Fort Lauderdale's Beach Business Improvement District Rolls Out "Road Trip & Relax" Summer Campaign, in Partnership With Popular Travel App
According to research from Visit Lauderdale, the official tourism marketing agency for Broward County, 49% of overnight visitors to Greater Fort Lauderdale traveled using their own car or truck, underscoring a powerful trend toward regional travel and road trips. With easy access from cities like Orlando, Tampa, Jacksonville, Atlanta, and Charlotte, Fort Lauderdale Beach is positioned as the ideal summer destination for those looking to hit the road and unwind with a drivable, stress-free summer escape.
'We know that Fort Lauderdale is a favorite summer road trip destination for so many travelers,' said Lisa Namour, General Manager of the Bahia Mar, and chair of the BBID. 'With this campaign, we're strategically embracing that travel trend, inviting visitors to make the journey and discover a destination where relaxation comes naturally. From the moment you arrive, the rhythm slows, the ocean breeze welcomes you, and the spirit of summer truly comes to life.'
Features of the campaign include:
'This is the kind of partnership we love, working with destinations that want to bring road travelers closer to authentic, unforgettable places,' said Robyn Barnes, Chief Commercial Officer at Roadtrippers. 'Road Trip & Relax' brings together our app's mission of exploration with the BBID's vision of hospitality. It's a match made in beach heaven.'
Running through Labor Day, the campaign aims to capture the growing market of regional travelers looking for a relaxing escape without the hassle of air travel. With walkable beach access, vibrant dining, and scenic ocean views, Fort Lauderdale Beach is the ultimate drive-to destination this summer.
To start planning your perfect summer road trip, visit https://bit.ly/RoadTripAndRelax or download the Roadtrippers app and search 'Fort Lauderdale Beach.'
Download Campaign Assets
Campaign partners and local businesses are encouraged to download the official Campaign Partner Toolkit for branded assets, promotional materials, and other information here.
About Fort Lauderdale Beach
Fort Lauderdale Beach is one of South Florida's premier coastal destinations, offering visitors a vibrant blend of natural beauty, cultural experiences, and laid-back luxury. With 24 miles of pristine beaches and turquoise waters, the area is perfect for sunbathing, swimming, water sports, and scenic strolls along its walkable oceanfront promenade. The beachfront district also boasts an array of hotels, dining, shopping, and entertainment options. Whether you're seeking outdoor adventure, waterfront relaxation, or dynamic local events, Fort Lauderdale Beach delivers a welcoming and unforgettable experience for travelers of all ages.
About Roadtrippers
Roadtrippers is the #1 road trip planning tool, helping millions of travelers discover unique stops, scenic routes, and hidden gems along their journeys. With over 38 million trips planned and counting, Roadtrippers makes it easy to build unforgettable adventures, whether you're headed for national parks, historic landmarks, or quirky roadside attractions. Roadtrippers empowers people to hit the road with confidence and curiosity. To learn more, visit roadtrippers.com and follow @roadtrippers on Instagram.
Contact InformationLuis Galvez Marketing Manager (786) 816-2274
SOURCE: Fort Lauderdale Beach Business Improvement District
press release
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
ERC CARES: A Lifeline for Businesses Caught Between Disaster and Relief
FORT MYERS, Fla., Aug. 18, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- In response to the ongoing needs of disaster-impacted businesses, the Economic Recovery Center (ERC), founded after Hurricane Ian, has partnered with Anchorra to launch ERC CARES, a non-profit organization dedicated to serving storm-ravaged communities across Southwest Florida and beyond. The goal of ERC CARES is simple yet powerful: to ensure communities are not left behind in the critical weeks and months following a natural disaster. By offering bridge funding, ERC CARES provides immediate support to businesses as they navigate the complex application processes for ERC's disaster recovery programs, federal loans, and grants. "Too often, survivors of major storms face long waits for relief, and that gap can mean the difference between recovery and permanent loss," said Kristin Norton, President of ERC CARES. "ERC CARES fills that gap by offering bridge funding and direct support, giving survivors the chance to breathe, regroup, and successfully access the long-term aid they need." Building Resilient Communities The mission of ERC CARES is to foster resilience before, during, and after disasters by: Providing bridge funding to stabilize businesses until long-term recovery funds are approved. Offering free access to disaster preparation services and guidance on essential supplies. Assisting in securing government financing, grants, and loans to rebuild stronger. By delivering both short-term relief and long-term solutions, ERC CARES aims to create sustainable recovery pathways for communities most at risk. Its success will be measured not just in dollars secured, but in the empowerment and preparedness of each community served. About Economic Recovery Center Founded after Hurricane Ian, the Economic Recovery Center has become a trusted partner for businesses navigating disaster recovery. ERC has helped secure millions in SBA Disaster Loans and other federal funding, providing a financial lifeline to storm-impacted communities. About Anchorra Anchorra is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit dedicated to strengthening communities by supporting changemakers through fiscal sponsorship, charitable investing, and earned-revenue model development. Its collaboration with ERC ensures that ERC CARES combines financial expertise with a strong foundation of local engagement. 📞 Media ContactEconomic Recovery CenterPhone: 385-376-2372Email: Support@ View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Economic Recovery Center Sign in to access your portfolio
