logo
The Galaxy Z Fold 7 may turn out to be the thinnest foldable, but it could come at a cost

The Galaxy Z Fold 7 may turn out to be the thinnest foldable, but it could come at a cost

Tom's Guide11-05-2025
Foldable phones may be engineering marvels, but they can't seem to shake a few inherent problems that I believe are keeping them from wider acceptance. They cost a lot, for starters, and despite some support from key app makers, there are still far too many apps that aren't optimized for the expanded screens. And even though phone makers have put a lot of effort into improving hinge mechanisms, concerns about durability linger on.
All of those would be reason enough to steer clear of foldable phones. But there's one thing keeping me from making a foldable my go-to mobile device — I'm just not impressed with the battery life that foldable phones deliver.
Certainly, I can understand the constraints that phone makers are working under when they build a foldable phone. If you want to keep the device portable, there's only so much internal space you have available, which puts limits on how big a battery you can use. With both a cover display and a larger interior panel, that's two screens the battery has to keep powered up. It's not a recipe for a phone that lasts a long time on a charge.
Still, it's something that foldable phone makers are going to have to address if they ever want these devices to escape the nice they currently occupy. And from the sound of two rumors about the upcoming Galaxy Z Fold 7 this week, it sounds as if Samsung doesn't agree that's a priority. And considering that Samsung has been pushing foldables more than any other phone maker, that's a little bit concerning.
Every phone we review at Tom's Guide goes through a battery test, where we set the screen of the device at 150 nits and then have it surf the web over cellular. We time how long it takes for the phone to run out of power, and after running that test a few times, we come up with an idea of what its average battery life is like.
On that test, the average smartphone these days posts a time of between 10 and 10.5 hours. The very best phones for battery life can hold out for 15 hours or more. It's safe to say most foldables don't come anywhere near the higher end of that range.
Phone
Battery size
Average attery life (Hrs:Mins)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
4,400 mAh
10:45
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6
4,000 mAh
10:12
OnePlus Open
4,805 mAh
11:31
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
4,650 mAh
10:32
Motorola Razr 2024
4,200 mAh
13:57
Motorola Razr Plus 2024
4,000 mAh
14:10
There are some exceptions. The 2024 versions of the Motorola Razr and Motorola Razr Plus both averaged around 14 hours on our test, give or take a few minutes in either direction. And given Motorola's reputation for delivering long-lasting phones of every size and design, there's every reason to believe that the 2025 versions of the foldable flip phone, led by the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025, will set the pace again.
Otherwise, the times we've recorded are pretty close to average for the smartphone category as a whole — the difference being that these phones all cost more than $1,000. And Samsung's latest foldable phones are notable for being bunched toward the back of the pack.
I want to be fair to foldable phones as a whole and note that these numbers are trending in the right direction, even if the results don't get them anywhere near our best phone battery life list. Foldable battery times used to fall well below the average result for smartphones, so we're seeing some progress on that front. But when you compare these times to what flagships with conventional designs are capable of, it really illustrates how battery life is a foldable phone shortcoming.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra and iPhone 16 Pro Max both have big screens, even if they don't fold out to cover as much space as, say, the Galaxy Fold 6. But the Ultra and iPhone also last a long time on a charge — more than 17 hours each. And while the respective $1,299 and $1,199 starting prices aren't cheap by any stretch of the imagination, they're hundreds of dollars less than the $1,899 you'd have to pay for the latest Galaxy Fold.
So how is Samsung responding to this challenge with the Galaxy Z Fold 7, which is rumored to be arriving later this summer? If you go by rumors about the phone's specs, Samsung's not really doing much of anything.
Recent leaks based on regulatory filings for the Galaxy Z Fold 7 indicate the phone will have the same 4,000 mAh battery as its predecessor. While you'd expect the chipset powering the new phone to be more efficient than its predecessor — especially since the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is in line to get the very efficient Snapdragon 8 Elite silicon — that doesn't we're likely to see big gains later this year when we put Samsung's new foldable to the test.
(If you want more encouraging news, those same listings indicate an increase in the Galaxy Z Flip 7's battery, which is in line to get a 4,300 mAh power pack. That's good since the Galaxy Z Flip 6 badly lags behind the Razr foldables when it comes to lasting a long time on a charge.)
Other Galaxy Z Fold 7 rumors reveal why Samsung may be unable to give the new phone much of a boost in battery size. That's because the updated Fold is in line to become much thinner than its predecessor.
Specifically, a tip from well-regarded leaker Ice Universe claims that the Galaxy Z Fold 7 will be 3.9mm thin when it's open and 8.9mm thin when it's folded shut. That compares to respective measurements of 5.6mm and 12.6mm for the Galaxy Z Fold 6.
I can understand the desire to make foldable phones thinner. The calling card for foldables is the ability to carry around a device with a tablet-sized screen in your pocket, and slimming down that device makes slipping it into your pocket that much easier.
Still, what do I care if it's easier to tote around my foldable phone, but I still have to keep a charger with me at all times and hope that there's a free outlet or charging pad wherever I'm headed to? Every design decision with a phone involves trade-offs, but Samsung seems to willing to sacrifice battery life when that's one of the big reasons why people might be reluctant to embrace foldabes.
As with any time we're dealing with rumors about unreleased phones, the reality of the Galaxy Z Fold 7 could turn out to be quite different from the picture that the latest rumors are painting. And like I said earlier, maybe the Snapdragon 8 Elite set to power the new foldable will make a world of difference when it comes to power management — the chipset certainly as for other phones released this year.
But as much as anything, I really value battery life in a phone. I want a device where I don't have to think about charging it from the moment i get up until the moment I go to bed. And if I forget to plug my device in overnight, it's not the end of the world, since there's still plenty of juice left in it to get me started the next day.
Foldable phones don't offer that right now. And until they start, I can't take them seriously as an option for the device I use on a daily basis.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Engadget review recap: Samsung Z Flip 7, Oakley Meta glasses, DJI Osmo 360 and more
Engadget review recap: Samsung Z Flip 7, Oakley Meta glasses, DJI Osmo 360 and more

