logo
Pro-Europe mayor triumphs in crucial vote which could decide Romania's path

Pro-Europe mayor triumphs in crucial vote which could decide Romania's path

Irish Examiner18-05-2025
The pro-European Union candidate in Romania's critical presidential runoff has won the closely watched race against a hard-right nationalist, nearly complete electoral data shows, in a tense election rerun that many viewed as a geopolitical choice between East or West.
The race pitted front-runner George Simion, the 38-year-old leader of the hard-right Alliance for the Unity of Romanians, or AUR, against incumbent Bucharest Mayor Nicusor Dan.
It was held months after the cancellation of the previous election plunged Romania into its worst political crisis in decades.
After 10.5 million of 11.6 million votes had been counted, Mr Dan was ahead with 54.32%, while votes for Mr Simion stood at 45.68%, according to official data.
Presidential candidate Nicusor Dan speaks to the media in Bucharest (Andreea Alexandru/AP)
When voting closed at 9pm (1900 UK time), official electoral data showed a 64% voter turnout.
About 1.64 million Romanians abroad, who have been able to vote since Friday at specially set-up polling stations, participated in the vote.
After polls closed on Sunday, Mr Dan told the media that 'elections are not about politicians' but about communities and that in Sunday's vote, 'a community of Romanians has won, a community that wants a profound change in Romania'.
'When Romania goes through difficult times, let us remember the strength of this Romanian society,' he said. 'There is also a community that lost today's elections. A community that is rightly outraged by the way politics has been conducted in Romania up to now.'
Presidential candidate George Simion grimaces as he speaks with the media (Andreea Alexandru/AP)
Turnout was significantly higher in Sunday's runoff and is expected to play a decisive role in the outcome. In the first round on May 4, final turnout stood at 9.5 million, or 53% of eligible voters.
Romania's political landscape was upended last year when a top court voided the previous election in which far-right outsider Calin Georgescu topped first-round polls, following allegations of electoral violations and Russian interference, which Moscow denied.
Standing on the steps of Romania's colossal Communist-era parliament building after polls closed, Mr Simion predicted a significant victory over his opponent, which he called a 'victory of the Romanian people'.
Mr Simion said that Mr Georgescu was 'supposed to be the president' before last year's election was annulled. He also called for vigilance against election fraud, but said that overall he was satisfied with the conduct of the vote.
Shortly after 6pm, Romania's ministry of foreign affairs spokesperson Andrei Tarnea said in a post on X that the election was subject to a 'viral campaign of fake news' on the Telegram messaging app and other social media platforms, which tried to influence the electoral process and had 'the hallmarks of Russian interference'.
Networks of co-ordinated disinformation have emerged as a pervasive force throughout Romania's entire election cycle. Romanian authorities debunked the deluge of fake news, Mr Tarnea said.
Mr Simion appeared alongside Mr Georgescu at a Bucharest polling station on Sunday and told reporters that he voted against the 'humiliations to which our sisters and brothers have been subjected'.
'We voted against abuses and against poverty,' he said. 'I voted for our future to be decided only by Romanians, for Romanians and Romania. So help us God.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Irish Examiner view: Commissioner must restore faith in rule of law
Irish Examiner view: Commissioner must restore faith in rule of law

