
Martin Lewis explains what the car finance consultation means for you
Martin Lewis has revealed that millions of motorists could soon pocket 'hundreds, not thousands of pounds' as part of a car finance consultation.
Drivers who were mis-sold car finance could be owed up to £18billion after the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) announced it will weigh in on an industry-wide compensation scheme.
Some car dealers for years have been paying hidden commissions as part of payment plans without telling their customers, called discretionary commission arrangements (DCA).
The loophole meant those who purchased a second-hand vehicle were forced to foot the bill for an extra 25% commission.
Lewis said in a video posted to X that up to 14million motorists may get a share of the compensation pot.
He said: 'Discretionary commission arrangements is when you went to a car broker or dealer and it increased the amount of interest that you were charged to increase its commission without telling you.
'Now, the big problem with DCAs is that they were hidden. You didn't know you had one.'
About 40% of people who bought a vehicle on a Personal Contract Purchase contract or Hire Purchase (not leasing) before January 28, 2021, paid the sneaky fees.
The financial guru said: 'If you did so, you are likely to get compensation under the scheme.'
He added: 'You might have had 0% interest, in which case you definitely might be paid out because there was no interest.
'Or your commission might have been very small, in which case you won't get anything back, although most people it's going to be in the hundreds of pounds.'
The FCA will launch a consultation on the shoddy insurance in October, the MoneySavingExpert said, with payouts likely coming next year.
Lewis said however the redress scheme shapes up to be will probably be 'simple', with lenders reaching out to mis-sold customers and will either automatically pay people or ask them to sign up to the scheme.
Drivers who have already complained don't need to do a single thing, Lewis said, but those worried they were not told about commission and paid more for insurance should do so.
Lewis said: 'If you're one of those people who've already had a letter saying that your car finance firm, after you complained, won't deal with it till December this year, that will almost certainly now be delayed until next year.'
To complain, Lewis advised people to use a tool that generates a template email to submit a claim.
People don't need to use a claims management firm to do this, he stressed: 'The fact you've signed up with them may mean they get 30% of your payout without doing anything at all.'
The only exception to this is those who were coughing up 'manifestly unfair commissions', so the interest was 55% on the cost of credit, which was not disclosed.
Lewis said: 'As that's case by case, unlike the DCA cases, we don't yet know whether that will be dealt with, on they'll contact you and pay you back.
'Or you may have to go through the ombudsman, because that one's more complicated.'
The compensation scheme follows a landmark ruling by the Supreme Court in favour of lenders, finding them not liable for hidden commission payments in car finance schemes.
Judges did not uphold an earlier Court of Appeal judgement, which led to DCAs being outlawed.
Out of three cases, judges upheld one consumer's case. The two others – alleging that commissions paid to car dealers were bribes and that dealers owed a duty of loyalty to the customer – were rejected.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The justices argued that secret commissions are not automatically illegal and car dealers do not have a duty to act solely in the customer's interest when arranging finance. More Trending
This drastically limited who can receive compensation, leaving one being floated by the FCA as the remaining option.
Yet Lewis warned that the industry 'could fight this, and could fight it hard'.
'Now I would urge people in the industry, this is a fair compromise,' he added.
'You're going to be paying out far less than you would have done had the Supreme Court upheld what the Court of Appeal said.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Storm Floris live updates: Major festival cancelled and 'danger to life' warning issued
MORE: Part of A11 closed to traffic after crash involving six cars and a lorry
MORE: Two thirds of disabled people fear they can't travel abroad this summer
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
5 hours ago
- Spectator
Was the car finance judgment fair?