Engadget

time35 minutes ago

  • Engadget

Engadget review recap: Samsung Z Flip 7, Oakley Meta glasses, DJI Osmo 360 and more

Whew, it's been a crazy few weeks for us at Engadget. School may still be out, but there's no summer break for the steady stream of new gadgets coming across our desks. I'll forgive you if you missed a review or two over the last few weeks — we've been busy. Here's a quick rundown of what we've been up to, just in time for you to catch up over the weekend. The Z Flip 7 has decent battery life, bigger screens and more AI smarts. However, the cameras are dated and Samsung isn't offering enough utility on this foldable's second screen. $1,091 at Amazon Explore More Buying Options $1,100 at Best Buy$1,090 at Walmart Alongside the Z Fold 7, Samsung debuted an updated version of its more compact foldable, the Z Flip 7. UK bureau chief Mat Smith noted that the company managed to provide a substantial overhaul, but there are some areas that were left untouched. "Certain aspects of the Flip 7 are lacking, most notably the cameras, which haven't been changed since last year," he said. "Samsung also needs to put more work into its Flex Window." There are some solid upgrades that will appeal to serious athletes and power users, but they don't quite justify the higher price. $399 at Meta Meta's first non-Ray-Ban smart glasses have arrived. While we wait for a more affordable version to get here, senior editor Karissa Bell put the white and gold option through its paces. "While I don't love the style of the Oakley Meta HSTN frames, Meta has shown that it's been consistently able to improve its glasses," she wrote. "The upgrades that come with the new Oakley frames aren't major leaps, but they deliver improvements to core features." DJI's Osmo 360 is a worthy rival to Insta360's X5, thanks to the innovative sensor and 8K 50 fps video. However, the editing app still needs some work. $530 at DJI Reporter Steve Dent argued that DJI is finally giving Insta360 some competition in the 360-degree action cam space. The design and performance of the Osmo 360 are great, but the problem comes when it's time to edit. "The all-new DJI Studio app also needs some work," he explained. "For a first effort, though, the Osmo 360 is a surprisingly solid rival to Insta360's X5." The Nothing Phone 3 might be the company's first 'true flagship,' but several specs don't match that flagship moniker. The bigger screen, battery and new Glyph Matrix make it a major step up from Phone 2, but camera performance is erratic and you'd expect a more powerful processor at this price. $799 at Nothing Nothing's first "true flagship" phone has arrived, ready to take on the likes of the Pixel 9 and Galaxy S25. Despite the company's lofty chatter, Mat argued the Nothing Phone 3 is hampered by a lower-power chip and disappointing cameras. "While I want Nothing to continue experimenting with its phones, it should probably prioritize shoring up the camera performance first," he said. The redesigned Galaxy Watch 8 has a longer battery life and much more comfortable fit. The Gemini integration is actually helpful and the new health metrics and fitness guidance are useful. $350 at Amazon Samsung debuted a big update to its Galaxy Watch line when it unveiled the Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7. Senior buying advice reporter Amy Skorheim spent two weeks testing the new wearable, which impressed her so much she declared it was "Samsung's best smartwatch in years." You can read her in-depth review here. Here are the rest of the reviews you might have missed:

These are 5 of my favorite gallery apps, but one stands out from the rest
These are 5 of my favorite gallery apps, but one stands out from the rest

Android Authority

time2 hours ago

  • Android Authority

These are 5 of my favorite gallery apps, but one stands out from the rest

Andy Walker / Android Authority Every modern smartphone has a capable camera system, and there's a good chance that you regularly browse the images you capture with it. Most devices come with a brand-adjacent gallery app. I find that Samsung Gallery is one of the best in this regard. But what if you don't own a Samsung and want a brand-agnostic option? After many years of trying various apps, I've narrowed my favorite gallery app selection to just five options. Some products have overlapping features, but each looks, feels, and behaves slightly differently. If I were to choose just one that I'd install on all of my devices, it would likely be the gallery app below. What is your preferred gallery app? 0 votes Aves Gallery NaN % Focus Go NaN % Fossify Gallery NaN % Google Gallery NaN % Piktures NaN % Other (let me know which in the comments) NaN % Focus Go Rita El Khoury / Android Authority This is the one I recommend to most people. Some seriously complex and capable gallery apps are available on Android, but often all you need is a simple, fuss-free way to view the image files stored on your phone. Focus Go excels at this. This tiny app offers a gorgeous UI focusing on images, with minimal secondary features tacked on. The app's features include various ways to organize, secure, and view content. By default, it arranges images by folder, making it super easy to see where everything is stored. I often use it to clear out folders that grow too unmanageable for my file explorer. If desired, you can also select to group images by time (day or month). Focus Go also offers essential power user options, including locking the app behind your fingerprint, rendering higher-quality images or shots in HDR, and pushing the viewer to use your phone's maximum brightness. If all you need in a gallery app is a way to view images, Focus Go is the best option and my favorite gallery app for Android. Aves Gallery Andy Walker / Android Authority If you require something more substantial, including an app that supports the viewing and editing of metadata and broader file support, Aves Gallery is worth a shout. Despite its name, Aves goes beyond a mere gallery app and offers tools to effectively manage video and photo libraries. I particularly like its stats page, which showcases various photography habits. This includes how many of each file type are stored on the device, where (which country) most of these files were taken, and when you took those photos. The latter is plotted on a handy bar chart. Aves also emphasizes swift search, combining user-added tags and specific metadata info, like a shot's location. You can also set a specific folder as the app's home screen, which is particularly handy when I need to quickly access screenshots on my phones. Piktures Andy Walker / Android Authority Piktures is a powerful Android gallery app for accessing photos stored across multiple cloud, network, and local sources. The app supports Google Photos, OneDrive, Nextcloud, and various other platforms, all of which are directly accessible when connected. Its most useful feature is direct access to a USB drive plugged into the phone. This comes in handy for me when my camera's SD card is full and I need to offload some of the content while hiking. And, for those who store more sensitive shots on their device, Piktures has a Secret Space feature that encrypts any images stored within it. Beyond its features, its UI stands out with its smooth animations, chunky default font, useful bottom toolbar for navigation, and large, easy-to-tap cards in the body of the screen. Piktures is free, but this version includes ads. There are two one-time payment options to remove these. Google Gallery Joe Maring / Android Authority It's remarkable how many people still don't know that Google has a second gallery app. This is the company that loves creating duplicates, after all. However, what sets Gallery apart from Photos is its simplicity. Gallery, like Focus Go, is limited in its feature spread, but this keen focus makes it ideal for those who only want to view images stored on their device and a little more. While Focus Go is limited to newer versions of Android, Gallery works even if your device is running Android 8, making it perfect for legacy devices. Fossify Gallery Andy Walker / Android Authority Finally, if you're looking for a solid open-source gallery app for Android, look no further than Fossify Gallery. It offers a truly dizzying number of settings, making it adaptable to any user's requirements. For the most part, I like its simple initial UI, with quick controls located right in the search bar. One can easily adjust how many images are shown by quickly toggling the number of columns used, and this setting can be selected for each folder. It's wonderfully granular. Pair this feature with its thumbnail quality settings, and Fossify may be the best app on this list for massive on-device libraries. There they are: the five Android gallery apps that I recommend. Of course, I haven't tried every app on the market, so weigh in with your choices below if you feel I've missed an obvious candidate. Follow

