Big Tech workers top donations to Mamdani campaign in headache for Google, Meta
The 33-year-old upstart has spooked New York business and tech leaders – many of whom fear that his vow to raise taxes on the wealthy and past calls to defund the police will spark a mass exodus similar to what San Francisco experienced under progressive leaders in recent years.
However, their underlings have thrown their financial support behind the front-runner for City Hall.
Advertisement
Rank-and-file Google employees donated nearly $40,500 to Mamdani's campaign through July 11 – more than any other company or institution, according to NYC campaign finance data reviewed by The Post.
Meta workers chipped in more than $10,500, ranking seventh on the list, followed by Amazon employees, who donated nearly $9,000.
Campaign funds also flowed in from employees at New York City mainstays like tech and media firm Bloomberg ($8,816), Spotify ($7,415), Block ($6,265), Squarespace ($3,957) and MongoDB ($3,900), the data showed.
Advertisement
6 Zohran Mamdani is the presumptive mayoral frontrunner after winning the Democratic primary.
Janet Mayer/INSTARimages.com
Outside of the tech sector, Mamdani received significant support from workers at NY-based colleges and city agencies. The Columbia University system ranked second overall with nearly $33,000 in donations, followed by the NYC Department of Education ($26,214), New York University system ($24,331) and CUNY system ($18,336), the data showed.
New York City's campaign finance regulations require donors to disclose their employer if their contributions exceed more than $100. The stats do not include donors who listed alternate designations, such as being unemployed, self-employed or retired.
Overall, Mamdani raised $816,014 from roughly 10,500 donors from June 25 through July 11, with more than $350,000 of that cash coming from outside New York, records show.
Advertisement
6 Some business leaders have raised concerns about Zohran Mamdani's platform.
Michael Nigro/Pacific Press/Shutterstock
Representatives for Google and Meta declined to comment. Amazon and the Mamdani campaign did not return requests for comment.
John Borthwick, a famed tech investor and CEO of NY-based Betaworks, said the donations from tech workers 'doesn't surprise me at all' because 'young people in particular want change.'
Mamdani, who handily beat former Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic primary, has vowed to lower the cost of living through policy proposals that include free public buses, a freeze on regulated rents, universal childcare starting at six weeks old and a pilot program for city-run grocery stores.
Advertisement
Crtics say his plans could cause chaos in the housing market, among other unwanted side effects — including businesses running for the exits.
6 Google employees donated more to the Mamdani campaign than those of any other company.
ZUMAPRESS.com
Tech giants are particularly focused on the quality-of-life impacts of Mamdani's policies on issues like public safety, housing and education because those are key to making the city an attractive destination.
Companies left San Francisco in droves due to rampant crime and homelessness, which some critics attributed to 'woke' policies adopted by city leadership.
Drew Oetting, the president of tech-focused venture firm 8VC, described San Francisco in 2022 as 'probably the worst run city in the United States,' while Elon Musk quipped in 2023 that the city looked 'post-apocalyptic.'
'What we saw when tech companies fled San Francisco – that was not because of tech policy,' said Julie Samuels, the President and CEO of the influential industry group Tech:NYC.
'That was because of what was going on in San Francisco.'
6 Google fired more than two dozen employees for staging anti-Israel protests.
Charles Guerin/ABACAUSA.COM
Advertisement
Insiders say companies are struggling to balance the need to voice real concerns about the impact a Mamdani administration would have on their businesses against the risk of alienating progressive workers who appear to be broadly supportive of him.
Companies like Google – which last year fired more than two dozen far-left employees who staged a sit-in protest at its New York City office over its cloud-computing contracts with Israel – could face further disruptions if they are seen as overly critical of Mamdani, who has made anti-Israel remarks.
But workplace drama is just one concern at a time when tech firms are spending billions of dollars to lure the best possible talent as they race to develop advanced artificial intelligence and other burgeoning products.
'Tech companies historically do a really great job of, frankly, catering to their employees,' Samuels said. 'A lot of tech leaders are not wanting to alienate themselves from their employee base.'
Advertisement
6 Amazon ranked in the top 10 among companies whose workers donated the most to the Mamdani campaign.
AP
Some of New York's tech and business leaders have publicly struck a cautiously optimistic tone about Mamdani's candidacy. Last month, Partnership for New York City hosted a pair of summits with the Queens Assemblyman – one aimed at executives across various industries and one specifically focused on the outlook for tech.
While The Partnership and Tech:NYC described the latter meeting as 'lively and productive,' other business leaders have been far less accommodating.