I must modestly doubt that the Supreme Court justices took account of my 12 July column in their ruling on the issue of hidden car finance commissions. But the effect, limiting compensation claims to the more egregious cases of overcharging, is to do exactly what I hoped: namely to head off 'a tsunami of claims that could cripple lenders and provoke a mini banking crisis'. Chancellor Rachel Reeves evidently hoped so too; given that up to 90 per cent of new UK car sales are financed by loans offered through car dealerships, a collapse of that market would have put another ding in an already battered economy. The total claims bill is now estimated by the Financial Conduct Authority at between £9 billion and £18 billion – vs a possible £44 billion if the court had ruled in favour of all claimants. The relief to lenders was evident in Lloyds' decision not to add to the £1.15 billion already set aside for compensation, while shares in Close Brothers, a smaller specialist in the field, shot up by a quarter. The losers are the ambulance-chasing 'claims advisers' who were looking forward to another bonanza akin to the payment protection insurance scandal which cost banks £50 billion. But we should also ask: was the judgment fair? In particular, what of the unsophisticated car buyer who thought the dealer had a duty to offer the best finance deal, rather than to seek richer rewards for himself? On this point, the justices were magisterial. 'Each party… (customer, dealer and lender) was engaged at arm's length from the other participants in the pursuit of separate objectives. Neither the parties themselves nor any onlooker could reasonably think that any participant was doing anything other than considering their own interest.' In short and as always, caveat emptor. Who'da thought? Here's a potpourri of items at the intersection of market swings, consumer whims and 'black swans' – the latter phrase, coined by the author Nassim Nicholas Taleb, meaning unforeseen events with extreme consequences, of which Donald Trump's global tariff attack is surely one. Who would have imagined, for example, that Swiss watchmakers – whose recession-proof sector has long been a staple source of advertising revenues that underpin publications like this one – could be thrown into crisis by a 39 per cent tariff on Swiss exports to the US? Likewise, did anyone predict that the share price of the Danish pharma group Novo Nordisk would fall by two-thirds this year as its bestselling slimming drugs Wegovy and Ozempic were overtaken by the even more in-demand Mounjaro – whose maker Eli Lilly is the share tipsters' new favourite? Next, let's look at food fads. Sliced bread is in retreat in the face of 'carb-conscious health trends as well as baguettes and sourdough', says the Financial Times, reporting rumours of a defensive alliance between the owners of Hovis and Kingsmill. But ice cream is the dish of the day and not just because we're in high summer: Unilever is about to spin out its Magnum arm, the world's largest producer, while Goldman Sachs makes a multi-billion investment in the second-largest, Froneri. And Dishoom, the brasserie chain founded by two cousins in 2010 that has London curry-lovers queuing round the block, has attracted investment from a fund linked to the luxury goods giant LVMH, which values it at a chilli-hot £300 million. But here's a downbeat, rain-stopped-play kind of postscript: who'd have thought concrete could ever go out of fashion? Despite Angela Rayner's rhetoric, the level of housebuilding and infrastructure works in the UK is so quiet that sales of this most basic building material have fallen to their lowest level since 1963. A rather random holiday-season round-up, you may be thinking: what's my point? In fact I've spent most of this week reading a huge pile of entries for The Spectator's Economic Innovator awards to high-growth smaller companies – and marvelling, as ever, at the resilience and optimism they embody. Whatever happens next in this mad, mad world, be thankful for the boldness of entrepreneurs. Animal spirits Whenever I eat at La Récréation in Les Arques – which I apologise for mentioning again, but it really is worth the detour – I think of From Here, You Can't See Paris (2002), Michael Sanders's charming account of a year spent working in the restaurant and observing the seasonal rhythms of south-west France. From my own summer idyll nearby, I really can't see Paris, never mind London or Washington, but I can at least offer some parables and parallels of economic life. The first point of comparison is simply that the manifold uncertainties illustrated by my previous item leave businesses everywhere struggling to meet forecasts and deliver chosen strategies.'C'est la douche froide,' begins Le Figaro's results round-up from the CAC 40 list of leading French companies, collectively reporting a 30 per cent drop in first-half profits attributed to Trump's tariffs and geopolitical turmoil as well as limp EU growth. But at least French inflation, at barely 1 per cent – Andrew Bailey and Rachel Reeves please note – is a fraction of ours (3.6 per cent in June), thanks to low energy costs and the strong euro I observed last week. And at the micro level, in the Dordogne village of St Pompon where I've shared a house for 25 years, the Sud Ouest newspaper reports the opening of a new butchers shop by an enterprising young couple, Elodie and Max, as 'un nouveau chapitre de dynamisme pour cette petite commune'. We've also got a new pub-cum-karaoke joint, Oscar's – and on the drawing board, my own quixotic scheme to create a mini arts centre in a converted barn. I wrote last month about the 'animal spirits' that drive revival against the odds: I'd say they're alive and kicking in this lost corner of la France profonde.


