New process turns wheat straw and oat husks into sustainable clothing
Researchers at Chalmers University in Sweden have discovered a process to turn wheat straw and oat husks, left behind after harvest and milling, into textiles.
They hope it will eventually lead to new sources of sustainable fabric, reducing the world's reliance on synthetics made from non-renewable sources.
While farmers in Australia will need to be convinced, those working on the frontier of new materials say there are compelling reasons to explore going from high fibre to high fashion.
The quest for new sources of textiles is not a new one.
Before the advent of synthetics like polyester and manufactured fibres such as rayon, textiles made from cotton, wool and silk are woven through human history.
But humanity's demand for affordable fashion is a challenge for sustainability.
The researchers at Chalmers University's department of chemistry and chemical engineering are searching for new sources of cellulose, the structural component of plant cell walls that allows them to stand upright.
Cellulose has been used in manufactured textiles since the 1880s.
"We looked into what Sweden would have for side-streams [from farms] that contain cellulose and which would also be available for the whole year round," Associate Professor Diana Bernin, who co-authored the study, said.
Early uses of cellulose include artificial silk and carbon fibres for light bulbs, but these days it is most commonly sourced from wood and made into rayon, also known as viscose.
Dr Bernin said the process, which involves creating a pulp similar to that used to make paper, is difficult, energy-intensive, uses toxic chemicals and has been linked to deforestation.
Published in the Royal Society of Chemistry Sustainability journal, the study tested wheat straw, oat husks, potato and sugar beet pulp — all by-products produced on Swedish farms.
"We figured out that potato and sugar beet are very difficult because they might contain a lot of soil," Dr Bernin said.
"But it worked very well for the oat husks and wheat straw."
Through a method called soda pulping, the plant material was able to be dissolved, washed and spun into a fibre, producing a final product "very similar" to cotton.
"Chemistry-wise, it's the same molecule inside," Dr Bernin said.
At Deakin University's Institute for Frontier Materials in Geelong, Associate Professor Chris Hurren is also working to reduce the environmental impact of fabric.
He said cotton made up about a quarter of the world's textile supply, wool accounted for about 2 per cent, with the remaining 65 to 70 per cent comprised of oil-based polyester.
If the oat husks and wheat straw could provide a high-purity source of cellulose then they had huge potential, he said.
"Research could occur in Australia to understand what is the ability for Australian materials to go down this path," he said.
But while the researchers were looking to add value to what European farmers considered to be waste, growers like Bradley Misfud in central Queensland already see it as valuable.
On his Kilcummin farm, south-west of Mackay, rain is sporadic and the wheat straw is "one of the biggest assets of the crop".
"Because we don't have big, strong, long winters, our wheat crops and yields aren't anywhere near what they get further south.
"We don't really have a big bulk density of straw to begin with, which is why we're pretty cautious about looking after and leaving what we have where it is."
Mr Misfud said he commonly left about 30 to 40 centimetres of wheat straw in the ground to help prevent erosion and retain soil moisture, compared to the 10-15 centimetres left behind in Sweden.
But Queensland is Australia's smallest wheat region, with the bulk of the crop grown in Western Australia, NSW, Victoria and South Australia — where, Mr Misfud said, there could be some application.
"I just feel that this particular strategy may not work in our area.
"We've all learnt with minimum till practices … capturing moisture is king, and that's what we're all trying to do day in, day out."
Beyond the climates where wheat and oats were grown, Dr Hurren said people all over the world were looking for alternative sources of cellulose.
He said seaweed, food waste, algae, banana, pineapple, kenaf, bamboo, hemp, coconut, linseed and blended textiles were all being investigated.
"We need to look at some new sources of fibres to fill the void," he said.
But he said strategies to reduce demand also needed to be explored.
"Australia is the world leader in the number of garments we buy per person … and something like 40 per cent of the garments coming into Australia don't get sold," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
a day ago
- ABC News
Microplastics are in our food, water and air. How can we minimise our exposure to them?
