Why Verstappen the Villain and Verstappen the Vulnerable are great for F1
Max Verstappen's form has slumped, with wins not coming as easily for the past 12 months and his temper also reverting to late-2010s levels.
Max Verstappen's form has slumped, with wins not coming as easily for the past 12 months and his temper also reverting to late-2010s levels. Photograph: Christinne Muschi/AP
Max Verstappen rose to fame as something of a villain. As the Formula 1 circuit hops back across the Atlantic for the weekend's Canadian Grand Prix, he appears on the verge of reclaiming the role.
Like Tim Robbins' strong-armed but hot-headed Nuke LaLoosh character in the baseball film Bull Durham, the brash Dutch phenomenon announced his presence with authority – undeniable skills and unfortunate lapses in judgment or focus. He became well acquainted with the walls of many a race circuit and earned a gentle 'warning' from F1 management.
Advertisement
Related: Max Verstappen must control his road rage to cement his legacy as a great | Giles Richards
His ascendance to the world championship title in 2021 at Abu Dhabi was also controversial – some might instead say farcical, as if the rule book was tossed out of one of Abu Dhabi's growing array of 300m-tall buildings. Race officials had no truly coherent reason for allowing some cars to 'unlap' themselves while following a safety car, allowing Verstappen to start the final lap right on Lewis Hamilton's tail, with a fresher set of tyres and everyone knows what happened next.
Since then, though, Verstappen's narrative has changed. He is no longer the impudent youngster with one tarnished championship. He's a four-time champion, following up his 2021 breakthrough by winning the 2022 and 2023 titles with dominance not seen since Michael Schumacher's heyday in the 2000s.
But while he held off Lando Norris to win his fourth straight title in 2024, for the past 12 months the wins haven't been coming quite as easily. This year, he stands in third place and may be losing contact with the McLaren duo of Norris and Oscar Piastri.
Advertisement
As his results have reverted to his late-2010s form, so has his temper. After taking 10th place and taking out his frustration on the luckless George Russell in Spain, he is on the precipice of a suspension, not a fifth title.
After the incident in Spain, Italian taxi drivers fought back against the accusation that Verstappen drives like they do. Anyone who has spent time in Italian taxis would agree that being compared to a four-time F1 champion would, under most circumstances, be considered a compliment. Not now.
So Verstappen the Villain is well and truly back. Russell expressed surprise in Montreal on Thursday that the Dutchman had even offered an apology of sorts but suggested Verstappen would be unlikely to change his aggressive approach even if he did accumulate the 12 points that would result in a ban.
The question for F1, now and for the foreseeable future: is this a good thing? Does the sport do better when it has someone to root against as well as many drivers to root for?
Advertisement
Other sports benefit from having foils for the fan favorites. If a supporter's favorite team loses, there's always a chance the New York Yankees or Manchester United might lose as well, and there's comfort in schadenfreude. Consider Nascar, where fans either loved or hated Dale Earnhardt's 'Intimidator' style and often distrusted Jeff Gordon because he was a smooth-talking Californian, not a rough-edged man with a Southern drawl.
Nascar also has long benefited from its unpredictability. In the modern era, champion drivers typically win no more than 25% of the races in a given season. In F1, Verstappen cruised to the 2023 title by winning 19 of 22 races.
But F1 has been doing just fine during the era of Verstappen dominance, especially in North America. The 25 May F1 race in Monaco drew the third-highest TV rating in US history, ESPN claims, with an average of 2.3 million viewers and a peak of 2.6 million. Imagine what could happen this Sunday, with F1 on a less glitzy but less predictable circuit than the traditional but tedious Monaco streets. Last year, the Canadian GP averaged a robust 1.76 million viewers in the US, ESPN reports. In Canada itself, the ratings were reported at a record 1.4 million, with 3.5 million viewers on all platforms – nearly 9% of the country's population.
Credit the Netflix documentary series Formula 1: Drive to Survive with showing that the people who drive and service these cars are human – or superhuman, in the case of the fiery crash from which Romain Grosjean emerged like a phoenix or a Targaryen and stunned doctor/YouTuber Dr Mike and countless others. Drivers have been shown to have delightfully quirky personalities, such that the top story on the 6.1million-strong F1 Reddit sub on Thursday was a debate over the veracity of a photo that may or may not show that longtime title contender Valtteri Bottas has broken a Colorado restaurant's record by consuming 51 tacos in one hour. (A cursory check of Yelp finds a review from August 2019 confirming that the 51-taco record dates back at least that far, so at best, Bottas tied the record.)
Advertisement
But the biggest development this year is that the title chase is far from a foregone conclusion.
The season is still young, and Verstappen's powerhouse Red Bull team may respond well to F1's in-season rules adjustments. But he's nearly 50 points off the pace set by Australian Piastri, with Piastri's fellow McLaren prodigy Norris a close second.
