Ghaziabad ‘love jihad' case: Muslim man arrested again despite Hindu wife denying abduction claim
The man, Akbar Khan, and the woman, Sonika Chauhan, got married in August 2022. They had, however, not been living together as Chauhan's family objected to their relationship. The couple had eloped on May 24, after which local Bharatiya Janata Party leaders stepped in to help the Chauhans separate the couple and bring Sonika back to her family.
Khan was arrested for the same offence on May 25, but was released on bail on June 8. Scroll had reported on the couple's ordeal at the time. A mob that claimed that the couple's marriage was a case of 'love jihad' had vandalised their businesses on May 26.
Love jihad is a Hindutva conspiracy theory that holds that Muslim men pose as Hindus to trick Hindu women into relationships with the aim of converting them to Islam.
In the early hours of July 30, the couple managed to run away again, reported The Indian Express. A member of Khan's family, who requested not to be identified, told Scroll that they went to Prayagraj to seek protection from the Allahabad High Court.
On the same day, the Ghaziabad Police filed a new case against Khan and four others under provisions related to abduction, using poisonous substances to cause hurt, theft and criminal intimidation. The case was filed based on a complaint by Sonika's father Laxman Singh Chauhan.
The complainant alleged that Khan had been threatening the family in the days leading up to his daughter's supposed abduction. He claimed that an intoxicating substance had rendered them unconscious on the night when the couple eloped again. Additionally, he claimed that Rs 50,000 and some jewellery were also missing from their home since then.
However, soon after the couple ran away on July 30, Sonika released a video declaring that she had left her home on her own because her family was 'mentally and physically torturing' her. She said that for the past two months, her parents and local BJP leaders had been forcing her to testify against Khan.
Ghaziabad interfaith couple: Nearly two months after the father of a 25-year-old woman in Ghaziabad accused her in-laws of kidnapping her, only for the daughter to claim that she has entered into an interfaith marriage by choice, her family filed a complaint at the Indirapuram… pic.twitter.com/K30b5lJu7l
— The Indian Express (@IndianExpress) July 31, 2025
Nevertheless, the police on Thursday brought the couple back to Ghaziabad. Khan's family claimed that the police acted so swiftly because of political pressure.
However, Indirapuram Assistant Commissioner of Police Abhishek Srivastava denied the allegations of political pressure. 'We are investigating the case based on the complaint by the woman's father,' he said. 'Her statement will be duly recorded.'
On Friday, the police arrested Khan, his brother Maksad and their neighbour Lalit Ayyar, according to Ravendra Gautam, station house officer of the Indirapuram police station. Gautam said that the police are investigating whether Sonika was 'under pressure' to record the July 30 video.
'She is with her family now,' he added. 'Her statement will be recorded in court whenever she is comfortable.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Quranic justice is restorative, not retributive
The case of the Malayali nurse Nimisha Priya in Yemen has spotlighted the legal and moral complexities of retributive justice in Muslim countries. Nimisha has been in prison since 2017 for the murder of her business associate, Talal Abdo Mahdi. While the Houthi Supreme Political Council dismissed her appeal in November 2023, the appeal court left open a path to clemency through the payment of blood money (diyah) to the victim's family, as provided for under Shariah law. The concept of diyah finds mention in verse 4:92 of the Quran, which states that in cases when a believer kills another believer by mistake (khata'an), then, as compensation, the killer must free a believing slave, and also pay blood-money (diyah) to the family of the slain. The Quran also talks about legal retribution (qisaas) for murder and violent assault as a life-preserving deterrent (lakum fil qisaasi hayaatun) to curb criminal behaviour. (2:178-179 & 194, 5:45) Restorative approach It is essential to recognise that many of the Quranic injunctions concerning homicide and bodily harm were not retributive — they were fundamentally restorative. Legal retribution (lex talionis) and compensation for murder and bodily harm had existed centuries before the advent of Islam. The Book of Exodus in the Hebrew Bible upheld capital punishment for intentional murder, exile for unintentional homicide, and either financial compensation or retaliatory injury for physical harm (Exodus 21:12-36). Similar provisions are found in even earlier laws, such as the Sumerian and Babylonian codes. In Law Collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor, Martha Roth cites an edict from the Hittite Kingdom (1650–1180 BCE), which stipulates that in cases of murder, the decision regarding the offender's fate rested solely with the victim's heir. The Quran made a reformative switch from this sort of retributive punishment to restorative justice, inviting all those impacted by an offence to jointly determine how best to address its consequences and shape future relations. In 2:178, it asked the legal heirs of the victim to pardon (faman ufiya lahu) the killer, even while instructing the killer to offer fair compensation to the family out of sincere gratitude. The same message is repeated in 5:45 with a compassionate appeal