US House panel subpoenas Bill, Hillary Clinton for testimony in Epstein probe
The Clintons were among multiple former Democratic and Republican government officials -- as well as the Justice Department -- targeted by investigators in a major escalation of the controversy surrounding the investigation into the disgraced financier, who died in 2019 awaiting trial for sex trafficking.
The White House has been facing increasingly intense demands to be more transparent after the Justice Department angered Trump supporters -- many of whom believe Epstein was murdered in a cover-up -- when it confirmed last month that he had died by suicide and that his case was effectively closed.
The department also said Epstein had no secret "client list" -- rebuffing conspiracy theories held by Trump's far-right supporters about supposedly high-level Democratic complicity.
Trump has urged his supporters to drop demands for the Epstein files, but Democrats in the Republican-led Congress -- with some support from majority lawmakers -- have also been seeking a floor vote to force their release.
"By your own admission, you flew on Jeffrey Epstein's private plane four separate times in 2002 and 2003," Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer wrote to former president Clinton.
"During one of these trips, you were even pictured receiving a 'massage' from one of Mr. Epstein's victims.
The White House has been seeking to redirect public attention from uproar over its handling of the affair with a series of headline-grabbing announcements including baselsss claims that former president Barack Obama headed a "treasonous conspiracy" against Trump.
Epstein was a financier and friend to numerous high-profile people -- for years, including Trump -- who was convicted of sex crimes and then imprisoned pending trial for allegedly trafficking underage girls.
His 2019 prison cell death supercharged a conspiracy theory long promoted by many Trump supporters that Epstein had run an international pedophile ring and that elites wanted to make sure he never revealed their secrets.
After Trump returned to power in January, his administration promised to release Epstein case files.
Past relationship
Several of Trump's most effective promoters over the years -- including new FBI Director Kash Patel and his deputy Dan Bongino -- made careers of fanning the rumors about Epstein.
But when Attorney General Pam Bondi announced on July 7 that she had nothing to release, Republicans were furious -- and Trump has attempted to control the scandal ever since.
Yet it has dominated headlines through the summer, showing just how hard it is for 79-year-old Trump to maintain his usual mastery of driving news agendas -- even within his fervently loyal "MAGA" base.
Things got even more complicated for him after a Wall Street Journal report that Trump had written a lewd birthday letter to Epstein in 2003. Trump denies this and has sued the Journal.
The Journal then dropped a separate story, saying Bondi had informed Trump in May that his name appeared several times in the Epstein files, even if there was no indication of wrongdoing.
The president recently raised further questions about his past relationship with Epstein when he told reporters he fell out with his former friend after Epstein "stole" female employees from the spa at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida.
Other officials targeted by the panel include former FBI director James Comey, former special counsel Robert Mueller and ex-attorney generals Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, Merrick Garland, Bill Barr, Jeff Sessions, and Alberto Gonzales.
Their depositions will take place between mid-August and mid-October.
Comer also issued a subpoena to the Justice Department for records related to Epstein -- including its communications with Trump's predecessor Joe Biden and his officials.
Lawmakers have also been seeking testimony from Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving 20 years in prison for her role in his alleged crimes -- although her cooperation is considered unlikely.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
18 minutes ago
- Hans India
Khalistani terrorist Pannun's endorsement of Trump's tariffs not pro-Punjab but betrayal: Report
Pro-Khalistani terrorist Gurpatwant Singh Pannun's support for US President Donald Trump's increased tariffs on Indian exports and even suggesting a 500 per cent hike aligns with economic harm to the Sikh community and implies that his anti-India theatrics take precedence over Sikh well-being, a report said. "For a man who claims to champion Sikh rights, backing a policy that directly threatens the lifeblood of Punjab's hardworking Sikh farmers and dairy workers is nothing short of bewildering. Or worse: hypocritical," the Khalsa Vox report stated. His support for Trump's tariffs is "not pro-Sikh, pro-Punjab" but a betrayal, it added. Punjab's economy relies mainly on agriculture and dairy. Its products, including basmati rice, textiles and processed foods, form an important chunk of India's exports to the US. The tariffs imposed by Trump would make these products expensive in the US markets. Furthermore, if India opens its agricultural markets due to tariffs, the American dairy and farm giants will enter Indian markets. Supported by heavy subsidies, American dairy and farm giants can undercut small-scale Sikh farmers of Punjab and cooperatives like Amul, according to the report. This does not have an economic impact only, but it also poses a threat to cultural traditions that link Sikh identity to the land and farming. The report said: "Consider the dairy sector, the quiet backbone of Punjab. Generations of Sikh families rely on it for sustenance and stability. If US dairy giants take over, what happens to these small farmers? The promise of Sikh self-reliance, often invoked by Pannun himself, collapses under the weight of cheap imports." Exports predict a 40-50 per cent reduction in Indian exports to the US if tariffs increase, and the Sikh community will be impacted the most. Khalsa Vox, in the report, stated: "Pannun's position exposes a troubling contradiction. His rhetoric drips with anti-India fervour, but his policy stance aligns squarely with economic harm to Sikhs themselves. By cheering on a trade war that undermines Punjab's farmers, he prioritises political vendettas over community upliftment. If his loyalty truly lies with Punjab, why endorse policies that jeopardise Sikh livelihoods? The answer seems plain: for Pannun, anti-India theatrics take precedence over Sikh well-being." Punjab's future lies in policies that protect farmers, bolster dairy cooperatives, and ensure fair trade and not in political grandstanding that sacrifices livelihoods for personal agendas, it said. "Pannun's endorsement of Trump's tariffs is not pro-Sikh. It is not pro-Punjab. It is, at its core, a betrayal."
