Post Office compensation still moving far too slowly, MPs warn
The Department of Business and Trade (DBT) needs to 'outline what more it will do to ensure every affected postmaster' is aware of their options for redress, according to the public accounts committee.
The government announced earlier this month that more than £1 billion has been paid out to subpostmasters across the Horizon-related schemes.
Between 1999 and 2015, more than 900 subpostmasters were prosecuted after faulty Horizon accounting software made it look as though money was missing from their accounts. Many are still awaiting compensation.
Committee chair Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown has described the scandal as 'one of the UK's worst ever miscarriages of justice' as 'thousands of people were failed deeply by the system'.
Releasing the annual report into DBT and its accounts, Sir Geoffrey said: 'This Committee would have hoped to have found government laser-focused on ensuring all those eligible were fully and fairly compensated for what happened.
'It is deeply dissatisfactory to find these schemes still moving far too slowly, with no government plans to track down the majority of potential claimants who may not yet be aware of their proper entitlements.'
According to the findings of the report released on Wednesday, DBT does not 'yet have clarity' on the number of claims that could be submitted under the Horizon Shortfall scheme, or the value of claims that could come forward under the convictions redress scheme.
According to figures released by the DBT earlier in June, £559 million has been paid out to 6,337 claimants from the Horizon shortfall scheme.
The data also says that of the 492 subpostmasters who joined Sir Alan Bates in taking the Post Office to court between 2017 and 2019 that have not been convicted, also known as the Group Litigation Order Scheme (GLO), 488 have received £167 million between them.
Elsewhere, £245 million has been paid out to 463 subpostmasters who had their convictions quashed by legislation put in place last summer, and £68 million has been paid to those who have had their convictions quashed in the courts.
A Department for Business and Trade spokesperson said: 'This report is based on a period from before last year's election.
'Since then, this Government has quadrupled the total amount paid to affected postmasters to provide them with full and fair redress, with more than £1 billion having now been paid to thousands of claimants.
'We will consider the recommendations and work with the Post Office, who have already written to over 24,000 postmasters, to ensure that everyone who may be eligible for redress is given the opportunity to apply for it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Gordon Brown had a good idea. But it won't fix the problem he created
Good evening! This week's edition of the In Common newsletter comes from Kaitlin Dryburgh, Common Weal's policy communications co-ordinator. GORDON Brown has given Rachel Reeves a sensible suggestion: increase taxes on the mighty gambling industry. Brown supports the proposal from the Institute for Public Policy Research, which would help to plug the two-child benefit cap and alleviate the appalling levels of child poverty we face. The former Labour leader thinks they should stand up to this industry, really show them who's boss, all in the name of doing some good for society. In a sense, he isn't wrong. The gambling industry isn't taxed enough. It also isn't fined as much as it should be – and it's woefully under-regulated. If we were being truly radical, we could follow the lead of some Scandinavian countries and nationalise all gambling, which would allow us to plough profits directly into doing good. That would also create benefits beyond monetary gain, such as a system capable of tracking and intervening in cases of gambling addiction. READ MORE: Is Gordon Brown right that Scottish child poverty 'worse every day'? However, such a move would require being unfazed by the gambling lobby – something Brown would know little about. While he comments on the meagre taxation the gambling industry faces and the good that revenue could achieve, Brown fails to mention the deregulation his government oversaw, the harm it caused, and the fact that in many cases it will have contributed to child poverty. He ignores the stark inequality between children growing up in deprivation and the gambling companies and executives who have grown their fortunes exponentially since he gave them a mighty boost. As Chancellor of the Exchequer, Brown presided over a shake-up of the gambling industry like never before. Tony Blair claimed there was 'no evidence' the changes would lead to gambling addiction (another example of Blair getting his evidence wrong) and even used Blackpool as an example of a place that could benefit from regeneration. Because nothing says 'revitalisation' quite like more gambling. Tony Blair and Gordon Brown pictured together during the New Labour yearsWhat followed was an explosion of betting shops and casinos across the country, alongside aggressive television advertising pumped directly into people's living rooms. But perhaps the most significant escalation came with the arrival of