
Schoolbook rep at publisher was informed of redundancy when wife read him email while he was in sick bed, WRC told
That meant the end of over a decade's service for its longstanding rep in the region, James Higgins, whose complaint under the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 against MH Gill & Co ULC was heard earlier this week at the
Workplace Relations Commission
(WRC).
Mr Higgins was Gill's sales rep for Sligo, Mayo, Roscommon, Leitrim, Donegal, Cavan and Monaghan from March 2014 until June last year. The publisher said it was it was necessary to make him and another sales rep redundant after the company started incurring losses.
The tribunal heard the company now markets books in Donegal, Sligo and Leitrim with a mix of telesales and roadshows and has no dedicated sales rep there.
READ MORE
Gill's chief executive Margaret Burns said on Monday that profits at the publisher 'declined sharply' between 2021 and 2023 – going from €1.4 million in profit to a loss of 'nearly €300,000'.
She said the plan had been to notify Mr Higgins and the other sales rep whose position was being extinguished 'simultaneously' and that she and Gill's sales director Colm Hyland intended to drive to Sligo to deliver the news to Mr Higgins on Tuesday, June 25th last year.
The tribunal heard Mr Higgins was expecting to have his annual review that Wednesday and go on annual leave until the start of the next school term that Friday.
Mr Higgins told the WRC he had just tested positive for Covid-19, and told his bosses he was too sick to meet them at a hotel in Sligo as planned, or to dial into a videocall on the Tuesday.
He said he was still 'very sick' the following morning and 'couldn't even talk'.
'I asked my wife to call Mr Hyland. She tried multiple times… Mr Hyland duly proceeded to text my wife, saying I had an important email, which started a chain of events that led to her reading an email to me in my sick bed to the effect that I was being made redundant,' Mr Higgins said.
He said he was 'devastated' by this turn of events, as he had gone from having 'no fear for my position whatsoever to my wife reading my dismissal to me'.
Cross-examining the CEO, Cillian McGovern BL, appearing for the complainant instructed by Dan Quinlan of Crushell & Co Solicitors, put it to her that his client was 'shocked' to get the news in the way he did.
Ms Burns accepted this and said: 'It really wasn't the way we would have liked to have done it.'
'Do you accept it was fair?' he asked.
Ms Burns said: 'In fairness, the email was sent as well because out of the reps, somebody else was involved in the redundancies and we wanted to let everyone know the situation for their own peace of mind.'
Mr Hyland said in his evidence that the decision to make Mr Higgins and the other sales rep redundant was taken 'probably mid-June' by the company, but he was unable to give the exact date.
Mr McGovern put it to the witness that he had only emailed his client with notice of the new Tuesday meeting at 4.20pm the afternoon before and that the agenda had only referred to 'realignment of the northwest territory' and a 'sales focus change'. He admitted that it did not refer to redundancy.
'You said you were aware of your duties pursuant to the Redundancy Payments Act, so how come you haven't told him that redundancy is on the agenda?' counsel asked.
'I can't remember at the time… we felt we wanted to talk to him face-to-face, to put that in an email would have been very blunt,' Mr Hyland said.
'Well, you did that the following morning,' Mr McGovern said.
'We had to,' Mr Hyland replied.
'Do you accept it looks a bit like an ambush?' Mr McGovern asked.
'No,' Mr Hyland said.
Mr Higgins said there was €160 million 'working its way back to publishers' under the State's school book programme and questioned how Gill could 'make claims they couldn't afford to give the same level of service' to the schools he covered in the northwest.
Mr Higgins said the school book trade was 'not a hard sell type business' but 'about trust', and that being the publisher's rep was to become 'nearly like a public-facing figure' and 'part of your identity'.
'The swiftness of the way I was cut had huge implications,' he said. 'I was cut off from all communications on 25 June. I'm still working in the education sector for a food supplier. I had sales in the pipeline that needed to be finalised; I had people looking for samples,' Mr Higgins said.
He said he knew 'hundreds, if not thousands' of teachers, whom he would encounter in public, and said he had experienced 'sarcastic' and 'snide' remarks referencing his job loss.
'The damage is palpable and very real,' he said.
Brian Curtin, a senior manager who presented the case for Gill, said: 'We try to act in good faith in running a redundancy process, but we were in a situation where the company was losing money.'