Metro
15 hours ago
- Metro
Martin Lewis shares unexpected need-to-knows when applying for a mortgage
Even if you've run the numbers, checked your eligibility and saved up a healthy deposit, a lender can still reject your mortgage application — and they aren't always forthcoming about why. In the latest edition of his newsletter, Martin Lewis shared a video to demystify the criteria, detailing three 'big things' loan acceptance hinges on: affordability, property type and credit. While prospective homeowners should be au fait with these three key factors already, the Money Saving Expert founder included a few extra nuggets of wisdom you might not be aware of. So if you want to make it through the 'mortgage maze' and buy your dream home, this is what to keep in mind. Martin calls affordability the 'most important' part of a mortgage application decision. You can access completely fee-free mortgage advice with London & Country (L&C) Mortgages, a partner of Metro. Customers benefit from: – Award winning service from the UK's leading mortgage broker – Expert advisors on hand 7 days a week – Access to 1000s of mortgage deals from across the market Unlike many mortgage brokers, L&C won't charge you a fee for their advice. Find out how much you could borrow online Mortgage service provided by London & Country Mortgages (L&C), which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (registered number: 143002). The FCA does not regulate most Buy to Let mortgages. Your home or property may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on your mortgage. Sounds obvious? That's because it is. But many people don't realise how this is worked out, expecting a statistical calculation like those used by credit cards and loan providers. When it comes to mortgages, the process is far more thorough, as the lender needs to 'stress test' to ensure you can make repayments even if interest rates go up — and that means your recent bank statements being rigorously analysed. Although the odd trip to Greggs is unlikely to stop you becoming a homeowner, if you're 'close to the brink', Martin says it's vital to be as frugal as possible in the run-up to applying (ideally at least three to six months). This extra wiggle room between your income and outgoings could make all the difference. Certain properties – which Martin described as 'counter-normal' – are considered too risky for some lenders, so it's worth doing your homework on what's problematic before you put an offer in. Alongside homes with short leases, potentially flammable cladding or specific restrictions in the title deed, studio flats can be difficult to get a mortgage on, 'particularly if they're less than 35 square metres or not in 'prime' location.' This is because smaller units may be harder to sell or rent out in future, with different lenders having different rules on what they consider an acceptable size. It's a similar story for high-rise homes; exact stipulations vary, but lenders can be reluctant about anything above the fourth storey or in a building without a lift. In some cases, you may end up needing a bigger upront deposit or a specialist mortgage. Perhaps the most surprising thing that could lead to a rejection is the home being above (or sometimes even just near) a commercial premises. 'Whether it's shops or restaurants or even an office, that can affect you getting a mortgage,' Martin explains, adding that his former colleague was refused because the property he was trying to buy had a Nando's downstairs — a location any chicken fan would think is perfect. While many believe this to be the main thing lenders look at, Martin claims creditworthiness is in fact the least important factor overall. More Trending The bank will likely focus on specific elements such as whether you've defaulted in the past or you have any county court judgements against you, meaning a 'really bad credit history' can stop you getting a mortgage. However, the financial guru says: 'If you've done well on the affordability score and it's a good property, this probably won't totally kibosh things.' So although he recommends looking at your credit file to see where you can make improvements before you put in a mortgage application, remember it's not the be all and end all you probably assumed. Do you have a story to share? Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@ View More » MORE: Unclaimed premium bond prizes reach £100,000,000 – have you won big? MORE: My girlfriend thinks I'm a humble teacher — I'm secretely loaded MORE: Martin Lewis explains what the car finance consultation means for you


Daily Mirror
16 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Martin Lewis urges NatWest, Nationwide and Lloyds customers 'take action this week'
The UK is expected to see another Bank of England rate cut on Thursday, and it could be bad news for savers with the likes of Nationwide, Lloyds and NatWest Martin Lewis has delivered an urgent warning to savers banking with the likes of Nationwide, Lloyds and NatWest. If you're a customer of any of these banks, you might want to pay attention to the following news. Trust me, you'd want to know this information. Britons are being encouraged to secure the finest savings accounts available now, with anothe r Bank of England interest rate reduction anticipated for Thursday. This will probably prompt numerous banks to eventually follow by cutting rates on savings products. This means the present moment offers an excellent opportunity to secure the top rates available, ensuring maximum returns on your cash. Those currently banking with major institutions like Nationwide, Lloyds and NatWest might discover superior rates with alternative providers, including digital banks. In other similar news, state pensioners could lose DWP payments after 'unfair' £10,000 rule READ MORE: DWP to pay out extra £904 to disabled individuals per month – see if you qualify It was reported that the Bank of England is anticipated to slash interest rates to 4% starting tomorrow (August 7, 2025), suggesting that it could result in a £300 difference for savers. As reported by The Guardian, this decision comes amid the rise in unemployment and the effects of global trade from Donald Trump's import tariffs. Therefore, it's an ideal time to investigate the finest offers currently on the market. Millions of Britons remain loyal to identical savings products despite them delivering disappointing interest rates under 2%. Martin Lewis insists people shouldn't accept anything less than 4%. In a fresh update, he declared: "UK interest rates are likely on the move. And that means savers need to check what they earn now. Millions are on pants sub-4% rates and can easily ditch, switch and gain." "All you usually need to do (barring with ISAs) is withdraw your money from one account and put it in a new one. Most analysts believe this Thursday the Bank of England will likely cut the UK base rate again, from the current 4.25% to 4%." He concluded: "Good news for some with debt, but a sign savers need to take action." Martin Lewis CBE, also known as the Money Saving Expert, has gained popularity due to his website being the UK's biggest consumer website. He's also a key voice to helping people financially, finding different ways to navigate it and getting the necessary help.