U.S. tariffs: ‘We should also raise it to 50%,' says Shashi Tharoor
U.S. tariffs on India: Follow LIVE updates on August 7, 2025
Mr. Tharoor questioned why India should stop at the current 17% tariff and emphasised that the country should not be intimidated by such actions. He also said that no country should be allowed to threaten India in this manner.
Speaking to the reporters, Mr. Tharoor said, 'It will definitely have an impact because we have a trade of $90 billion with them and if everything becomes 50% more expensive buyers will also think why should they buy Indian things?... If they do this, we should also impose a 50% tariff on American exports... It is not that any country can threaten us like this...'
Also Read | Trump non-committal on whether extra India tariffs will go with Russia-Ukraine ceasefire
'Our average tariffs on American goods are 17%. Why should we stop at 17%? We should also raise it to 50%... We need to ask them, do they not value our relationship? If India doesn't matter to them, they should also not matter to us,' he added.
Earlier, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order on August 6 imposing an additional 25% tariff on imports from India. Mr. Trump cited matters of national security and foreign policy concerns, as well as other relevant trade laws, for the increase, claiming that India's imports of Russian oil, directly or indirectly, pose an 'unusual and extraordinary threat' to the United States.
Also Read | Trump's imposition of 50% tariff is economic blackmail to secure unfair trade deal: Rahul Gandhi
Terming the United States' move to impose additional tariffs on India over its oil imports from Russia as 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable,' the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) declared that New Delhi will take 'all actions necessary to protect its national interests.
In further development, a senior United States Administration Official told ANI that there is simply 'no comparison' between the hundreds of billions of dollars of growing Indian imports of Russian oil and the modest U.S. imports of Russian goods.
In response to a question, the U.S. official told ANI, 'There is simply no comparison between the hundreds of billions of dollars of growing Indian imports of Russian oil, and the modest U.S. imports of Russian goods, which amount to less than 1% of the value of Indian imports'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
a few seconds ago
- Indian Express
7 books that faced bans in India and why they were controversial
The Jammu & Kashmir Home Department has banned 25 books on Kashmir, citing concerns over 'secessionist content' and their alleged role in spreading misinformation, glorifying militancy, and undermining national sovereignty. The banned books include constitutional expert AG Noorani's The Kashmir Dispute 1947-2012, Sumantra Bose's Kashmir at the Crossroads and Contested Lands, David Devadas' In Search of a Future: The Kashmir Story, Booker-prize-winning author Arundhati Roy's Azadi and journalist Anuradha Bhasin's A Dismantled State: The Untold Story of Kashmir After Article 370. The move, which invoked provisions of the new Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, has renewed debate over censorship. This is not the first time books have been banned or restricted across India or in specific states and territories for allegedly offending religious sentiments, distorting history, or threatening public order. Here are some books that have faced bans in Independent India: Published in 1954, Rama Retold by British writer Aubrey Menen was the first book to be banned in Independent India. The novel offers a satirical retelling of the Ramayana, interpreting its characters, including Rama, Sita, and Ravana, in an unconventional manner. Menen's version sought to secularise the epic and question traditional interpretations, which drew strong criticism for allegedly offending religious sentiments. In 1955, the Jawaharlal Nehru government banned the book's import, citing concerns over potential communal unrest. An Area of Darkness (1964) by Indian-origin author and winner of the Nobel Prize in Literature VS Naipaul documents his impressions during a visit in 1962. Though Naipaul was of Indian origin, the book was banned soon after publication for portraying the country in a negative light. However, decades later, re-published by Pan Macmillan and is now available on Amazon. Naipaul's account focuses on poverty, bureaucracy, and social issues, described in blunt and critical language. The Indian government banned its import, citing concerns that the depiction was offensive and misrepresented the nation. Critics accused Naipaul of generalising and lacking cultural understanding, while others acknowledged the honesty of his observations. The Rajiv Gandhi government 'banned' Salman Rushdie's The Satanic Verses in 1988, following global outrage from Muslim groups who considered its content blasphemous. The novel sparked protests worldwide and led to a fatwa calling for Rushdie's death. For decades, the book remained officially unavailable in India. In late 2024, however, the Delhi High Court closed a petition against the ban after authorities failed to produce any official ban notification. Shortly after, limited copies began appearing at Bahrisons Booksellers in Delhi. Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code was banned in the state of Nagaland in 2006, following protests from Christian groups who considered its content blasphemous. The Nagaland government prohibited the book's publication, sale, and distribution, citing that it hurt religious sentiments in the Christian-majority state. The ban was prompted in part by the global publicity around the film adaptation released the same year. The film also faced opposition in other Indian states, including Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Punjab, and Goa. Censors allowed the film to release with an 'adults only' rating and required a disclaimer stating it was a work of fiction. The book and film continue to draw controversy over their depiction of Christian history and beliefs, particularly the suggestion that Jesus married Mary Magdalene. Hansda Sowvendra Shekhar's The Adivasi Will Not Dance, a short story collection published in 2015, was temporarily banned by the Jharkhand government in 2017. The ban followed criticism that the book portrayed Santhal women in a negative light. The decision drew widespread condemnation from writers and free speech advocates. The ban was lifted four months later after a review by the state government. In November 2022, the Manipur government banned The Complexity Called Manipur: Roots, Perceptions and Reality, written by the late Brigadier Sushil Kumar Sharma. The book, based on Sharma's PhD thesis, claimed that the princely state of Manipur covered only the valley region at the time of its merger with India. The implication that the surrounding hill areas were not part of the state was seen as factually incorrect and potentially inflammatory. The state government cited risks to communal harmony and national security, saying that the book contradicted official records, including the 1950 White Paper on Indian States. The order directed that all copies be forfeited and prohibited further circulation. Following the controversy, the government announced that future books on Manipur's history and culture would require clearance from a state-appointed review committee.
