logo
Gas producers question whether Coalition's energy plan will cut consumer prices

Gas producers question whether Coalition's energy plan will cut consumer prices

The Guardian01-04-2025

Gas industry leaders have expressed confusion and concern about a Coalition plan to force them to sell more of the fossil fuel in Australia and cast doubt over whether Peter Dutton's target to cut gas prices can be delivered.
Speaking at an Australian Domestic Gas Outlook conference in Sydney, several executives argued the policy to create what the opposition leader called an 'east coast gas reservation policy' could exacerbate future gas supply issues in southern states.
Dutton has said he would require east coast gas exporters to add 10% to 20% to available gas supply for Australian homes and businesses, and that it could lead to wholesale gas prices falling from $14 to $10 a gigajoule before the end of the year. The Coalition has not explained how the policy would work, but has promised to release modelling to back up the claims.
Squadron's executive general manager of operations, Stuart Davis, told the conference it was a 'good question' if his company would survive if wholesale prices fell to $10 a gigajoule.
'That was a comment from a political party that's not in power and there's no policy to back that up yet,' he said. 'I think $10 gas would be a challenge for many in this room to foresee happening.'
Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter
The Shell Australia chair, Cecile Wake, said there was confusion in the industry about what the Coalition's proposal would mean. 'There are not very many details about either party's policies, so we don't really know what the price outcome [is] that is trying to be achieved,' she said.
Wake said she was concerned that the policy could 'potentially push more supply into the market than there is actual demand … and when that happens, it has the effect of potentially driving prices even lower than the $10 [a gigajoule], potentially to the point where future investment decisions are not economic.'
But she said even if this happened, it was not guaranteed lower prices would be passed on to households and businesses. 'There are a lot of intermediaries that sit between the export projects and the ultimate consumers, so it is difficult to predict what the final price to consumers will be,' she told the conference.
Industry leaders said they were desperate for more detail about the policy, which Dutton announced last week in his budget reply. Wake told Guardian Australia she learned of the proposed policy when the opposition leader addressed parliament.
'It is the first that we heard of the specific policy announcement,' she said. 'Not very much detail was announced on Thursday night last week. We don't have detail on exactly how it's going to work. Like everybody else, we're listening to the announcements as they come, we're expressing some of our concerns.'
Wake said controlling exports was the 'easiest lever' in the federal government's control, but that was 'not a good reason to pull that lever harder'.
'This does not increase supply, it simply redistributes it, and when coupled with price caps [as introduced under Labor] and other market interventions, it can impede investment and actually exacerbate the challenge,' she said.
Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
About three-quarters of the gas extracted in Australia is exported. The gas price on the country's east coast has been tied to international prices since the export industry at Gladstone expanded significantly in 2014. It led to a charge jump in coal and gas prices – and power bills – after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022.
Some analysts have said opening new gas basins was unlikely to significantly reduce prices, in part because most cheap gas in Australia has already been extracted. They have also warned it would lead to higher greenhouse gas emissions given gas is methane, a fossil fuel, and it releases carbon dioxide when it is burned. They have said while some gas will likely be needed for decades to come, locking in more gas use than is needed was likely to slow the shift to zero-emissions energy.
Several gas industry experts have said rather than address a gas shortage, the country needs to find a way to get more of the gas extracted in the north rather than the south before a projected annual shortfall from 2029. This was not the view of most gas executives at the conference.
Beach Energy's managing director, Brett Woods, described the Coalition's proposal as the potential 'expropriation of Queensland's gas resources'. He said there were 'many positive elements within the opposition's energy policies' for the gas industry – listing promises to approve developments faster, reduce 'activist lawfare' and offer funding for gas infrastructure – but that 'reducing LNG exports and deliberately oversupplying southern markets has a large risk of being a negative'.
Chevron Australia's managing director, Mark Hatfield, said energy security was 'an easy target to be a political football' and political partisanship was not good, 'not just for producers but for consumers of gas'.
'Some of the things we're seeing right now are maybe some short-term fixes that could have long-term implications with negative outcomes,' he said.
Wake also said energy policy was too significant an issue to be decided in the heat of an election campaign. 'There is a danger that if it gets caught in the dynamic of an election … then we can have unintended consequences that are very difficult for anybody to walk back [from] or to modify,' she said.
The industry bosses largely did not raise the role gas played in driving the climate crisis, or the scientific evidence that gas use needed to be limited to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tottenham set deadline to appoint Thomas Frank as £10m talks progress rapidly
Tottenham set deadline to appoint Thomas Frank as £10m talks progress rapidly

Daily Mirror

time6 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Tottenham set deadline to appoint Thomas Frank as £10m talks progress rapidly