Irish Examiner

timean hour ago

  • Irish Examiner

Irish Examiner view: Commissioner must restore faith in rule of law

The Crowe Report, an independent review of roads policing which was published yesterday morning, makes for difficult reading — and not just for the gardaí. The report finds that a majority of gardaí involved in roads policing are productive and professional, but it has also highlighted issues with poor productivity and behaviour among a 'noticeable' minority, stating some are 'unproductive' and appear 'demotivated and unconcerned' with doing their jobs properly. This is deeply concerning on many levels. The number of road deaths this year, at the time of writing, was 103, which is higher than two fatalities per week. The fact that the section of An Garda Síochána charged with policing the roads has been condemned in such trenchant language by an independent review will not instil confidence in the safety of our road systems. There are other factors involved in the number of serious traffic accidents, but the fact that 'noticeable' numbers of the enforcement agency policing this area are unproductive only serves to embolden those breaking the law on the roads. In addition, the report's findings also do little for the standing of the Gardaí generally. It is widely accepted that the job of a garda has rarely been more difficult, and revelations such as this undermine the authority of the force across the board. It is also the latest in a series of scandals involving serving members of the force. These have ranged from a former garda jailed for inciting men to rape a female colleague and her daughters, to another former garda who was convicted of selling cocaine. These, and other matters, are sure to loom large in the in-tray of incoming Garda Commissioner Justin Kelly, who takes up his new role on September 1. His immediate predecessor, Drew Harris, has drawn plenty of criticism in recent years, and it remains to be seen how his tenure will be evaluated in the long term, but Mr Kelly has more than enough to contend with himself next month. A lack of confidence in the gardaí means a lack of confidence in the rule of law. Zelenskyy needs real guarantees On Friday, US president Donald Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin are to meet in Alaska, with the war in Ukraine expected to dominate the agenda. This, the blandest statement of the facts possible, is about as decisive as anyone can be about this meeting; long experience has taught us all to treat anything said or promised by Mr Trump with extreme caution. It might be worth noting, for instance, that some residents of Anchorage, Alaska, have pointed to their president initially saying he was meeting Mr Putin in Russia and have — half-jokingly — sought assurances that their state will not be sold back to Russia. The fact that a discussion of Ukraine's future is being held without the presence of that country's president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, is an obvious caveat ahead of any agreements that might emerge from those discussions. Mr Zelenskyy has been in Britain in recent days holding talks with British prime minister Keir Starmer. Even at a remove of several thousand kilometres, the Ukrainian president articulated what might be expected from the discussions in Alaska when discussing his meeting with Mr Starmer: 'We discussed expectations from the meeting in Alaska and possible prospects. We also discussed in detail the security guarantees that could make peace truly sustainable if the United States manages to pressure Russia into stopping the killings and engaging in genuine, meaningful diplomacy.' As someone who has seen at first hand the impact of Mr Putin's attacks on his country, it is no surprise that Mr Zelenskyy isolated the two linked issues which are involved here. What specific security guarantees could make peace sustainable? Can Russia, as the aggressor in this conflict, be trusted to accept and maintain such guarantees? In order to do so, as Mr Zelenskyy pointed out, Russia would have to stop the killings and engage in meaningful diplomacy. More meaningful diplomacy than lunch with Mr Trump in Alaska, at any rate. Invasive species The recent warm weather has probably encouraged many readers to enjoy the outdoors, which makes recent warnings about the Asian hornet all the more timely. An invasive species, the hornet is native to South-East Asia, but has spread to Europe in recent decades. One was spotted in Cork by a member of the public, sparking a biosecurity alert, but the National Parks and Wildlife Service has since said the hornet has been captured, and the Government has convened a taskforce to co-ordinate a response to the sighting. The presence of the Asian hornet is a serious matter — although it does not pose a significant public health risk, even a single hornet nest has the potential to devastate native bee populations. Given how central bees are to our entire ecosystem, it is no surprise that this is being taken very seriously by the Government. The official advice is that people continue to keep their eyes open and report any sightings of the Asian hornet, but to avoid disturbing or capturing them. The good news is that there is no evidence of a nest, while the fact that a member of the public identified the hornet is also encouraging. As minister of state for biodiversity Christopher O'Sullivan said, this shows 'members of the public are our eyes on the ground'. Long may that continue.

Taliban's return to power extinguished hard-won gains for women's rights
Taliban's return to power extinguished hard-won gains for women's rights

