logo
‘Do not buy' warning to parents over 3 major suncream brands that won't properly protect children this summer

‘Do not buy' warning to parents over 3 major suncream brands that won't properly protect children this summer

The Sun23-06-2025
PARENTS have been warned against three major suncream brands ahead of the summer holidays.
These products were found to not offer significant protection to children in the hot weather.
4
Which? carried out a series of tests to determine the effectiveness of popular suncream brands ahead of the peak summer season.
The independent lab exams tested sun creams that pass British Standard tests for UVA and UVB sun protection.
However, the tests uncovered three suncreams which failed either the UVA or UVB tests or both.
According to the outlet, this means they don't provide the protection they claim.
First on the list is the Morrisons Moisturising Sun Spray SPF30, available for £3.75.
Which? claimed this suncream failed SPF tests, which verify if the product can provide the claimed levels of protection from UVB rays.
The outlet said it tested the suncream twice to confirm the result and it failed both times.
However, the product did pass the UVA test carried out independently by Which?.
"We work closely with our supplier and conduct extensive efficacy and safety testing during product development," said a Morrisons representative.
"As such all our sun care products are tested to the relevant industry test standards and are not approved for launch until they meet these standards.
"During development and production all tested variants consistently achieved an SPF of 30."
In direct response to the Which? report, the spokesperson told The Sun: "We have retested the SPF against the British and International Standard and can confirm the product has achieved an SPF value of 34.5 and can therefore be labelled as SPF 30."
The second suncream on the Which? no-go list is the Ultrasun Family SPF30, available for £22.40 from Boots.
The outlet said the product failed a UVA test by not meeting the minimum required level in a first and second test.
However, Which? reported that the suncream did pass SPF tests, but said it couldn't recommend it due to failing one of the required tests.
The importance of sun cream in your skincare routine
Dermatologist and skincare enthusiast Andrea Suarez - known as Dr Dray - revealed why you should wear suncream.
The one thing you can do that will make the biggest difference - and this matters for all ages - is protecting your skin from the sun, Andrea stressed.
"The vast majority of external aging is due to exposure to ultraviolet radiation," she continued, not because you're "not using some jazzy serum or layering 90 different things on your face everyday".
"If you're not doing in your 20s, get on that now."
But she said the use of sun cream alone doesn't go far enough. Andrea urged that you also wear sun-protective clothing like broad-brimmed hats and long sleeves, on top of not staying out too long in the sun.
Doing this over your lifetime - and all year, not just during the summer or on sunny days - "will reduce the visible signs of photoageing", Andrea said.
Those are wrinkles, muddled pigmentation and sagging skin.
Ultrasun disputed the findings, telling the publication: "Ultrasun is fully confident in our testing protocols.
"As an independent brand delivering very high UVB and UVA protection options for over 30 years, our detailed testing processes continue to not only meet but surpass industry standards.
"Our chosen testing protocol is one of the strictest available, and our UVB and UVA filters are tested both in-vitro and in-vivo.
"We conclusively support the results of our independent tests which found the Ultrasun Family SPF30 reached a UVB-SPF in vivo of 31.4 and a UVA-PF in vitro of 13.1, which equates to a 92% UVA absorbance."
Finally, Which? claimed the Asda Protect Moisturising Sun Lotion SPF30 High, £2.66, also failed to deliver when tested.
According to the outlet, tests did not confrim the product's claimed SPF30 in both an initial test or a retest.
When contacted by The Sun, a spokesperson for Asda offered an update.
"We recently had our Asda Protect Moisturising Sun Lotion SPF 30 High re-tested by a leading external provider using internationally recognised testing methods," they said.
"These test results confirmed that this product has a sun protection factor of 31.5, and therefore we do not recognise the test results Which? has published.
'When Which? reviewed this same product in 2022, they awarded it 'Great Value' at that time and it also passed their SPF test.
"The product formulation has not changed since then, so we would question the validity of their test.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'I tried storing potatoes with one fruit and the hack actually worked'
'I tried storing potatoes with one fruit and the hack actually worked'

Daily Mirror

time12 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

'I tried storing potatoes with one fruit and the hack actually worked'