Tottenham Hotspur sacked Ange Postecoglou after his second season in charge of the club and are pushing to appoint Brentford boss Thomas Frank as the new coach in the coming days Tottenham are nearing an agreement with Brentford over Thomas Frank and could appoint the Bees boss as their new head coach in time for the weekend. Spurs quickly turned to Frank as their preferred candidate after sacking Ange Postecoglou last week. The north Londoners parted ways with the Australian coach despite winning the Europa League after a sub-par 17th place finish in the Premier League. And Daniel Levy looks to have taken a change in tact by looking to appoint Frank, who is deemed as a more pragmatic option. ‌ The move is set to cost Tottenham £10million but Frank could be confirmed as the club's new boss within the next 48 hours such is the positive feelings around negotiations, according to the BBC. There is will from both parties to get a deal finalised quickly. ‌ It is said new Spurs chief Vinai Venkatesham, previously of Arsenal, has been a key figure in the process alongside Levy. Venkatesham only started work at the club just over a week ago. And the positive talks are set to be tied up soon. Having said that, the £10m compensation cost could rise depending on how many members of backroom staff Frank looks to bring with him to north London. One such figure Spurs already said to be in talks over is assistant Justin Cochrane. Discussions are underway over Frank's backroom team with Cochrane's arrival particularly apt after he started his coaching career with the Europa League winners. Cochrane was previously touted as being in contention to succeed Frank at Brentford. Frank himself moved up from an assistant role under Dean Smith to take the job. The 51-year-old Dane is already thinking about the new squad that awaits him and set out a task for his future employers. Frank would like to see Brentford star Bryan Mbeumo join him across London. ‌ The Cameroon international, who scored 20 goals in 2024/25, is a target for Manchester United. The 25-year-old has already indicated his willingness to make the move to Old Trafford with a significant pay increase. Brentford want to bring in £60m for the signature of their star, who has also drawn interest from Newcastle United. And perhaps Frank's exit could provide a complicating factor. Ex-Manchester United goalkeeper Ben Foster reckons the forward will be better served following his coach across London. ‌ "I would say that if you want to be part of something that's going to make you a better footballer and work hard and be part of a team, then go to Spurs with Thomas Frank," the ex- Wrexham shot-stopper said on his Fozcast podcast. "If you are happy picking up your wages knowing that there's going to be an awful lot more pressure, a lot more eyes on you, a lot more judgement and failure is just part of what they do, then you'd go to Manchester United." Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our commgunity members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.

Netanyahu's government could collapse over Israel's ultra-Orthodox military draft law
Netanyahu's government could collapse over Israel's ultra-Orthodox military draft law

The Independent

time8 hours ago

  • The Independent

Netanyahu's government could collapse over Israel's ultra-Orthodox military draft law

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faces a vote to dissolve parliament Wednesday and key coalition partners have threatened to bring down his government. Still, few think it's the end of the road for Israel's longest-serving prime minister, who has been battling corruption charges for years, or his far-right government, still in power after presiding over the security failures surrounding the Hamas-led Oct. 7, 2023, attack. The move to dissolve, called by the opposition, will only pass if Netanyahu's ultra-Orthodox coalition partners break with him over the failure to pass a law exempting their community from military service, an issue that has bitterly divided Israelis, especially during the ongoing war in the Gaza Strip. The threats coming from the ultra-Orthodox could be posturing, and many expect Netanyahu to pull off a last-minute deal. But Wednesday's vote is the most serious challenge to Netanyahu's government since the war began, and the coalition's collapse could have major implications for Israel and the ongoing war. Why the ultra-Orthodox reject military service Most Jewish men are required to serve nearly three years of military service followed by years of reserve duty. Jewish women serve two mandatory years. But the politically powerful ultra-Orthodox, who make up roughly 13% of Israeli society, have traditionally received exemptions if they are studying full-time in religious seminaries. The exemptions — and the government stipends many seminary students receive through age 26 — have infuriated the general public. After Hamas' 2023 attack, Israel activated 360,000 reservists, its largest mobilization since the 1973 Mideast war. Israel is engaged in the longest active war in the country's history, which has stretched its robust military to the breaking point. Many reserve soldiers have served multiple rounds of duty in Gaza totaling hundreds of days. Some reserve soldiers are rejecting new call-ups. The number of Israelis continuing to report for reserve duty has dropped so low that the military has taken to social media to try to recruit people to keep serving. The enlistment exemption for the ultra-Orthodox goes back to Israel's 1948 founding, when small numbers of gifted scholars were exempt from the draft in response to the decimation of Jewish scholarship during the Holocaust. But with a push from politically powerful religious parties, the numbers have swelled to tens of thousands today. Israel's Supreme Court said the exemptions were illegal in 2017, but repeated extensions and government delay tactics have prevented a replacement law from being passed. Among Israel's Jewish majority, mandatory military service is largely seen as a melting pot and rite of passage. That's exactly why some ultra-Orthodox don't want their children to serve. 'It mixes together people with very different backgrounds, very different ideas, some people with very immoral ideas,' said Rabbi Ephraim Luft, 66, from the ultra-Orthodox stronghold of Bnei Barak. Luft said the community's dedication to upholding Jewish commandments protects the country as much as military service. 'Over thousands of years, the Jewish people have stood very strongly against any kind of decrees to force them to give up their religion, they've given up their lives for this,' Luft said. 'People have to understand there's no difference between the Spanish Inquisition or the Israeli draft law.' Why ultra-Orthodox parties would want to bring down the government Two parties belonging to the Haredim, or 'God-fearing' in Hebrew, are essential to Netanyahu's coalition. Both would need to vote to dissolve the government to force new elections, including Shas, which has traditionally been more supportive of Netanyahu. On Monday, a Shas spokesperson told an ultra-Orthodox radio program the party plans to vote in favor of dissolution, unless there is a breakthrough in negotiations. The other party, Degel HaTorah, has been threatening to leave the government since last week. 'Basically, they don't really care about the war and the economic situation of the state and anything else but their communal interest. And the focus of this communal interest is getting the exemption from serving in the army," said Shuki Friedman, an expert on religion and state affairs and vice president of the Jewish People Policy Institute, a Jerusalem think tank. Friedman and other experts say the current system is unsustainable. With its high birthrate, the ultra-Orthodox are the fastest-growing segment of Israel's population, at about 4% annually. Each year, roughly 13,000 ultra-Orthodox men reach the conscription age of 18, but less than 10% enlist, according to parliament's State Control Committee, which held a hearing examining the issue. The shock of the Oct. 7 attack appeared to ignite some enthusiasm among the ultra-Orthodox to serve, but no large enlistment materialized. The army has repeatedly declined to comment on the ultra-Orthodox enlistment rate. What happens if parliament is dissolved If the dissolution vote passes, it still faces a series of bureaucratic steps, including additional votes, that the government would likely drag on for weeks or months, said Gayil Talshir, a political science professor at Hebrew University. 'It will be like a gun that's been put into position, but that doesn't mean the coalition is over,' she said. Elections in Israel are scheduled for the fall of 2026. Both Talshir and Friedman believe it's unlikely the dissolution vote will pass Wednesday. If one ultra-Orthodox party is absent, the vote will not pass and another cannot be brought for six months, Talshir said. However, there's also a 'valid possibility' the rabbis who advise the ultra-Orthodox parties will say they've waited long enough for a draft exemption law, because they are facing enormous pressure from their communities, Friedman said. On Tuesday, top Haredi rabbis issued a religious decree emphasizing their stand against military service, which complicates the Haredi politicians' ability to negotiate, Friedman added. The army has issued thousands of draft notices to the ultra-Orthodox community, and those who refuse to serve can face arrest. While only around a dozen have been arrested after being stopped for trying to leave the country or for traffic violations, the fear this has inspired is significant, he added. Impact on the war in Gaza and the hostage crisis Netanyahu frequently cites the ongoing war as a reason Israel needs to provide a united front against its enemies. While the ultra-Orthodox parties remain part of the coalition, they want the war to end as quickly as possible, Talshir said. 'The Haredim think once the war is over, the pressure will be off them and they will be able to get their (military) exemption law,' she said.