to the victim's family: 'If anyone remits the retaliation by way of generosity, it would be an act of atonement (kaffaara) for him.' What is remarkable about this exhortation is its paradigm shift from retribution to the spiritual healing of the aggrieved party. It introduces a mechanism that not only fosters genuine remorse in the offender but also promotes social harmony and quiet dignity among all parties involved. This is in keeping with the Quran's moral dictum (in 64:14) that God is forgiving and merciful to those who 'pardon, overlook and forgive' (in ta'fu wa tasfahu was taghfiru). The prophet echoed this in a hadith found in Abu Dawud, encouraging Muslims to practice mercy on 'earth' so that mercy may be shown to them from 'the heavens'. Implications for Nimisha It may be noted that the Quran's appeal to give up retaliation pertains to intentional murder. For non-premeditated killing without malice aforethought (qatl khata'), the Quran prescribes only blood money, not a retaliatory death penalty, as stated in 4:92 above. This carries serious implications for Nimisha. If, as reported, she did not sedate Mahdi with the intent to kill him — and this can be proven — then, under the Quranic injunctions in 4:92, his family would not have the right to demand the death penalty. Media reports suggest that Nimisha administered the sedative only to retrieve her passport, which Mahdi had allegedly confiscated unlawfully, and that his death was the result of an accidental overdose. Besides, if Mahdi had previously served time for criminal offences, as alleged, the claim of his complete innocence is open to challenge. Therefore, for justice to be served in Nimisha's case, the Quranic law must prevail. However, what reigns in most Muslim societies in its name is sectarian jurisprudence, which views Islam not as a moral order in which justice and rational logic are intrinsic, but a dogmatic 'religion' defined and dominated by male authority. This internal subversion coincided with the rise of post-Prophetic schools of religious thought during the height of Muslim imperial expansion, when a convenient alliance developed between theologians and the ruling elite: rulers sought religious legitimacy for their authoritarian regimes, while theologians wanted the latitude to impose patriarchal structures. It was the consolidation of this power dynamic that brought about Islam's shift from Quranic deen — a rational, justice-oriented ethical framework — to mazhab - a rigid, clerically dominated theology. Consequently, Islam ceased to be what is plainly stated in the Arabic text of the Quran and the Prophetic understanding of it. This structural transformation remains one of the most significant and unresolved crises in Muslim history, reshaping the course of Islamic thought. Nowhere is this more evident than in criminal law, which often paints Islam as a harsh faith. If Muslim theologians truly believe in the Quran's opening statement that the Islamic god is 'most Gracious' (Al-Rahman) and 'most Merciful' (Al-Raheem), then they must allow the merciful deen of Islam to prevail over their rigid juristic schools. A. Faizur Rahman is Secretary-General of the Chennai-based Islamic Forum for the Promotion of Moderate Thought. E-mail: themoderates2020@ X: @FaizEngineer
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
7 held for attack on Suvendu's convoy in Cooch Behar
1 2 Kolkata/Jalpaiguri: Seven people were arrested by Cooch Behar Police on Wednesday in connection with the attack on the convoy of Bengal leader of opposition Suvendu Adhikari. Sources said the arrested included TMC workers and Trinamool Yuva functionaries. The arrested were remanded to five days' judicial custody. Meanwhile, Bengal BJP president Samik Bhattacharya moved a notice in Rajya Sabha under Rule 267 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Council of State (Rajya Sabha), seeking a discussion on the attack, which he described as "an attack on democracy". Adhikari's convoy came under attack in Cooch Behar on Tuesday, when he arrived to attend a protest rally and submit a memorandum to the SP regarding alleged assaults on BJP workers. As the convoy reached Khagrabari, a group of alleged TMC supporters attacked the convoy. In his complaint, Adhikari named 41 persons, including state minister, Udayan Guha. "We are not going to leave them. If Udayan Guha was directly involved in the incident, the police's role cannot be ruled out," Adhikari said at a meeting on Wednesday. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata According to an agency report, Union home minister Amit Shah spoke to Nisith Pramanik, former Union Minister of state for home affairs, seeking details about the incident. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Live Your Best Life: The 20 Top-Ranked Cities to Move to in 2024 Learn More Undo Guha said the identities of those arrested demonstrate that the allegations made by Adhikari — that the attack on his convoy was carried out by illegal Rohingya and Bangladeshi infiltrators — are unfounded. "Not a single Rohingya or Bangladeshi Muslim was named in complaint or arrested. His comments were baseless and he should apologise. Those who disrespect Bengalis and the Bengali language will be shown black flags," Guha said.
Deccan Herald
3 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
Indore Congress leader asks councillor named in 'love jihad' finance case to surrender
The term 'love jihad' is used by right-wing organisations to claim that Muslim men lure women of other religions into love traps to convert them to Islam.
