Israel-Iran war: Why are Middle East stock markets gaining despite US attack on Iran?
The broad Tel Aviv 125 index closed up 1.8%, bringing its gains for the week to nearly 8%, while the blue-chip TA-35 (.TA35) rose by 1.5 per cent.
Following Israeli strikes on Iran, the stock market posted gains throughout all five sessions last week, rising around 6 per cent, as Israel targeted Iranian nuclear and military sites ahead of the unexpected U.S. attacks on Saturday.
Meanwhile, other Middle East countries stock market also witnessed strong rally amid ongoing tensions. Kuwait stock market indices Boursa Kuwait Premier Market Index was up nearly a per cent to 8,650.6.
Meanwhile, in Muscat, Oman, the MSX30 Index was trading 0.50 per cent up to 4,525.31.
U.S. President Donald Trump announced that he had destroyed Iran's key nuclear facilities in overnight strikes using powerful bunker-busting bombs, aligning with an Israeli offensive in a major escalation of tensions in the Middle East.
"The destruction of Iran's key nuclear facilities by the U.S. military is, of course, a positive development ... in terms of improving the regional security environment and reducing Iran's military and nuclear capabilities," said Mizrahi Tefahot chief markets economist Ronen Menachem, was quoted as saying by Reuters.
Israel launched intense strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, ballistic missile production centers, and senior military figures on June 13, prompting retaliatory attacks from Iran in response.
Tehran pledged to protect itself and retaliated on Sunday by launching a barrage of missiles at Israel, injuring dozens and causing significant destruction to buildings in Tel Aviv.
"Looking at the medium- to long-term — which is relevant for many strategic investors — this could represent a genuine opportunity, possibly related to the prospect of closer ties between the Saudi and American axis," Menachem said.
(With inputs from Reuters)
Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, not Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
17 minutes ago
- Economic Times
India's Online Gaming Bill 2025: Regulation or disguise for prohibition?
Reuters Representative image In the past decade, India has become one of the world's fastest growing online gaming markets, with nearly half-a-billion users and a projected addition of 250,000 jobs by 2025, as reported by EY India's New frontiers: Navigating the evolving landscape for online gaming in India in 2023. It has become a mainstream industry that caters to employment generation, innovation and tech, while also propelling India's global digital the introduction of Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill 2025, there appears to be speculation among stakeholders. By proposing a blanket ban on online money gaming while selectively encouraging e-sports and casual games, GoI's intent seems inclined more towards prohibition than regulation in disguise. This approach may fail to address the sources of harm while undermining the domestic gaming ecosystem that India has progressively built. It is undeniable that the Bill's intentions are well placed, as it attempts to address problems of addiction, consumer protection and prevention of money laundering. However, in practice, it may inadvertently create an illegal betting economy and encourage the gambling industry. This may undermine India's domestic gaming sector and its digital Make in India ambitions. The areas of concern include: Disadvantages Indian innovator e-Sports and casual gaming sectors are dominated by international giants, whereas India's domestic gaming companies are in the skill-based money games space. Out of India's 488 mn gamer base, more than 155 mn are engaged with real-money gaming (RMG) sub-segments like fantasy sports and other transaction-based games, making it the largest segment in the country's gaming economy. This could distort the market under the guise of consumer protection. Moreover, by equating legitimate businesses with gambling, the Bill risks setting a dangerous precedent that not only undermines judicially recognised distinctions between games of skill and games of chance, but also violates the constitutionally guaranteed right to trade and occupation under Article 19(1)(g), thereby affecting multiple stakeholders who have built a value chain around this sector. Overlooks money mechanics in casual gaming The Bill overlooks real-money mechanics in casual gaming, social gaming and video gaming. If addiction and overspending are the concern, the real danger lies in in-app purchases, microtransactions and loot boxes, which are key features embedded in such games. These monetisation models rely on psychological nudges that resemble gambling mechanics. Players routinely spend on skins, upgrades and loot boxes, which use triggers that encourage repeat spending, as suggested by the 2023 IAMAI and the Netherlands have classified loot boxes as gambling and imposed bans. Meanwhile, Japan enforces strict disclosure norms without prohibiting the mechanic altogether. India should