1724919650-0%2FUntitled-design-(5)1724919650-0.png&w=3840&q=100)
Governor laments poor law and order in K-P
Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Governor Faisal Karim Kundi has said that the law and order situation in K-P is not encouraging, with army and police busy in intelligence-based operations.
He said security agencies are making huge sacrifices.
He expressed these views while talking to the media at his residence, Kundi Model Farm, on Eidul Fitr.
Kundi said the state is fulfilling its responsibilities and the issue of law and order in K-P was also discussed in a recent meeting of the National Security Council (NSC).
"Unfortunately, some political parties boycotted this meeting. Which shows that they only want to get concessions from the government for their political purposes," he said.
He said that some elements wanted Imran Khan to be brought back to the National Assembly, but did anyone demand this in the past when other leaders were in jail?
These are the same parties that have supported such policies in the past while in power, but today, when they themselves are in trouble, they are demanding an NRO.
When the 26th Amendment was tabled, they also betrayed their allies and boycotted the meeting.
The governor said that it is important to keep politics and accountability separate. If someone is accused of corruption or illegal actions, they will have to face the court of law.
The government cannot give NRO to anyone. If someone considers himself innocent, he will have to wait for the court's decision.
Regarding the events of May 9, PTI's own leaders have admitted that their workers were involved. Violence, vandalism of government property, and hate campaigns against national institutions in the name of political struggle are not acceptable, he said, adding that in the past, many leaders remained in jail for years, but no one attacked state institutions.
Kundi said that water scarcity in Sindh is a serious problem and the people of Sindh and the Sindh government have serious concerns about it.
The federal government needs to take serious steps on this issue.
The issue of distribution of NFC award is also yet to be resolved, and the provinces will have to take effective steps to secure their financial rights.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
10 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Beyond the divide: rethinking federal-provincial collaboration for economic transformation—II
Agriculture, livelihoods, and forests: climate impacts and systemic constraints Agriculture remains the backbone of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's rural economy—contributing 30% of provincial GDP and employing 32% of the labour force. KP hosts 45% of Pakistan's forest cover and contributes over 50% to the country's carbon sink—yet receives little recognition or fiscal compensation for its stewardship role. Forest conservation, reforestation, and sustainable land-use initiatives remain underfunded and excluded from federal climate finance frameworks. Beyond the divide: rethinking federal-provincial collaboration for economic transformation—I Despite constitutional devolution, KP lacks the fiscal autonomy and institutional access to key instruments such as green climate funds, carbon markets, and agricultural risk insurance schemes. Without flexible financing, targeted climate adaptation resources, and greater programmatic authority, the province remains constrained in addressing both the short-term needs of farmers and the long-term challenge of climate change. Misaligned policies and data disconnect One of the gravest flaws in Pakistan's fiscal governance is the siloed preparation of budgets. Federal and provincial budgets are formulated in isolation, without integrated data or joint economic planning. Decisions like changes in property taxation, sales tax, etc., are taken unilaterally by the federal government, with little regard for provincial fiscal autonomy or local economic realities. The Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS), central to data generation, remains under federal control—leaving provinces dependent on potentially outdated or misaligned datasets for planning and investment. Rethinking the NFC: misaligned incentives and a disconnected federation The current National Finance Commission (NFC) Award—structured predominantly around population size — has become increasingly disconnected from Pakistan's development needs and federal realities. Provinces like Punjab and Sindh, by virtue of their demographic weight, receive nearly 80% of the divisible pool. In contrast, regions such as Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), Balochistan, Gilgit-Baltistan, and Azad Jammu & Kashmir — despite facing deeper development deficits, climate vulnerability, and regional instability — remain chronically underfunded. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa exemplifies this imbalance. The province that hosts over 1.5 million Afghan refugees has absorbed the Ex-FATA region without corresponding fiscal adjustment, and accounts for 45% of Pakistan's forest cover. Its vital contributions to national security, environmental preservation, and humanitarian burden-sharing go largely unrecognized in the current NFC formula. By rewarding population growth over economic performance, resilience, or service delivery, the NFC structure not only neglects disadvantaged regions but also distorts provincial incentives. International models—such as Vietnam's capped population shares and performance-linked transfers—offer more equitable frameworks, aligning resource allocation with outcomes rather than demographics alone. Efforts to reform the fiscal compact have been insufficient. KP's National Dialogue on the NFC in February 2025 signaled an intent to revisit the distribution model, but the absence of key federal and provincial actors reflected a broader lack of political will. The debate over vertical and horizontal allocations remains hostage to entrenched interests, especially in larger provinces that dominate federal politics. Federal fiscal policies further compound the imbalance. IMF-mandated surplus targets require provinces to underwrite federal deficits, while unfunded mandates—such as the devolution of higher education, social protection, and climate adaptation—shift responsibilities to provinces without the resources or autonomy to meet them. These gaps between constitutional obligations and fiscal reality are growing wider. If Pakistan is to function as a true federation, the NFC must evolve. A reformed framework should account for provincial contributions to national stability, equity, and long-term development—not just population figures. Until