No card, no problem: Ohio bill would require retailers to accept cash
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) – A recently introduced bill would require Ohio retailers to accept cash as a form of payment.
Sens. Louis Blessing III (R-Colerain Township) and Catherine Ingram (D-Cincinnati) introduced Senate Bill 30 last week. The legislation would ban cashless businesses, requiring physical money to be accepted during any retail transaction conducted in person. The bill excludes transactions that occur over the phone, through the mail or online.
'We tend to be moving more towards a cashless society now and there are privacy concerns with that,' Blessing said. 'Beyond that, there's a number of people who are unbanked. Think immigrants and low-income people. So a cashless society becomes more problematic for them, and of course, seniors.'
Student, attorney among Ohioans killed in D.C. plane crash
In Ohio, 4.2% of households did not use banking services as of 2023, according to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Since there is no federal law in the United States that requires businesses to accept cash, a business can legally reject it unless a state or local law specifically prohibits it.
The bill would allow the Ohio attorney general to sue businesses that reject cash for damages between $5,000 to $25,000 under the Consumer Sales Practices Act. Customers would also be able to sue for the amount of their transaction, plus up to $5,000.
The bill does have exemptions for the following circumstances:
Airport vendors in terminals where at least two other establishments sell food and accept cash
Parking facilities owned by a city
Parking facilities that only accept mobile payments
Rental car companies that accept a cashier's check or certified check as payment
Venues with a seating capacity of 10,000 or more
Businesses that offer a device to convert a customer's cash into a prepaid card, as long as there is no conversion fee
In recent years, multiple groups have come out against cashless establishments. The American Civil Liberties Union has condemned cashless stores, citing how low-income and undocumented people often lack access to banking services. MarketWatch, a financial news company, said cyberattacks and data leaks are more likely to affect those who pay digitally.
Yes to caribou, no to crocodiles: A list of which exotic pets you can own in Ohio
However, not everyone is on board with SB 30. The Ohio Council of Retail Merchants, an association representing over 7,700 businesses in the state, said the bill is unnecessary governmental oversight on businesses.
'This should be something that's between a business and its customers,' said Lora Miller, director of governmental relations and public affairs. 'Businesses know what their customers want and respond accordingly.'
Miller said she is not aware of any businesses in the organization's thousands of members that do not accept cash.
'Maybe one of our over 7,000 members doesn't accept cash,' Miller said. 'It's just very unusual because in the business of retail, you want to take whatever the customer is going to give. … To tie their hands, so to speak, for the future by a state law seems overly burdensome and unnecessary.'
Miller said she is perplexed by why the establishments that are frequently going cashless, such as sports or entertainment arenas, are the ones that are exempt from the bill.
Ohio schools risk federal funding if they teach 'unpatriotically' under Trump order
Blessing said he modeled the bill off of similar legislation that was signed into law in New Jersey. The exemptions in that law are the ones included in SB 30.
'As you can probably surmise, these things always turn out to be compromises; that's how it worked out in New Jersey,' Blessing said. 'Not having any options for cash at a sports facility – it's not something that most people go to on a daily basis. It's not the end of the world, and it's not really vital like going to the grocery would be.'
The new legislation marks the third time Blessing has introduced a bill requiring retailers to accept cash. If SB 30 fails to pass, he said he plans to continue introducing the measure until it becomes law.
