Judge Throws Out Justin Baldoni's Defamation Lawsuit Against Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds
The post Judge Throws Out Justin Baldoni's Defamation Lawsuit Against Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds appeared first on Consequence.
A vast majority of Justin Baldoni's $400 million civil lawsuit against Blake Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds was thrown out by a judge on Monday.
Per People, Judge Lewis J. Liman granted a motion to dismiss the lawsuit filed by Baldoni and his production company, Wayfarer Parties, against Lively and Reynolds, which alleged extortion and defamation related to allegations Lively has made about Baloni occurring on the set of the film It Ends With Us. Baldoni does have the option of amending the lawsuit for breach of implied covenant and tortious interference with contract and re-filing by June 23rd.
Additionally, Judge Liman dismissed Baldoni's separate defamation lawsuit against the New York Times over its reporting on Lively's allegations and her subsequent lawsuit against the actor/director
'The Wayfarer Parties have not alleged that Lively is responsible for any statements other than the statements in her [California Civil Rights Department] complaint, which are privileged,' Judge Liman wrote in the opinion and order filing. 'The Wayfarer Parties have alleged that Reynolds and [publicist Leslie] Sloane made additional statements accusing Baldoni of sexual misconduct and that the Times made additional statements accusing the Wayfarer Parties of engaging in a smear campaign. But the Wayfarer Parties have not alleged that Reynolds, Sloane or the Times would have seriously doubted these statements were true based on the information available to them, as is required for them to be liable for defamation under applicable law.'
Lively's federal lawsuit against Baldoni remains active and is expected to go to trial in 2026. Among several allegations, Lively has accused Baldoni — who directed and co-starred in It Ends With Us — of sexual harassment, fostering a hostile work environment, and orchestrating a PR campaign to damage her reputation.
Popular Posts
Sabrina Carpenter Announces New Single "Manchild"
Black Sabbath's All-Star Final Concert to Stream Worldwide
Jack White Celebrates Trump and Elon Musk's Breakup: "More Popcorn Gruppenfuehrer!"
T-Pain Announces 20th Anniversary US Tour
Miley Cyrus Heckled at Something Beautiful Film Premiere: "Thought This Was a Concert!"
Nick Jonas to Play Paul Stanley in KISS Biopic Shout It Out Loud
Subscribe to Consequence's email digest and get the latest breaking news in music, film, and television, tour updates, access to exclusive giveaways, and more straight to your inbox.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fans React to Judge Dismissing Justin Baldoni's $400 Million Lawsuit Against Blake Lively
Justin Baldoni's $400 million lawsuit against Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds has been tossed out by a judge — and fans aren't holding back their opinions. On Monday, June 9, Judge Lewis J. Liman dismissed the defamation and extortion countersuit filed by Baldoni, 41, and his production company, Wayfarer Studios, against Lively, 37, her husband Ryan Reynolds, 48, and her publicist, Leslie Sloane. The judge also threw out a separate $250 million claim against The New York Times. The court of public opinion is divided as fans took to X (formerly Twitter) to share their thoughts on this new ruling. Some people were happy for the Gossip Girl alum and felt she was finally vindicated. 'If Baldoni's case had credibility, the judge wouldn't have tossed it out,' one fan wrote. 'That's a big win for blake,' a second commented. Another declared, 'Seemed pretty thin from the beginning. Glad it was thrown out.' However, many came to the Jane the Virgin actor's defense. 'It doesn't matter…the world sees blake and Ryan for who they are and they are not supported,' one person wrote. 'This is a technicality….Justin will still have support of the people when this is over. #staystrongjustin.' 'Who says money can't buy you everything,' a second commented. 'Justin Baldoni's countersuit being dismissed DOES NOT mean Blake Lively is telling the truth,' a third fan noted. 'It just shows sexual assault claims—YET TO BE PROVEN—are generally protected.' In his filing, obtained by People, Judge Liman explained, 'The Wayfarer Parties have not alleged that Lively is responsible for any statements other than the statements in her CRD complaint, which are privileged.' 'The Wayfarer Parties have alleged that Reynolds and Sloane made additional statements accusing Baldoni of sexual misconduct and that the 'Times' made additional statements accusing the Wayfarer Parties of engaging in a smear campaign,' he continued. 'But the Wayfarer Parties have not alleged that Reynolds, Sloane or the Times would have seriously doubted these statements were true based on the information available to them, as is required for them to be liable for defamation under applicable law.' According to People, Lively's legal team said that the ruling was a 'total victory and a complete vindication' for the actress. While Baldoni's lawyers have yet to make a public statement, they have until Monday, June 23, to file an amendment. The legal drama between the two stars began in December 2024, when Lively filed a lawsuit alleging that Baldoni sexually harassed her on the set of their film It Ends With Us. Baldoni, who also directed the film, denied the allegations and filed a $400 million countersuit in January 2025.
