Russia denies any link to Keir Starmer arson attacks after 3 charged over ‘plot to torch two homes and car linked to PM'
VLAD HITS BACK Russia denies any link to Keir Starmer arson attacks after 3 charged over 'plot to torch two homes and car linked to PM'
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
RUSSIA has denied any link to the arson attacks on Sir Keir Starmer after three were charged over the alleged plot.
Two homes and a car previously owned by the Prime Minister were torched earlier this month.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
3
A burning car in the same north London street where Sir Keir Starmer has a property
Credit: PA
3
Police forensics officers seen near the PM's home on May 12
Credit: Getty
3
Russian President Vladimir Putin delivers a congratulatory speech on the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the first issue of The Komsomolskaya Pravda newspaper
Credit: EPA
Officials have been probing whether the three Ukrainian-born men charged with arson or conspiring to commit arson were recruited by the Kremlin, according to senior Whitehall figures.
This is just one of many lines of investigation being explored.
But the Kremlin has denied the claims, calling them "false, unsubstantiated" and "ridiculous".
More to follow... For the latest news on this story keep checking back at The Sun Online
Thesun.co.uk is your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures and must-see video.
Like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/thesun and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSun.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
34 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Starmer's defence spending plans under pressure as Nato pushes for more
The Prime Minister has committed to spend 2.5% of gross domestic product on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to 3% over the next parliament – a timetable which could stretch to 2034. But Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte is thought to be pushing for allies to commit to spending 3.5% on the military with a further 1.5% on defence-related measures as the alliance responds to Russian President Vladimir Putin's actions in Ukraine. Leaders from the alliance will meet in The Hague later this month with the total 5% spending target by 2035 set to be on the table. But Downing Street refused to be drawn on the possible increased spending commitment, which would put a further strain on the public finances into the middle of the next decade. The Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'I'm not going to get into the discussions that are ongoing, in the usual way, ahead of (the) Nato (summit). 'The UK is already the third-highest spender in Nato in cash terms behind the United States and Germany, we are one of 22 allies of the 32 in Nato that already exceed the 2% of GDP Nato target. 'But it isn't just about cash, it's about contributions to capability that each Nato ally brings. 'Whether it is our nuclear capability, whether it's our world-class carriers with fifth-generation combat aircraft, our armed forces who are some of the most advanced in the world, the UK has been a leading contributor to Nato and will remain one.' Sir Keir and Defence Secretary John Healey have already come under pressure to spell out how the existing 3% goal could be met. Mr Healey insisted he was '100% confident' that military funding would increase as he promised to prepare the armed forces for the future. The Strategic Defence Review published on Monday recommended sweeping changes, including a greater focus on new technology including drones and artificial intelligence based on rising budgets. The authors of the review have suggested reaching that 3% target is vital to delivering their recommendations while US President Donald Trump has led the charge for Nato allies to spend 5%. Mr Healey denied he was gambling on economic growth to meet his target, telling BBC Breakfast: 'I'm 100% confident that we'll hit that 3%. 'The important thing for now is what we can do, and we can do now more than we've been able to do before, because of an extra £5 billion the Chancellor has put in to the defence budget this year and the 2.5% that we will deliver three years earlier than anyone expected. 'It means that a £60 billion budget this year will rise throughout this parliament and beyond.' The Ministry of Defence announced a £5 billion investment in the 'kit of the future' following the publication of the review on Monday. The funding includes £4 billion for drones and autonomous systems, and an extra £1 billion for lasers to protect British ships and soldiers. A new era of threat requires a new era for defence. The Strategic Defence Review marks a landmark shift in our deterrence and defence ⬇️ — Ministry of Defence 🇬🇧 (@DefenceHQ) June 2, 2025 Mr Healey said the investment would provide 'the most significant advance in UK defence technology in decades' and 'ensure our armed forces have the cutting-edge capabilities they need to meet the challenges of a rapidly changing world'. Part of the investment will see the establishment of a new 'drone centre' to accelerate the deployment of the technology by all three branches of the armed forces. The focus on drones comes as the technology has proved increasingly lethal on the battlefield in Ukraine, where it now kills more people than traditional artillery. At a meeting of allied defence ministers in April, Mr Healey said the UK estimated drones were inflicting 70-80% of battlefield casualties, while on Sunday Ukraine launched a major attack on Russian airfields deep behind the front line using a fleet of small drones. In addition to investment in drones and AI, the Government has announced an additional £1 billion for the development of 'directed energy weapons' (DEWs) during the current Parliament. This includes the DragonFire laser scheduled to be fitted to the Royal Navy's Type 45 destroyers from 2027, with a similar system provided for the Army by the end of the decade. DragonFire and other DEWs are intended to provide a lower-cost form of air defence against targets including drones, costing just £10 per shot compared with the thousands of pounds it costs to fire existing weapons. Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said the Government should 'urgently commit to spending 3% this Parliament'. 'This commitment from Nato contrasts with Labour's total failure to set out a plan to spend 3% on defence,' he said. 'As a result, their defence review has completely unravelled. The submarines and ships it promises are nothing but a fantasy fleet based on fantasy funding.'