Harvard Business Review
17 minutes ago
- Harvard Business Review
Boards Can Continue to Lead the Way on Climate Governance
During the past year, political and investor pushback against corporate climate efforts has intensified. Nearly 320 anti-ESG bills have been introduced across U.S. state legislatures since 2021. States such as Florida and Texas have curbed the use of ESG considerations in public investments. The U.S. SEC has all but repealed its climate-disclosure rules, and pending climate-disclosure rules in California are mired in litigation. This backlash has triggered a corporate retreat in some parts of corporate America. Firms are scaling back climate disclosures, reducing sustainability headcount, and in some cases abandoning emissions goals. Major financial institutions—including BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, State Street, and JPMorgan Chase—have withdrawn from global climate alliances, while companies such as Alphabet and McDonald's have purged 'ESG' from public statements. ExxonMobil took the unusual step of suing shareholders for proposing stronger emissions targets. Yet the underlying risks associated with climate change—from supply-chain disruption to asset impairment and shifting consumer preferences—haven't disappeared. If anything, they are accelerating. As climate impacts grow more visible, companies will need strategies that address both mitigation (reducing emissions) and adaptation (strengthening resilience to physical and operational climate risks). Globally, companies appear to recognize these risks. Despite headlines about ESG retreat, a PwC study found that 37% of the more than 4,000 companies reporting climate targets to CDP in 2024 had increased their ambitions, and only 16% had dialed them back. The question for boards then is not whether they should engage in climate governance, but how to do so credibly, legally, and effectively in an era of heightened scrutiny. Guidance for a Shifting Landscape Last year, in an HBR article ' How Robust Is Your Climate Governance? ' we outlined eight hallmarks of meaningful board engagement on climate. In view of the political and social changes that have taken place since that article was published, we provide the following updated guidance for navigating today's shifting climate landscape. 1. Know your climate profile, now more than ever. In an era of heightened scrutiny, a board's foundational knowledge of its climate profile serves as its first line of defense. Boards must develop rock-solid understanding of their climate exposure—how the company affects climate and especially vice versa. Climate data must be not only internally accurate but externally defensible. This means requesting third-party verification of emissions metrics, rigorously stress-testing assumptions, and preparing for public scrutiny. Scenario planning should incorporate a range of plausible futures—including regulatory fragmentation, delays in policy implementation, supply-chain instability, reduced tax benefits, and escalating physical climate impacts. For each scenario, boards should understand the risks and opportunities it presents for the company as well as how it affects the company's responsibilities as a corporate citizen. 2. Define the board's role. When facing pressure to retreat from climate oversight, boards should recognize that climate risks connect to core business fundamentals rather than ESG trends. As we wrote in our earlier article, the board's role in climate oversight should be clearly defined and documented in charters, committee descriptions, and proxy filings. The linkages to fiduciary duties—risk management, strategic resilience, and long-term value creation—should also be clear. We recommend having legal counsel review governance documents to ensure compliance with evolving expectations. 3. Build a defensible oversight structure. Rather than centralize oversight in a stand-alone ESG committee, a distributed governance model is more resilient and less vulnerable to attacks. A stand-alone 'ESG committee' makes an easy target for activists. We continue to recommend assigning responsibility for coordinating climate oversight to a primary committee (such as governance or nominating), while embedding specific climate responsibilities into other relevant committees: audit (for disclosure), risk (for exposure), and compensation (for incentives). The integrated approach becomes even more valuable when facing criticism, because it demonstrates that climate considerations are embedded in core business processes. This signals integration into the business, not conformity to the latest trend. Explicitly document how the board's structure supports accountability and coherence, reducing perceptions of arbitrary decision-making. Should the political winds shift again, boards can adjust emphasis without wholesale structural change. 