Wall Street Journal
38 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Judge Tosses Justin Baldoni's Lawsuits Against Blake Lively and New York Times
A federal judge has dismissed lawsuits brought by actor and director Justin Baldoni against actress Blake Lively, her husband, Ryan Reynolds, and the New York Times NYT -0.32%decrease; red down pointing triangle, the latest wrinkle in a PR battle-turned-legal saga that has gripped Hollywood. The feud between the celebrities is centered on Baldoni and Lively's behavior during and after the filming of the movie 'It Ends With Us,' based on Colleen Hoover's bestselling novel. Baldoni and Lively co-starred in the film, which was released in August 2024, and Baldoni also directed it.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Justin Baldoni's Lawsuit Being Tossed Out Is A Win For Survivors
Note: This post is an Op-Ed and shares the author's personal views. I fucking told you so: Justin Baldoni's $400-million countersuit against Blake Lively was tossed out by a judge. Last December, Blake filed a California Civil Rights Department complaint against her It Ends with Us costar and director, in which she alleged sexual harassment and a subsequent retaliatory media campaign (she would then go on to sue Justin). Justin denied the claims and filed a countersuit of his own, alleging defamation and extortion, among other things. Related: 21 Times Celebrities Revealed Wildly Juicy, Shady, Or Even Disturbing Things In Interviews Earlier today, a judge ruled that the countersuit against Blake, as well as Ryan Reynolds, Leslie Sloane, Vision PR, and the New York Times Company had been dismissed. The Wayfarer parties can still amend their complaint for "breach of implied covenant and tortious interference with contract." But the important part that I'd like to highlight is the emphasis that the allegations Blake made in her CRD complaint were privileged speech. To highlight one section from the judge: "The Wayfarer Parties have not adequately alleged a defamation claim as to any part of the purported conspiracy. The Wayfarer Parties have not adequately alleged that any false statements were made to the Times other than the statements in Lively's CRD complaint, which were privileged under California law. There also is no allegation that the distribution of the CRD complaint was made by anyone other than Lively or, more particularly, with the involvement or agreement of Sloane or Reynolds. The Wayfarer Parties have not adequately alleged that Sloane or Reynolds individually did any more than repeat Lively's version of events, which they had no reason to doubt. And the Wayfarer Parties have not adequately alleged that Lively should be held responsible for Sloane or Reynolds' statements. Their allegations of a conspiracy between the parties are conclusory." In non-legal-speak terms, California has a rule that essentially means you can't be sued for defamation if you make a serious allegation of sexual harassment. It's designed to prohibit a tactic that can be used to silence survivors who do speak out by bleeding them dry via the courts. Related: Here Are 16 Actors Who Saved Their Skin By Turning Down Roles In Movies That People Notoriously Hated Nineteen women's organizations already expressed concern over Baldoni's lawsuit because of what it could mean for survivors. Child USA worried that allowing Baldoni's lawsuit to continue would effectively have grave complications for California's civil code and "would force survivors into the untenable position of having to choose between remaining silent or facing emotional, reputational, and financial devastation through protracted, abusive litigation." The Child USA amicus brief continues, "It would also send a dangerous message to other survivors contemplating disclosure — that speaking out may carry intolerable risks — and it would embolden perpetrators and complicit institutions that depend on secrecy to perpetuate cycles of abuse." This is what I have been harping on about since news of the lawsuits first emerged. This isn't just an annoying celebrity trial. If Blake Lively, a rich white lady with celebrity cache, can face a multimillion retaliatory defamation lawsuit, where the fuck does that put the rest of us who might want to speak out about sexual harassment? We need allegations of sexual harassment without malice to be considered privileged speech, which isn't the case across the country. The suit against the New York Times being dropped is also good news for the media's ability to report on alleged sexual harassment cases. Smaller publications sounded the alarm from the get-go. To a certain extent, I do worry that the damage has already been done. Most people I speak to voice confusion about what to me is a fairly simple sexual harassment and retaliation case, citing the sheer abundance of media flooding our feeds. Will all the tabloids and TikTokers that called Blake a bitch in a million different ways because she made an allegation of sexual harassment finally look at themselves in the mirror? Will my comments finally not be full of people who claim they know more about this case and its implications for women than a domestic violence shelter? (For the love of god, "Believe All Women" is not the slogan.) Or perhaps the slop machine will keep churning until the trial, reminding us that we are in an age of conspiracy that will continue to assert that survivors' stories are really important — well, unless I don't like you. Nothing says, "I champion survivors' stories" more than spending most of your time bashing a woman online! Also in Celebrity: Chrissy Teigen Posted The Results Of Her Hairline Lowering Surgery, And Ouch Also in Celebrity: 18 Celebrities Who Called Out Other Celebs On Social Media For Bad, Problematic, Or Just Plain Mean Behavior Also in Celebrity: 21 Incredible Photos Of Hollywood Legends Back In The Day That I Guarantee You've Never, Ever Seen Before
