
Trump's tariffs on cars, copper, drugs, aluminum could hit harder than other levies
These so-called "Section 232" tariffs — already announced on cars, steel and aluminum, and floated for copper and other items — further constrain businesses and U.S. trading partners trying to navigate a constantly evolving trade environment.
Trump said Tuesday that he would impose 50% tariffs on copper imports, double what he had previously floated for the valuable commodity. He also said he would soon announce tariffs "at a very high rate" on pharmaceuticals.
Trump's announcement sent copper prices soaring, and the metal posted its highest single-day gain since 1989. The copper futures contract for September closed Tuesday up 13%, at $5.6855 per pound.
The threats were the latest sign of the president's willingness to use sector-specific tariffs to gain leverage over trading partners and try to reshape the U.S. economy.
The announcement came a day after Trump rolled out stiff tariff rates on imports from 14 countries, all effective Aug. 1: Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Kazakhstan, South Africa, Laos, Myanmar, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Tunisia, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Serbia, Cambodia and Thailand.
The letters are intended to ratchet up the pressure on U.S. trade partners to come to the table before the Aug. 1 deadline.
But as countries' negotiations are still in limbo — and some nations are still pushing for carve-outs, with varying degrees of receptiveness from the White House — sector-specific tariff rates are already squeezing trading partners and U.S. consumers.
South Africa and Kazakhstan, two countries that Trump hit with tariff rates on Monday, are both major producers of aluminum, while Japan and South Korea, also on the list, are both major steel producers.
"Reciprocal tariffs are making headlines, but the product-specific tariffs will still have a significant impact on the domestic market," Mike Lowell, a partner at law firm ReedSmith, told CNBC.
Last month, Trump announced that he was doubling tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to 50% for most countries, effective the following day.
Steel and aluminum are essential materials for durable goods like refrigerators and cars. But they are also the chief components of smaller items Americans use every day, like zippers and kitchenware.
The steel and aluminum tariffs are a continuation of Trump's first-term trade agenda, when he implemented a 25% tariff on steel and 10% tariff on aluminum imports in 2018, causing near-immediate price spikes, Reuters reports.
But they are also different from his first term tariffs in important ways. Firstly, the rates are much higher — in some cases double their previous levels. Secondly, the tariff rates today are being layered on top of other customs duties.
"The use of section 232 together with other instruments is adding further complexity to the tariff landscape and elevates the importance of country negotiations to get exemption," Iacob Koch-Weser, an associate director of global trade and investment at BCG wrote last month.
Trump has repeatedly cited Section 232 of the massive 1962 Trade Expansion Act to justify his sector-specific tariffs. That measure permits the president to unilaterally adjust tariff rates when America's national security is under threat.
A different law, Section 301, is being used to impose tariffs on specific products from China. Some of these were imposed during Trump's first term, and remained largely in place during the tenure of his successor, President Joe Biden.
Another sector that has been hit hard with specific tariffs is cars and auto parts. That 25% rate disproportionally impacts Japan and South Korea, two leading automotive exporters to the United States.
The White House is still considering whether to grant exemptions on the auto tariffs to some companies, partly in response to intense lobbying by industry groups, CNBC reported.
The White House in April did sign an executive order preventing the auto tariffs from being stacked with other levies, such as on aluminum and steel, bringing some relief to the auto industry.
But given that supply chains often have delayed reactions to tariffs, Trump's levy on auto parts may not be fully felt for years.
Experts have also noted that Trump's legal authority to set and adjust tariffs is more firmly established when it comes to sector-specific imports than it is for his country-specific "reciprocal" rates.
"Section 232 tariffs are central to President Trump's tariff strategy," said Lowell, of ReedSmith.
"They aren't the target of the pending litigation, and they're more likely to survive a legal challenge and continue into the next presidential administration, which is what we saw with the aluminum and steel tariffs originally imposed under the first Trump administration," he added.
To justify imposing country-by-country tariffs earlier this year, Trump invoked emergency powers that are currently being challenged in federal court. If the president loses that case, he may decide to fall back on sector tariffs as a different way of leveraging U.S. economic power.
Trump has also already floated the possibility of imposing additional sector-specific tariffs on agricultural products, iPhones, trucks and other items, though no action has been reported yet.
Trump had previously ordered the Commerce Department to institute a Section 232 national security investigation into both copper and lumber imports, with results due in November.
But his Tuesday comments suggest that the steep levies could be coming much sooner.