smartphones in our pockets: the online gambling boom. Since the liberalisation of gambling laws, the UK gambling market has become one of the largest in the world relative to its population. Thank you, Tony and Gordon. Almost half the UK population places at least one bet a month. Despite Blair's flippant assurance that this relaxation of gambling laws wouldn't cause addiction, he was dead wrong. I saw a betting advert the other month. I don't know if you're like me, but when it comes to this kind of thing on TV, I usually switch off, make a cup of tea, and ignore it. But my god, this one caught my attention, for all the wrong reasons. It showed people in different situations doing mundane tasks: one waiting for a bus, another building flat-pack furniture. The entire message was: in those moments, why not place a bet? Does that not feed directly into addiction? They were effectively saying: 'This isn't really about enjoyment – just do it out of boredom or habit.' READ MORE: Labour took more than £1m in donations and gifts from gambling firms Apparently that was fine, because our gambling regulations are not fit for purpose. One of the most recent large-scale studies estimates that 2.5% of the UK population has some form of gambling problem, and the NHS has seen a rise in those seeking help. Gambling ruins lives; people lose their homes, their jobs, their families, and in some cases their lives. Betting companies are sometimes called out on this. Either they get a slap on the wrist or endure a short bout of bad publicity – but they don't care. Paddy Power, a company worth tens of billions, was fined a mere £280,000 for failing to carry out sufficient checks on problem gamblers. They even actively encouraged one addicted customer to stay longer and spend more on their premises. A decision that cost the individual their jobs, access to their children, and their home. There are countless horror stories of gambling companies employing the most exploitative strategies imaginable to extract as much money as possible from vulnerable gamblers. This is the direct result of commercial lobbyists shaping government policy, rather than the other way around. They feebly present 'investment' as an excuse, when in reality industries like these extract wealth, they don't create it. That's why there are four entries on the top 100 UK Rich List linked to gambling, with a combined fortune of £23.1 billion. Brown certainly has a point when it comes to taxing gambling more heavily, but the monster that is the UK gambling industry is partly his creation. The harm it has caused for decades lies at the door of his former government, and the betting companies are still reaping the rewards of the legislation he helped to pass.
Daily Mirror
6 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Paul Doyle: All the charges he now faces after Liverpool parade crash
Paul Doyle, 53, now faces 31 charges relating to the Liverpool parade crash in May, which saw 134 football fans injured. He is due to appear in court again ahead of trial The alleged driver in the Liverpool parade horror crash now faces a total of 31 charges relating to 29 victims. Paul Doyle, 53, sobbed as the court heard how the youngest victims on the indictment were two baby boys aged just six and seven-months-old at the time. Another six children aged 10 to 17-years-old were also injured in the ordeal. The oldest victim was a 77-year-old woman. Doyle, of Burghill Road, West Derby, is now charged with injuring eight children and 21 adults. The identities of the children are protected by a court anonymity order. Doyle was originally charged with seven offences, but the court heard another 24 had since been added to the indictment. The 31 charges he faces include one of dangerous driving, one of affray, and 29 other GBH-related offences, including nine of causing GBH with intent, two of wounding with intent and 18 of attempted GBH. He is scheduled to face a trial in November, but will appear at Liverpool crown court next month to enter a plea to all 31 counts. Merseyside Police said a total of 134 people were injured in the crash on May 26, as 1.5 million football fans had gathered to celebrate Liverpool FC winning the Premier League. Fans had begun walking home after the celebrations when a Ford Galaxy Titanium began mowing down pedestrians on Water Street in Liverpool city centre. Police and fans swarmed the car in the aftermath and Doyle was arrested on suspicion of being the man behind the wheel of the vehicle. Appearing in court via videolink from prison, Doyle wore a grey t-shirt and sat behind a desk with a notepad and pen in front of him during the short 20 minute hearing on Thursday. The court heard that Doyle had made an application to have a laptop in prison in order to watch video evidence of the crash. But two months after making the application, Doyle had still not been given an answer, the court was told. Judge Andrew Menary adjourned the proceedings to September to give Doyle's barrister time to go through the new charges with the defendant. Full breakdown of the charges and Doyle's alleged victims: 1. Dangerous driving 2. Affray 3. Attempt to cause GBH to Jack Trotter 4. Attempt to cause GBH to Jon Evans 5. Attempt to cause GBH