analyse these models and adapt them while keeping in view indigenous ecosystems. Prohibition doesn't work Instead of reducing harm, prohibitions create black markets that are harder to regulate and far riskier for users. In states where RMG is banned, such as Telangana, over 3,900 betting platform-related violations were documented in 2025. Additionally, 25 celebrities and influencers faced charges for endorsing prohibited betting platforms. Moreover, prohibition risks discounting the judgement of adult gamers. Many view RMG as a form of entertainment or relaxation and should have the right to make that choice under a regulated regime. Regulation must avoid paternalism, providing safeguards without underestimating user agency. Skill vs chance Courts have reiterated that games like rummy and fantasy sports involve a substantial degree of skill and cannot be equated with gambling. By putting all online money games into the same category, the Bill ignores judicial precedent, stifles skill-based industries and chills investor confidence in a fast-growing digital sector. By equating the two, it erases this intelligible difference and treats legitimate skill-based industries as if they were indistinguishable from betting or lotteries. Weak framework While the Bill hints at the creation of a central regulatory authority, this stands in stark contradiction to MeitY's 2023 amendment to the IT Rules 2021, which had envisioned industry-led self-regulatory bodies with GoI oversight. The sudden pivot to a stringent central authority reflects a dichotomous approach. Instead, GoI could have institutionalised responsible gaming measures, mandated transparency and created safeguards for vulnerable groups such as minors. Such a model would align better with global best practices and balance innovation with consumer forward, GoI must: Create a transparent system that mandates disclosure of odds, pricing and spending limits on loot boxes and in-app purchases. Initiate age-appropriate safeguarding protocols with verification mechanisms and parental oversight in cases of minor gamers. Adopt a self-regulatory model where compliances are monitored by an independent regulator. Together, these measures can construct a transparent, user-friendly and accountable ecosystem. To attain Aatmanirbhar Bharat, GoI must strive to make India a hub of a world-class gaming ecosystem. User protection must go together with technological innovation to uphold the essence of Viksit Bharat. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Swiggy, Tencent backer Prosus gets Rajinikanth fan to script India AI play India's F&O boom puts spotlight on retail protection through education Can new shipping laws bury the ghost of British legacy? As big fat Indian wedding slims to budget, Manyavar loses lustre Stock Radar: Bajaj Auto showing signs of reversal after falling over 30% from highs; medium term should 'buy the dip' F&O Radar | Deploy Bull Call Ladder in JSW Steel stock to benefit from bullish outlook Time for risk-takers to come out of hibernation? 5 mid-cap stocks from different sectors with an upside potential of up to 27% Buy, Sell or Hold: Motilal Oswal initiates coverage on JSW Cement; Emkay Global sees over 30% upside in Gravita India
India Today
43 minutes ago
- India Today
The alliance that Trump cannot break
As External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar prepares for crucial talks with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in Moscow, India finds itself at the centre of a diplomatic storm. President Trump has unleashed his most aggressive economic assault on India in recent memory, wielding tariffs and sanctions as weapons to force New Delhi away from its Russian partnerships. advertisementThe pressure campaign began in August 2025 with sweeping 25% tariffs on Indian exports, later doubled to 50% specifically targeting Russian oil imports. For a nation whose economic planners depend heavily on US markets, this represents a devastating blow. Nearly 70% of India's American exports now face punitive duties, threatening everyone from farmers to IT firms and small manufacturers. Yet Trump's arsenal extends beyond tariffs. The spectre of secondary sanctions looms large, threatening to cut India from dollar-based financial networks if it maintains Russian trade ties. The warning is unambiguous: choose between Moscow and access to the global financial system dominated by public response has been characteristically defiant. Officials denounce the measures as "unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable," repeating the familiar mantra that India does not recognise country-specific sanctions. However, the ghosts of previous capitulations haunt this stance, particularly the Iranian oil episode where similar rhetoric eventually gave way to compliance under American Iran precedent is instructive. When Washington reimposed sanctions after abandoning the nuclear deal, India initially stood firm, thundering about the illegitimacy of unilateral sanctions. Yet reality gradually eroded this defiance. Iranian oil, once