logo
Can Pakistan use highly advanced F-16 against India? If it does than US will...

Can Pakistan use highly advanced F-16 against India? If it does than US will...

India.com09-05-2025

India Pakistan war: With the commencement of Operation Sindoor by the Indian Armed Forces in response to the Pahalgam terrorist attacks, India has destroyed almost the entire terror infrastructure across the Line of Control (LoC) and the International Border. Pakistan retaliated by shelling across the LoC killing many civilians and injuring many. Pakistan also used drones and missiles across Jammu, Punjab, Rajasthan and Gujarat but they were intercepted by India.
Reports also suggest that two of Pakistan's highly celebrated JF-17 jets were shot down by India adding that Islamabad may have deployed its American F-16 fighter jets.
This begs the question: Can Pakistan use America supplied F-16 fighter jets against India?
The entire fleet of Pakistan's F-16s has come from the United States, which has placed strict conditions on how these aircraft can be used. These fighter jets were sold under the US Foreign Military Sales (FMS) programme. Every such sale comes with an End-Use Monitoring (EUM) agreement, meaning Pakistan cannot freely use or modify the jets without approval, reports WION.
There are also embedded US teams on the ground in Pakistan, part of programmes like Golden Sentry and Blue Lantern, whose job is to ensure American technology is not misused. These teams monitor the deployment of jets and weapons around the clock, says the report further.
Hence, as per the arrangements between the USA and Pakistan, the latter is prohibited from using F-16s in conventional warfare unless approved by the US administration. Moreover, these F-16s have been given to Pakistan on the condition that they will be used only in counterterrorism missions and not in direct state-to-state conflict.
Hence, it is to be understood that these fighter jets are not meant to be used against India in war-like situations.
To recall, US officials had accused Pakistan of breaking its F-16 agreement following the 2019 Balakot air strikes when Pakistan attacked a few sites inside India using these aircraft.
If Pakistan does not adhere to the agreement rules and misuses the F-16s again, America reserves the right to cut off support or suspend agreements.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Donland deal: How Pakistan got Trump's attention again
The Donland deal: How Pakistan got Trump's attention again

Economic Times

time20 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

The Donland deal: How Pakistan got Trump's attention again

ET Online Pakistan has entered Donald Trump's mind and occupied some head space by doing what it does best - please, pamper and satisfy all needs of the moment, be it delivering terrorists or minerals. Like it or not, Pakistan is in the room, if not at the table, even as Trump and Modi will bump into each other at the ongoing G7 Summit at Kananaskis, Canada. It anticipated contours of Trump's second coming better, adjusted its posture, made the right offers and made them early. The effort is bolstered by more than 10 different lobbying firms working the system, including one headed by Trump's former bodyguard Keith Schiller.A unique quirk: Trump seems to like generals in uniform. Be sure he's thinking of army chief Asim Munir and not Shehbaz Sharif when he talks of Pakistan's 'great leaders' in his frequent remembrances of the India-Pak ceasefire he 'crafted'. A detail: contrary to reports in the hyper media, Munir was not invited to attend the parade to celebrate 250 years of the US army. India is struggling to adjust to a presidency that is less institutional, less structured and less focused. It's about getting the Kremlinology right, the sophisticated art of reading cryptic and crypto signals, and flying close to the sons (even Barron Trump). Outrage - however satisfying - will not help get over the Trump hump. Nor would cancelling defence orders in a fit of pique and losing the long game. Better to use the relationship to build capacity. It's good to remember that US-Pak relations were factored in when India decided to strengthen relations with Washington back in the day and negotiate the nuclear deal. They have remained a reality even though New Delhi thought it had put Pakistan in the diplomatic isolation ward. It kept bouncing back with American and British help and a permanent cadre of sympathetic bureaucrats, including retired ambassadors, in both capitals. Official India learnt to deal with the pain even if IT cell warriors and rabid TV anchors didn' says an analyst, the question remains the same: 'Does India want to - or will it - give Pakistan a veto on US- India ties?' The answer from New Delhi so far seems to be 'no' even as anger rises and political pain grows. Pakistan will do anything to please Trump and Sons. India will Pakistan's play. Over the past few years, with the Afghanistan war over and US interest waning, the army-ISI combine realised that Pakistan was no longer a frontline state. Joe Biden paid little attention and never dialled Islamabad. As American focus moved to the Indo-Pacific and rivalry with China, Pakistan knew it wasn't going to be part of the Quad, although it made some half-hearted elite understood they couldn't vie with India. But they were 'happy just to be heard and not be considered irrelevant'. The militablishment went back to the original drawing board - counterterrorism cooperation - to keep parts of the US government engaged. The easiest doors to open were at the State Department and was dismissive of Pakistan. But note that his administration approved $450 mn to 'sustain' Pakistan's F-16 fleet, including engine hardware upgrades and classified software support. The package was said to be for counterterrorism operations. In a replay, Trump approved $397 mn in February for the same fleet, despite announcing a wide freeze on foreign aid. He made an the background, Rawalpindi slowly took control of Pakistan's China policy from the politicians and worked to dispel the notion the country was (completely) in Beijing's camp. Americans wanted to believe the myth for their own reasons. For the Pakistan army, maintaining ties to America, enjoying the free military training and keeping tabs on Pentagon's thinking have always been priorities. To say nothing of serving as an important window for China in to the point, Pakistani generals never let US Centcom lose sight of the fact that their country was/is always available as a strategic staging area for US operations. Which brings us to the present. Munir and Centcom commander Michael Kurilla go back a long way. Both assumed their current positions in 2022 and have hosted each other more than shouldn't be a surprise that last week, the American general called Pakistan 'a phenomenal partner' in the fight against IS-Khorasan. Kurilla clearly thinks the military partnership with Pakistan can, and should, exist separately from the one with was the first person Munir called to say that the Abbey Gate bomber Mohammad Sharifullah, a.k.a. Jaffar, had been caught. He then requested that the message be passed on to the president. Result: a special mention in Trump's address to so it will go. Until it won't. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. How a nudge from Cyrus Mistry helped TCS unlock a USD1 billion opportunity Operation Sindoor, Turkey, Bangladesh played out as India hosted global airlines after 42 years Benchmarked with BSE 1000, this index fund will diversify your bets. But at a cost. How individual bankruptcy law can halt suicides by failed businessmen Explainer: The RBI's LAF corridor and its role in rate transmission Stock picks of the week: 5 stocks with consistent score improvement and return potential of more than 32% in 1 year Defence stocks: Black & white, and many shades of grey. 10 stocks with an upside potential of up to 30% Stock Radar: 40% drop from highs! Swiggy stocks make a rounding bottom pattern; time to buy the dip?

