Govt respects court ruling, but warns of legal limits ahead of Turun Anwar protest
THE government respects the Federal Court's ruling that rally organisers are not required to notify police, effectively allowing the Himpunan Turun Anwar protest to proceed on July 26.
However, Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail (picture) stressed that despite parts of the Peaceful Assembly Act being declared unconstitutional, three key restrictions still apply to organisers and participants.
'There are three main prohibitions: No dangerous weapons, no speeches touching on the 3Rs — royalty, religion and race — and no children allowed.
'If these are violated, we will be forced to take action. But don't accuse the police of suppressing freedoms — that would be unfair,' he said at a press conference after the Home Ministry's monthly assembly yesterday.
The Turun Anwar protest, organised by Perikatan Nasional (PN), is expected to take place at Dataran Merdeka in Kuala Lumpur (KL) and draw over 300,000 people from across the country.
The gathering is being promoted as a public manifestation to 'save the country' from what organisers describe as worsening conditions under Prime Minister (PM) Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's leadership.
Saifuddin acknowledged that the protest would pose logistical challenges for the police but assured that it would be managed professionally.
'The rally has been widely publicised. At the same time, the Federal Court has ruled that organisers don't have to notify the police.
'We cannot override the Federal Court's decision. But the police are still responsible for ensuring public safety.
'If organisers had informed the police, we would know the venue and expected turnout. That would help us deploy the appropriate number of officers — not to obstruct, but to facilitate,' he added.
Saifuddin also emphasised that the government does not restrict freedom of expression but insisted that public assemblies must remain within legal boundaries and avoid provoking disorder.
Earlier this month, the Federal Court unanimously ruled that penalising rally organisers for failing to provide five days' notice was unconstitutional.
The five-judge panel, led by former Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, made the ruling in a case involving former Muda secretary-general Amir Hariri Abdul Hadi.
Tengku Maimun stated that Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act contravened Articles 8 and 10(1)(b) of the Federal Constitution.
Article 8(1) guarantees equal protection under the law, while Article 10(1)(b) affirms the right to peaceful assembly.
Meanwhile, the Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections (Bersih) said it would not participate in the protest and called on the government not to interfere.
Speaking to Utusan Malaysia, Bersih president Muhammad Faisal Abdul Aziz stressed that the right to assemble must not be hindered by government intervention.
'Bersih will not be directly involved in the rally. Let the party organising it handle the event themselves.
'However, we want the government to refrain from obstructing or interfering with the protest. It is a right protected under Article 10 of the Federal Constitution — the right to peaceful assembly without arms,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Anwar's constitutional reference appeal for case management tomorrow
Anwar Ibrahim wants the Court of Appeal to refer eight legal questions, which he said arise from a civil suit brought by former research assistant Yusoff Rawther, to the Federal Court for determination. PUTRAJAYA : The Court of Appeal has brought forward case management of Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's constitutional reference appeal to tomorrow, with a view to disposing of the case on an expedited basis. Anwar is appealing against the High Court's refusal to refer eight legal questions – which he claims arise from a civil suit brought by former research assistant Yusoff Rawther – to the Federal Court for determination. An e-mail sent out by senior assistant registrar Ahmad Izuddin Fajri Fakrullah, sighted by FMT, said the case management was being brought forward as the appeals court bench had indicated this morning that an early hearing should be held. As such, Izuddin said case management, previously scheduled for Sept 2, has been brought forward to tomorrow. Lawyer Rafique Rashid Ali, appearing for Yusoff, who filed his suit in 2021 against Anwar over an alleged assault, confirmed the matter. 'The case management will be held online,' he said when contacted. Earlier today, a three-member bench chaired by Justice Ruzima Ghazali said the stay should be granted as Anwar had shown special circumstances. Ruzima, who sat with Justices Wong Kian Kheong and Lim Hock Leng, however, said parties were at liberty to apply for an early hearing date. On June 4, High Court Justice Roz Mawar Rozain dismissed Anwar's reference application and directed that the trial proceed on the seven days previously set between June 16 and June 25. In her decision, Roz Mawar said none of the questions posed in the application had crossed the threshold set out in Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 to justify a referral to the apex court. In a 21-page judgment, she said the application was misconceived as to the jurisdiction of the courts and based on speculative doctrines with no constitutional footing. On June 10, the Court of Appeal granted Anwar an interim stay pending today's hearing of the prime minister's stay application. The prime minister wants the apex court to determine whether Articles 5(1), 8(1), 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution grant him qualified immunity from the suit filed by Yusoff four years ago. Yusoff's suit relates to events which allegedly took place before Anwar took office on Nov 22, 2022. A grandson of the late Penang consumer advocate SM Mohamed Idris, Yusoff claims he was assaulted at Anwar's home in Segambut in October 2018. He is seeking general, special, aggravated and exemplary damages, as well as interest, costs and other relief deemed fit by the court. Anwar denies the claim and has filed a countersuit.
