logo
OnePlus partners with Bhagwati to make OnePlus Pad 3 and OnePlus Pad Lite in India

OnePlus partners with Bhagwati to make OnePlus Pad 3 and OnePlus Pad Lite in India

The Hindu6 days ago
OnePlus on Tuesday (August 12, 2025) announced its collaboration with Bhagwati Products Limited to locally manufacture premium tablets in India. Earlier, the Chinese smartphone maker partnered with Optiemus to make IoT products in India.
Bhagwati Products Limited (BPL), an electronics manufacturing services, has been the maker of erstwhile smartphone brand Micromax.
OnePlus said that OnePlus Pad 3 and OnePlus Pad Lite are being manufactured in India as part of the brand's strategic partnership with BPL.
OnePlus is investing under its Project Starlight funds with aim to localise manufacturing, sales and services.
(For top technology news of the day, subscribe to our tech newsletter Today's Cache)
It has also started manufacturing its tablet products at BPL's facility in Greater Noida.
'The collaboration with BPL marks a strategic milestone in our India journey towards deepening our manufacturing capabilities and expanding our connected ecosystem. By localizing tablet production, we are not only reinforcing our commitment to India, but also creating meaningful value for our user community. This partnership reflects our long-term vision to innovate for India, invest in India, and grow with India,' said Robin Liu, CEO, OnePlus India.
Vikas Jain, Co-Founder, Bhagwati Products Limited, said 'We are excited to join hands with OnePlus for their new range of tablets. With our rapidly advancing manufacturing capabilities and growing team of experts we are proud to deliver value and precision. This milestone not only marks the addition of OnePlus to our customer portfolio but also the introduction of a new form factor to our manufacturing expertise at our Greater Noida facility. We look forward to building on this momentum and forging a long-term, mutually rewarding partnership with them.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Safeguard import duties on steel could cripple auto, engineering, and construction sectors: GTRI
Safeguard import duties on steel could cripple auto, engineering, and construction sectors: GTRI

Time of India

time32 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Safeguard import duties on steel could cripple auto, engineering, and construction sectors: GTRI

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The three-year safeguard duty on steel imports by Directorate General of Trade Remedies ( DGTR ) could cripple the auto, engineering, and construction sectors by pushing up input costs and squeezing downstream users, stated a report by the Global Trade Research Initiative GTRI ).The safeguard duty, confirmed on August 16, will start at 12 per cent in the first year, followed by 11.5 per cent in the second year and 11 per cent in the third stated that the decision is taken due to a sharp surge in steel imports, especially from China, and a steep fall in domestic industry profits However, GTRI stated "that duties would cripple auto, engineering, and construction sectors".DGTR launched probe in December 2024 after complaints from major producers such as AMNS, JSW Steel , Jindal Steel & Power, and SAIL , covered a wide range of products including hot-rolled and cold-rolled steel, metallic-coated, and colour-coated steel.A provisional 12 per cent duty had already been imposed on April 21, 2025. In its final order, DGTR said imports rose "recently, suddenly, sharply and significantly" during October 2023 to September per data, Chinese exports alone reached 110.7 million MT in 2024, a 25 per cent jump from 2023, with much of the excess supply being redirected to hot-rolled coils landed at USD 450 per MT in May 2025, which was nearly USD 87 per MT lower than Indian costs, even after profit before tax plunged 76 per cent, which DGTR said amounted to "serious injury" to local GTRI stated that more than 250 stakeholders, including leading automakers, electronics firms, and industry bodies opposed the duty. Tata Motors Maruti Suzuki , Hyundai, Toyota Kirloskar, LG, Samsung, Whirlpool Havells , and L&T were among those warning that the move would raise input costs, harm export competitiveness, and make customer-specific grades harder to EEPC, and IEEMA echoed similar concerns, saying many grades of steel are not produced locally and imports are essential. They argued that import volumes were only returning to pre-COVID levels, not surging, and criticized DGTR's choice of base also countered DGTR's findings, noting that India remains a net steel importer with demand in FY2024-25 estimated at 137.82 MT against domestic production of 132.89 pointed out that steelmakers still enjoyed strong profitability, with Tata Steel recording a 21 per cent EBITDA margin in India and SAIL at 11.6 per to GTRI, far from being under distress, Indian steel producers were thriving, and the safeguard duty risks creating cartel-like conditions when combined with Quality Control GTRI also noted that the safeguard duty would end up protecting a few large producers at the cost of India's wider manufacturing ecosystem.

China beats US, Japan, Germany in AI race; robot games in China leaves everyone in shock due to...
China beats US, Japan, Germany in AI race; robot games in China leaves everyone in shock due to...