'It was quite a difficult position for all involved. Our view is we made a reasonable redundancy settlement. It wasn't an unfair dismissal. it was based on genuine financial commercial decisions,' he said.
Adjudication officer Patricia Owens closed the hearing on Monday, and will give her decision in writing at a later stage.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
11 hours ago
- RTÉ News
WRC awards €50,000 to new mum denied part-time hours after having baby
A security firm which refused to let a new mother come back to work on part-time hours after having her first baby has been ordered to pay her €50,000 in compensation for discrimination. The ruling came after a manager for the company, Net Smart Security Ltd, told an equality hearing it had "no employees working part-time" - but accepted under cross-examination that two daughters of the CEO did part-time hours there. In a decision published today, the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) upheld a complaint of unlawful discrimination on the grounds of gender and family status against Net Smart Security on foot of a complaint under the Employment Equality Act 1998 by Lisa McGrath. Ms McGrath, an accounts administrator with the firm since August 2022 earning a base salary of €24,000 a year plus a bonus, took maternity leave in January 2024, followed by parental leave up to mid-September that year, when she asked to go back to work part-time. Ms McGrath gave evidence she had to tell the company's account's manager Elaine Barton she was pregnant when Ms Barton initially refused to release her from work an hour early for a doctor's appointment. Ms Barton "displayed a shocked reaction" and proceeded to make "comments about [the complainant] still living at home", the complainant said in evidence. She said that from that point onward there was a "major change" in her relationship with Ms Barton, who was her line manager, and that she received "sarcastic comments" and felt "belittled". Her evidence was that she was marked absent on days she had appointments at the Coombe maternity hospital, with a knock-on deduction being made to her bonus pay. She said under cross-examination that she was aware another pregnant employee had been paid for her ante-natal appointments. When her parental leave expired last September, she said she arranged to meet Ms Barton to discuss part-time work, and said she "could do mornings" but was "open to any other arrangements". Ms McGrath said her manager's response was to state she had been anticipating the request and to remark: "Everyone has kids". Giving evidence, Ms Barton said Ms McGrath was "treated in the same manner as when she started working" after her pregnancy. She said she was "sympathetic" towards Ms McGrath when they met on 12 September last year and that it was not in her character to belittle anyone. However, she said she had told the claimant that part-time work "could only be considered on medical grounds", and that she would have to "push" for it with the CEO. Her evidence was that "part-time was never done in the office" because the company had "a large customer base" and "part-time work would not work in the finance or sales office". Under cross-examination from the complainant's solicitor, Setanta Landers, Ms Barton confirmed that the CEO Derek Ramsay was her brother. When counsel put it to her that she would be "perceived to carry weight in relation to the business", Ms Barton said she did not. An accounts supervisor, Shauna Kavanagh, also gave evidence that there were "no employees working part-time". Mr Landers asked her about two named female employees who worked in the office occasionally. Ms Kavanagh said they were the CEO's daughters and confirmed, upon being questioned further, that they worked on a part-time basis. Anna Rosa Raso, from human resources firm ESA Consultants, appearing for the employer, said Ms McGrath's complaints were denied by the firm. The complainant's request to come back part-time "was considered and lawfully declined on operational grounds". Adjudication officer John Harraghy wrote the company witnesses displayed a "lack of knowledge in relation to the protection afforded to pregnant employees". There was "no credible explanation" for the lack of a risk assessment, paid leave for maternity appointments and for "meaningful and tangible efforts" at reasonable accommodation for Ms McGrath, he wrote. "It is also a fact that the respondent denied that there was any part-time work given to any employee. However, relatives of the CEO were afforded this opportunity and it was not even considered for the complainant," Mr Harraghy added. He wrote that the employer had been "unable to justify why a part-time employee would not be of assistance" in Ms McGrath's former job, given she had not been replaced at the time of the hearing in July. Mr Harraghy ruled that Ms McGrath was discriminated against on the grounds of gender and family status, and awarded her €50,000 in compensation. He awarded the sum - just short of the maximum jurisdiction allowed of double Ms McGrath's annual earnings of €26,000 - in part "to ensure there is a dissuasive effect with regard to the employer".


Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Schoolbook rep at publisher was informed of redundancy when wife read him email while he was in sick bed, WRC told
Bosses under pressure to cut costs at schoolbook publisher Gill decided last year that the 'sparse' population of Donegal, Leitrim and Sligo, meant it wasn't worth having a dedicated salesman there, a tribunal has heard. That meant the end of over a decade's service for its longstanding rep in the region, James Higgins, whose complaint under the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 against MH Gill & Co ULC was heard earlier this week at the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC). Mr Higgins was Gill's sales rep for Sligo, Mayo, Roscommon, Leitrim, Donegal, Cavan and Monaghan from March 2014 until June last year. The publisher said it was it was necessary to make him and another sales rep redundant after the company started incurring losses. The tribunal heard the company now markets books in Donegal, Sligo and Leitrim with a mix of telesales and roadshows and has no dedicated sales rep there. READ MORE Gill's chief executive Margaret Burns said on Monday that profits at the publisher 'declined sharply' between 2021 and 2023 – going from €1.4 million in profit to a loss of 'nearly €300,000'. She said the plan had been to notify Mr Higgins and the other sales rep whose position was being extinguished 'simultaneously' and that she and Gill's sales director Colm Hyland intended to drive to Sligo to deliver the news to Mr Higgins on Tuesday, June 25th last year. The tribunal heard Mr Higgins was expecting to have his annual review that Wednesday and go on annual leave until the start of the next school term that Friday. Mr Higgins told the WRC he had just tested positive for Covid-19, and told his bosses he was too sick to meet them at a hotel in Sligo as planned, or to dial into a videocall on the Tuesday. He said he was still 'very sick' the following morning and 'couldn't even talk'. 'I asked my wife to call Mr Hyland. She tried multiple times… Mr Hyland duly proceeded to text my wife, saying I had an important email, which started a chain of events that led to her reading an email to me in my sick bed to the effect that I was being made redundant,' Mr Higgins said. He said he was 'devastated' by this turn of events, as he had gone from having 'no fear for my position whatsoever to my wife reading my dismissal to me'. Cross-examining the CEO, Cillian McGovern BL, appearing for the complainant instructed by Dan Quinlan of Crushell & Co Solicitors, put it to her that his client was 'shocked' to get the news in the way he did. Ms Burns accepted this and said: 'It really wasn't the way we would have liked to have done it.' 'Do you accept it was fair?' he asked. Ms Burns said: 'In fairness, the email was sent as well because out of the reps, somebody else was involved in the redundancies and we wanted to let everyone know the situation for their own peace of mind.' Mr Hyland said in his evidence that the decision to make Mr Higgins and the other sales rep redundant was taken 'probably mid-June' by the company, but he was unable to give the exact date. Mr McGovern put it to the witness that he had only emailed his client with notice of the new Tuesday meeting at 4.20pm the afternoon before and that the agenda had only referred to 'realignment of the northwest territory' and a 'sales focus change'. He admitted that it did not refer to redundancy. 'You said you were aware of your duties pursuant to the Redundancy Payments Act, so how come you haven't told him that redundancy is on the agenda?' counsel asked. 'I can't remember at the time… we felt we wanted to talk to him face-to-face, to put that in an email would have been very blunt,' Mr Hyland said. 'Well, you did that the following morning,' Mr McGovern said. 'We had to,' Mr Hyland replied. 'Do you accept it looks a bit like an ambush?' Mr McGovern asked. 'No,' Mr Hyland said. Mr Higgins said there was €160 million 'working its way back to publishers' under the State's school book programme and questioned how Gill could 'make claims they couldn't afford to give the same level of service' to the schools he covered in the northwest. Mr Higgins said the school book trade was 'not a hard sell type business' but 'about trust', and that being the publisher's rep was to become 'nearly like a public-facing figure' and 'part of your identity'. 'The swiftness of the way I was cut had huge implications,' he said. 'I was cut off from all communications on 25 June. I'm still working in the education sector for a food supplier. I had sales in the pipeline that needed to be finalised; I had people looking for samples,' Mr Higgins said. He said he knew 'hundreds, if not thousands' of teachers, whom he would encounter in public, and said he had experienced 'sarcastic' and 'snide' remarks referencing his job loss. 'The damage is palpable and very real,' he said. Brian Curtin, a senior manager who presented the case for Gill, said: 'We try to act in good faith in running a redundancy process, but we were in a situation where the company was losing money.' 'It was quite a difficult position for all involved. Our view is we made a reasonable redundancy settlement. It wasn't an unfair dismissal. it was based on genuine financial commercial decisions,' he said. Adjudication officer Patricia Owens closed the hearing on Monday, and will give her decision in writing at a later stage.


