logo
Budget battle lines drawn at Colorado State Capitol as a special session gets underway

Budget battle lines drawn at Colorado State Capitol as a special session gets underway

CBS News15 hours ago
Colorado lawmakers head back to the Capitol on Thursday for a special session, and many are divided on how to address the budget shortfall.
They need to come up with $750 million to cover this year's expenditures after the passage of President Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill". The bill lowered taxes for businesses and individuals, resulting in less revenue for Colorado, which is one of only four states that use federal taxable income to determine how much people pay in state taxes.
Lawmakers have already filed more than two dozen bills, but they are limited in scope. Gov. Jared Polis sets the parameters for the special session, and since the law allows him to decide what to cut, he directed lawmakers to increase tax revenue. But the two parties have very different ideas for how to do that.
"The number one thing we are looking at is closing corporate tax loopholes," said Democratic Representative Yara Zokaie of Fort Collins.
Democrats plan to roll back up to $400 million in business tax breaks, including a $70 million a year incentive for insurance companies to establish regional home offices here.
"When we are talking about taking money from working families and, quite literally, food out of the mouths of children, food stamps are on the line here, I think it is completely unethical for us to say the insurance industry deserves money instead," said Zokaie.
Carol Walker with the Rocky Mountain Insurance Information Association says the bill could cost the state thousands of jobs, "This is just another signal to the insurance industry that they really aren't welcome in the state, and those jobs don't mean anything."
Democrats are also expected to impose up to $100 million in new fees on health insurers to offset cuts to federal subsidies for low-income Coloradans, and they plan to end a tax break meant to compensate businesses for sales tax collection.
Nick Hoover with the Colorado Restaurant Association says restaurants will be hit hard. "The problem is that it's death by a thousand cuts. This is just yet another thing that's going to be another cost that is going to be increased for the restaurant industry."
Republican Senator Barb Kirkmeyer says the state needs to cut spending, not increase taxes. "The federal government gave us tax relief, and the state Democrats' answer is we've got to increase your taxes now."
Kirkmeyer says the state could absorb almost all the lost revenue by changing a program meant to lower the tax liability of families that make under $95,000 a year.
The Department of Revenue says about 230,000 families have received more money than they owe in taxes, $663 million more. Under a bill by Kirkmeyer, the state would cover the tax liability only, "to make sure we have the funds to spend on what are core functions of government; K-12 education, healthcare, public safety, those types of things, roads."
Zochaie says the two parties have a difference of priorities: "It does not surprise me that Republicans are once again looking to take from working families in order to pad the pockets of billionaires."
Kirkmeyer says Democrats should do what the Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TABOR) requires and let voters decide on changes to tax policy: "If they're so sure of their scheme, why don't they put it to a vote?"
Lawmakers are also expected to use about $300 million from the state reserve to cover the shortfall.
In addition to bills dealing with the budget, there are four bills addressing a controversial artificial intelligence law set to kick in in February, as well as several bills regarding funding for food stamps and Planned Parenthood.
The special session is expected to last up to a week.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Colby Cosh: Homeless people ridiculously exempt from Nova Scotia's forest ban
Colby Cosh: Homeless people ridiculously exempt from Nova Scotia's forest ban

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Colby Cosh: Homeless people ridiculously exempt from Nova Scotia's forest ban

