spirit is enshrined, it cannot be removed," and does not allow the separation of Class-A war criminals. In response to the backlash -- both at home and abroad -- over then Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's 2001 visit, a private advisory panel for the chief Cabinet secretary suggested the need to create a "permanent, secular, national memorial facility." Due to opposing views, however, the debate over this matter faded and remains stalled to this day.