"Today, we're doing copper," Trump said of the commodity that makes up most of the electrical wiring in American homes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
3 minutes ago
- New York Post
Kellogg's becomes first company to sign legally binding agreement removing toxic dyes from cereals
After months of investigation and negotiations, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced Wednesday that WK Kellogg Co. 'Kellogg's' will permanently remove toxic dyes from its cereals. In a historic legal agreement, Paxton and Kellogg's signed an Assurance of Voluntary Compliance (AVC), which certifies that the company commits to removing artificial food colorings from its cereals by the end of 2027. While other companies have verbally committed to removing food dyes, Kellogg's is the first to officially sign a legally binding agreement confirming that it will remove food colorings, according to Paxton's office. 'Following months of investigating and negotiating, I'm proud to officially say Kellogg's will stop putting these unhealthy ingredients in its cereals,' Paxton wrote in a statement. 'The signed AVC demonstrates that Kellogg's is committed to keeping this pledge, and I commend the company for doing the right thing.' 4 Kellogg's will permanently remove toxic dyes from its cereals. Getty Images 4 Kellogg's plans to remove artificial food colorings from its cereals by the end of 2027. Pascal Huot – Paxton encouraged other food manufacturers to sign similar agreements to 'demonstrate their commitment to helping Americans live healthier lives.' In February, Paxton's office issued a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) to Kellogg's, and formally announced an investigation in April after the company claimed it would remove petroleum-based food colorings in the US, but allegedly did not do so. Charlie Gasparino has his finger on the pulse of where business, politics and finance meet Sign up to receive On The Money by Charlie Gasparino in your inbox every Thursday. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Instead, Paxton's office claimed Kellogg's removed toxic ingredients in Canada and Europe, while continuing to put different types of blue, red and yellow dyes in American cereals. Kellogg's markets popular cereals such as Froot Loops, Apple Jacks, Frosted Flakes and Rice Krispies as 'healthy,' Paxton previously said. 4 Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton urged other food manufacturers to remove artificial food colorings. Tobias Arhelger – 4 The New York Post cover for Wednesday, April 23, 2025. rfaraino However, he noted that some varieties contain petroleum-based artificial dyes linked to hyperactivity, obesity, autoimmune disorders, endocrine issues and cancer. 'A critical part of fighting for our children's future is putting an end to companies' deceptive practices that are aimed at misleading parents and families about the health of food products,' Paxton wrote in a statement. 'Artificial food colorings have been shown to have disastrous impacts on health, and in no world should foods that include these dyes be advertised as 'healthy.' 'There will be accountability for any company, including Kellogg's, that unlawfully makes misrepresentations about its food and contributes to a broken health system that has made Americans less healthy,' he added.

Business Insider
4 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Africa's youngest state dismisses deal to host Palestinians from war-torn Gaza
South Sudan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has firmly denied claims that it is engaged in talks with Israel to resettle Palestinians from the war-ravaged Gaza Strip. South Sudan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs denied allegations of involvement in discussions to resettle Palestinians from Gaza. South Sudan emphasized its priorities are addressing internal challenges, stating these claims were unfounded. Other African nations, such as Somalia, have also previously rejected similar proposals concerning displaced Palestinians. The statement comes in response to an Associated Press report on citing six unnamed sources who alleged that discussions were underway between Juba and Tel Aviv to relocate some Palestinians to the East African nation. South Sudanese officials dismissed the claims as unfounded, stressing that no such negotiations had taken place and reaffirming the country's current priorities lie in addressing its own internal humanitarian and development challenges. In a statement sighted by Reuters, South Sudan's foreign affairs ministry described the claims as baseless and ' do not reflect the official position or policy of the Government of the Republic of South Sudan," The ministry's clarification seeks to put to rest mounting speculation over the reported arrangement, which had quickly drawn international attention due to the highly sensitive nature of the Israel–Palestine conflict and South Sudan's delicate diplomatic posture. African nations take a firm stance on hosting Palestinian refugees This marks the second time an African nation has rejected proposals to host displaced Palestinians from Gaza. In March, both Somalia and its breakaway region of Somaliland denied receiving any such proposal from the United States or Israel, with Mogadishu stating it categorically opposed the idea. The refusal by African states such as South Sudan, Somalia, and Somaliland to host displaced Palestinians from Gaza is rooted in a mix of political, security, and geopolitical considerations, all of which intersect with historical sensitivities about sovereignty and foreign influence. Gaza has become almost uninhabitable due to a combination of prolonged conflict, blockade, and the current war's unprecedented destruction. Years of restrictions on movement and goods imposed primarily by Israel and Egypt, have crippled Gaza's economy, infrastructure, and health systems. Water and electricity are scarce, and large parts of the territory lie in ruins after sustained Israeli military operations. These conditions have fueled occasional proposals to relocate some displaced Palestinians abroad. The AP report published in March disclosed that the United States and Israel engaged officials from several East African governments to discuss the possibility of using their territories as destinations for Palestinians displaced from the Gaza Strip under President Donald Trump's proposed postwar plan. The outreach to Sudan, Somalia, and the breakaway region of Somaliland highlighted Washington and Tel Aviv's determination to advance a proposal that has drawn widespread condemnation and raised serious legal and moral concerns. Given that all three locations face poverty and, in some cases, ongoing violence, the plan also casts doubt on Trump's stated aim of resettling Gaza's Palestinians in what he described as a 'beautiful area.'