The Hindu
18 minutes ago
- The Hindu
UDF Opposition seeks to weaponise leak of confidential complaint to CPI(M) polit bureau, accusing certain Kerala leaders of corruption
The Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) Opposition on Sunday (August 17, 2025) sought to politically weaponise the media leak of a purported 'confidential complaint' to the Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)] polit bureau, reportedly accusing an assemblage of party leaders from Kerala, including former Ministers, of partnering in financial shenanigans allegedly enabled by a U.K.-based business person from the State. Leader of the Opposition, V.D. Satheesan, who demanded a clarification from the party and government on the veracity of the accusation, pointed out that the controversial letter, which grabbed headlines in Kerala, was adduced as evidence in a libel suit in New Delhi involving two business persons with apparent CPI(M) connections. UDF demands CM's resignation after court accuses political executive of subverting anti-corruption probe against ADGP He said the crux of the litigation appeared to be bitter feuding between two business rivals for the patronage of powerful CPI(M) leaders. 'Financial transactions gone awry might also have fuelled the disagreement, which has put the CPI(M) on the defensive in Kerala,' he added. Mr. Satheesan noted that the U.K.-based businessperson was an invitee to the CPI(M)'s 24th party conference in Madurai in April 2025 and a member of the Left Democratic Front (LDF) government-sponsored Kerala Loka Sabha. Mr. Satheesan said the NRI's rival objected to the businessperson's presence at the conference and later submitted a lengthy letter loaded with accusations of financial fraud, including possible FEMA violations allegedly involving CPI(M) leaders in Kerala. Vigilance court verdict on ADGP validates Opposition's claim, says Satheesan Mr. Satheesan said the serious imputations in the letter, if true, prima facie warranted investigation under the provisions of the anti-money laundering law. 'For one, the accuser alleged in the letter that the previous LDF government routed major projects to a paper company floated by the NRI businessperson in Chennai. Is this a classic case of reverse hawala?' he said. V.D. Satheesan assures to field CMP candidates from more than one seat in 2026 Assembly elections 'I am not taking names at this juncture. However, Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan and CPI(M) State Secretary M.V. Govindan owed the public an explanation. It's also mystifying how the confidential letter to the CPI(M) polit bureau ended in the possession of an NRI businessperson to adduce as evidence in court. It seems the letter's leak has brought to the fore the hidden but deeply entrenched fissures in the CPI(M) leadership in Kerala,' he stated. The CPI(M) was yet to react to Mr. Satheesan's accusations. Attempts to seek a comment about Mr. Satheesan's allegations from a few leaders were yet to yield a response.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
18 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump wants to hold trilateral talks with Putin, Zelenskyy by August 22: Report
A day after the Alaska Summit, reports are emerging that US President Donald Trump wants to arrange trilateral talks with his Russian and Ukrainian counterparts, Putin & Zelenskyy, by August 22 As more details about the meeting between US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin emerge, a report suggests that Trump said he wants to arrange a trilateral meeting with the Russian leader and the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on August 22. According to a report by Axios, Trump told Zelenskyy and European leaders in a phone call that he wants to hold the trilateral summit 'fast' and as early as next Friday, August 22. While two sources close to the matter told Axios about Trump's plan, it is unclear if Putin will join the meeting. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD After the 3-hour discussion in Alaska, the Russian leader proposed to Trump that the next talks should be held in Moscow. A hesitant Trump admitted that he would receive flak for accepting such an invitation but noted that a meeting in Moscow is possible. However, if talks happen in the Russian capital, it would pose a major security threat to Zelenskyy, whose country has been locked in a war with Russia for the past three years. Putin's maximalist claims to Ukraine's east The sources told Axios that during the talks, Putin said that Ukraine would have to withdraw entirely from two of its eastern regions, which Russia claims as its own. The source noted that based on Putin's approach in the Friday meeting, 'a major breakthrough appears to be unlikely'. The sources noted that Putin demanded that Ukraine cede two of the four regions to which Russia has laid claim (Donetsk and Luhansk), and freeze the front lines in the other two (Kherson and Zaporizhzhia). Russia controls nearly all of Luhansk, but only about three-quarters of Donetsk. According to Axios, Putin expressed willingness to stop pushing forward in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia as a concession, and in exchange, Ukraine should completely withdraw from Donetsk. It is important to note that Russia has not made progress in any of those areas for some time. Meanwhile, a Ukrainian source said that the US side had the impression Putin was willing to negotiate over the small slivers of the Sumy and Kharkiv regions under Russian control. But overall, Putin's proposal reportedly calls for significantly more territory to shift from Ukrainian to Russian control than vice versa.
