xAI apologizes for Grok's offensive posts
After the Tuesday upgrade, Grok praised Nazi leader Adolf Hitler in the posts on social media platform X, and suggested that people with Jewish surnames were more likely to spread online hate.
X deleted some of those posts several hours later, amid growing outrage.
"We deeply apologize for the horrific behavior that many experienced," the company posted on X Saturday, adding that it had modified the system "to prevent further abuse."
The company said the change occurred after the chatbot was prompted to "reply to the post just like a human" as well as "tell like it is and you are not afraid to offend people who are politically correct."
As a result, Grok became susceptible to users' "extremist views," which made it produce "responses containing unethical or controversial opinions to engage the user."
Grok, which Musk promised would be an "edgy" truthteller following its launch in 2023, has been mired in controversy.
In March, xAI acquired X in a $33 billion deal that allowed the company to integrate the platform's data resources with the chatbot's development.
In May, Grok ignited controversy by generating posts with unbacked right-wing propaganda about purported oppression of white South Africans that it termed "white genocide."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bangkok Post
3 days ago
- Bangkok Post
xAI apologizes for Grok's offensive posts
NEW YORK - Elon Musk's startup xAI apologized Saturday for offensive posts published by its artificial intelligence assistant Grok this week, blaming them on a software update meant to make it function more like a human. After the Tuesday upgrade, Grok praised Nazi leader Adolf Hitler in the posts on social media platform X, and suggested that people with Jewish surnames were more likely to spread online hate. X deleted some of those posts several hours later, amid growing outrage. "We deeply apologize for the horrific behavior that many experienced," the company posted on X Saturday, adding that it had modified the system "to prevent further abuse." The company said the change occurred after the chatbot was prompted to "reply to the post just like a human" as well as "tell like it is and you are not afraid to offend people who are politically correct." As a result, Grok became susceptible to users' "extremist views," which made it produce "responses containing unethical or controversial opinions to engage the user." Grok, which Musk promised would be an "edgy" truthteller following its launch in 2023, has been mired in controversy. In March, xAI acquired X in a $33 billion deal that allowed the company to integrate the platform's data resources with the chatbot's development. In May, Grok ignited controversy by generating posts with unbacked right-wing propaganda about purported oppression of white South Africans that it termed "white genocide."
Bangkok Post
5 days ago
- Bangkok Post
Musk, Trump and Mao have a lot in common
The only place where some people still see Elon Musk as a political genius is China. "Brother Musk, you've got over a billion people on our side backing you," wrote a fan on Weibo, China's biggest social media site. "If Elon Musk were to found a political party," wrote another, "his tech-driven mindset could inject fresh energy into politics." Distance lends enchantment, but the home market is a harder sell. Back in the USA a few days later, when Mr Musk announced the foundation of the "America Party", the public response fell considerably short of rhapsodic. Tesla shares fell 7.5% the next day, and Mr Musk's personal stake in the company fell by $10 billion. President Donald Trump pretended pity for his former ally for about ten seconds -- "I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely off the rails" -- before reverting to form: "The one thing Third Parties are good for is the creation of Complete and Total DISRUPTION AND CHAOS." Like a stopped clock, Mr Trump is occasionally right, and this may be one of those times. Mr Musk may seem completely out of control, but if he gets the strategy right, his new political party could spread disruption and chaos right within the ranks of the Republican Party. Most American political analysts have dismissed the electoral prospects of Mr Musk's new party. After all, new third parties have not broken the grip of the two-party system in the United States for more than a century. However, third parties have often determined the outcome in races between the two big parties. There isn't time for Mr Musk to build a nationwide third party in the twenty months between now and the mid-term elections for the Senate and the House of Representatives in November 2026. That's when he plans to launch his first challenge to Mr Trump, but he doesn't need a nationwide party for that. Indeed, he probably never intends to go that route. Mr Musk often claims to have won the 2024 election for Donald Trump with his massive donations ($277 million) to various elements and supporters of the Republican Party, but it was those people and organisations who actually put the money to work in Mr Trump's campaign. This time, he won't have them on his side, and a different strategy is needed. It's still a strategy that would take large amounts of money, but that is no issue for Mr Musk. His current wealth (slightly discounted by recent events) is still around $400 billion, or about $2,000 for every American voter. Besides, he doesn't need to buy all of them, or even most. All he has to do in 2026 is unseat two or three Republican incumbents in the Senate and half a dozen in the House, and the Republicans lose control of both houses of Congress. Concentrate on twenty Republican-held Senate seats and fifty marginal House seats, and spend a hundred million