vital and discounted, was quietly phased out of India's energy mix. The much-touted non-recognition policy withered under the threat of secondary time, however, the stakes are fundamentally different. Unlike Iran, Russia is integral to India's core security architecture. Between 60 to 70% of India's military hardware originates from Moscow, including fighter jets, submarines, and the controversial S-400 missile defence systems. Simultaneously, Russia has emerged as India's largest crude supplier, accounting for over a third of oil dependency runs deeper than mere commercial convenience. Russian oil provides India with crucial leverage against OPEC price manipulation whilst offering substantial discounts that help manage domestic inflation. Similarly, decades of defence cooperation have embedded Russian technology throughout India's military ecosystem. Severing these ties would not merely inconvenience New Delhi; it could fundamentally compromise national hypocrisy argument carries considerable weight. China imports even more Russian energy yet faces far less American pressure, highlighting what appears to be selective enforcement based on perceived vulnerability rather than principled opposition to Russian trade. This double standard allows India to position itself as an unfairly targeted middle power, potentially rallying sympathy amongst BRICS partners and Global South upcoming Jaishankar-Lavrov meeting represents more than bilateral diplomacy; it is geopolitical theatre. Both nations are accelerating work on rupee-ruble trade mechanisms and non-dollar payment systems designed to circumvent American financial dominance. Russian Deputy Chief of Mission Roman Babushkin has already signalled Moscow's commitment to supporting India against Western the economic pain is mounting. Exporters are suffering, farmers linked to American markets are protesting, and opposition parties smell political opportunity. Prime Minister Modi has publicly vowed not to compromise domestic welfare for diplomatic expediency, declaring India prepared to bear significant costs for its strategy appears clear: project defiance whilst quietly exploring compromises, diversify markets away from American dependence, and leverage the crisis to accelerate long-delayed economic reforms. Whether this gambit succeeds depends largely on India's ability to endure short-term pain for long-term strategic battle lines are drawn, with India's fundamental principle at stake: that sovereign nations should not bow to extraterritorial sanctions. The outcome will define not just India-US relations, but India's place in an increasingly multipolar world order.- EndsMust Watch
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
After India-Russia, Apple ignores Trump's threat, takes BIG decision linked to India, will manufacture…, in…
Former U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff threats were not taken seriously by India. The country is still buying oil from Russia,similarly even after Trump's warning while Apple has taken this decision. India Resumes Russian Oil Imports State-run oil companies Indian Oil (IOC) and Bharat Petroleum (BPCL) have restarted purchases of Russian crude for September and October deliveries. The decision was driven by rising discounts on Russian oil. According to two company officials quoted by Reuters, these firms had stopped buying in July when discounts had narrowed, but are now benefiting from a $3 per barrel discount on Russian Urals crude. Trump had imposed tariffs on many countries worldwide and issued several warnings. He threatened that if India continued to buy crude oil from Russia he may penalise the country with more tariffs. Also Read: Big trouble for Sundar Pichai's Google and Steve Jobs Apple? this regulator to mandate changes for…, to protect consumers, businesses from… iPhone Makers Big Decision Linked To India He had already given warnings to Apple. However, neither India nor Apple seems to be falling for his pressure. Apple has now decided that the entire new iPhone series will be manufactured in India. For the first time, all models of the iPhone 17 series, including the Pro versions, will be manufactured in India across five factories, two of which have recently become operational. Apple is doing this to reduce its dependence on China for iPhones destined for the U.S. market and to shield itself from the risk of tariffs. The company has already shifted a major share of iPhone production from China to India. Also Read: Satya Nadella's BIG move, Microsoft stops 30-year-old practice and drops Apple, IBM, Meta, NVIDIA from its list of… Story Highlights India Russia Response On Donald Trump's Tariffs Apple iPhone 17 To Be Manufactured In India Donald Trump Warning To India Over Russian Oil Apple Iphone 17 In India According to Bloomberg, Tata Group's plant in Hosur and Foxconn's hub near Bengaluru Airport will play a critical role in this expansion. Tata has emerged as Apple's fastest-growing partner, and experts believe it could handle nearly half of India's iPhone production within the next two years.