The scourge of plastic pollution will continue to grow, at least for now, after talks to strike a global treaty fell apart this month. It was the sixth round of such negotiations in three years, but despite a last-ditch scramble on Friday, delegates could not reach agreement. Meanwhile, new research continues to expose plastic's quiet presence in our food, tap water and the air we breathe. A study published last month found higher-than-expected levels of inhalable plastic particles in a handful of apartments and cars in France. Recent Australian research found even compost contains teeny plastic fragments, which may eventually make their way into agricultural soils and food crops. These are a couple of the latest studies into microplastics: fragments or fibres of plastic between a micron (one millionth of a metre) up to 5 millimetres in size. Microplastics can be created as a result of larger pieces of plastic shedding or breaking apart, or be added to products, such as plastic powders added to some cosmetics. Along with microplastics, there are also nanoplastics. These are plastic particles less than a micron wide. For context, a human hair is about 50 microns in diameter. Being so tiny, nanoplastics might more easily infiltrate human cells and tissues such as our blood, "so they're the ones scientists are interested in", University of Queensland microplastics researcher Cassandra Rauert said. So considering micro- and nanoplastics are everywhere, from the summit of Everest to the deepest ocean, how can we minimise our exposure without living in a cave? The short answer is: we don't yet know. Part of that stems from the fact that we don't know a whole lot about microplastics in general, such as where they come from, how many are in our environment, how they might get into our body, what they do once they're in there, and how much we excrete. "Unfortunately, microplastics is a very new field of research," Dr Rauert said. Compared to other everyday pollutants such as pesticides, scientists don't have a good handle on the potential effects of microplastic or nanoplastic exposure. And current techniques to identify micro- and nanoplastics in various organs "are not perfect". "We really don't have good data showing that plastics are ending up in our brains or our liver or our placenta and things like that. "There's a lot of reactive media to those studies and it's causing a lot of concern, which is very understandable, but … we really don't have a good grip on if plastics are actually getting into our bodies yet." So what do we know? More research needs to be done, but it seems that micro- and nanoplastics can generate inflammation, Dr Rauert said. It's not just the physical presence of plastic particles in the body that may affect our health — it's also the chemicals they bring with them, she added: "You're getting a double hit when you're exposed to these things." Such chemicals can be picked up by plastic particles from the environment, or are additives used during manufacturing that make the plastic more malleable, for instance. These chemicals can disrupt hormones, and "there's evidence coming out now that they're linked to type 2 diabetes", Dr Rauert said. "It's these chemicals that we … are more concerned about exposure to [than the plastic itself]." Despite not yet having definitive evidence that microplastics cause harm to our health, researchers suggest avoiding them as much as possible. That can be hard, considering just how much plastic is all around us all the time. When it comes to food, there is some good news: there's probably less plastic in what we eat than originally feared. One of Dr Rauert's students surveyed food a typical Australian would buy from the supermarket and found low concentrations of nano- and microplastics in them. Any plastic present in food probably comes from the packaging around it. But it's what we do with the food when we bring it home that can contribute to microplastic levels, Dr Rauert added. "If you're using a plastic chopping board, every time you use that [and] you can see it's deforming and degrading as you're using it, there are small pieces of plastic that are going to be coming off that board and end up in the food you're eating." The same goes with plastic ladles and the like. So if possible, try to use wooden chopping boards and metal or wood utensils. Tap water is a potentially bigger source of microplastics than food. These plastic particles can come from any number of sources, from the water treatment process to the PVC pipes that plumb your home. Putting tap water through a filter may be helpful in removing some of the larger microplastics, Dr Rauert said, even if some of the smaller microplastics and nanoplastics slip through. "I reckon in the next couple of years there probably will be some [microplastic-filtering devices] on the market." The air inside our home and the dust that settles on surfaces could well be teeming with micro- and nanoplastics small enough to get into our lungs. Synthetic textiles such as polyester and nylon shed tiny fragments and fibres of plastic, and they are found everywhere from furniture to clothes