Mamdani's approach to artificial intelligence is a 'key concern' for Borthwick, who noted that the upstart has yet to articulate a vision on how New York City should leverage a technology that carries major potential but also threatens to cause significant upheaval in the white-collar workforce.
Advertisement
'This technology is going to transform the city and he isn't thinking or ready for it,' said Borthwick, who previously told The Post that a Mamdani mayorship would be 'disastrous for the city.'
6 Meta employees donated more than $10,500 to the Mamdani campaign through July 11.
AFP via Getty Images
Mamdani has vowed to regulate the industry, warning that AI could 'harm workers, replicate biases, and weaken vital services if done irresponsibly.'
'We must ultimately create checks to ensure that technological tools are being deployed responsibly to deliver effective services,' Mamdani told Crain's New York. 'As mayor, I would work with unions and the City Council to pass legislation to appropriately regulate AI.'
Advertisement
Mamdani has tried to take the edge off his more radical stances – including publicly backing off his past support for defunding the police.
At the same time, he has rankled some executives over his refusal to outwardly 'condemn the phrase 'globalize the intifada,' which is widely seen as antisemitic.
Local tech leaders are hoping that Mamdani – or whoever ultimately wins the mayoral race – will take a more open-minded approach to AI's potential benefits while also preparing for its risks, according to Samuels.
'I absolutely would hope that the next mayor would be open to experimentation, would be open to using these modern tools to make New York work better,' said Samuels. 'If our elected officials come in only worrying about the negative first, I don't think we'll ever see real change in the way that the city uses technology.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
8 minutes ago
- CNN
The ‘godfather of AI' reveals the only way humanity can survive superintelligent AI
Geoffrey Hinton, known as the 'godfather of AI,' fears the technology he helped build could wipe out humanity — and 'tech bros' are taking the wrong approach to stop it. Hinton, a Nobel Prize-winning computer scientist and a former Google executive, has warned in the past that there is a 10% to 20% chance that AI wipes out humans. On Tuesday, he expressed doubts about how tech companies are trying to ensure humans remain 'dominant' over 'submissive' AI systems. 'That's not going to work. They're going to be much smarter than us. They're going to have all sorts of ways to get around that,' Hinton said at Ai4, an industry conference in Las Vegas. In the future, Hinton warned, AI systems might be able to control humans just as easily as an adult can bribe 3-year-old with candy. This year has already seen examples of AI systems willing to deceive, cheat and steal to achieve their goals. For example, to avoid being replaced, one AI model tried to blackmail an engineer about an affair it learned about in an email. Instead of forcing AI to submit to humans, Hinton presented an intriguing solution: building 'maternal instincts' into AI models, so 'they really care about people' even once the technology becomes more powerful and smarter than humans. AI systems 'will very quickly develop two subgoals, if they're smart: One is to stay alive… (and) the other subgoal is to get more control,' Hinton said. 'There is good reason to believe that any kind of agentic AI will try to stay alive.' That's why it is important to foster a sense of compassion for people, Hinton argued. At the conference, he noted that mothers have instincts and social pressure to care for their babies. 'The right model is the only model we have of a more intelligent thing being controlled by a less intelligent thing, which is a mother being controlled by her baby,' Hinton said. Hinton said it's not clear to him exactly how that can be done technically but stressed it's critical researchers work on it. 'That's the only good outcome. If it's not going to parent me, it's going to replace me,' he said. 'These super-intelligent caring AI mothers, most of them won't want to get rid of the maternal instinct because they don't want us to die.' Hinton is known for his pioneering work on neural networks, which helped pave the way to today's AI boom. In 2023, he stepped down from Google and started speaking out about the dangers of AI. Emmett Shear, who briefly served as interim CEO of ChatGPT owner OpenAI, said he's not surprised that some AI systems have tried to blackmail humans or bypass shutdown orders. 'This keeps happening. This is not going to stop happening,' Shear, the CEO of AI alignment startup Softmax, said at the Ai4 conference. 'AIs today are relatively weak, but they're getting stronger really fast.' Shear said that rather than trying to instill human values into AI systems, a smarter approach would be to forge collaborative relationships between humans and AI. Many experts believe AIs will achieve superintelligence, also known as artificial general intelligence, or AGI, in the coming years. Hinton said he used to think it could take 30 years to 50 years to achieve AGI but now sees this moment coming sooner. 'A reasonable bet is sometime between five and 20 years,' he said. While Hinton remains concerns about what could go wrong with AI, he is hopeful the technology will pave the way to medical breakthroughs. 'We're going to see radical new drugs. We are going to get much better cancer treatment than the present,' he said. For instance, he said AI will help doctors comb through and correlate the vast amounts of data produced by MRI and CT scans. However, Hinton does not believe AI will help humans achieve immortality. 'I don't believe we'll live forever,' Hinton said. 'I think living forever would be a big mistake. Do you want the world run by 200-year-old white men?' Asked if there's anything he would have done differently in his career if he knew how fast AI would accelerate, Hinton said he regrets solely focusing on getting AI to work. 'I wish I'd thought about safety issues, too,' he said.