Sky News
40 minutes ago
- Sky News
Roman Abramovich has kept a low profile since his Chelsea sale - but now he's in the chancellor's sights
Since being seen at peace talks early in the war, Roman Abramovich has kept a low profile for the last three years. The oligarch has neither supported nor condemned Russia's war on Ukraine publicly, positions that could bring risks and consequences. What we do know is that he has not approved the release of funds from the government-enforced sale of the Premier League club that provided his status beyond Russia. Under the threat of sanctions, Abramovich had tried to hold on to Chelsea while relinquishing control. Sanctions quashed that plan, as the government oversaw the unprecedented sale of one of the country's most successful teams. But one of Abramovich's last public statements, in March 2022, was a desire that "all victims of the war in Ukraine" benefit from the sale proceeds. That conflicts with the desire in Westminster for cash to only flow into humanitarian causes in Ukraine and not potentially into Russia, which started the war. So, the £2.5bn generated from selling the Blues remains frozen, unable to be released to a new foundation to help those most in need. Perhaps the dynamic would have changed had Donald Trump fulfilled a campaign pledge to swiftly end the war on his return to the Oval Office? The slow pace of any peace talks delays any prospect of sanctions on Abramovich being lifted anytime soon. Were they to be lifted, could Abramovich be in control of the destination of the windfall? Overseeing a foundation personally could provide a route back into public life. But will his close association with Vladimir Putin, which Abramovich has sought to deny, be too damaging in the long term? And there is still a trail of questions about Abramovich's business dealings. To Chelsea supporters, though, there is some longing for the days of relative stability and constant silverware under the Russian, whose huge investment transformed their fortunes from 2003 to 2021.
Reuters
42 minutes ago
- Reuters
No way to restart Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant at present, IAEA chief says
KYIV, June 3 (Reuters) - Conditions for restarting Ukraine's Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant do not exist at present due to a lack of water for cooling and the absence of a stable power supply, the head of the UN's nuclear safety watchdog said on Tuesday. IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi told Reuters in an interview in Kyiv that water would have to be pumped from the Dnipro River for the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, which is currently shut down, to restart. The facility, in Ukraine's southern Zaporizhzhia region, was occupied by Russia in March 2022, shortly after it launched a full-scale invasion of its neighbour. Grossi said the Russians had "never hidden the fact" that they want to restart the plant, but they would not be able to do so soon. "We are not in a situation of imminent restart of the plant. Far from that, it would take quite some time before that can be done," Grossi said. The IAEA chief added that the plant's machinery, which has not been operating for three years, would have to be thoroughly inspected before any restart. Ukraine has said that an attempt by Russian technicians to restart the plant would be dangerous because they are not certified to operate the Zaporizhzhia plant. Grossi said Russian nuclear staff were capable of conducting a restart, and that the issue of certification was a political rather than technical one. Ukraine has also protested at the IAEA's monitoring mission to the plant accessing it via Russian-occupied territory. Grossi said this was to protect the safety of his staff, and that at present he does not have the necessary guarantees from the Russian side to safely transit IAEA staff through the frontlines to Ukraine-controlled territory, as had been done several times before.
