Pendo releases AI agent performance measurement tool
Pendo, the world's first software experience management platform, today announced Pendo Agent Analytics, a first-of-its-kind solution that gives companies visibility into how AI agents are performing.
0
Companies can leverage Pendo Agent Analytics in two powerful ways: To measure the performance of their digital workers like they would their employees and to measure adoption of their agentic software like they would their SaaS applications.
As agents join org charts and product roadmaps across the enterprise, companies require systems to understand how agents work and to optimise their performance. IT teams need confidence that agents will act in compliance and improve productivity, and R&D teams must ensure that agents drive business outcomes for customers. According to the Forrester report Agentic AI Agents Are A Rare Sighting: 'We need transparency, data security and protection, controls and guardrails, and advanced monitoring before we see broad adoption of agentic systems.'
Pendo Agent Analytics supports these functions with metrics and reports that track homegrown and third-party agent behaviour alongside usage of traditional software. With Pendo Agent Analytics, companies can answer questions like: 'Are people using my agents and how frequently?' What prompts are they using?' 'What do users do on my platform after an AI interaction?' And ultimately, 'Is this agent delivering value?'
Pendo Agent Analytics includes functionality that:
Tracks user behaviour across agents and traditional software to understand how workflows are changing;
Provides insight into what people do before and after they interact with an agent;
Analyses conversations with agents to determine prompt trends;
Highlights non-compliant behaviour;
Maps agent usage to task completion, helping companies measure the ROI of agentic AI; and
Ensures safety, trust, and governance at every step - so companies can innovate confidently, knowing they have enterprise-grade monitoring and controls in place.
'The shift to intelligent software is happening faster than we could ever imagine, and enterprises are faced with improving their SaaS applications, while accelerating agent and AI innovation,' said Todd Olson, CEO and co-founder of Pendo. 'I'm proud that we are supporting customers wherever they are on their transformation journey.'
Pendo announced the new offering during its inaugural Pendomonium X event in New York City, along with numerous product updates that help teams improve user onboarding, accelerate user success and cut support costs, increase upsell revenue, and drive team productivity.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Elon Musk's X sues New York over hate speech and disinformation law
Elon Musk's X Corp filed a lawsuit on Tuesday against the state of New York, arguing a recently passed law compelling large social media companies to divulge how they address hate speech is unconstitutional. The complaint alleges that bill S895B, known as the Stop Hiding Hate Act, violates free speech rights under the first amendment. The act, which the governor, Kathy Hochul, signed into law last December, requires companies to publish their terms of service and submit reports detailing the steps they take to moderate extremism, foreign influence, disinformation, hate speech and other forms of harmful content. Musk's lawyers argue that the law, which goes into effect this week, would require X to submit 'highly sensitive information' and compel non-commercial speech, which is subject to greater first amendment protections. The complaint also opposes the possible penalty of $15,000 per violation per day for failing to comply with the law. The bill's authors issued a statement on Tuesday rejecting Musk's suit as an attempt to 'use the First Amendment as a shield against providing New Yorkers with much needed transparency' and argued that the act does not infringe upon the free speech rights of social media companies. X successfully sued last year to block a similar law in California, which also required social media companies to disclose to the government how they define hate speech and extremism. Since Musk bought Twitter in 2022, he has heavily downgraded content moderation efforts and fought against attempts at regulating the platform. The Stop Hiding Hate Act was written by Brad Hoylman-Sigal, a New York state senator and Grace Lee, a state assemblymember, in cooperation with the Anti-Defamation League, with the intent of providing great transparency and accountability over harmful online speech. Lee and Hoylman-Sigal rejected a request last year from X to discuss and amend the bill, according to the state senator, on the grounds that they believed the company was not acting in good faith and only seeking to weaken the bill's requirements. 'Now more than ever, with the rise in political violence and threats emanating from the spread of hate speech and disinformation by President Trump and Elon Musk, New Yorkers deserve to know what social media companies like X are doing (or not doing) to stop the spread of hatred and misinformation on their platform,' Hoylman-Sigal and Lee said Tuesday. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion Although Musk has described himself as a 'free speech absolutist', his platform X has targeted journalists and media outlets that post critical information about him. The platform suspended the accounts of several journalists in recent years that have reported on Musk and throttled links to news sites he has criticized. Musk also sued a non-profit that catalogued racist and extremist content on X, in a case that a US district judge threw out as an attempt to punish freedom of speech.