The legislation was assigned to the Small Business and Economic Opportunity committee and awaits its first public hearing.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Stephen Miller Demanded ICE Target Home Depots
A lot of things happened. Here are some of the things. This is TPM's Morning Memo. Sign up for the email version. President Trump's dream of mass deportations has always suffered from logistical and practical obstacles that make the entire exercise part cruelty, part performance, and part salve of his fragile ego. It falls to White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller to keep all the plates spinning, a role he happily embraces, but which comes with the inherent challenge of putting the 'mass' in mass deportations. And so it was that ICE officials found themselves being berated by Miller in late May that their arrest numbers weren't high enough and the rhetorical focus on the worst of the worst needed to shift on the ground to focus on all undocumented immigrants, the WSJ reports: Agents didn't need to develop target lists of immigrants suspected of being in the U.S. illegally, a longstanding practice, Miller said. Instead, he directed them to target Home Depot, where day laborers typically gather for hire, or 7-Eleven convenience stores. Miller bet that he and a handful of agents could go out on the streets of Washington, D.C., and arrest 30 people right away. That kind of indiscriminate enforcement action has had the effect of sweeping up documented and undocumented, citizen and noncitizen, workers and criminals in a Kafkaesque crackdown that was sure to enflame tensions in immigrant and minority communities that were hardest hit. The WSJ report on the indiscriminate and aggressive nature of the ICE sweeps is worth your time. No one anecdote captures the entire picture, but repeated over and over across the country, a pattern emerges – and the grievances associated with it. It's not hard to draw a straight line from reckless roundups to civil unrest to military action from Trump. In other developments: In federal court in San Francisco, California sued Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth over the deployment of the National Guard over state objections. Some 2,000 guardsman and 500-700 marines have been deployed to Los Angeles, and the Pentagon said Monday night that another 2,000 National Guard troops were being mobilized. Attorney General Pam Bondi said violent Los Angeles protesters will face federal charges. At least nine have been charged so far. With unclear rules of engagement for the military and a vague, open-ended mission, it's not clear what the path to deescalation might be – or if that's even the plan. As Politico reports about Trump's troop deployment: Trump's stated rationale, legal scholars say, appears to be a flimsy and even contrived basis for such a rare and dramatic step. The real purpose, they worry, may be to amass more power over blue states that have resisted Trump's deportation agenda. And the effect, whether intentional or not, may be to inflame the tension in L.A., potentially leading to a vicious cycle in which Trump calls up even more troops or broadens their mission. The Brennan Center's Liza Goitein cut through some of the legalese with a good thread that makes this important point: 'But it would be a mistake to focus too much on which statutory power is being used here. What matters it that Trump is federalizing the Guard for the purpose of policing Americans' protest activity. That's dangerous for both public safety and democracy.' While overseeing a historic deployment of U.S. troops on American streets, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is, well, still Pete Hegseth: The White House is struggling to find qualified people to fill roles as senior advisers to Pete Hegseth because they either don't want to work for him or don't fit the bill politically, NBC News reports. The Pentagon inspector general looking into Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's Signal group chats is focused on whether the details of a military operation he shared were classified and if anyone ordered texts to be deleted, the WSJ reports. The Pentagon was allegedly 'duped' by a DOGE staffer who falsely claimed to know of warrantless surveillance conducted by the National Security Agency (NSA) that had identified DoD leakers, The Guardian reports. The DOGE staffer denies the allegation. Alien Enemies Act: U.S. District Judge David Briones of El Paso ruled on the substance that President Trump's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act to target the Tren de Aragua gang was unlawful. CECOT detainees: The Trump administration is appealing U.S. District Judge James Boasberg's ruling last week that it violated the due process rights of Venezuelan nationals when it deported them to a prison in El Salvador without notice or hearing. South Sudan: The detainees originally slated to be deported to South Sudan remain at a military base in Djibouti, the Trump administration told a court yesterday, and have been given attorney contact info and will be given access to telephones. The White House dismantling of the crime-fighting capabilities of the Justice Department in the white collar realm is going to end up being defining issue of this decade, with a cascading series of consequences ranging from simply more unbridled public corruption to the dire risk of a culture of corruption developing and implanting itself in American life. (I'll concede that there's a good argument such a culture already exists and produced two Trump presidencies.) Here's the latest: Reuters goes deep on the Trump White House's crippling of the DOJ's Public Integrity Section: dismantling its staff, bypassing it on charging decisions, and stripping its authority to file