Is Jimmy Kimmel planning to leave US after Trump's warning? Late-night host confirms Italian citizenship
His statement came after CBS decided to terminate Stephen Colbert, Kimmel's adversary, late-night program in June. Some have conjectured that the unexpected action was politically motivated in a bid to gain support from the Trump administration.
Kimmel, who has presented ABC late-night comedy show Jimmy Kimmel Live!, for 22 years, appeared on his former girlfriend Sarah Silverman's podcast and talked about Trump and the current situation of American politics.
After Colbert's cancellation, Trump warned Kimmel in a post on Truth Social, stating that 'Next up will be an even less talented Jimmy Kimmel, and then, a weak, and very insecure, Jimmy Fallon. The only real question is, who will go first?'
Also Read: US scraps interview waiver program for H1-B and other visa holders; How it will impact you from September 2 - Explained
Jimmy Kimmel speaks about his Italian citizenship
During Kimmel's appearance on the 'Sarah Silverman podcast', the host said, 'A lot of people I know are thinking about where are they going to get citizenship?'
To this, Kimmel said, 'I do have… I did get Italian citizenship.'
Kimmel was granted Italian citizenship this year after documenting his ancestry, according to the Italian news agency Ansa. Kimmel's maternal great-grandparents left Naples for New York following the devastation of their village of Ischia by an earthquake in 1883.
Jimmy Kimmel slams Trump's second term
Moving forward, Kimmel told Silverman, 'What's going on is… as bad as you thought it was gonna be, it's so much worse. It's just unbelievable. I feel like it's probably even worse than [Trump] would like it to be,' pointing to Trump's second term.
'Way worse,' Silverman added.
In case Kimmel decides to leave the United States, he will follow in the footsteps of celebrities like Ellen DeGeneres and Rosie O'Donnell, who have found their new homes in England and Ireland, respectively.
Trump critic Kimmel has frequently blasted the President for his various policies and moves, including trade war. He also accused Trump of inciting market turbulence to 'distract us from all the other horrible stuff' following a stock market setback.
In addition, Kimmel has given Donald and Melania Trump the nicknames Don Valjean and Lady Misérable.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Caving to a bully only fuels more demands: Former Indian envoy on Trump's tariffs
The former diplomat also criticised Washington's deepening engagement with Pakistan, calling it a "strategic mistake" given Islamabad's close ties with Beijing. "I think it's a strategic mistake on the part of the US that you are getting in bed with Pakistan, which is in bed with China. China is the US's strategic competitor," Swarup said. "If you cave in to a bully, then the bully will increase his demands. Then there will be even more demands. So, I think we have done the right thing. India is too large, too proud a country to become a camp follower of any other country. Our strategic autonomy has been the bedrock of our foreign policy right from the 1950s. I don't think that any Govt in Delhi can compromise on that," he added. On criticism over India's foreign policy, Swarup said India should not cave in to any pressure, as India's strategic autonomy is non-negotiable. "Here, I would not blame our diplomats at all. I think what has happened is Pakistan, through some intermediaries, has gotten the ear of the US President, and that is why, two visits by Asim Munir to Washington, the so-called "deal" with America on the so-called "oil reserves" of Pakistan," the former diplomat said. "More importantly, I think Pakistan is now trying to position itself as the 'Crypto King' of South Asia and there, through World Liberty Financial, in which Trump's family has stakes, Steve Witkoff's family has a stake, through that I think Pakistan has managed to project an image of itself as a reliable these things have led to Trump having a softer approach towards Pakistan," Swarup said. "But that does not mean that he has given up on India or that India is now an adversary for him. I think this is part of his pressure tactics to secure a more favourable deal. India should not cave in because our strategic autonomy is non-negotiable," he added. Swarup, also a noted author, added that Trump has made no secret of his longing for the Nobel Peace Prize, and while he is a dealmaker, he has now made it his USP that he is the peacemaker.
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Putin's 3 Big Demands For Trump Before Alaska Summit; 'No Compromise, No Bargain...'