then, regions like KP will continue to carry disproportionate burdens, with limited fiscal space to realize their full potential. Toward a functional federation: empowering provinces, energizing Pakistan Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's experience offers a window into a broader national truth: Pakistan's progress is only as strong as the sum of its provinces. Yet today, provinces are expected to deliver on national priorities without the authority, autonomy, or tools to do so. Fiscal transfers alone are not enough. What Pakistan needs is a new federal compact—one that shifts from control to coordination, from entitlement to performance. The National Finance Commission (NFC) Award must evolve to reward results, resilience, and resource stewardship—not just population size. Provinces should have the power to issue bonds, tap into international climate and diaspora finance, and generate their own revenues. Control over key sectors—energy, minerals, tourism, trade logistics—must be operationally devolved, backed by institutional coordination rather than political gatekeeping. Federal planning must reflect provincial realities, not override them. KP has shown initiative—reforming regulations, attracting investors, and pushing innovation—but its efforts remain stifled by a system that doesn't keep pace. To unlock Pakistan's full potential, we must empower its provinces—not just with mandates, but with the means to lead. Conclusion: expand the pie, don't just fight over slices — unlocking Pakistan's true potential Pakistan's future won't be won by provinces fighting over shrinking slices of a fixed pie or by a federal system that clings to outdated formulas. Instead, real progress will come from expanding the pie—by empowering provinces to unlock their unique strengths, invest boldly, and drive growth that benefits all. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's story is a powerful reminder: it's not a tale of dependency or deficit, but of immense potential held back by an inflexible system. Despite bearing heavy burdens—from hosting millions of refugees to safeguarding nearly half of Pakistan's forests—KP remains shackled by fiscal constraints and limited autonomy. Imagine the possibilities if these provinces were trusted to lead their own growth with the tools and resources they deserve. The National Finance Commission must transform—from a zero-sum contest focused on population numbers to a dynamic framework that rewards innovation, resilience, and results. Provinces should be architects of their own destinies, empowered to build infrastructure, attract investment, and pioneer solutions aligned with national goals. This is not just a fiscal debate—it's a call for a new social contract: a federation that shares opportunities, not just resources; a Pakistan where every province sees itself not as a burden, but as a vital partner in shaping a prosperous, sustainable future. The true test of federalism lies in creating an ecosystem where provinces grow not in spite of the system, but because of it. Reform the structure, and provinces like KP won't just survive—they will thrive and lead Pakistan toward green growth, enhanced regional trade, and lasting unity. The road ahead demands courage and vision. But if Pakistan can embrace a federation that trusts its provinces, values their contributions, and grows the pie together, the promise of inclusive, resilient development will finally be within reach. (Concluded) (The writer is an expert in public policy and finance, focusing on fiscal federalism, economic development, and governance reforms) Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
11 hours ago
- Express Tribune
JCP to review tenure of CB
A crucial meeting of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP), chaired by Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, will be held on June 19 in the Supreme Court building. The meeting will discuss extending the tenure of constitutional benches. The matter was last addressed in the commission's session on December 21, 2024, where a majority approved a six-month extension for the nominated judges of the Supreme Court's constitutional benches. At present, 15 judges have been working for the constitutional benches. Among them, a committee led by Justice Aminuddin Khan and comprising Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail and Justice Ali Mazahar selects judges for the particular constitutional benches. Performance of CB The present CB led by Justice Aminuddin Khan has been able to issue only three reported judgement since it's creation through 26th constitutional amendment. The CB had issued first reported judgement in January. This two-page decision was related to the jurisdiction of CB itself. The order had held that regular benches could not hear matters related to the interpretation of law and constitution. Secondly, reported short order has been passed in military courts case. Likewise, another reported judgement was authored by Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail. Lawyers are wondering as who will judge the performance of the constitutional bench. They are also raising question that why Justice Mandokhail is not being given independent CB. A lawyer says that the CB started by spending two months studiously avoiding the 26th Amendment case in favour of hearing cases of no importance which had already become infructuous. "It followed that by spending four months almost exclusively on the military courts case before passing a verdict which must surely have pleased the establishment. The only other order of note it passed in that period was to ensure that no regular bench of the Supreme Court could hear any case of importance. "Next, it took up the reserved seats review case in which most of the original judges were excluded and the few who were included seemed to have suddenly, and inexplicably, become of the opposite view from day one", says the lawyer. He said that when the idea of a CB elected by politicians was first floated; many said such a bench was fundamentally against the idea of judicial independence and predicted it would reduce the credibility of the SC to nothing. Nonetheless, judges in Pakistan have sometimes defied predictions. "Unfortunately, the CB's performance thus far has proved this is not one of those times." He also said that the stated rationale of the CB at the time of the 26th Amendment was to improve the constitutional jurisprudence of the SC. In its first six months, the number of detailed judgments it has issued can be counted on the fingers of one hand. And all of them have tended to take out jurisprudence backwards and closer to the desires of the establishment," he adds.