India.com

timean hour ago

  • India.com

China beats US, Japan, Germany in AI race; robot games in China leaves everyone in shock due to...

Countries across the globe, especially China and the United States, are currently trying to stay ahead in the field of AI. Recently, China seems to be ahead of the competition. Robot Games were held in Beijing, and we saw new machines from Unitree Robotics, a Chinese company, which bolstered China's claims in AI and humanoid advancement. The three-day event included American companies like Tesla Inc. and other Chinese companies. China is hosting the world's first Humanoid Games, where robots compete in sports such as basketball and kickboxing, demonstrating the country's increasing strength in AI and robotics. Two-legged, humanoid robots from companies like Unitree Robotics and X-Humanoid kicked off the World Humanoid Robot Games by competing in a 1,500-meter race in Beijing on Friday. Hangzhou-based Chinese robotics darling Unitree took first place in the initial race with its H1 humanoid coming in first and third place. Beijing-based X-Humanoid's Tien Kung Ultra, which won the world's first half-marathon featuring human and robot runners in April, finished second. The Robot Games took place recently in Beijing, where Chinese manufacturer Unitree Robotics showed off its state-of-the-art machine, further solidifying China's position in AI and humanoid robotics. Alongside Chinese companies, American firms—including Tesla Inc.—also participated in this three-day competition. The H1 humanoid Robot from the Hangzhou-based company completed the 1,500m humanoid race in 6 minutes and 35 seconds, winning the gold medal. Another robot from Unitree also achieved a podium finish on the first day of the World Humanoid Robot Games. Unitree's family of robots did many athletic exhibitions during the event, while Tesla's Optimus humanoid appeared to be in the developmental phase.

India's strategic pillars are crumbling. Complacency is not an option
India's strategic pillars are crumbling. Complacency is not an option