4. Build expertise thoughtfully. Meaningful oversight requires informed engagement. Focus on ensuring that directors have business-relevant expertise—transition economics, energy systems, regulatory risk—rather than symbolic 'climate credentials.' Use independent briefings, industry site visits, and neutral education partners to demonstrate a multi-source learning approach. Boards that show deliberate, ongoing engagement will enhance both their credibility and their understanding. At a time when trade-offs are more complex than ever, boards lacking climate literacy will struggle to make informed choices—or explain their climate position to skeptical stakeholders. 5. Clarify climate positioning—consistency is critical. Companies face the delicate task of defining their climate posture without appearing to abandon commitments or stakeholder expectations. Whether the company aims to lead, follow, or comply on climate the current environment, clarity is crucial. As we've previously emphasized, boards must align with management on the company's climate posture. They should also communicate the company's stance accurately. ' Greenhushing '—downplaying or withholding information about climate commitments and activities from the public—may seem sensible as a way to avoid the spotlight, but lack of transparency can alienate other stakeholders, and failure to disclose financially material climate-related information raises legal issues. Lack of transparency also makes collective action to address climate change more difficult. Inconsistent or opaque positioning creates unnecessary risk. Stakeholders—including employees—will be watching to see whether a company's actions consistently reflect its stated climate position and corporate values. This means aligning internal strategy with public statements, investor presentations, and regulatory filings. If you are scaling back goals, explain why—whether due to technology limits, economic shifts, or capital reallocation. Such positioning should be the result of business strategy, not political convenience. In the face of skepticism about climate initiatives, a coherent climate stance—regardless of ambition level—builds trust. 6. Probe management plans, and demand clarity and accountability. With average shareholder support for ESG resolutions declining from 33.3% in 2021 to 19.6% in 2024, boards must ensure their oversight provides the accountability that external mechanisms may not. We continue to advocate the approach from our previous article: Boards must review climate strategies with the same rigor as financial forecasts. This includes emissions targets, capital allocation, and operational planning. Avoid aspirational goals without clear roadmaps. Ask: What assumptions underpin our targets? Who is accountable? Can we defend these assumptions publicly—to shareholders, the media, or policymakers? Independent verification and board-level dashboards add credibility and clarity to climate oversight. Plans to scale back strategies or relax emissions targets should get the same level of scrutiny as plans to increase them. A useful litmus test: 'If called before a Congressional hearing, can we explain our climate plan with clarity and credibility?' 7. Tie incentives to operations. Though controversial, tying climate goals to executive incentives can signal serious intent. Figures for 2025 are not yet available, but the practice actually grew slightly in 2024—28% of S&P 500 companies linked executive pay to climate metrics in 2024, up from 23% in 2023. Whenever it is used, climate-linked compensation must be auditable, proportionate, and clearly tied to operational outcomes. Consider how climate performance connects to business outcomes rather than external recognition or ratings. If incentives are politically sensitive, use non-compensation levers such as performance reviews, strategy reviews, or balanced scorecards. The goal is creating alignment through accountability mechanisms. 8. Acknowledge trade-offs and embrace complexity. Climate governance is no longer about win-win narratives (if it ever was). It requires navigating real tensions: short- vs. long-term returns, investor expectations vs. emissions goals, and resilience vs. risk. Be honest about trade-offs and avoid overly simplistic ESG narratives, such as 'Doing well by doing good.' Instead, document how the board weighs competing priorities and scenarios. Sophistication and transparency signal integrity. The best defense against politicized criticism is a well-reasoned, well-documented decision-making process rooted in business realities. Articulate clearly how the board weighs competing stakeholder interests and time horizons. More than ever, boards must embrace a realistic perspective on climate governance, acknowledging the complexities and uncertainties involved. In an environment where climate action faces criticism, transparently acknowledging challenges and demonstrating a thoughtful approach to overcoming them—rather than presenting a simplistic narrative—will foster greater trust and resilience. . . . Retreating from climate governance in the current political moment may provide short-term relief, but it carries long-term strategic risk. Climate change remains a material business issue. Even if the pushback grows, some stakeholders—from insurers to employees—will continue to demand clarity and accountability. That means embedding climate into the core of governance—not as a political gesture but as a strategic necessity. And it means preparing for scrutiny, not fearing it.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