new cases. The Trump DOJ will only pursue a parred down range of foreign-bribery cases, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced. This come after a Trump executive order in February essentially froze cases under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The Trump White House is pushing hard for a rare and super controversial midterm redistricting in Texas to try to redraw the congressional map and give it a few more GOP seats so that it can hold on to the House majority. In a sign of how serious the move is, the Texas House GOP delegation held an emergency meeting on the Hill last evening, the NYT reports. There's a natural tension in such a scheme because drawing a map more favorable to the GOP overall means narrowing the partisan margins in the districts of GOP incumbents, which makes them more vulnerable. You'll recall that former Rep. Tom Delay (R-TX) muscled through a hugely controversial midterm redistricting in Texas in 2003 that shaped the national political landscape for years. In an extraordinary move, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., announced in a WSJ op-ed that he has fired all 17 members of the committee that advises the CDC on immunizations. The decision directly contradicts a promise Kennedy made to Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA), the decisive vote during his confirmation hearings, when he said he would not alter the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, the NYT reports. John Ganz on the recent passing of Michael Leeden: Ledeen might appear like a mere callous political opportunist, a dirty trickster, and he was, but it seems to me he was also a secret idealist, holding on to a dream of a non- or even anti-Nazi fascismo vero, something he took very seriously as an ideological project as he strenuously rejected the 'opera buffa' interpretation of Italian fascism.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Stephen Miller wages war on the GOP's libertarians
The Movement is a weekly newsletter tracking the influence and debates steering politics on the right. or in the box below. Stephen Miller is leading a public war against the Republican Party's libertarians as he reframes the 'one big, beautiful bill' to being the key that unlocks President Trump's mass deportation agenda. Going mainly after libertarian-leaning lawmakers such as Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who have brought up concerns about the megabill's deficit impact, the White House deputy chief of staff — and chief architect of Trump's immigration agenda — is taking a sledgehammer to what remains of the libertarian-conservative fusionism that was prominent in the party pre-Trump. 'The libertarians in the House and Senate trying to take down this bill — they're not stupid. They just don't care,' Miller said in an interview with conservative activist and commentator Charlie Kirk last week. 'Immigration has never mattered to them; it will never matter to them. Deportations have never mattered to them; it will never matter to them. You will never live a day in your life where a libertarian cares as much about immigration and sovereignty as they do about the Congressional Budget Office.' Miller's personal advocacy for the bill ramped up amid outcry from deficit hawks within Congress and from outside voices like Elon Musk. And while he echoed other top Republicans in denying the Congressional Budget Office's budget math, Miller has particularly focused on one of the legislation's key pillars: the billions of additional dollars to fund construction of the border wall and deportation efforts such as detention facilities, more Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers, and transporting deportees. The uprisings by those objecting to deportations that popped in Los Angeles over the weekend — prompting Trump to deploy the National Guard in response — is further fueling Miller's arguments. And there is plenty of polling to explain the strategy: A CBS News poll released Monday, for instance, found 54 percent of Americans approved of Trump's deportation efforts. Miller has explicitly wondered if libertarian-leaning Republicans such as Massie were fighting the bill in order to oppose the deportation program. Massie, calling from the road on his way back to D.C. on Monday, told me that is not the case. 'He and I have the same immigration, deportation, wall policy, with the exception of E-verify. That's the only libertarian objection I have,' Massie said. 'He's appealing to a trope that all libertarians are open borders, and he knows that's not true about me. He and I have spent hours talking, Stephen Miller and I, on these drives to and from D.C. … He's trying to spread some doubt about the messenger, and not my message.' But times are different now. 'He can't be as honest and candid as he was with me when he didn't have Donald Trump as his boss,' Massie said. 'He's got his job is to sell this bill, and he's trying to put lipstick on a pig, and Rand Paul and I are pointing out it's a pig.' Paul again became a Miller target after he told Fox News's Maria Bartiromo on 'Sunday Morning Futures' that the funding Trump administration is seeking for the border wall is 'excessive,' and he would probably do 'half as much' as what he wants for hiring more agents. The border, Paul argued, is 'largely controlled right now,' warning against hiring 'an army of Border Patrol agents that we have on the hook for payments and pensions Miller seethed. 'While ICE officers are battling violent mobs in Los Angeles, Rand Paul is trying to cut funding for deportations and border security,' he posted on the social platform X. A spokesperson for Paul sent me a statement firing back at Miller and the campaign against the libertarian senator. 