Potatoes seem to have a mind of their own - they sprout into something resembling a shuffling cordyceps undead in a flash. But one food storage trick ensures they last longer It's one of life's minor irritations - you've finally summoned the energy to cook a proper meal after a long day, rather than just ordering a takeaway, but when you open the cupboards everything's... gone a bit pear-shaped. ‌ Potatoes, in particular, seem to despise being fresh and ready to eat. Neglect them for just a few days, and you could find yourself with a bag full of alien-like tuber horrors sprouting into something that resembles a shuffling cordyceps undead from The Last of Us. ‌ Especially in hot summer weather like the conditions we're currently experiencing this August, it can feel like food spoils almost instantly in the warm confines of a British kitchen. Reporter Alex Evans has dug into a potato-preserving hack foodies swear by. It's said to work particularly well in the summer months. It comes after UK households issued warning if they have Nescafé coffee in kitchen. ‌ Since I spend my day writing about food storage hacks (it's a living), I decided to put a quite popular potato storage hack to the test - storing your potatoes with apples, writes Alex. According to food storage experts (yes, they exist), keeping potatoes in the fridge with apples will prevent them from going off for 'three times longer' than if they're stored without apples in a cupboard, reports the Express. The science behind it is apparently due to ethylene gas produced by the apples in the fridge. This chemical is released by the fruit as part of its typical ripening process, which is slowed by the colder temperature, in turn keeping the potatoes fresh for longer, too, say the boffins. This same chemical can be used to delay the sprouting of potatoes because it inhibits the metabolism of enzymes in the starch of the spud. I dutifully purchased two standard 1KG bags of spuds from Asda, along with a pack of Golden Delicious apples. One bag had an apple popped in it and was then tucked away in the crisper drawer of the fridge. The other was stashed in a dark cupboard in one corner of the kitchen, sans apple. ‌ I kept putting off writing this article for weeks on end, simply because the trick was working too well. Every few days, I'd check, and everything looked the same for the fridge potatoes, while the cupboard ones also seemed fine, until suddenly, they weren't. So, does storing your spuds with apples really make them last longer? Two weeks later: the cupboard potatoes without apples are completely inedible, covered in sprouts and rotting. I've been known to chop off the odd growth and carry on, but these are beyond salvageable. ‌ They're grotesquely sprouting into some alien lifeform. The fridge potatoes look as good as the day I bought them; they're flawless, pristine, and still fully edible. In fact, the apple has sacrificed itself to protect its earthy mates because it's shrivelled and starting to rot. But the potatoes are perfectly edible—in fact, with the added chill of the fridge, I'm not sure they're ever going to spoil; it almost works too well. So yes: apples really DO save your spuds - and your fridge even more so. Note: No food will be wasted for science. The rotten potatoes will be chopped up for compost, and the poorly apples will be sliced up for the birds.

New Kellogg's cereal hits shelves and it's just like this discontinued favorite
New Kellogg's cereal hits shelves and it's just like this discontinued favorite

Metro

time16 hours ago

  • Metro

New Kellogg's cereal hits shelves and it's just like this discontinued favorite

Head over to Morrisons and you might spot Kellogg's 'Smacks' on the shelves for just £2.50. 'So what?', we hear you ask. Well, shoppers and cereal lovers have pointed out that the product looks and tastes a lot like Sugar Puffs – a fan-favourite breakfast choice that was discontinued back in 2014. Already a popular choice in the US, Kellogg's Smacks has had Brits in a frenzy now that it's crossed the pond. The cereal is made from puffed wheat and sweetened with honey, it's presented as a classic, crunchy breakfast choice, made without artificial colours and flavours, and high in vitamin D. Users headed to a Facebook group called 'Snack Reviews', where the product immediately caught the attention of users for its similarity to Sugar Puffs. 'They'll always be sugar puffs to me,' one commenter said, while another wrote: 'In other words, they've brought out sugar puffs again and called it a different name.' Sugar Puffs are fondly remembered by British crowds. The Original Quaker Oats cereal was discontinued when their name was changed to 'Honey Monster Puffs' and the sugar content slashed by 20%. The new formula, which exchanged sugar for honey, significantly changing its taste, was shifted to align with new health standards as the government began an initiative to reduce excessive sugar consumption. Kellogg's new arrival, 'Smacks', is reported to taste far more similar to Sugar Puffs thanks to the dose of nostalgia and their satisfying crunch. More Trending I brought these back from Paris because they were the nearest thing to sugar puffs I've ever tried,' Facebook user Charlie Mcmillan commented. 'Amazing, hopefully they stick around .' But be warned: a 30g serving contains a tasty 10g of sugar. View More » Yikes. It's been a tough couple of years for cereal lovers with a sweet tooth. Coco Pops Rocks were discontinued in August 2024, and some reported finding it 'hard to live without them.' Then Weetabix Golden Syrup was axed for good just one month later, causing one mum, Emma Ball, to say: 'My son was heartbroken, he loved these.' A personal fave, Kellogg's Apricot Wheats, didn't fare for long. But nothing shook breakfast lovers more than Frosties being ditched from the mini variety packs. Childhood sleepovers and camping trips will never be the same again. The good news is, customers do have some sway on the matter. Chocolate Cornflakes made a return in 2024 thanks to high demand. So if you're really missing the original Sugar Puffs, you know what to do. MORE: Bakery chain hailed as 'better than Greggs' is opening new shops across UK MORE: Culture appropriation never used to bother me — hummus changed everything MORE: Where to sip on mini cocktails in London Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.

Methanol poisoning victim issues warning to others after losing sight
Methanol poisoning victim issues warning to others after losing sight

The Independent

time16 hours ago

  • The Independent

Methanol poisoning victim issues warning to others after losing sight

Calum Macdonald, a British man, has spoken out about losing his sight after suffering methanol poisoning while travelling in Laos in 2024, saying he experienced a 'kaleidoscopic, blinding light'. Mr Macdonald was one of several tourists who fell victim to methanol poisoning after consuming free alcoholic drinks at the Nana Backpacker Hostel. Six people in the group died. He said he felt 'my life wasn't worth living' after the poisoning and is advising tourists to avoid drinking free spirits. Methanol, often found in cleaning products, is tasteless and odourless, making contaminated drinks impossible to detect. Mr Macdonald is now campaigning with other victims' families for the Foreign Office to issue clearer warnings about methanol poisoning risks in South East Asia.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store