PM reaches Cyprus; President Nikos Christodoulides receives Modi at airport
PM reaches Cyprus; President Nikos Christodoulides receives Modi at airport

Time of India

time20 minutes ago

  • Time of India

PM reaches Cyprus; President Nikos Christodoulides receives Modi at airport

Prime Minister Modi's visit to Cyprus, the first in over two decades, aims to strengthen strategic ties, leveraging Cyprus's location and stance against Turkish expansionism. Discussions focused on Cyprus's role in the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor and energy diversification. Both nations share similar views on international issues and support a UN-backed resolution for the Cyprus issue. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads On his maiden trip abroad since Operation Sindoor , Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Sunday sought to expand India's strategic ties with Cyprus, taking advantage of its location in the Mediterranean region and its principled position on Turkish a significant gesture, Cyprus President Nikos Christodoulides received Modi at the airport. This is the first visit to Cyprus by an Indian PM in over two the President hosted the PM for the dinner, Modi engaged with business leaders eager to deepen partnership. Cyprus's maritime connectivity and strategic location position it as a potential hub in the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor . Cyprus is a key player in Eastern Mediterranean natural gas exploration and can assist India in diversifying its energy sources. Cyprus' strong ties with Israel, Greece and Egypt could also lead to cooperation in the region. Cyprus will also hold the rotating presidency of the EU Council in whose northern part has been under Turkish occupation since 1974, has been among India's steadfast supporters on the Kashmir issue . Both countries support similar positions on major regional and international issues and have collaborated constructively in the UN, Commonwealth and other has consistently endorsed the solution of the Cyprus issue based on UNSC resolutions, international law and the EU acquis. India supports a bi-zonal bi-communal federation based on UN Resolutions as a solution to the Cyprus problem.

Iran Israel Airstrikes: Will US join war? Here's what Trump said and who can mediate to resolve conflict
Iran Israel Airstrikes: Will US join war? Here's what Trump said and who can mediate to resolve conflict

Economic Times

time21 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Iran Israel Airstrikes: Will US join war? Here's what Trump said and who can mediate to resolve conflict

Donald Trump said the US was not behind Israel's recent strike on Iran but warned of a strong military response if Iran targets American assets. Trump expressed interest in peace talks, mentioned Putin as a possible mediator, and referenced past success in global negotiations to urge for a resolution. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US Denies Role in Latest Strike Mediation by Russia Iran Retaliates Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Iran Requests US Condemnation Israel Warns Iranian Civilians Past Negotiations Car Bombs Explosion FAQs US President Donald Trump addressed the conflict between Israel and Iran in a recent interview with Rachel Scott of ABC News. He said the US did not take part in Israel's military strike on Iran but "it's possible we could get involved." However, he warned that any attack on US forces by Iran would result in a severe response. Trump also mentioned potential diplomatic efforts to resolve the ongoing Trump stated the US had no involvement in Israel's attack on Iran. The attack took place overnight. Trump made this statement on Truth Social. He warned that if Iran targets the US in any way, the American military would respond with full an interview with ABC News, Trump said Russian President Vladimir Putin offered to mediate the conflict. Trump said he was open to that idea. The conversation between Trump and Putin occurred over a phone launched missile attacks following Israel's operation named 'Rising Lion.' Reports say at least 10 people died, including two children. Over 200 people were injured. One strike in Bat Yam killed at least six Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi asked the US to condemn Israel's attacks on Iranian nuclear sites . He said Iran does not want to escalate the war. He claimed the strikes were acts of warned residents living near nuclear facilities to evacuate. An Israeli spokesperson said that staying near such sites could be dangerous. The message was shared through social media mentioned past negotiations that involved Iran. Talks broke down in early June. He said Iran and Israel can still reach an agreement. He compared this situation to past efforts involving India and Sunday, car bombs exploded near government buildings in Tehran. Iran blamed Israel for the attack. He emphasized the goal is to remove threats, not destroy Donald Trump said the US did not take part in the recent Israeli strike on Trump said peace is possible and suggested Russia could help mediate the talks.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store