Indianapolis Star
9 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
Indiana mom sues school district after it banned her for recording a meeting
A mom and a national public policy organization are taking her northeast Indiana school district to court to challenge a school policy they say violates her First and 14th Amendment rights. The Goldwater Institute, a conservative-leaning Arizona-based think tank, filed a complaint Aug. 12 in the Northern District of Indiana that, if successful, could overturn the school district's meeting recording policy and clarify a gray area of First Amendment law. Whitley County Consolidated Schools' policy says a building administrator must first give permission before parents and others can record private school meetings such as parent-teacher conferences. Goldwater argues that the policy is unconstitutional, saying there is "no compelling, substantial, important, or even rational reason" to prohibit parents from recording. "We think there's a clear idea that the First Amendment protects more than just verbal speech. It protects conduct, and especially conduct that's inherently expressive," Goldwater attorney Adam Shelton said. "We think that presents a very good and important First Amendment question." In a previous statement to IndyStar, district Superintendent Laura McDermott said Nicole Graves was restricted from campus for "a pattern of aggressive interactions with school staff and public commentary involving children other than her own," not for expressing concerns. IndyStar has reached out to McDermott regarding the newly filed litigation. Last year, Graves recorded a meeting with her school principal about an incident on her daughter's school bus concerning the driver's behavior. She decided to record the meeting so she could accurately recount what was said, according to Goldwater. Discontent with the principal's answers, she posted part of the recording on social media. The district then notified Graves in a letter, which IndyStar obtained, that she broke policy and was given a school grounds ban and restrictions on staff communications. The punishment has since expired. As she brings her fight to court, Graves said she is surprised it has come to this but not that the school won't back down. She said she is continuing to fight to establish better policies for parents and protect children. "This is not fun for me. This is not something I ever thought I would have to fight for," she said. "But I am more than happy to stand up and fight and talk to who I need to talk to to get things to change because I think it's important for all the families in this school district." With her four children still attending school in the district, Graves is concerned about retaliation. She said she is keeping a close eye on her children's schooling and is "terrified" the school will ban her again. The right to record public officials engaged their official duties in a public place has been solidified through previous case law. Goldwater, through its complaint, is attempting to deepen those rights by arguing that some private conversations are protected as well. In its complaint, Goldwater argues that people have the right to record meetings with government officials as long as the recording doesn't violate the rights of other private individuals and the person is lawfully present. "When it's just a conversation between a parent and a school official about their child and doesn't implicate any privacy rights of other students, we think a parent has the right to record that meeting," Shelton said. If the school restricted Graves from talking about the meeting or drafting a transcript, Shelton previously said, it would undoubtedly violate the First Amendment. He questions why a recording would be any different. The complaint also says the policy violates Graves' 14th Amendment rights to control her child's education in several instances, overlapping with their First Amendment argument. Goldwater is seeking an injunction halting the recording policy and a judgment finding the school district violated Graves' First and 14th Amendment rights. This is Goldwater's second crack in two years at clarifying First Amendment case law on recording conversations with school officials. The institute petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court in June 2024 to take up the case of a Massachusetts dad denied the ability to video-record his son's special education accommodation conferences. The high court did not take up the appeal after a district court ruled the act of recording was not protected by the First Amendment. Shelton said the institute is hopeful the courts will take a full look at their arguments in Graves' case. "We think we have a very good argument here that the recording of this meeting is protected both by the First Amendment and the 14th Amendment," he said. "We look forward to expressing those ideas in court." The USA TODAY Network - Indiana's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners.
San Francisco Chronicle
14 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Telecom Argentina: Q2 Earnings Snapshot
BUENOS AIRES, Argentina (AP) — BUENOS AIRES, Argentina (AP) — Telecom Argentina SA (TEO) on Tuesday reported a loss of $155.6 million in its second quarter. The Buenos Aires, Argentina-based company said it had a loss of 36 cents per share. The telecommunications company posted revenue of $1.67 billion in the period. _____