National Park Service cuts hit home as staffing shortages largely close Fort Barrancas
Once a popular destination as much for locals as tourists, visitation to historic Fort Barrancas at Naval Air Station Pensacola has been reduced to being open just one day a month. Until 2017, Fort Barrancas was open seven days a week. Gulf Islands National Seashore - which is part of the National Park Service − cut back its schedule to five days a week starting that year, eliminating Tuesday and Wednesday visitation, due to a shortage of staff. Staffing has plummeted this year, however, and without explanation Gulf Islands National Seashore − part of the National Park Service − announced earlier this year that Fort Barrancas would only be open for its summer season on May 24, June 28, July 26 and Aug. 23. One of those four dates - July 26 - remained closed to visitors, with officials citing "unforeseen circumstances." In response to a request for explanation, officials would only says that "the reduced operating hours are a result of a shortage of temporary seasonal staff. This is the first year the park has operated this schedule at this location. Gulf Islands National Seashore plans to continue opening and staffing the site one day a month for the foreseeable future." While a GINS spokesperson told the News Journal the "fourth Saturday of the month" schedule will continue all year starting in September, its website lists no other dates for the remainder of the year after Aug. 23. Fort Barrancas Area includes 60 acres and features three historic structures − Spanish Water Battery, Fort Barrancas and Advanced Redoubt. There are also two short hiking trails, waysides and a visitor center. The exterior to Advanced Redoubt is available to the public year-round. Kizmetz Tatum, 48, is among the regular visitors searching for explanation. "I have been there a lot over the years, but my teenage son has never been to Fort Barrancas," said Tatum, a Pensacola native. "We went one Saturday in March and when we get there it's closed." She did some research and found that Fort Barrancas would be open just four days for the summer. So Tatum and her 15-year-old son Alex Apperson drove to NAS Pensacola on July 26. After some confusion they eventually were granted access through the western gate and drove to Fort Barrancas, which is located near the National Naval Aviation Museum. But when they eventually got to the fort entrance, it was closed. "It's been like a months-long hassle," Tatum said. "And he still hasn't been able to visit." In February, at least 1,000 National Park Service rangers and workers were fired by President Donald Trump and Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. The National Parks Conservation Association, an independent organization that advocates for the protection and protection of National Parks, issued a statement in July stating that staffing cuts since President Trump's inauguration earlier this year have resulted in a 24% reduction in permanent National Park Service staff. In the July 3 press release, Theresa Pierno, president and CEO of the National Parks Conservation Association, said "This new date confirms what NPCA has been warning the Administration and Congress about. National parks cannot properly function at the staffing levels this administration has reduced them to. And it's only getting worse." There are also Gulf Islands National Seashore areas on the Mississippi Coast, including Cat Island, Horn Island, Ship Island and more, many of which are only accessible by boat. While Fort Barrancas might not be the crown jewel of Gulf Islands National Seashore, it is one of the area's best-preserved forts. The hilltop fort was built by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers between 1840 and 1844 over the ruins of other forts. Fort Barrancas is connected to the adjoining Spanish Watery Battery − the white structure just below the kite-shaped brick fort. Even before the start of the American Civil War, Fort Barrancas was seeing action. More than three months before the South Carolina militia attacked U.S. Army troops at Fort Sumter, South Carolina, in April 1861, U.S. Army soldiers at Fort Barrancas fired at a Florida militia group, which they were able to repel. Still, U.S. forces were feeling the pressure and soon relocated to Fort Pickens, leaving Fort Barrancas in the hands of the militia. Just days later, Florida seceded from the Union and soon the newly-born Confederacy would bring troops to Fort Barrancas. Fort Pickens, built by the U.S. Army on the western tip of Santa Rosa Island and which is also part of Gulf Islands National Seashore, remains open daily. Other Florida features of Gulf Islands National Seashore are the Naval Live Oaks Area in Gulf Breeze, Rosamond Johnson Beach on Perdido Key, as well as beach access areas in Santa Rosa and Okaloosa counties. "It's sad, because I actually like Fort Barrancas more than Fort Pickens," Tatum said. "It's in better shape and a lot nicer." This article originally appeared on Pensacola News Journal: Fort Barrancas open once month following National Park Service cuts Solve the daily Crossword