Irish Examiner

timean hour ago

  • Irish Examiner

Taliban's return to power extinguished hard-won gains for women's rights

The return of the Taliban to power in Afghanistan on August 15, 2021, was a devastating reversal of the progress that Afghan women had made over the previous two decades. For nearly 20 years, Afghan women had experienced a period of significant progress — particularly after the fall of the Taliban in 2001. With the support of international forces led by the US, women were able to reclaim rights and freedoms that had been stripped away during the Taliban's first rule in the late 1990s. Girls returned to school in their millions, women re-entered the workforce, and many took up leadership roles in politics and civil society. By 2021, Afghan women formed 29.39% of the civil service, and women held 27% of parliamentary seats. These strides were not just symbolic. They represented a transformative shift in the lives of millions of women and girls, offering them previously unimaginable opportunities. However, the Taliban's return to power swiftly extinguished these hard-won gains. The Taliban, known for its oppressive and patriarchal interpretation of Islam, immediately began implementing a series of decrees that systematically dismantled women's rights across Afghanistan. These decrees, now numbering over 100, have touched every aspect of life for Afghan women — from education and employment to freedom of movement, and even how they dress and the colour of dress they wear. The echoes of the Taliban's previous rule, when women were barred from virtually all public life and subjected to brutal enforcement of gender norms, have returned with a vengeance One of the most catastrophic decrees issued by the Taliban was the ban on education for girls beyond the sixth grade. This policy has not only deprived millions of girls of their right to education, but also condemned them to a future of dependency and limited opportunities. The ban on girls' education is emblematic of the Taliban's broader strategy to erase women from public life and confine them to Afghan-specific traditional roles. Despite international condemnation, the Taliban has shown no willingness to reverse this policy, leaving the fate of an entire generation of women and girls in jeopardy. The assault on women's rights did not stop with education. The Taliban has also inflicted strenuous restrictions on women's employment, effectively barring them from most forms of work outside the home. While the de-facto regime initially pledged that women would be allowed to work, once appropriate segregated environments were established, this proved to be an empty promise. Taliban fighters patrol a market in Kabul's Old City, Afghanistan, after their return to power in 2021. Freedom of movement for Afghan women has also been severely curtailed under the Taliban's rule, writes Mahbooba Faiz. File Picture: Bernat Armangue/AP Women have been almost entirely pushed out of the workforce, losing their economic independence and being forced into roles dictated by the Taliban's biased interpretation of Sharia law. The prohibition of women working in most NGOs has further incapacitated efforts to deliver essential services, particularly in rural areas where female health workers and educators are desperately needed. Freedom of movement for Afghan women has also been severely curtailed under the Taliban's rule. Women are now required to be accompanied by a male guardian, or mahram, for any journey beyond 72km, and they are forbidden from entering public spaces such as parks, gyms, and even public baths. These restrictions not only isolate women socially but also trap them within their homes, depriving them of physical exercise, social interaction, and any semblance of a normal life. The Taliban's enforcement of these rules through their morality police has infused a climate of fear, as women know that any perceived violation could result in severe punishment Beyond these overtly repressive policies, there have been numerous reports of abduction and sexual violence against women — particularly those in detention. In Taliban-controlled prisons, women are often subjected to rape and other forms of sexual abuse by their captors. These horrific acts of violence are infrequently reported, as the victims fear retaliation and societal shame. The Taliban's control over the judicial system means that women have no access to justice. Those who speak out are women who have escaped the country or use pseudonyms to report. Around 16 victims of Taliban imprisonment have become pregnant. Many women and girls released from detention centers have tragically taken their own lives. In a case reported on July 29, 2024, a 19-year-old girl was abducted by a Taliban soldier in Bamyan and held captive in a prison for four days. After her release, she tragically died by suicide. She had been raped by the soldiers. The soldier responsible for her abduction and rape was merely fired from his job as punishment. Women who dare to defy the Taliban even slightly are often met with violence or ostracism. The culture of impunity that allows such abuses to continue unchecked is a stark reminder of the Taliban's deeply entrenched misogyny. The psychological and social toll of the Taliban's rule on Afghan women is profound. The combination of physical violence, social isolation, and economic disenfranchisement has led to a sharp increase in mental health issues among women, particularly young girls who have been denied an education. Reports of depression, anxiety, and suicide have surged as women grapple with the hopelessness and helplessness of their situation. The Taliban's policies have created an environment where women are not only physically confined but also mentally oppressed, with almost no hope for a brighter future. Mahbooba Faiz, in the RDJ offices on Cork's South Mall where she has worked for two years, is one of several Afghan activists in Ireland who are campaigning for the term 'gender apartheid' to be incorporated in Article 2 of the Draft Crimes Against Humanity Convention. Picture: Chani Anderson Despite the widespread condemnation of the Taliban's treatment of women, the international community has largely failed to take effective action. While diplomatic efforts, including the non-recognition of its government by the world, have been employed, they have had little effect on altering the Taliban's behaviour. Humanitarian aid, though crucial, cannot address the systemic oppression faced by Afghan women. The international community needs to take more robust, co-ordinated action, including increased support for Afghan women, offering asylum to those fleeing persecution, and holding the Taliban accountable through international legal mechanisms. Despite the enormous challenges they face, Afghan women continue to resist Taliban oppression with extraordinary courage. Protests, although often brutally suppressed, are a testament to the resilience and determination of Afghan women who refuse to accept their inhuman treatment under any pretext, including that of religion. However, they cannot win this imbalanced fight alone. They need the support of the international community and all conscious individuals of the human family to stand in solidarity with them to fight for their dignity and rights. The situation for women in Afghanistan under Taliban rule is nothing short of a humanitarian tragedy. The systematic rollback of women's progress has plunged the country into darkness, undoing two decades of gains and leaving millions of women and girls without hope. The Taliban's decrees have obliterated women from public life, subjected them to violence and abuse, and deprived them of their most basic human rights. This is personal for me. When Kabul fell to the Taliban in August 2021, my husband and I fled Afghanistan with our young son and one back pack apiece. One of those backpacks held an Irish flag — a symbol of the promise of sanctuary a small country on the opposite side of the world had offered to us. However, we were forced to leave many of those we hold dear behind. The world must not turn a blind eye to this crisis of questioning the dignity of women. Rather than mere words, concrete actions are needed to support Afghan women in their struggle for dignity, justice, and equality. The resilience of Afghan women is a beacon of hope. They need a global voice to support their cause, to overcome this dark chapter, and to ensure that the promise of a better future is not lost forever. Mahbooba Faiz is a lawyer, women's rights advocate and leading the Irish Campaign to have 'gender apartheid' as practiced by Taliban of Afghanistan codified as a 'crime against humanity'. Follow the campaign at #EndgenderApartheid