I've used Pixel and Galaxy phones for a decade, and Google wins in one aspect every time
I've used Pixel and Galaxy phones for a decade, and Google wins in one aspect every time

Android Authority

time3 hours ago

  • Android Authority

I've used Pixel and Galaxy phones for a decade, and Google wins in one aspect every time

Robert Triggs / Android Authority I've been using smartphones since 2011, and they've all been Samsung and Google devices (aside from a few other brands due to my job). Both companies have come a long way over the years, and while the S24 Ultra is my phone of choice for now, that may soon change for one reason. Pixels and Galaxy phones each have their strengths and weaknesses, but one thing I've always found Google is best at is customer support, while Samsung has more reliable devices. As I think back on my experience with both, I've started to reevaluate which of those things is more important to me. Do I want a phone that's less likely to be a problem and accept that it'll be a fight if something does go wrong, or the inverse? How has your customer support experience been? 0 votes Samsung: Good NaN % Samsung: Bad NaN % Google: Good NaN % Google: Bad NaN % Galaxy phones have held up well, but foldables make it complicated Eric Zeman / Android Authority I've owned a lot of Samsung phones over the years. I started with the Galaxy S2 and S4, and then after a dip into the Google ecosystem, I've had the Galaxy S10 Plus and every Ultra from the S20 to the S24 series and a smattering of foldable review units. Of the eight Galaxy phones I've personally owned, only one has had an issue. Being in the UK, I've had to endure my fair share of Exynos-powered phones, and my S20 Ultra was by far the worst, suffering from an unfortunate failure in the summer of 2020. It got so hot during a video call with my then-fiancé that it cooked its motherboard. Samsung covered this on warranty, so I didn't have to pay for any repairs, but the process was a joke. Samsung has a repair-at-all-costs policy in the UK, causing considerable delays of weeks before I get my phone back. Samsung has a repair-at-all-costs policy in the UK. Because of that, my S20 Ultra was gone for six weeks while they replaced the motherboard, two of the rear cameras, the battery, and the rear glass, which cracked during removal. Replacing the phone would've been much simpler, but Samsung insisted on repairing it. To make matters worse, the phone got lost in shipping for another week. In total, I was without my phone for nearly two months. The experiences get worse when we look at my wife's phones. She's had the Z Flip 4, 5, and 6, and so far, only the latter has endured a full year with no more than an in-store screen protector change. Zac Kew-Denniss / Android Authority The Flip 4 had an unfortunate encounter with our fish tank, so I arranged a repair through our Samsung Care policy. Due to Samsung's insistence on repairing rather than replacing, the phone was initially gone for five weeks, during which time it had its motherboard, screen, hinge, frame, rear glass, and all of its cameras replaced. The only part of the phone that stayed the same was the cover display. The issues began when the phone came back. My wife was at work, so I started the phone up, intending to sign in for her and restore her data so she could switch back to it during her lunch break. Imagine my surprise when the phone defaulted to French out of the box and said 'Z Flip 4 Maison Margiela Edition' on the bootloader. That was a special black and white version of the phone, only sold in France, and the device in my hand was still Bora Purple. The phone was a mess once I got it started, with constant UI crashes, warnings, and an OS build several months old, with the software update screen not working. I called Samsung and learned that the repair center had flashed the wrong software build onto the phone after it was repaired, and I would need to send it off to be reflashed. A simple software flash sounds like something that could be done quickly, but it was gone for another three weeks. If I'm being realistic, those two instances aren't that bad. My S20 Ultra repair was in the middle of the pandemic, which certainly would have contributed to the longer wait. With the Z Flip 4, mistakes do happen in isolated instances. Unfortunately, things only got worse the following year with the Z Flip 5. Zac Kew-Denniss / Android Authority It's been over a year, and my blood still boils whenever I think about it. Aside from the Flip 4 that slept with the fishes, my wife and I baby our phones. They are always protected by a case and screen protector, and we take them out of those cases for a thorough cleaning at least once