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Azam pays first courtesy visit to newly appointed IGP
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Chief Commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki paid a courtesy call on the newly appointed Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Datuk Seri Mohd Khalid Mohd Ismail at the Federal Police headquarters today. In a social media post on the Royal Malaysia Police official Facebook page, it was confirmed that this afternoon's visit marked Azam's first official call on Mohd Khalid following his appointment as the country's 15th IGP on June 23. "The meeting aimed to strengthen bilateral cooperation between both enforcement agencies. "Among the key areas discussed were the implementation of the Joint Action Task Force, operational information sharing, and coordinated investigations," the post read. It added that the discussion was aimed at enhancing the effectiveness of law enforcement efforts. "The visit reflects a continued commitment to inter-agency collaboration, particularly in combating corruption and ensuring justice is upheld," the post said. Mohd Khalid, who hails from Manong, Perak, was born on April 8, 1965. He holds a Master's Degree in Comparative Law from the International Islamic University Malaysia. His appointment as IGP was consented to by His Majesty the Yang di-Pertuan Agong in accordance with Clauses (4) and (5) of Article 140 of the Federal Constitution, upon the advice of the Prime Minister and the recommendation of the Police Force Commission.
Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Lawyer wants BM version of constitution declared as authoritative text
The suit filed in the Kuala Lumpur High Court names the government as the defendant. PETALING JAYA : A lawyer has filed a suit against the government in the Kuala Lumpur High Court, seeking a declaration that the Bahasa Malaysia version of the Federal Constitution is the authoritative text. Haniff Khatri Abdulla said he filed the writ of summons and statement of claim through the law firm Ahmad Fuad Abi & Aidil. The suit names the government as the defendant and is aimed at getting the High Court to declare that the Bahasa Malaysia version of the constitution should take precedence over the English version. 'This suit is based on Article 160B of the Federal Constitution, which provides that if and when the constitution has been translated into the national language, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong may prescribe the national language text as the authoritative text. 'After that, if there is any conflict or inconsistency between the national language and English text, then the national language text shall prevail,' he said. Although the Agong had launched the BM version of the constitution on Sept 29, 2003, Haniff said, the government has yet to make it the authoritative version. 'Even more than two decades later, the government continues to fail, refuse and/or neglect to enforce the position of the text in the national language as the authoritative version,' he said. He claimed this was a breach of the government's constitutional duty to ensure that it took the necessary steps to uphold and dignify the national language. 'It is highly unreasonable that a sovereign and independent nation like Malaysia still does not have an authoritative constitutional text in its own national language, more than six decades after achieving independence,' he said. In 2023, then attorney-general Idrus Harun said the Attorney-General's Chambers planned to suggest that the government make the Bahasa Malaysia version of the constitution the authoritative text. However, he said, this was subject to the approval of the king. This proposal was met with opposition from an interfaith council, which said relying on the Bahasa Malaysia text would have an effect on the Federal Court ruling on unilateral conversion. An MP also said such a move must first obtain Sabah and Sarawak's approval.