The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Alex Jones accused of trying to hide assets from Sandy Hook families
The trustee overseeing Infowars host Alex Jones's personal bankruptcy case is accusing the far-right conspiracy theorist of trying to shield more than $5m from creditors, including relatives of victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook elementary school shooting in Connecticut. Three new lawsuits filed by the trustee on Friday alleging fraudulent asset transfers are the latest developments in Jones's long-running bankruptcy case, which has been pending in federal court in Houston for more than two years. In financial statements filed in bankruptcy court last year, Jones listed his net worth at $8.4m. The Sandy Hook families won nearly $1.5bn in judgments in 2022 in lawsuits filed in Connecticut and Texas accusing Jones of defamation and emotional distress for saying the school shooting that killed 20 first-graders and six educators was a hoax. Victims' relatives testified in court about being terrorized by Jones's supporters. Attempts to liquidate Jones's Infowars broadcasting and product-selling platforms and give the proceeds to the families and other creditors have been hindered by a failed auction and legal wrangling. Jones, meanwhile, continues to appeal the Sandy Hook judgments. Here's what to know about the status of Jones's bankruptcy case: The trustee, Christopher Murray, alleges that Jones tried to shield the money through a complex series of money and property transfers among family members, various trusts and limited liability companies. Other named defendants include Jones's wife, Erika; his father, David Jones; and companies and trusts. Murray alleges that a trust run by Jones and his father fraudulently transferred nearly $1.5m to various other Jones-associated entities in the months leading up to the bankruptcy. Jones is also accused of fraudulently transferring $1.5m to his wife, more than $800,000 in cash and property to his father, and trying to hide ownership of two condominiums in Austin, Texas, with a combined value of more than $1.5m. Murray is trying to recoup that money and property for creditors. Jones's bankruptcy lawyers did not return email messages seeking comment. In an email to the Associated Press, Erika Wulff Jones called the lawsuits 'pure harassment' and said she already had sat for a deposition. She said 'the accounting has been done', but did not elaborate. A lawyer for David Jones did not immediately return an email seeking comment. Jones railed against the new allegations on his show on Saturday. He has repeatedly said Democratic activists and the justice department are behind the Sandy Hook defamation lawsuits and bankruptcy proceedings, and claimed they were now 'trying to get' to him by suing his father, who he says is seriously ill. The fraud allegations are similar to those in a lawsuit in a Texas state court filed by Sandy Hook families. Jones also denied those claims. That lawsuit was put on hold because of the bankruptcy. Jones says the fact that the Sandy Hook families haven't received any money from him yet should be expected because he is appealing the $1.5bn in judgments. Infowars' assets continue to be tied up in the legal processes. Those assets, and some of Jones's personal assets, are being held by Murray for eventual distribution to creditors. An effort to sell Infowars' assets was derailed when US bankruptcy judge Christopher Lopez rejected the results of a November auction in which the Onion, a satirical news outlet, was named the winning bidder over only one other proposal by a company affiliated with Jones. The Onion had planned to turn the Infowars platforms into parody sites. Lopez had several concerns about the auction, including a lack of transparency and murky details about the actual value of the Onion's bid and whether it was better than the other offer. The judge rejected holding another auction and said the families could pursue liquidation of Jones's assets in the state courts where the defamation judgments were awarded. In a financial statement last year, Infowars' parent company, Free Speech Systems, listed $18m, including merchandise and studio equipment. Lawyers for the Sandy Hook families said they will soon move their effort to sell Infowars' assets to a Texas state court in Austin, where they expect a receiver to be appointed to take possession of the platform's possessions and sell them to provide money to creditors. A court schedule has not been set. 'The families we represent are as determined as ever to enforce the jury's verdict, and he will never outrun it,' Christopher Mattei, a lawyer for the Sandy Hook families in the Connecticut lawsuit, said Tuesday. Jones's appeals, meanwhile, continue in the courts. He said he plans to appeal the Connecticut lawsuit judgment to the US supreme court, after the Connecticut supreme court declined to hear his challenge. A lower state appeals court upheld all but $150m of the original $1.4bn judgment. The $49m judgment in the Texas lawsuit is before a state appeals court. He said in 2022 that he believes the shootings were '100% real'. Because Infowars' assets are still tied up in the courts, Jones has been allowed to continue broadcasting his shows and hawking merchandise from Infowars' Austin studio.


The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
Amazon plans to cut corporate jobs as it turns more to AI
Amazon CEO Andy Jassy shared his thoughts on generative artificial intelligence Tuesday and said it could lead to a reduction in its corporate workforce over the next few years. 'Today, in virtually every corner of the company, we're using generative AI to make customers lives better and easier,' Jassy said in a memo shared first with Amazon employees and then the public. Generative AI is used to create new content. The executive said Amazon is 'investing quite expansively' in generative AI and listed several projects such as Alexa+ that will be able to provide 'intelligent answers to virtually any question.' Amazon is also using generative AI in its internal operations, Jassy said, adding, 'In our fulfillment network, we're using AI to improve inventory placement, demand forecasting, and the efficiency of our robots—all of which have improved cost to serve and delivery speed.' He said the company has more than 1,000 generative AI services and applications either in progress or already built. But all this innovative work will come at a cost to workers amid fears AI will replace human jobs. 'As we roll out more generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done. We will need fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today, and more people doing other types of jobs,' Jassy wrote in the memo. He continued: 'It's hard to know exactly where this nets out over time, but in the next few years, we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce as we get efficiency gains from using AI extensively across the company.' It's unclear how many workers are expected to be replaced by AI and when. When The Independent reached out to Amazon for comment, it did not give any specific numbers. People familiar with the matter told The Wall Street Journal that Amazon doesn't expect to have mass layoffs soon. Amazon laid off more than 18,000 employees in 2022 and 2023, the Journal previously reported. Those cuts were focused on its devices business, recruiting and retail operations, according to the publication. The company employed more than 1.5 million full-time and part-time workers as of last December.