Textile industry for adopting proposals
Pakistan Hosiery Manufacturers and Exporters Association (PHMA) and Pakistan Readymade Garments Manufacturers and Exporters Association (PRGMEA) have jointly urged the government to consider and implement the textile industry's key budget proposals through the Federal Board of Revenue's (FBR) budget anomaly committee.
The demand came during a post-budget meeting of both associations, which was attended by PHMA Chairman Abdul Hameed, former PHMA chairmen Naseer Butt and Shehzad Azam Khan, PRGMEA Chairman Dr Ayyazuddin and former PRGMEA chairmen Ijaz Khokhar and Sohail Afzal Sheikh.
Meeting participants stressed that the government must not only examine industry recommendations through the anomaly committee but also implement the committee's final report once compiled.
PHMA Chairman Abdul Hameed pointed out that Pakistan's value-added textile, apparel, bed wear, home textile and towel sectors contribute over $11 billion in annual exports and provide livelihoods to millions. He expressed concern over the replacement of the simplified Final Tax Regime (FTR) with the more complex Normal Tax Regime (NTR), which now subjects exporters to both 1% minimum tax and 1% advance tax on export proceeds, regardless of the actual profit.
Former PHMA chairman Naseer Butt, while speaking at the meeting, said that dual taxation was counterproductive for an already distressed export sector. He warned that many small and medium enterprises (SMEs) were operating on thin margins and may be forced to close down if the policy was not reversed immediately.
Shehzad Azam Khan, also a former PHMA chairman, highlighted the issues of refund delays, rising production costs and inflation. He stressed that exporters were burdened with more taxes than their earnings and demanded that the government urgently facilitate timely refunds and ensure stable energy pricing.
PRGMEA Chairman Dr Ayyazuddin, in his remarks, raised concerns over changes to the Export Facilitation Scheme (EFS), particularly the removal of zero-rating on local purchases and the imposition of sales tax on imported cotton yarn. He emphasised that these changes undermine the very objective of the EFS, which was introduced to reduce liquidity pressure and digitise export procedures.
Ex-PRGMEA chairman Ijaz Khokhar said that Pakistan's regional competitors like Bangladesh and Vietnam provide tax-free access to raw material for exporters, giving them an edge in international markets. He called for restoring the original EFS framework under SRO 957(I)/2021.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Public choice at work? The end of EFS?
SRO 1395(I)2025 is not the end of the EFS. It is certainly the end of the beginning of the end of the EFS. SRO 1395(I)25, July 29, 2025, excludes 'Raw cotton, yarns, and fabrics' from the purview of the EFS. Imported cottons, yarns, and fabrics will now be at par with local produce and attract a 'refundable' 18 percent GST. The Public Choice Theory provides a framework about how private, material, bureaucratic and even ideological interests, of bureaucrats, politicians etc., work their way into full-blown public policies resulting in stunting and killing public goods and policies-like the inevitable demise of the EFS. EFS, July 2021 was launched, recognizing that the domestic fiscal constraints must not burden exporters as they compete internationally with competitors with no such baggage. The EFS intended to immunize exporters from the chronically 'kadak', cash-deficient FBR's penchant for meeting its revenue requirements by illegally denying refunds to EFS registered exporters. EFS meant no pay-ins, no refunds. Exporters and few in Islamabad were happy. However, many in Islamabad had different thoughts. FBR, like all, would like to retain control over the refund pipeline. EFS had blown that 'Nordstream 2' of coveted refunds which FBR would tap during lean days when these funds could buy the Republic a day or more. Via denial and delay of refunds, FBR perhaps got away, when needed, by passing off the cash thus withheld as 'revenues' to the 'gullible' multilateral overlords who often took it with a soup ladle. The good FBR was thus doing a sacred work. There is, however, reportedly another cohort who had seen slammed shut doors and tunnels to the cavernous corrupt bowels of the 'refund industry', i.e., the bad FBR. Oddly such officers doing a sacred work saving the Republic are no different from accountants in 'kadak' corporates who routinely stretch payables to meet 'priority' financial commitments. There is, perhaps, no daylight between 'kadak' cadres in public and private worlds. Kudos, however, and now commiserations, to the Ministry of Commerce and the few good men at FBR who had enacted the EFS SRO in 2021whose unravelling is an education in itself. How