Trump says he thinks Putin will make a deal on Ukraine
Trump says he thinks Putin will make a deal on Ukraine

Irish Examiner

time9 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

Trump says he thinks Putin will make a deal on Ukraine

US president Donald Trump said on Thursday he thought Vladimir Putin was ready to make a deal on ending the war in Ukraine after the Russian president floated the prospect of a nuclear arms agreement on the eve of their summit in Alaska. Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his European allies have intensified their efforts this week to prevent any deal between the US and Russia emerging from Friday's summit that leaves Ukraine vulnerable to future attack. "I think he's going to make a deal," Trump said in a Fox News radio interview, adding that if the meeting went well he would call Zelenskyy and European leaders afterwards and that if it went badly he would not. The aim of Friday's talks with Putin is to set up a second meeting including Ukraine, Trump said, adding: "I don't know that we're going to get an immediate ceasefire." Putin earlier spoke to his most senior ministers and security officials as he prepared for the meeting with Trump in Anchorage, Alaska on Friday that could shape the endgame to the largest war in Europe since World War Two. In televised comments, Putin said that the US was "making, in my opinion, quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities, stop the crisis and reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in this conflict". This was happening, Putin said, "in order to create long-term conditions for peace between our countries, and in Europe, and in the world as a whole - if, by the next stages, we reach agreements in the area of control over strategic offensive weapons." His comments signalled that Russia will raise the issue of nuclear arms control as part of a wide-ranging discussion on security when he sits down with Trump. A Kremlin aide said Putin and Trump would also discuss the "huge untapped potential" for Russia-US economic ties. A senior eastern European official, who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said Putin would try to distract Trump from Ukraine at the talks by offering him possible progress on nuclear arms control or something business-related. Activists dressed as Donald Trump (L) and Vladimir Putin pose after ripping up a map of Ukraine at a demonstration in front of the Brandenburg Gate. Picture: Sean Gallup/Getty "We hope Trump won't be fooled by the Russians, he understands all (these) dangerous things," the official said, adding that Russia's only goal was to avoid any new sanctions and have existing sanctions lifted. Trump said there would be a press conference after the talks but that he did not know whether it would be joint. He also said that there would be a give and take on boundaries and lands. Russia controls around a fifth of Ukraine and Zelenskyy and the Europeans worry that a deal could cement those gains, rewarding Putin for 11 years of efforts to seize Ukrainian land and emboldening him to expand further into Europe. An EU diplomat said it would be "scary to see how it all unfolds in the coming hours. Trump had very good calls yesterday with Europe but that was yesterday". Seeking clarity on security guarantees Trump had shown willingness to join the security guarantees for Ukraine at a last-ditch virtual meeting with European leaders and Zelenskyy on Wednesday, European leaders said, though he made no public mention of them afterwards. Zelenskyy said the security guarantees had been discussed in "considerable detail" in comments after a meeting in London on Thursday with British prime minister Keir Starmer. Friday's summit, the first Russia-US summit since June 2021, comes at one of the toughest moments for Ukraine in a war that has killed tens of thousands and displaced millions since Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. Speaking after Wednesday's meeting, French president Emmanuel Macron said Trump insisted that the transatlantic NATO alliance should not be part of security guarantees that would be designed to protect Ukraine from future attacks in a post-war settlement. Macron said, however, that Trump had also said the United States and all willing allies should be part of the security guarantees. Expanding on that, a European official told Reuters that Trump said on the call he was willing to provide some security guarantees for Europe, without spelling out what they would be. It "felt like a big step forward", said the official, who did not want to be named. It was not immediately clear what such guarantees could mean in practice. On Wednesday, Trump threatened "severe consequences" if Putin does not agree to peace in Ukraine and has warned of economic sanctions if his meeting on Friday proves fruitless. Russia is likely to resist Ukraine and Europe's demands and has previously said its stance had not changed since it was first detailed by Putin in June 2024. — Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store