Economic Times
a few seconds ago
- Economic Times
Donald Trump's new India tariffs could hit American household kitchen cabinet. Here's how, why?
Live Events FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel A dash of this and a pinch of that could cost more in American kitchens with new tariffs on goods from India. Many spices used by home chefs, restaurants and large manufacturers are imported from India, and the 50 per cent tariffs on the country imposed by President Donald Trump could drive costs higher, a trade association warned year, the United States imported more than $410 million in spices from India, according to the U.S. Department of essential spices, including cinnamon, pepper, nutmeg and cloves, require tropical climates and, therefore, cannot be grown in the United States on a large enough scale to meet demand, Laura Shumow, executive director of the American Spice Trade Association, said in a spice industry is one of many sectors that are tallying up the potential costs of Trump's trade wars with various partners, warning that the fallout could hit either profits at American companies or consumers' late June, executives at McCormick warned that Trump's tariff policy could cost the spice company $90 million a year."Tariffs on these products -- including additional new tariffs announced this week -- do not incentivize U.S. production or create American jobs," Shumow said. "Instead, they place an undue financial burden on U.S. food manufacturers, restaurants and, ultimately, American consumers."The spice association noted that in the framework of a trade deal with Indonesia, the Trump administration had created the potential for exemptions or reductions in tariffs for commodities not naturally available or produced in the United States. The trade group said it hoped a similar framework could be put into agreements with other nations."We firmly believe that smart, targeted trade policies can support the U.S. spice industry and other American businesses," Shumow said, "while helping to keep grocery costs down for families."A1. President Donald Trump has imposed 50 per cent tariffs on India.A2. Last year, the United States imported more than $410 million in spices from India, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Hindustan Times
a few seconds ago
- Hindustan Times
Donald Trump to sign order requiring universities to submit admissions data on race
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Thursday that US President Donald Trump is expected to sign a memorandum requiring universities with federal funding to submit their admissions data to prove that they are not engaging in any discriminatory practices. The Trump administration has been pushing elite college admissions offices towards a "merit-based" process. (Reuters) Leavitt shared the news on the microblogging platform X. The presidential memorandum, which Trump is expected to approve on Thursday, directs Education Secretary Linda McMahon to expand the scope of requiring reports from institutions' admissions data to "provide adequate transparency" and "to increase accuracy checks" on that data, CNN reported. The US Supreme Court had in June 2023 ruled that colleges and universities could not longer consider race as a basis for admission, terming it to be 'unconstitutional'. In a landmark decision, SCOTUS overturned the long-standing precedent that benefited students of colour in higher education. Citing that there is not enough admissions data from the universities, the White House raised "concerns about whether race is actually used in admissions decisions in practice". ALSO READ | Columbia University to pay $200 million as settlement to Trump administration: Here's why McMahon will also be expected to revamp the higher education database known as the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, which carries out surveys to review trends in tuition and fees, admissions considerations, enrollment and financial aid, the report mentioned. The latest development against the backdrop of Trump's continued emphasis on policy changes at universities and colleges, including Diversity, Equity and Inclusion initiatives. Just recently, two Ivy League universities, Columbia and Brown, agreed to disclose admissions and race data in a settlement with the Trump administration. The administration will reportedly gain access to the standardised test scores and grade point averages of all applicants, including information about their race, a move that could potentially alter college admissions, The New York Times reported. The Trump administration is pushing to bring elite college admissions offices toward "merit-based" processes, which give higher weightage to grades and test scores. Education Secretary Linda McMahon had said while announcing the Brown deal, "Because of the Trump administration's resolution agreement with Brown University, aspiring students will be judged solely on their merits, not their race or sex."