a week. But in February 2024, the Flip 5 died. It had never been dropped or banged, but the screen destroyed itself. The culprit? One of the rubber seals at the side of the display, along the hinge, came loose and got caught in the hinge mechanism. Claiming a component is 'engineered not to fail' on a foldable and asking me to pay full-price to repair it is a joke. Rather than send the phone away, we took it to a Samsung Store. The employee inspected the device and then told us that while it was clear the phone was in pristine condition, we'd need to pay for the repair. According to Samsung's repair guide for the Z Flip 5, that component was 'engineered not to fail.' Last time I checked, most things aren't engineered to fail, but it sometimes happens anyway. Thankfully, our Samsung Care plan meant it cost £90 rather than the full repair cost, but even so, this was a low blow. Pixels break, but Google cares My experience with Google devices has been the opposite. I've owned the Nexus 6, 6P, Pixel XL, 2XL, and 3XL, and each of them had to go through warranty at least twice. Two of my Nexus 6s popped their rear panel, four Nexus 6Ps either bent or had the display pop out of the frame, two Pixel XLs developed dead speakers, one 2XL got dead display pixels while the other decided it didn't want to take pictures anymore, and my 3XL couldn't record video without crashing. The latter was in its return window, so I sent it back and got an S10 Plus instead. That's a terrible track record to be sure, and my Android Authority colleagues tell me I'm the unluckiest guy on the planet because nothing this terrible has ever happened to their Pixels, especially this frequently. But something impressed me during that time: Google's support really looked after me. I purchased all of those devices through the Google Store, and it replaced each of them with either a brand-new phone or a freshly refurbished unit in less than 48 hours of my reporting the issue. Aside from the support agent encouraging me to use the charging brick that came with the phone (the 6a doesn't come with one), Google's support experience was perfect. Google's warranty policy, at least in the UK, is to replace the faulty phone right away to minimise the impact on the user. Then the defective device gets repaired and fully refurbished so that it can be used as a replacement for someone else who makes a warranty claim. It's an efficient process that made me feel cared for as a customer. Google's customer support is always friendly and (usually) asks questions and offers troubleshooting steps that make sense. Zac Kew-Denniss / Android Authority I had another solid experience with Google support in the last few weeks. Pixel 6a battery problems are widespread, and my Grandfather's 6a developed a swollen battery. In the UK, phones get a two-year manufacturer's warranty, but this 6a was over three years old, so Google didn't have an obligation to do anything. Still, I reached out to support, and in less than 12 hours, a refurbished 6a that had a brand new battery and display arrived at my door. Aside from the support agent encouraging me to use the charging brick that came with the phone in the future (the 6a doesn't come with one), the support experience was perfect, and everything was sorted via a live chat in less than half an hour. Pixels have improved Robert Triggs / Android Authority Another thing to consider is that Pixels have improved over the last few years. My cousin has had a Pixel 6 Pro since launch, and it's never let him down. A friend has a 7a and loves it, and several people I know have various models of the Pixel 9 series and couldn't be happier. Phones from all manufacturers will have issues at times, but from the experience of those around me, it seems that Google's reliability has improved, and users aren't facing frequent issues like I did in my early Pixel days. Even with Android 16's expressive redesign, I still prefer One UI. But that's undermined by the knowledge that Samsung's customer support will be an uphill battle if anything goes wrong. Pair the improved reliability with fantastic customer support, and I'm left wondering if I should go back to using a Pixel. I still love Samsung's products. I've had the S24 Ultra since it launched, and it's never once let me down. The Material Expressive redesign of Android 16 looks fantastic, but I still prefer One UI overall. However, no matter how much I love One UI or the phone it runs on, I always have that fear that if something does go wrong, getting it fixed would be an uphill battle with Samsung, and until the company changes that, it could be time for me to move on. Follow

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store