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Jeffrey Epstein is dead. Ghislaine Maxwell is not': Sex trafficker fights DOJ move to unseal grand jury records
Ghislaine Maxwell, the former girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein who after his death was convicted of sex trafficking girls and young women as his accomplice, is opposing the government's requests to unseal the grand jury transcripts in her criminal case. The Trump administration has been firefighting the fallout from the so-called 'Epstein Files' since the DOJ released a memo last month that contained little new information and concluded no further investigation was warranted into the late sex offender's alleged sex trafficking scheme. Since the uproar, which has included Republican lawmakers and many from his MAGA base, President Donald Trump asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to make public 'any and all pertinent' grand jury transcripts in the Epstein and Maxwell criminal cases. Experts say these documents only account for a small fraction of the files related to the investigations. The grand jury transcripts are sealed, and Maxwell's attorneys say she wants to keep them that way as she continues to make appeals to the Trump administration to toss or lessen her prison sentence. The 63-year-old is serving 20 years after being convicted in 2021 of sex trafficking and other counts for her role in the scheme to sexually exploit and abuse teenage girls and young women with Epstein. Her attorneys have taken an appeal of her conviction to the Supreme Court. 'Jeffrey Epstein is dead. Ghislaine Maxwell is not,' Maxwell's attorneys wrote in a Tuesday filing. The public interest in the Epstein case 'cannot justify a broad intrusion into grand jury secrecy in a case where the defendant is alive, her legal options are viable, and her due process rights remain.' The Supreme Court will consider whether to take up her appeal in September. If the judge allowed the transcripts to be unsealed before then, her lawyers argued, the documents could impact any future litigation. Releasing the raw transcripts would 'inevitably influence any future legal proceeding' and cause 'severe and irrevocable' reputational harm, her attorneys said. Maxwell has never been allowed to review the documents. Her lawyers asked the court to deny the government's motion to unseal the transcripts. The judges overseeing the cases previously asked the government to address legal questions before they can consider releasing them. On Monday, the DOJ gave the judges annotated versions of the transcripts, identifying what information is not publicly available. However in an attached memo, Bondi admitted that 'much' of the information in the transcripts is already in the public domain. 'The enclosed, annotated transcripts show that much of the information provided during the course of the grand jury testimony—with the exception of the identities of certain victims and witnesses—was made publicly available at trial or has otherwise been publicly reported through the public statements of victims and witnesses,' Bondi wrote. The attorney general also noted that the government has provided notice about its requests to unseal transcripts to all but one of the victims referenced in the documents. 'The Government still has been unable to contact that remaining victim,' she wrote. After meeting with the DOJ last week, Maxwell was moved from a federal prison in Tallahassee, Florida to the Federal Prison Camp Bryan in southeast Texas. The Florida prison was classified as a minimum security prison, where she was detained in an 'honor dorm' for the best-behaved inmates, and activities included yoga and pilates. The Texas prison mainly houses those convicted of 'white-collar' crimes and minor offenses and boasts a sports field, gym, arts and crafts activities, and a theater program. Earlier this week, two of Epstein's victims criticized the Trump administration's handling of the case. The victims remained anonymous and filed their letters in the New York case related to the late pedophile. 'The latest attention on the 'Epstein Files', the 'Client List' is OUT OF CONTROL and the ones that are left to suffer are not the high-profile individuals, IT IS THE VICTIMS. Why the lack of concern in handling such sensitive information for the victims sake?' one wrote in a Monday filing. Another wrote: 'Dear United States, I wish you would have handled and would handle the whole 'Epstein Files' with more respect towards and for the victims. I am not some pawn in your political warfare.' Furor has mounted over the administration's handling of the case since the Justice Department released its July 6 Epstein memo. In it, the DOJ confirmed that Epstein died by suicide and said there was no evidence to support the existence of a 'client list' of high-profile individuals involved in his alleged sex trafficking. The memo put to an end months-long anticipation for new Epstein information. In February, Bondi had released 'Phase 1' of the files, a tranche of documents that included mostly publicly available information. She also suggested that the 'client list'was sitting on her desk. Parts of Trump's MAGA base and prominent lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have called for heightened transparency around the Epstein files. Those calls grew louder after the Wall Street Journal published a report last month claiming that the president drew a sexually suggestive 50th birthday card for Epstein in 2003. Trump has vehemently denied making the card and sued the Journal in a $10 billion defamation case. The Wall Street Journal also reported that DOJ officials told the president in May that his name, among many others, had appeared in the Epstein Files. Being named in the files does not suggest any wrongdoing. The president's name was reportedly redacted from documents as the administration prepared for their potential public release, Bloomberg reported last week. The Trump administration has declared itself the 'most transparent' in history.