Verstappen the Villain surely is a boon for F1 fandom. But Verstappen the Vulnerable may have an even greater impact.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
25 minutes ago
- New York Times
NASCAR Cup Series at Mexico City odds, expert predictions for Viva Mexico 250
The NASCAR Cup Series heads to Mexico City for its first-ever event in Mexico and its first international points race in over six decades. The track is most known for hosting Formula One races, but NASCAR drivers will use a slightly altered 2.49-mile layout compared to F1's 2.67-mile layout, and they'll have to complete 29 more laps than the F1 race. Advertisement It's a massive event, with high stakes for the league's work to expand internationally. Plus, a brand-new track for the Cup Series brings new intrigue and unpredictability to this weekend's race. We're bringing our questions about the race — who could excel on the track, what the high altitude could mean for teams, etc. — to our motorsports experts, Jeff Gluck and Jordan Bianchi. Take it away, guys! I have to start with this softball: How hyped are you for the first-ever NASCAR Cup Series points race in Mexico? Jeff: My overriding emotion going into this whole experience is curiosity. I'm curious to see how the Mexican fans react — will they show up in huge numbers and bring the enthusiasm we see at Formula One races? — and how the Mexican media covers it. I'm curious to see what NASCAR drivers think of the city and the racetrack and whether they would like to return. I'm curious to see what the team members, many of whom seem somewhat skeptical about foreign travel, take away from the event. And how will the racing be? So while I'm excited, I'm also just interested in the unknowns. Jordan: Should be an electric, festive atmosphere with an environment that hopefully elevates the race to the point that people watching at home get the sense of just how big a deal this race is. Because NASCAR adding Mexico City to the schedule is a big deal. This is the first time since 1958 that NASCAR's premier series has raced outside the continental United States, and having an international points race is something NASCAR and many of its teams have sought to accomplish for some time. So the fact that they were able to pull it off is commendable. Jeff shared some insights this week into how drivers and teams are preparing for the altitude in Mexico City. Which teams do you think stand to gain the most advantage from this change? Who adapts best? Does it help even the playing field or exacerbate disparities? Jeff: I personally think the altitude thing is overblown in terms of the athletes. As a Denver resident who lives at 5,280 feet, I don't think 7,300 feet will be much of a shock to these drivers' bodies. Sure, they might get out of breath a little bit quicker. But it's not like they're climbing Everest here. That said, I don't fault anyone (like the Toyota drivers) who are preparing as much as they can; why not, right? Better safe than sorry. I think the bigger issue is the engines running hotter and generating less horsepower, which the engine builders and tuners will have to figure out. But it's hard to tell who could benefit. Advertisement Jordan: When you look back at the four-year stretch when the Xfinity Series raced at Mexico City (2005-08), the altitude didn't seem to have much effect on either the drivers or the cars' performance. And with nearly every driver in good shape, the expectation is that they should be able to adapt to conditions that will be unlike any they face throughout the season. Whether this also applies to the cars' performance or not, we'll see. One issue to be mindful of is the concern many teams have regarding overheating the engine, as the high altitude can put a strain on this, especially during caution laps when engine temperatures tend to rise more due to reduced air circulation brought on by the slower laps. If there are a number of cautions on Sunday, don't be surprised if some teams begin to fight mechanical gremlins. I love a sports crossover moment, so I really enjoyed reading your account of Chase Briscoe drawing inspiration from the Indiana Pacers' clutch play in the NBA playoffs. What is the outlook for Briscoe over the next several races? With his three consecutive starts in pole position, what's not connecting for Briscoe in his races? Do any other drivers strike you as a Pacers' comp in terms of surprising us with a second-half surge? Jeff: It's clear Briscoe has speed, but the team doesn't seem to be able to keep up with the track during the race, and they have faded (or had bad things happen). But it was only a month ago that Briscoe said he was finally getting the feel of the Joe Gibbs Racing cars after joining the team in the offseason; he still has time to put it all together and win a race before the playoffs (thus eliminating the points-bubble talk). In terms of other drivers who could be a 'We should have never counted this person out!' Pacers-like performer? I'll go with Brad Keselowski. He's had a horrible start to the year, but has shown enough flashes of speed lately that you could see him jumping up and salvaging the season with a victory before the playoffs. Jordan: Briscoe has had a good start to his first season with Joe Gibbs Racing. He's won a series-best four poles, his six top-five finishes rank sixth best, and he is 21 points above the cut line to make the playoffs. But the one thing Briscoe has yet to do is win, and this, ultimately, is likely going to define whether his first season with Joe Gibbs Racing is deemed successful. His team has had speed most weeks, especially on intermediate-sized tracks, and now they have to convert this speed into consistent top-end results. Who is your favorite to win this week? Jeff: This is going to be tough as we sit here before seeing any practice, as this is NASCAR's inaugural visit to the track. In addition, the Xfinity Series race here in the mid-2000s (the last of which was won by Kyle Busch) had a different layout. But without the ability