Russia has reaffirmed its hardline conditions for ending the war in Ukraine, just days before a high-stakes summit between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump in Alaska. Moscow insists Ukraine must withdraw its forces from contested regions, abandon its NATO ambitions, and recognise Russian control over Crimea, Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson. These terms, first outlined by Putin in 2024, also demand guarantees for Russian-speaking citizens and legally binding international agreements. Ukraine has rejected the demands as an 'absurd ultimatum,' vowing never to recognise Russian occupation. President Volodymyr Zelensky says a ceasefire must precede any territorial discussions and refuses to abandon defensive lines in the Donbas. The Alaska summit will be the first US–Russia leaders' meeting since 2021, with Trump suggesting that both sides may need to swap land to reach peace. However, both Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart, raising doubts over any immediate breakthrough.#Russia #Ukraine #Putin #Trump #AlaskaSummit #UkraineWar #PeaceTalks #Geopolitics #Zelensky #BreakingNews
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
23 minutes ago
- First Post
5 reasons not to read much in Trump's ‘very severe consequences' warning for Putin
While US President Donald Trump warns his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, of severe consequences, here are five reasons why the threat holds no substance ahead of the Alaska talks While speaking to the reporters on Wednesday, US President Donald Trump warned that his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, would face ' very severe consequences' if he did not agree to a ceasefire in the Ukraine war at the Alaska Summit on Friday. Trump's remarks on the matter came after he held talks with the Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, along with other European leaders. While Trump's latest warning against Putin drew significant attention ahead of the Alaska summit, many wonder if the threat holds any substance. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While speaking to the reporters on Wednesday, Trump also suggested that if his meeting with Putin goes well, he will organise a second summit, which would include Zelenskyy as well. 'If the first one goes OK, we'll have a quick second one,' Trump told reporters in Washington. 'I would like to do it almost immediately, and we'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin, President Zelenskyy and me, if they'd like to have me there.' Trump will be meeting Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday. The summit will reportedly be held at the Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson, a military facility crucial to countering the Soviet Union during the height of the Cold War. Here are 5 reasons why Trump's threat might fizzle out. 'Feel-out' session Ahead of the talks in Alaska, Trump's White House has already lowered expectations for any breakthrough from the meeting. In the run-up to the meeting, the Trump administration often used terms like 'listening session' and ' feel-out meeting' to describe the planned discussion about the war in Ukraine. Even Trump himself has indicated that the Friday summit in Alaska is not meant to be one that ultimately brings an end to the Ukraine war, which has been raging on for three years. 'There's a very good chance that we're going to have a second meeting that will be more productive than the first,' Trump said Wednesday. 'Because the first is I'm going to find out where we are and what we're doing.' Meanwhile, the White House has also steered clear of making any firm commitments about what will come out of Friday's gathering in Anchorage. 'This is a listening exercise for this president,' Leavitt told reporters on Tuesday. 'Look, only one party that's involved in this war is going to be present. And so this is for the president to go and to get, again, a firmer and better understanding of how we can hopefully bring this war to an end.' Hence, Russia poses no immediate threat to the Trump administration after the Friday meeting. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD TACO? There has been a peculiar term going around on social media describing Trump's frequently shifting stance. The term is called ' TACO', and it is not about the famous Mexican food. The full form of the term is 'Trump Always Chickens Out'. Before the Alaska meeting was announced, on July 28, Trump set a new deadline of '10 or 12 days' for Russia to reach a peace deal in its war on Ukraine. The American leader warned that if Russia failed to do so, it would face tough new sanctions and tariffs. Interestingly, Trump's warning came as he shortened a 50-day deadline he had set this month. However, the deadline is long gone, and the US did nothing to Russia. Instead, the Trump administration unleashed wrath on India by imposing nearly 50 per cent tariffs on Indian goods. Trump went on to threaten secondary sanctions on India for purchasing Russian oil. While speaking to _Firstpost_ earlier this week, Trump's former National Security Adviser John Bolton called out the president's duplicity of standards. 'Another 25 per cent imposed on Indian exports to the US because of the purchase of Russian oil and gas. Yet at the same time, within days, Trump was agreeing to a summit meeting with Putin in Alaska this coming Friday and not proceeding with his threat to impose tariffs on Russia or put further sanctions on Russia,' Bolton told Firstpost on Tuesday. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'During all this time, no sanctions were imposed on China for its even larger purchases of Russian oil and gas. So I think it's just typical of the confusion in the way Trump does business. But it's going to cause, I think, severe difficulties between the US and India at a time when we should be doing exactly the opposite,' he said. The former US ambassador to the UN pointed out how Russia was not harmed by any of Trump's initiatives. When asked about Trump's reluctance to hold trade talks with India until it stops purchasing oil from Russia, Bolton emphasised that the whole thing is 'self-defeating'. He said, 'It is indicative of Trump's inability to prioritise among competing objectives.' 'He hoped that this [secondary sanctions] would affect the negotiations that will take place in Alaska this Friday. But the fact is, it hasn't hurt Russia at all. India still buys oil from Russia. So tariffs hurt India, but don't hurt Russia.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The secondary tariff is not as effective as dealing with Russia directly, but I'm not sure anybody in the White House has explained that to Trump,' he added. Already pushing for a second summit Even before the Alaska summit, Trump is already preparing for a second summit. Part of the reason the Potus is pushing for a second summit is that this one won't involve Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Ukraine and several European leaders have already made it clear that a peace deal cannot be signed without Ukraine's say in it. Earlier this month, there were reports that the Trump administration was pushing for Zelesnkyy's inclusion in the Alaska meeting. However, the Kremlin insisted that the meeting should be kept bilateral. Putin said that he was not ready to meet his Ukrainian counterpart even as the Kremlin claimed preparations were underway for a set-piece bilateral summit with Donald Trump next week. 'I have nothing against it in general; it is possible, but certain conditions must be created for this,' the Russian leader averred when asked about the meeting with Zelenskyy. 'But unfortunately, we are still far from creating such conditions," he added. Trump ultimately bowed down to Putin's wishes and said that he is willing to talk to him at first without Zelenskyy. While speaking to the reporters in the Oval Office on the same day of the Kremlin's request, Trump said Putin did not have to meet with Zelenskyy first before the US and Russian presidents could meet. 'No, he doesn't,' Trump said. 'They would like to meet with me, and I'll do whatever I can to stop the killing.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It might come as reassurance to Zelenskyy and European leaders Trump's warning against Putin came after his phone call with Zelenskyy and European leaders. In the impromptu call, US Vice President JD Vance was also in attendance. Trump said that he had a 'very good call' with European leaders in which he consulted them about the general goal and strategy for his summit. He told reporters that he gave reassurances to the European leader that a ceasefire was his priority and he would not make any territorial concessions without Kyiv's full involvement. Meanwhile, French President Emmanuel Macron said that Trump's approach at the video conference appeared to reassure some of the leaders, who were making a final collective plea to the unpredictable US president that he had a duty to protect Ukraine's sovereignty – and European security – at the talks. Hence, Trump's remarks after the call can be seen as just his way to assure Zelenskyy and European leaders without any anger directed towards Putin. Putin has his cards to play While we contemplate Trump's strategies for the Alaska meeting, the key piece of the puzzle is what Russian President Vladimir Putin brings to the table. 'Well, for most of the first six months, what Trump was trying to do was use what he thought was his friendship with Vladimir Putin to negotiate a ceasefire in Ukraine. Now I'll just tell you from my own experience,' Ambassador Bolton told Firstpost. 'Putin doesn't see Trump as his friend. He sees them as somebody that he thinks he can manipulate in true, true fashion of a former KGB agent. And I think he's been pretty successful with it. But at some point toward the end of the first six months, whether intentionally or unintentionally, I think Putin pushed Trump a little too far, and Trump concluded that Putin wasn't interested in a ceasefire.' 'That's what angered him. He threatened tariffs on Russian exports to the US and secondary sanctions or tariffs on countries that were buying Russian oil and gas. So all of these issues with the secondary sanctions have arisen within the past 30 or 45 days,' he explained. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Bolton emphasised that the Russian president had already won with the meeting in Alaska. 'Well, I think Putin has seen the playbook, so it wouldn't surprise me if he came with a big plaque that said 'Here's my letter of nomination [Nobel Peace Prize] for you.' I think what Putin really wants to do is use his KGB training and try to get Trump back under his influence,' Bolton said. 'I do think he recognises he pushed Trump too far. Maybe he did it intentionally, maybe unintentionally. I don't know. It is a big win for Putin to come to the United States. He's a pariah leader of a rogue state that committed unprovoked aggression against Ukraine.' 'On Friday, he's going to get to stand next to the President of the United States and get his picture taken on territory that used to be Russian. Nobody in Russia has missed the fact that we bought Alaska from Russia in 1867. So it's what Trump can do. I think a lot of people are going to be watching. But the main thing is to see if Putin emerges with Trump thinking that they're friends again,' Ambassador Bolton concluded. Hence, all five reasons point to the fact that Trump's latest threat against Putin might not be of much substance. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