The Print

timean hour ago

  • The Print

India's strategic pillars are crumbling. Complacency is not an option

The erosion of the post-Cold War construct has been gradual but unmistakable. The war in Ukraine, now in its fourth year, has exposed the limits of Western deterrence, the resilience of Russia, and its resolve to recover lost territory and status. Despite successive waves of sanctions, Moscow remains defiant, bolstered by Chinese dual-use exports and North Korean ammunition. The Gaza conflict, meanwhile, has become a humanitarian catastrophe, with ceasefire talks repeatedly collapsing due to mutual distrust and unreasonable expectations. These conflicts are not isolated but indicative of a broader unravelling of the rules-based order, where power is increasingly coercive, transactional, and the solidity of alliances suspect. The wars in Ukraine and Gaza rage on with no clear end in sight, each serving as a proxy battlefield for deeper geopolitical rivalries. Meanwhile, the US, the self-appointed global policeman, has turned inward and belligerent, unleashing a tariff war that has upended global trading norms and strained relations with erstwhile allies. India, caught squarely in the crosshairs of these upheavals, finds itself in a precarious position. Its principal adversary, China, has deepened its strategic partnership with Pakistan. The US, under the Trump administration, has grown openly hostile, with Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir even issuing nuclear threats from American soil. The global order is once again in a state of flux, overtaken by multiple crises that have shattered old convictions and exposed new vulnerabilities. In this altered landscape, India must urgently recalibrate its national security policy and defence architecture to meet the demands of a more volatile, multipolar world. Also Read: India sees the value of US defence ties, but MAGA-style tariffs threaten long-term stability India's strategic pillars under strain India's strategic calculus is based on a few pillars: a robust deterrent posture against China and Pakistan; a growing partnership with the United States; and a commitment to multilateralism through forums like the UN, SCO, and BRICS. But each of these pillars is now under strain. China's aggression along the Line of Actual Control, its naval assertiveness in the Indian Ocean, and its deepening ties with Pakistan—manifested in joint military exercises, intelligence sharing, and infrastructure projects under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor—pose a multi-dimensional threat. Pakistan, emboldened by Chinese backing and the militarisation of its polity, has escalated both its rhetoric and capabilities. Munir's recent threats to target Indian economic assets such as the Jamnagar refinery and other intemperate remarks on nuclear retaliation while on US soil mark a dangerous new phase in Pakistan's strategic signalling. Compounding these challenges is the deterioration in US-India relations. President Trump's tariff blitzkrieg of imposing duties of up to 50 per cent on Indian goods, has been vaguely justified on the grounds of India's continued trade with Russia, particularly in oil and defence. The irony is that the same administration which once hailed India as a counterweight to China now penalises it for pursuing strategic autonomy. The optics of Munir being hosted at the White House and issuing threats from Florida have not gone unnoticed by the strategic community in India, driving home a stark message that we can no longer rely on the US as a consistent strategic partner. Overhauling national security doctrine In light of these developments, India must undertake a comprehensive overhaul of its national security doctrine. In light of these developments, India must undertake a comprehensive overhaul of its national security doctrine. First, it must embrace the reality of a multipolar world and diversify its strategic partnerships. While the Quad remains important, India must also deepen ties with middle powers like France, Japan, and Australia, and explore new alignments with ASEAN, Africa, and Latin America. A new 'Quad', comprising Australia, Japan, and India, and including other countries of the South China Sea littoral—most notably the Philippines, which has shown the gumption to stand up to Chinese bullying in the region—must be explored. In this period of uncertainty, it is very unlikely that the Quad summit scheduled to be held in India later this year will materialise. Attempts should also be made to resuscitate SAARC, a fitting platform to engage our immediate neighbours. The aim should be to build a web of relationships that reduces dependence on any single power and enhances India's leverage in global and regional forums. Second, India must accelerate its defence modernisation. The recent success of the S-400 air defence system in intercepting Pakistani aircraft during Operation Sindoor underscores the importance of technological superiority. India's nuclear triad, bolstered by MIRV-capable Agni-V missiles, provides credible deterrence, but conventional capabilities must also be upgraded. Investments in cyber warfare, space-based surveillance, and unmanned systems are no longer optional but inescapable operational imperatives. The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) must be restructured to incentivise innovation, concentrating solely on R&D and moving away from production. Reduction in procurement timelines remains a constant priority. Third, India must rethink its internal security architecture. The threat from cross-border terrorism remains acute, especially with Pakistan's military increasingly aligned with extremist groups. The menace from Left Wing Extremism, though reduced, retains the potential to destabilise the country internally. Intelligence coordination between central and state agencies must be streamlined, and counterterrorism capabilities enhanced. The Paramilitary Forces (PMF), which play a crucial role in border management and internal security, must receive sounder training, modern equipment, and be better integrated with the armed forces. Attachment of PMF officers with army units would go a long way in achieving the dual aim of training and integration. The absorption of released Agniveers into the PMF will also be a positive step. Fourth, India must recalibrate its nuclear posture. While maintaining a no-first-use policy, it must signal readiness to respond decisively to any nuclear blackmail. This includes developing second-strike capabilities, securing command and control systems, and conducting periodic strategic reviews. The rhetoric from Pakistan's leadership, threatening to 'take half the world down,' must be met not with escalation but with clarity and resolve. Re-articulating our nuclear policy, especially with regard to 'launch on warning', will discourage any nuclear adventurism. Strategic maturity lies in enunciating red lines and indicating the will to respond should these be in danger of being breached. Fifth, India must leverage its economic position as the world's fourth-largest economy as a strategic tool. The asymmetry between India and Pakistan is most pronounced in economic terms. Every percentage point of GDP growth widens the gap, reducing Pakistan's relevance in global forums. India must continue to liberalise its economy, attract foreign investment, and build infrastructure corridors that enhance connectivity and resilience. Initiatives like the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) need to be fast-tracked. Pending trade agreements, especially with ASEAN, should be pursued and, where existing, implemented without further ado. A multipolar export strategy must be adopted to mitigate the impact of US tariffs. The US may be our largest trading partner, but it is certainly not the only one, with the rest of the world still accounting for around 70 per cent of our trade. Also Read: What India can learn from Israel about atmanirbharta in defence Taking control of the narrative Finally, India must invest in strategic communication. In an age of information warfare, perception shapes policy. India must counter hostile narratives and, by engaging with global media, think tanks, and diaspora communities, actively project its role as a net-security provider for a stable and inclusive Indo-Pacific. The goal should be to build a narrative of India as a responsible power that's firm in its resolve, mature in its conduct, and committed to resolving disputes through dialogue. The world is not what it was, and India cannot afford to be complacent. The threats are real and evolving, alliances uncertain and dynamic, and the risks higher than ever. But within this churn—a modern-day Samudra Manthan—lies the opportunity for India to rise and redefine its role on the world stage by building a security architecture that is robust and adaptive. India must chart its own course, guided not by fear but by foresight. The recalibration must begin now, sans rhetoric, but demonstrating firm resolve. General Manoj Mukund Naravane PVSM AVSM SM VSM is a retired Indian Army General who served as the 28th Chief of the Army Staff. Views are personal. (Edited by Asavari Singh)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store