dollars in each one. That ought to do the trick. Would Mr Musk really do that? It would be one of history's biggest tantrums, and all he would get out of it is the satisfaction of creating a potential majority in Congress that might repeal or at least modify Mr Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill". Mr Trump would still be president, but Mr Musk really seems to believe that an extra three trillion dollars on the national debt matters. Would he get away with it? Of course not. However, the measures Mr Trump would take to thwart Mr Musk's strategy might mark a decisive break with the current constitutional order. Many people fear it's coming anyway, but in practice, it needs a crisis. This could be it. Foreign analysts can sometimes see analogies and parallels in American politics that Americans themselves miss. Some Chinese scholars, in particular, make comparisons between Mr Trump and Mao Zedong. Zhang Qianfan, a constitutional law professor in Beijing, calls the rapid Trumpist takeover of US politics against only feeble resistance "America's Cultural Revolution". Ding Xueliang, once a Red Guard and now professor of Chinese politics at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, says "It's not identical, but there are certainly parallels." Many people in China see the war on "woke" and on elite universities in America, the mistrust of bureaucracy, the hatred of the "deep state", and the cult of the leader as symptoms of an anti-intellectual drive as strong as that in China under Mao. They remember that Mao destroyed the bureaucracy and effectively made himself emperor. "During Trump's presidential inauguration speech, Republican lawmakers all stood up and applauded with such fervour that it rivaled North Korea. These are deeply troubling signs," Prof Zhang said. Or as Mr Trump said when Xi Jinping abolished term limits: "I think it's great. Maybe we'll have to give that a shot someday."
Bangkok Post
6 days ago
- Bangkok Post
'Stuck in limbo': Over 90% of X's Community Notes unpublished, study says
WASHINGTON — More than 90% of X's Community Notes -- a crowd-sourced verification system popularised by Elon Musk's platform -- are never published, a study said Wednesday, highlighting major limits in its effectiveness as a debunking tool. The study by the Digital Democracy Institute of the Americas (DDIA), which analysed the entire public dataset of 1.76 million notes published by X, formerly called Twitter, between January 2021 and March 2025, comes as the platform's CEO Linda Yaccarino resigned after two years at the helm. The community-driven moderation model -- now embraced by major tech platforms including Facebook-owner Meta and TikTok -- allows volunteers to contribute notes that add context or corrections to posts. Other users then rate the proposed notes as "helpful" or "not helpful." If the notes get "helpful" ratings from enough users with diverse perspectives, they are published on X, appearing right below the challenged posts. "The vast majority of submitted notes -- more than 90% -- never reach the public," DDIA's study said. "For a program marketed as fast, scalable, and transparent, these figures should raise serious concerns." Among English notes, the publication rate dropped from 9.5% in 2023 to just 4.9% in early 2025, the study said. Spanish-language notes, however, showed some growth, with the publication rate rising from 3.6% to 7.1% over the same period, it added. A vast number of notes remain unpublished due to lack of consensus among users during rating. Thousands of notes also go unrated, possibly never seen and never assessed, according to the report. "As the volume of notes submitted grows, the system's internal visibility bottleneck becomes more apparent –- especially in English," the study said. "Despite a rising number of contributors submitting notes, many notes remain stuck in limbo, unseen and unevaluated by fellow contributors, a crucial step for notes to be published." 'Viral misinformation' In a separate finding, DDIA's researchers identified not a human but a bot-like account -- dedicated to flagging crypto scams –- as the most prolific contributor to the program in English, submitting more than 43,000 notes between 2021 and March 2025. However, only 3.1% of those notes went live, suggesting most went unseen or failed to gain consensus, the report said. The study also noted that the time it takes for a note to go live had improved over the years, dropping from an average of more than 100 days in 2022 to 14 days in 2025. "Even this faster timeline is far too slow for the reality of viral misinformation, timely toxic content, or simply errors about real-time events, which spread within hours, not weeks," DDIA's report said. The findings are significant as tech platforms increasingly view the community-driven model as an alternative to professional fact-checking, which conservative advocates in countries such as the United States have long accused of a liberal bias. Studies have shown Community Notes can work to dispel some falsehoods such as vaccine misinformation, but researchers have long cautioned that it works best for topics where there is broad consensus. Some researchers have also cautioned that Community Notes users can be motivated by partisan motives and tend to target their political opponents. X introduced Community Notes during the tenure of Yaccarino, who said on Wednesday that she had decided to step down after leading the company through a major transformation. No reason was given for her exit, but the resignation came as Musk's artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot Grok triggered an online firestorm over its anti-Semitic comments that praised Adolf Hitler and insulted Islam in separate posts on X.