to Scott Dolan 6. Cause GBH to a 12-year-old boy 7. Attempt to cause GBH to a 17-year-old boy 8. Cause GBH to Helen Gilmore 9. Attempt to cause GBH to a 10-year-old girl 10. Attempt to cause GBH to Jacqueline McClaren 11. Caused GBH to Anna Bilonozhenko 12. Attempt to cause GBH to Jamie Fagan 13. Attempt to cause GBH to a 13-year-old boy 14. Attempt to cause GBH to Carl Martin 15. Attempt to cause GBH to James Vernon 16. Wounded Simon Nash with intent to do him grievous bodily harm. 17. Attempt to cause GBH to a six-month-old baby boy 18. Cause GBH to Sheree Aldridge 19. Attempt to cause GBH to Emily Wright 20. Attempt to cause GBH to a seven-month-old baby boy 21. Cause GBH to an 11-year-old boy 22. Wounded Robin Darke with intent to do him grievous bodily harm 23. Cause GBH to Sam Alexander 24. Attempt to cause GBH to Hannah O'Neill 25. Attempt to cause GBH to Stefan Dettlaf 26. Cause GBH to Christine Seeckts 27. Attempt to cause GBH to David Price 28. Cause GBH to Susan Passey 29. Cause GBH to a 17-year-old boy 30. Attempt to cause GBH to Ethan Gilland 31. Attempt to cause GBH to James Weston
The Sun
8 hours ago
- The Sun
I get paid £24 per HOUR to do a job no one wants – all I do is stand in line
A MAN has revealed he makes a £24 an hour, just for standing in a line. The man quit his 9-5 to do the unusual job full time, and can be paid up to £100 for one job. 1 Everyone hates standing in queues, whether it's for restaurants, concerts or theme park rides. And now, those who can afford it, are paying others to do it for them. Using TaskRabbit, a website that offers odd job services, people are now making a full-time wage for standing in line for other people. 'I do this all week now", one man told The i Paper. "I get asked to wait in line at restaurants, or for concert tickets or the Post Office; anything, really. "I do various errands and make a decent living out of it." The man revealed that the longest he has waited in a queue for someone is three hours, and added that his pay varies depending on where he needs to be and how long he needs to wait. And although you may think that no one would pay for this kind of service, the man revealed that there are plenty of people who have the disposable income to pay for it. Many restaurant chains such as Dishoom and Padella have chosen not to offer reservations, meaning that customers often have to queue for a long time before getting seated. So it makes sense that the rich would rather sit back and relax whilst someone does the queueing for them. I earn cash by selling 'actual rubbish' on eBay - I flogged a freebie I found on the floor by a bin for £10, it's crazy To hire someone to queue for you, all you need to do is head to TaskRabbit, put in the details of where you want the queuer to go, what you want them to order, and your card details. You will then be shown available queuers in your area, who can complete the task for you. And if you want to become a queuer yourself, all you need to do is sign up via the TaskRabbit website. Grave cleaner And standing in queues isn't the only unusual job you can do to make cash. Do I need to pay tax on my side hustle income? MANY people feeling strapped for cash are boosting their bank balance with a side hustle. The good news is, there are plenty of simple ways to earn some additional income - but you need to know the rules. When you're employed the company you work for takes the tax from your earnings and pays HMRC so you don't have to. But anyone earning extra cash, for example from selling things online or dog walking, may have to do it themselves. Stephen Moor, head of employment at law firm Ashfords, said: "Caution should be taken if you're earning an additional income, as this is likely to be taxable. "The side hustle could be treated as taxable trading income, which can include providing services or selling products." You can make a gross income of up to £1,000 a year tax-free via the trading allowance, but over this and you'll usually need to pay tax. Stephen added: "You need to register for a self-assessment at HMRC to ensure you are paying the correct amount of tax. "The applicable tax bands and the amount of tax you need to pay will depend on your income." If you fail to file a tax return you could end up with a surprise bill from HMRC later on asking you to pay the tax you owe - plus extra fees on top. A side hustle whiz has revealed how he makes an extra £4,000 a month, from a job nobody wants to do. Known only as @thegravecleaner online, the money-making pro cleans people's headstones for cash, alongside his regular job. The cleaning pro charges £135 for a basic clean, and up to £452, for a full restoration. TikToker @themoneyshark, who used the grave cleaner as an example of a great way to make extra cash, said: "You're probably thinking to yourself, no one's gonna pay for that. People don't even visit graves anymore. "Well, you're wrong, because he stays booked up." The Money Shark explained that one of the best things about this side hustle is that there isn't much competition, because "let's be real, not many people wanna offer this service". He added that it also doesn't cost much to get started, as you just need around £150 to purchase all of the supplies you need.