do you dismantle a scheme which is wildly popular with exporters and the Ministry of Commerce? Public Choice offers a possible explanation. A few quarters after EFS' enactment, the press had suddenly started carrying stories of EFS frauds. Must not FBR be apprehending the fraudsters? Many exporters' associations approached FBR to work with them to make EFS more robust, but to no avail. The 'good' and the 'bad' FBRs were at least indifferent or positively upset with EFS. Here is one way this fraud might have happened. Those who imported 60s yarn under EFS, made a killing by illegally selling it locally, pocketing the unpaid GST and then exporting some 20s yarn-based product claiming it was a twisted/tripled 3×60s! Local 20s was purchased GST free, under EFS! Fraudsters made a killing. Industry wanted to plug the leakage, FBR instead blew the pipeline. It was in this backdrop, last year and literally out of the left field, FBR rendered local yarn purchases ineligible for EFS. If an EFS registered exporter wanted to purchase local cotton yarn, it had to pay GST while it could import the same product GST free! EFS fraud tales-many, even most could be true-set the stage with a sinister hum of expectations. A few rent-an-associations also played their quisling parts. Local yarn manufacturers cried at this obvious miscarriage of justice. Exclusion of local yarns from EFS created a genuinely aggrieved party who just wanted re-inclusion into EFS. They were dragged, stomped on, slapped around until the aggrieved confederates sued for peace and on July 29 were served the textile equivalent of the Treaty of Versailles. Now, many are happy at their own defeat. Imposition of GST on cotton yarns is not a victory for spinners and not for the value-added champions. All exporters are losers. All manufacturers are losers. It is like on account of few purse snatching incidents, the city police banned pillion riding. Spinners and a few more, in their desperation — they were hurting bad — were offered Hobson's choice. They had to take it. Today it is yarns and fabrics tomorrow it will be something else. The real losers, however, mostly textiles exporters, continue to congregate in a motley crew of cults and associations whose chaotic best has never been good enough. The unravelling of EFS is the latest epiphany of the 'Entrepreneurs as Chor' creed which the tax collectors, ageing accountants and highly paid bankers who enjoy a revolving door access to the top echelons continue to believe and mean. Still, EFS, has perhaps been the most notable success that the Ministry of Commerce had notched in its long history of lost battles with the FBR. In Islamabad, tomorrow always trumps the future. EFS is not the first pro-exports government initiative to go down. It is high time that FBR evolved into a learning organization, learning by doing, driven by data, in perpetual consultation with entrepreneurs whose competitiveness depends on lifesavers like EFS. FBR can then use data to 'Rank and Yank' exporter population. For now, it is curtains for EFS. Textile exports of USD 1.5b per month or so is our fate. On a good day, that is. This tactical victory for some in the textile value chain is a strategic rout for the entire textile value chain. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
07-08-2025
- Business Recorder
FPCCI chief seeks clarification about IDC on imports in Sindh
KARACHI: Atif Ikram Sheikh, President Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI), has strongly sought the clarification on infrastructure development cess (IDC) on imports in Sindh as it has been even further increased from 1.25 percent to 1.80 percent - 1.85 percent. As per details, Mukesh Kumar Chawla, Sindh Minister of Excise, Taxation and Narcotics visited FPCCI on Wednesday for a detailed, interactive and consultative session on the longstanding issue. Atif Ikram Sheikh explained that the business community in Sindh is primarily concerned about the financial strain, legal validity and lack of visible infrastructure improvements despite the substantial revenue generated from the cess. While the Sindh government defends the cess as essential for infrastructure maintenance, the ongoing legal battles and perceived mismanagement of funds continue to fuel tensions. However, Chawla offered that provided the businesses and companies can all collectively withdraw all court cases vis-à-vis infrastructure development cess, the Sindh Government is ready to lower the cess to 1.0 percent from the current 1.85 percent – and, keep it at that level for the next 3 years. He also agreed to consider withdrawing cess on solar panels. On the issues of delay in the issuance of number plates, the minister informed that 200,000 number plates will be delivered within a week; and, additionally, the government is planning to