to see who unloads fastest and gets up to speed quickly, I'll jump on board with Tyler Reddick. Yes, it's tempting to pick Shane van Gisbergen — but he's a fairly significant favorite, and sometimes that can be a trap. Reddick has won four career road course poles, including the inaugural NASCAR race at the other shared F1 track, Circuit of the Americas (COTA) in Austin. He has never finished outside the top 10 when he wins a road-course pole. If you look at his team as a whole, including the pit crew, it is stronger than SVG's. Maybe I'm talking myself into it just to pick someone other than SVG, but Reddick is a good choice. Jordan: This is actually a more wide-open race than many think, and a good case could be made for any number of drivers. Denny Hamlin would have been near the top of the list, but won't race due to the birth of his son. Reddick is certainly up there, and so too are Chase Elliott, Kyle Larson, Chris Buescher, Kyle Busch and Christopher Bell. But this is also a great opportunity for the likes of van Gisbergen and AJ Allmendinger, two drivers who excel on road courses and likely need a win to make the playoffs. So, forced to go with a pick, let's go with van Gisbergen. He should have little issue getting up to speed, and his team knows they need to win and that points are rather meaningless, which allows them to set up their strategy accordingly. All the unknowns favor a driver who won the last time NASCAR visited a track so different than what NASCAR typically races on (the Chicago street course). Advertisement Who is a long shot you like? Jeff: Looking at the odds list, the lowest I'd go is Briscoe at +4000. He's a good road racer and will have a fast car, so he should be higher than that. Austin Cindric has the same odds and is another solid pick on road courses, but he had a very disappointing outing at COTA earlier this season, which gives me pause. But there are plenty of excellent road racers with so-so odds who could win: Michael McDowell at +2500, Ty Gibbs at +3000. Heck, Alex Bowman is +3000 and won the Chicago street course race last year. Jordan: Austin Cindric at +3500 is enticing, considering the Team Penske driver comes from a road-course background and should be among the contenders on Sunday. Don't overlook Bowman, who may be in a slump but did surprise everyone by winning at Chicago last year. And Kyle Busch at +1400 has good value considering he nearly won at COTA earlier this year. Betting/odds links in this article are provided by partners of The Athletic. Restrictions may apply. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication. (Photo of Daniel Suarez: James Gilbert / Getty Images)
San Francisco Chronicle
4 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Casey Schmitt's 1st career grand slam powers Giants past Dodgers 6-2 in series opener
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Logan Webb tossed seven innings of two-hit ball, Casey Schmitt hit his first career grand slam off Yoshinobu Yamamoto and the San Francisco Giants defeated the Los Angeles Dodgers 6-2 on Friday night in the series opener between the NL West's top two teams. Webb (6-5) allowed two runs, struck out four and walked three for his first win since May 16 against the Athletics. He twice struck out Shohei Ohtani, who was hitless in four at-bats. Schmitt's grand slam traveled 423 feet to left-center with two outs in the third, snapping a 1-1 tie. Yamamoto sandwiched walks to Jung Hoo Lee and Heliot Ramos around two strikeouts before walking Wilmer Flores to load the bases and set up Schmitt. Willy Adames homered for the Giants in the first. In the second, Webb walked Freddie Freeman and Will Smith back-to-back to open the inning before Max Muncy's fielder's choice grounder to first and Andy Pages' sacrifice fly scored Smith. The Dodgers added another run on Teoscar Hernández's homer off Webb in the seventh. The teams are meeting for the first time this season, and it's the latest they've gone in a season without playing each other since 1999. The Dodgers were 9-4 against the Giants last year, including 6-1 at home. Key moment Giants catcher Andrew Knizer had his first hit and first homer of the season off Justin Wrobleski in the eighth. The ball went off the wall in center. Key stat The Giants rapped out 10 hits, including three by Dominic Smith. Up next ___
San Francisco Chronicle
4 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Agustín Ramírez homers twice to power Marlins past Nationals 11-9
WASHINGTON (AP) — Rookie Agustín Ramírez hit two home runs and Eric Wagaman had three RBIs to help the Miami Marlins hand the Washington Nationals their sixth straight loss, 11-9 on Friday night in a game that included a rain delay of more than two hours. Ramírez hit a solo shot off Nationals starter Mitchell Parker (4-7) in the first for a 1-0 lead and then hit his 10th of the season leading off a four-run third as Miami took a 6-0 lead. It was Ramírez's second multihomer game after hitting two solo shots in a 7-6 loss to Seattle on April 27. Wagaman had an RBI double and Dane Myers added a two-run double as Miami built the six-run advantage. CJ Abrams reached on an infield hit and James Wood followed with his 17th homer to get the Nationals within 6-2 after three. Fortes and Xavier Edwards had RBI singles in the fifth following a delay of 2 hours, 14 minutes for an 8-2 lead. Wood hit a two-run double and Nathaniel Lowe, Alex Call and Keibert Ruiz followed with RBI singles as Washington scored five times in the seventh to pull within 8-7. Miami answered with Wagaman's two-run single and Connor Norby's RBI groundout in the eighth. Parker allowed six runs and eight hits in 3 1/3 innings. Jackson Rutledge got the final two outs in the fourth before the second delay and then allowed two runs. Jose A. Ferrer was tagged for three runs on four hits in an inning. Miami has won three of four against Washington this season. Up next Miami had not announced who will start Saturday's game opposite Washington RHP Trevor Williams (3-7, 5.91). ___