Dutch VVD rules out coalition with ‘unbelievably untrustworthy' Wilders
Dutch VVD rules out coalition with ‘unbelievably untrustworthy' Wilders

The Guardian

time16 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Dutch VVD rules out coalition with ‘unbelievably untrustworthy' Wilders

The Netherlands' biggest centre-right party has ruled out forming another coalition government with Geert Wilders as its leader called him 'an unbelievably untrustworthy partner' and a 'quitter' who 'puts his own interests above those of the country'. In a significant blow to the far-right firebrand's hopes of returning to power, Dilan Yeşilgöz leader of the VVD, said late on Monday that her party would not enter another government with Wilders after elections, due on 29 October. The anti-Islam politician, who last week pulled the plug on the country's four-party coalition in a row over immigration and asylum policy, 'takes no responsibility whatsoever', Yeşilgöz told RTL TV. 'He has shown that he simply runs away when things get difficult. That's tough for voters, and for the country. Geert Wilders is only interested in Geert Wilders,' she said. In a separate interview with the Telegraaf newspaper, Yeşilgöz said Wilders was 'an unbelievably untrustworthy partner' and that the Netherlands deserved 'adult leadership'. She added: 'We are not going to work with him again.' Yeşilgöz announcement means Wilders is unlikely to be able to be part of a new coalition even if his far-right Freedom party (PVV) finishes first in the elections, since every major political formation has now ruled out working with him. The PVV's shock victory in elections in November 2023 led, after months of fraught talks, to a coalition with the populist Farmer-Citizen Movement (BBB), centrist New Social Contract (NSC) and liberal-conservative VVD that was sworn in last July. Wilders said last week he was pulling his party's ministers out of the pact after the other three partners refused to sign off on his 10-point plan to reduce immigration, which included turning back all asylum seekers and closing refugee hostels. Polling suggests the PVV has lost support and is now level with the VVD and Green-Labour alliance. Yeşilgöz said her party, which led the Netherlands's four previous governments, would also not consider a confidence-and-supply deal with Wilders. 'In fact, from day one he was someone who couldn't do it and didn't want to do it,' said the VVD leader, whose willingness to work with Wilders before the last election was widely credited with boosting the PVV's vote. 'It all just goes nowhere.' Yeşilgöz said there was still an 'enormous gulf' between the VVD's policies and those of the Green/Labour alliance (GL/PvdA). Most analysts predict either a VVD-led centre-right coalition or a centre-left arrangement headed by GL/PvdA.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store