RTÉ News
3 days ago
- RTÉ News
How do older employees view age discrimination in the workplace?
Analysis: A new report has found that one in 12 employers openly admitted to discriminating against potential employees because of age By Sophie Butler and Trudy Corrigan, DCU What does ageism in the workplace look like? It can be hiring bias, stereotyping, early layoffs, forced retirement, microaggressions or exclusion. Sometimes it's loud and visible; other times it's subtle and silent. Unlike many other forms of workplace discrimination, ageism often remains invisible and undiscussed, yet it profoundly affects the lives, careers, and mental well-being of those who experience it. While younger workers can experience ageism, research shows it is more commonly reported by older employees. Ireland's population is living longer and healthier lives than ever before, thanks to advances in healthcare, early diagnosis, and better nutrition. But an ageing population means we must challenge outdated stereotypes and re-imagine what positive ageing looks like in the workplace, in the media, and across society. In 2017, the Workplace Relations Commission issued a Code of Practice on Longer Working, recognising the growing number of older workers who wish to remain in employment beyond the traditional retirement age of 65. "The proportion of older workers, and, in particular, workers who want to continue in employment beyond what would have been regarded as the traditional retirement age, is forecast to grow significantly in the future. "This shift demands that employers and society create workplaces that support employees of all ages, foster lifelong learning, upskilling, and flexible working options; recognise the value of experience, mentorship, and stability that older workers bring; a healthy ageing workforce is not only beneficial for individuals; it's vital for our economic resilience and social cohesion." A recent report from the Say No to Age Discrimination in the Workplace project found that one in 12 employers openly admitted to discriminating against potential employees because of their age, particularly older individuals. 76% of respondents believe that the media plays a crucial role in the perpetuation of stereotypes associated with older people. This points to how the media can influence the perception of the public (not only on this topic) and should serve as a way to contribute to decreasing the stereotype. From RTÉ Radio 1's Today with Claire Byrne, how Age Friendly Ireland hopes to combat ageism The highest percentage of employees and employers found that companies and organisations do not have clear policies to address ageism. Where they have these policies, they are not always known to employees or are effective in their design and implementation. This is in particular to ensure that organisations value age diversity in the workplace. Where ageism is considered to be predominant, is in the recruitment of staff over 50 years of age and in promotions of older staff, relevant to some workplaces. Almost 87% of respondents believe that stereotypes associated with age exist. One respondent noted that "ageism is very active." When asked about perceptions of older workers, 58% agreed or strongly agreed that older workers are often underestimated in terms of their abilities, while 50% disagreed or strongly disagreed. This indicates a near parity of opinion on this issue. From RTÉ Radio 1's Liveline, listeners Teresa and Martin both feel they are victims of ageism in Ireland Additionally, 50% of respondents either disagreed or strongly disagreed that older workers are less adaptable to new technologies, while 22% were undecided. Notably, 88% either disagreed or strongly disagreed that older workers are less productive than younger workers, representing the strongest consensus that older workers are just as productive as their younger counterparts. In an era saturated with "age-reducing" products and procedures, real change requires reshaping attitudes, not appearances. Re-imagining ageing is about empowerment, dignity, and inclusion — building a society where all individuals, regardless of age, are valued and have opportunities to thrive. Positive ageing means: Seeing ageing as a time of opportunity, not limitation. Representing older adults in the media as active, diverse, and vibrant. Creating closer intergenerational contact to break down age barriers. Encouraging younger people to see ageing not with fear, but with optimism. Creating opportunities in the workplace where younger and older people can share their tacit knowledge and lived experiences to shape a better future together. Today's conversations around ageing and ageism must move beyond anti-ageing marketing and outdated stereotypes. We must reframe ageing as a phase of possibility, contribution and growth, rather than decline.