to manchester and carpet. "A lot of our carpets are polypropylene, so when pieces of the carpet are just wearing off over time, then you're getting small pieces of polypropylene in the air," Dr Rauert said. It might sound boring, but wiping down dusty surfaces and vacuuming regularly can reduce microplastics in your home. Another big source of microplastics in the home, Dr Rauert said, is the clothes dryer, especially if you use it to dry synthetic materials. As they tumble in the hot air, synthetic materials release plastic fibres that aren't captured by the dryer filter. And if that hot air blows out into your home, it carries all those fibres with it. It's often not available to people in apartments, but having a dryer that exhausts to the outside environment instead of inside your house can help keep microplastics down, as can avoiding using the dryer for synthetic materials altogether. Generally, the air outside has fewer microplastics than indoor air, especially in winter when windows might remain closed to keep the warmth in. So it's worth periodically opening windows and doors to ventilate the air in your home and let microplastics out. While we can take individual action to keep our home environment as microplastic-free as possible, plastic pollution will continue to be a problem until large-scale changes are made, such as tougher action from governments, Dr Rauert said. "There are small things we can do, but we really need a bigger, collective global effort to try and really cut down the amount of unnecessary plastic that we keep on producing every year. "You don't actually consider how much plastic you use in your everyday life. It's always there. It's just you don't think about it." For more on microplastics, check out the full episode of Lab Notes.
ABC News
6 days ago
- ABC News
CSIRO opens Australia's largest wildlife vault
A new CSIRO National Research Collections facility has opened in Canberra, where it will safeguard more than 13-million irreplaceable biodiversity specimens. Named 'Diversity', the $90-million building brings together the Australian National Wildlife Collection and the Australian National Insect Collection under one roof
ABC News
6 days ago
- ABC News
New $90 million research facility opens at CSIRO to house specimens collected over 150 years
Millions of irreplaceable biodiversity specimens have been re-homed at a new CSIRO facility that the agency says will support research to better understand and manage Australia's natural environment. Named 'Diversity', the $90 million National Research Collections building in Canberra features temperature-controlled vaults that are bushfire and pest-resistant while designed to preserve 13 million specimens for future generations. Among the specimens, which have been collected over 150 years, are 55,000 birds, 17,000 orchids, 2.4 million moths and seven million beetles. Dr Clare Holleley, who is the director of vertebrate collections, says the facility serves as a "time machine for Australia's biodiversity". "It's taken snapshots of specimens over time, and when we put all of those little snapshots together, it puts together a picture of how Australia's biodiversity is changing. "We can learn from those trends and potentially predict what is going to happen in the future." The collections include 99 per cent of Australia's native birds, as well as exotic bird species, skeletons, mammals, reptiles stored in ethanol, eggs and frozen tissue. Relocating the specimens took about a year. The official opening of the facility coincides with National Science Week, described by CSIRO chief executive Doug Hilton as an "exciting" moment. Dr Hilton described the facility as "cutting-edge", featuring new genomics laboratories and digitisation facilities that will allow scientists to extract and share more information from research specimens. "If we can't understand how things are changing over time, it's very hard to conserve things for the future," he said. "What we have here is a facility that holds specimens in a highly secure way and allows us to digitise and automate digitisation in a way that is just the envy of the world." While there was celebration at the opening of the building, concern remains about the potential of job cuts at the agency, with the Community and Public Sector Union warning that hundreds of jobs could be axed this year. In responding to those concerns, Dr Hilton said: "Our science has to adapt". "There are programs of research that we may have to stop in order for us to be able to do new programs of research to tackle those big problems like productivity, sustainability and our sovereign science capacity." He said the agency would be reviewing its whole portfolio of science next month and then would need to make "hard choices", but wouldn't say how many jobs could be affected. The new National Research Collections building was jointly funded by the CSIRO and the Department of Education through the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy. While the building won't be open to the public, the collections will be accessible to researchers, governments, and citizen scientists worldwide.