Express Tribune
16 hours ago
- Express Tribune
JCP to review tenure of constitutional benches
A crucial meeting of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP), chaired by Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, will be held on June 19 in the Supreme Court building. The meeting will discuss extending the tenure of constitutional benches. The matter was last addressed in the commission's session on December 21, 2024, where a majority approved a six-month extension for the nominated judges of the Supreme Court's constitutional benches. At present, 15 judges have been working for the constitutional benches. Among them, a committee led by Justice Aminuddin Khan and comprising Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail and Justice Muhammad Ali Mazahar selects judges for the particular constitutional benches. Extension of constitutional benches has been proposed for the second time. The federal government on December 21 managed to get its way at the JCP which had rejected a suggestion to nominate all Supreme Court judges to its Constitutional Bench (CB) by a majority vote of 7 to 6. Except Justice Aminuddin, all JCP's judicial members namely CJP Yahya Afridi, Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Munib Akhtar, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail had voted for all the Supreme Court judges to be part of the CB. Two PTI members Barrister Gahar Ali Khan and Barrister Ali Zafar supported their view. However, the government as well as the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) representatives in JCP did not support their suggestion. The judicial members had faced embarrassment, when their own fellow judge, Justice Aminuddin Khan, did not support their suggestion. The JCP by majority 7 to 6 endorsed the extension of the CB led by Justice Aminuddin Khan for six months. Once again it is being expected that the government will be successful to get majority votes for the extension of present CB, which performance is under question. There is no objective criteria for the selection of judges for CB. Performance of CB The present CB led by Justice Aminuddin Khan has been able to issue only three reported judgement since it's creation through 26th constitutional amendment. The CB had issued first reported judgement in January. This two-page decision was related to the jurisdiction of CB itself. The order had held that regular benches could not hear matters related to the interpretation of law and constitution. Secondly, reported short order has been passed in military courts case. Likewise, another reported judgement was authored by Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail. Lawyers are wondering as who will judge the performance of the constitutional bench. They are also raising question that why Justice Mandokhail is not being given independent CB. A lawyer says that the CB started by spending two months studiously avoiding the 26th Amendment case in favour of hearing cases of no importance which had already become infructuous. "It followed that by spending four months almost exclusively on the military courts case before passing a verdict which must surely have pleased the establishment. The only other order of note it passed in that period was to ensure that no regular bench of the Supreme Court could hear any case of importance. "Next, it took up the reserved seats review case in which most of the original judges were excluded and the few who were included seemed to have suddenly, and inexplicably, become of the opposite view from day one", says the lawyer. He said that when the idea of a CB elected by politicians was first floated; many said such a bench was fundamentally against the idea of judicial independence and predicted it would reduce the credibility of the SC to nothing. Nonetheless, judges in Pakistan have sometimes defied predictions. 'Unfortunately, the CB's performance thus far has proved this is not one of those times.' He also said that the stated rationale of the CB at the time of the 26th Amendment was to improve the constitutional jurisprudence of the SC. In its first six months, the number of detailed judgments it has issued can be counted on the fingers of one hand. And all of them have tended to take out jurisprudence backwards and closer to the desires of the establishment,' he adds.