have the number plates generating plant installed at the Civic Centre, Karachi, in order to fully resolve the issue. Saquib Fayyaz Magoon, SVP FPCCI, apprised that the recent efforts to resolve the cess issue through dialogue and collaboration indicate a potential path forward; but, the business community remains cautious – seeking tangible outcomes and greater transparency. He mentioned that cess on solar panels should be withdrawn. He said that FPCCI, being the apex body, is receiving feedback from all chambers, associations and trade bodies from various sectors to advocate reversal of these counterproductive measures, he added. Abdul Mohamin Khan, VP & Regional Chairman Sindh, FPCCI, elaborated that international export markets are very competitive; and, any addition in cost of production through duties, taxes or cess on temporary imports; i.e., raw materials used for export-oriented production have direct detrimental effects on fulfilment of export orders in a profitable, timely and competitive manner. He proposed that the imports falling under Export Facilitation Scheme (EFS) should be exempt from IDC as these are essentially aimed for industrial production meant for exports – and, the imposition of the cess on those imports makes no economic sense and it undermines the very spirit of EFS. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
06-08-2025
- Business Recorder
US tariff relief offers boost, but Pakistan's high production costs still hamper exports
The United States has lowered its reciprocal tariff rate on Pakistani goods to 19%, compared to the 20–25% imposed on regional competitors such as India, Bangladesh, Vietnam, and Sri Lanka—offering a potential edge in the US market, which underscores the impact of Pakistan's diplomatic efforts to secure more favorable trade terms. However, this win may fall short of delivering substantial export gains unless Pakistan addresses persistent structural issues at home. Industry leaders and economists warn that high input costs—stemming from steep interest rates, costly energy tariffs, and reduced export financing incentives—continue to undermine the country's global trade competitiveness. 'The price of electricity remains the second-highest component after cotton in Pakistan's textile production costs,' said Jawed Bilwani, President of the Karachi Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KCCI). Textile exporters alarmed by 19pc US tariff decision He added that recent changes to the Export Finance Scheme (EFS) have also dampened export momentum. 'Retaining the EFS in its original form is vital for sustaining textile exports,' he emphasized. According to Dr. Usama Ehsan Khan, Head of Research at the Policy Research and Advisory Council (PRAC), despite the lower US tariff, Pakistan may not see a significant shift in orders from global buyers unless input costs are brought down. 'The tariff cut helps retain volume in the US market, but high production costs keep Pakistan's export prices uncompetitive,' he said. Khan pointed to three critical areas for immediate cost reductions: interest rates, power tariffs, and gas prices. He noted that Pakistan's central bank has kept its policy rate at 11%—well above inflation, which has recently fallen below the targeted 5–7% range. Peer economies, by contrast, are operating with rates between 3% and 10%. 'There's room for Pakistan to bring interest rates into single digits,' Khan said, arguing that such a move would lower the cost of doing business, spur exports, and ease debt servicing. 'Every 1% cut in the policy rate reduces interest payments by Rs200–250 billion annually,' he added. Power tariffs for Pakistani exporters, currently around $0.16 per unit, are also significantly higher than those in competitor countries, where rates range from $0.06 to $0.10. Khan suggested that Pakistan could lower electricity costs by shutting down expensive local plants and renegotiating contracts with foreign-owned independent power producers (IPPs). Gas tariffs, another burden on exporters, also require downward revision, he said, noting that a strategic reduction would enhance Pakistan's appeal as a manufacturing hub. A joint PRAC and KCCI infographic comparing Pakistan's input costs with those of regional competitors reveals further weaknesses. Pakistan's labor productivity, for instance, stands at just $7.20 in GDP per hour worked—well below the $8.70–$18 range of peer countries, except Cambodia, which stands at $4. As global trade dynamics shift and buyers seek reliable, cost-effective sourcing destinations, experts stress that Pakistan must enact bold domestic reforms to fully capitalize on external trade opportunities like the US tariff cut. 'Without reducing production costs, Pakistan risks missing out on the benefits of this hard-earned trade advantage,' Khan cautioned.