'Clearly, they are afraid the big, not yet beautiful, bill won't pass. That's why he's being attacked by a pack of rabid paid influencers and the guy that wants to suspend the ancient writ of habeas corpus,' the Paul spokesperson said — making a reference to Miller saying the administration was 'actively looking' at suspending the constitutionally-protected mechanism that migrants have used to challenge their detention by declaring an invasion. 'They've given up arguing on the issue of our time, the debt, and have now descended to lies, innuendo and nonsense,' the Paul spokesperson said. Asked about Miller's digging into libertarians, White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson responded: 'Libertarians hate taxes which is why they're going to love The One, Big, Beautiful Bill that gives a 15 percent tax cut to working Americans while totally eliminating taxes on tips and overtime.' Miller's aversion to libertarians, though, seems to go deeper than opportunistic messaging for the bill. He posted in 2022 that the uprising of the ideology in the House GOP is 'how we ended up with open borders globalist [Paul] Ryan.' He blamed libertarian candidates for siphoning votes away from failed Trump-endorsed candidates in 2022 — Herschel Walker in Georgia, Blake Masters in Arizona, and Don Bolduc in New Hampshire. 'Another example of how libertarians ruin everything,' Miller said in one post responding to a 2022 Georgia Senate poll. He did, however, praise Trump's courting of the Libertarian Party — speaking at the minor party's national convention in 2024, and following through with a major campaign promise giving a full pardon to Ross Ulbricht, the founder of the Silk Road drug marketplace. And Massie told me he endorsed Trump to try to help boost the small-L libertarian contingent of the GOP coalition. That coalition, though, has apparently worn out its usefulness to Miller. 'By including the immigration language with the tax cuts with the welfare reform, it creates a coalition. Politics is all about coalitions,' Miller said in the interview with Kirk — also praising Trump in the interview as 'able to create a winning formula for populist, nationalist, conservative government.' Massie sensed the lack of electoral pressure is adding to the willingness to cast the libertarians aside. 'The thing here is that he doesn't have to run again,' Massie said. 'This is one of these signature things. If he has to burn part of the coalition to get it done, they're probably willing to do it.' Alex Nowrasteh, vice president of economic and social policy studies at the Cato Institute – the biggest libertarian think tank in Washington — said Miller's attacks on libertarians are, in one sense, no surprise. But he warned about the political implications that Miller's war has for the right. 'They are not typically long-term thinkers in terms of political coalition,' Nowrasteh said of Trump folks such as Miller, adding that 'this disagreement between Miller and Massie and Paul just shows how sundered that coalition was.' A White House official noted Trump's coalition includes Americans from all different backgrounds, including those who were not Republican voters prior to supporting Trump. , a weekly newsletter looking at the influences and debates on the right in Washington. I'm Emily Brooks, House leadership reporter at The Hill. Tell me what's on your radar: ebrooks@ Not already on the list? Free-marketers are putting their advocacy for extending President Trump's tax cuts into overdrive. The free market group Unleash Prosperity Now came out with a letter signed by 300 economists saying the extension of tax cuts in Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' will 'succeed in making the tax system more pro-growth and fairer,' getting positive shoutouts from Treasury Department Secretary Scott Bessent and a Truth Social share from Trump. Stephen Moore, a former economic adviser to Trump in his first term who co-founded Unleash Prosperity Now, told me the advocacy for the tax cuts is going well — but that GOP leaders' goal of sending it to Trump's desk by Independence Day is likely too ambitious. 'I'd love to see that, but I think there's too many differences right now to get it done by Fourth of July,' Moore told me. And he is 'not pleased' by the House version of the bill hiking up the state and local tax (SALT) deduction from $10,000 to $40,000. 'It's going to have to be negotiated down,' Moore said. 'We're very much in favor of playing hardball with them and saying, 'Look, OK, you want to take the whole party down with you, and you want to vote against a bill that gets 85 percent of your constituents a tax break, go ahead and blow it up,'' Moore said of the SALT-focused blue-state Republicans. Moore also responded to my reporting from last week's edition of about the 'new right' populist think American Compass celebrating its fifth anniversary with Vice President Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. 'This is kind of, you know, the big government Republicanism coming back. I view it as a cancer in the party,' Moore said. 'This is a movement that's anti-trade, anti-immigration, pro-union, pro-big-government-spending. Those are all contrary to the very free market freedom policies that binds all Republicans together. It's a movement that's really being funded by the left to try to divide and conquer the Republican Party.' 'The fact that Rubio and JD Vance have associated themselves with that movement is not a positive sign for the future of the party,' Moore added. : , from Fox Business's Eric Revell…President Trump's move to empower Elon Musk after the 2024 election — namely through the meme-inspired Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) effort — was met with excitement over the winter, with lawmakers giddy to see Trump's new bestie, the world's richest person (a campaign benefactor for several of them). But now the Musk-Trump falling out over the 'big, beautiful bill' has soured many Republicans on the 'DOGEfather.' If you're a Republican, choosing between Musk and Trump is an easy call (in favor of the president, of course). And it raises questions about the future of the DOGE organizations within Congress. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) had hitched her political wagon to DOGE by chairing a new DOGE subcommittee — and while she needled Musk by condemning 'lashing out on the internet,' she still has high praises for the government efficiency effort. 'I think DOGE is great. Government efficiency is fantastic. It's exactly what we need. And the American people support it, and it must continue. It doesn't have anything to do with with a disagreement on the internet. It has everything to do with the massive $36 trillion in debt,' Greene said. But Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Texas), a co-chair of the House DOGE Caucus, said the blowup does impact his group's effort. 'It impacts any time there's a casualty on the field,' Sessions told me. Related: , from me and my colleague Mychael Schnell Tuesday, June 10: Americans for Prosperity has a fly-in of state leaders to press Senators to extend the 2017 tax cuts. Wednesday, June 11, 7:05 p.m.: Congressional Baseball Game for Charity Thursday, June 12, 12:00 p.m.: The Cato Institute hosts a policy forum: 'What Is the Opportunity Cost of State AI Policy?' Florida state Sen. Ileana Garcia (R), co-founder of Latinas for Trump, excoriated the president for seeking to ramp up deportation efforts, calling the effort 'unacceptable and inhumane.' She posted on X: 'I understand the importance of deporting criminal aliens, but what we are witnessing are arbitrary measures to hunt down people who are complying with their immigration hearings—in many cases, with credible fear of persecution claims—all driven by a Miller-like desire to satisfy a self-fabricated deportation goal.' A White House spokesperson said in response that deportees receive due process. Rep. Mary Miller (R-Ill.) misidentified a Sikh as a Muslim while saying it was 'deeply disturbing' that the turban-wearing guest chaplain delivered the opening prayer in the House on Friday. She later deleted the post, but said: 'America was founded as a Christian nation, and I believe our government should reflect that truth, not drift further from it.' Derek Guy, the man behind the @dieworkwear account on X that posts commentary on men's fashion, revealed he arrived in the U.S. as an immigrant without legal status, having been brought over the border with Canada by his parents when he was a baby — prompting teasing from Republicans who have often been the target of his commentary. Vice President Vance responded with an approving meme to a post that suggested he now had 'the opportunity to do the funniest thing ever.' Guy responded with a jab at Vance's outfits: 'I think i can outrun you in these clothes.' Spectator World's Kara Kennedy: The rise of Eric Trump Wall Street Journal's Joshua Chaffin: The Other Nasty Breakup Inside MAGA The Hill's Zach Schonfeld and Ella Lee: Trump unleashes MAGA rebellion on Federalist Society Axios's Scott Rosenberg: Silicon Valley's not crying for Musk Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Unacceptable and inhumane': Latinas for Trump founder blasts immigration arrests
WASHINGTON – Florida state Sen. Ileana Garcia, who co-founded the group Latinas for Trump, criticized President Donald Trump's recent immigration enforcement actions as 'unacceptable and inhumane' in a social media post. Her remarks come as federal agents have arrested immigrants in courthouses across the United States, including in Florida, stripping them of due process protections, as NBC News reported. Family members and pro-immigration advocates have said that in some of the arrests, immigration judges dropped active cases against migrants, potentially expediting the deportation process. The Trump administration's crackdown on immigration enforcement spurred protests in Los Angeles, in which some demonstrators hurled large chunks of broken concrete at officers, slashed tires and defaced buildings, according to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. On June 7, Trump ordered 2,000 National Guard troops deployed to the region over the objections of California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. 'I understand the importance of deporting criminal aliens," Garcia, who served as the deputy press secretary for the Department of Homeland Security during Trump's first term, wrote in a tweet on June 7. "But what we are witnessing are arbitrary measures to hunt down people who are complying with their immigration hearings – in many cases, with credible fear of persecution claims – all driven by a Miller-like desire to satisfy a self-fabricated deportation goal,' she said, referring to White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller. "This undermines the sense of fairness and justice that the American people value." She added that she stood with Florida Republican Rep. María Elvira Salazar, who also denounced Trump's actions. 'I remain clear in my position: anyone with a pending asylum case, status-adjustment petition, or similar claim deserves to go through the legal process.' Salazar wrote in a statement on June 6. Salazar said she would meet with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem this week, along with Florida Republican Reps. Mario Díaz-Balart and Carlos Giménez, to "personally explain the dire situation unfolding in South Florida." Contributing: Reuters This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Latinas for Trump founder blasts 'inhumane' immigration arrests