CBC News' industrious Taryn Grant gives us a fresh occasion to peep at Nova Scotia, that parched corner of Hades wherein it is currently forbidden to go for an invigorating saunter in the woods. A couple of weeks ago I discussed the controversial and suffocatingly broad travel restrictions imposed by the province in response to dangerous wildfire conditions. Nova Scotia, not content with everyday tools of regulation like campfire or vehicle bans, has almost totally denied its citizens access even to privately owned woodlands. When critics outside the province yoinked a few questioning eyebrows upward, they were told they failed to understand the precious communitarian spirit of Nova Scotia or its particular vulnerability to forest fire. Well, let's concede that the government of Nova Scotia is answerable primarily to the people of Nova Scotia. In our usual sunny, optimistic way, I scanned for the glint of a silver lining in the exotic, ambitious ban on walking in or through the forest. Perhaps, I remarked, it betokened a new no-nonsense approach to the regulation of public amenities. 'If 'extremism in defence of public property is no vice' is to be the new rule in Canada, we are surely going to see a lot of big changes to urban public parks and other land patches, which, for a decade, have been beset by nomadic tent-dwellers who make copious and inveterate use of propane tanks, electrical heaters, camp stoves, improvised wiring from hijacked power supplies, and open fires.' Well, don't hold your breath. The CBC has now inquired into the possibility that some members of the Wandering Fire-Bringer class may be testing the Nova Scotia fire ban. Turns out it's made of vapour. The province's Department of Opportunities and Social Development estimates that an estimated 137 rough sleepers are still living in the Nova Scotia woods and 'cannot be convinced' to leave. They've been visited repeatedly by a team of 'outreach workers' who themselves enjoy an exemption from the travel rules. A few of the tent-dwellers, worn down by social-worker nattering, agreed to move on or accept spaces in urban shelters. Most have stayed put as if they'd grown roots. And the state turns out to be helpless, even though one fire may already have been started at an 'encampment.' It seems to be generally agreed that there is no point in fining any of the fairy folk of the forest. The provision in the provincial fire proclamation that allows for $25,000 penalties is reserved exclusively for those who might conceivably have such a sum to cough up. Well, what about the ordinary police powers of arrest and detention? After a fortnight of hearing Nova Scotians insist that the current forest-fire risks are unprecedented, and that the traditional mobility privileges of citizenship must necessarily shrivel into abeyance, I am suddenly assured by a legal-aid lawyer that anyone collared for being unlawfully encamped 'would have to be quickly released, as the offence would not warrant being detained.' This ultra-confident prediction leaves me confused. One struggles to understand, from outside N.S., how forest protection can be so important as to justify a ministerial fiat of extraordinary and unprecedented character — but not so important as to be at all enforced. National Post

Needham Reduces PT on Alight, Inc. (ALIT); DA Davidson Maintains ‘Buy' Rating
Needham Reduces PT on Alight, Inc. (ALIT); DA Davidson Maintains ‘Buy' Rating

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Needham Reduces PT on Alight, Inc. (ALIT); DA Davidson Maintains ‘Buy' Rating

Alight, Inc. (NYSE:ALIT) is included in our list of the . A futuristic datacenter with servers and high-tech equipment, signifying the company's cutting-edge digital technology. On August 6, 2025, Needham reduced its price target on Alight, Inc. (NYSE:ALIT) from $8 to $6, maintaining a 'Buy' rating. This price revision follows the company's Q2 results. For the quarter, its revenue and EPS surpassed expectations, thanks to strong recurring revenue growth and disciplined expense management. However, the company reduced its FY2025 revenue guidance due to lengthening deal cycles. At the same time, EBITDA, EPS, and free cash flow targets were reaffirmed. Meanwhile, on the same day, DA Davidson maintained its 'Buy' rating on Alight, Inc. (NYSE:ALIT) with a $10 price target. The company's results were stronger than analysts' estimates, reinforcing its bullish stance. Alight, Inc. (NYSE:ALIT), a U.S.-based IT and consulting company, offers cloud systems, outsourcing, and HR-related advisory services. It is included in our list of the most oversold stocks. While we acknowledge the potential of ALIT as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 11 Best Gold Penny Stocks to Buy According to Hedge Funds and 11 Best Rebound Stocks to Buy According to Hedge Funds. Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio

US farm agency plan to close flagship research site threatens critical research, critics warn
US farm agency plan to close flagship research site threatens critical research, critics warn

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US farm agency plan to close flagship research site threatens critical research, critics warn

By Leah Douglas WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Department of Agriculture's plan to close its flagship laboratory near Washington, D.C., could undermine research on pests, blight and crop genetics crucial to American farms, according to lawmakers, a farm group, and staff of the facility. The USDA has already lost thousands of research staff to President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal government, even as Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins has said farm research is a pillar of national security. Rollins said in July that the USDA will close the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, which occupies nearly 7,000 acres in the Maryland suburbs outside Washington, as part of an agency reorganization effort that will also move roughly half of its Washington-area staff to hubs in North Carolina, Utah and elsewhere. The agency has said it is closing BARC and several other USDA buildings because of costly necessary renovations and underutilized space. Workers at BARC in 2023 filed whistleblower complaints about unsafe working conditions there. But critics of the plan to close BARC say it could backfire by interrupting the facility's ongoing research, and by pushing the scientists conducting it to resign. "It is unlikely that senior scientists of this caliber with mature research partnerships and rich professional lives will simply move somewhere else," said Donnell Brown, president of the National Grape Research Alliance, which depends on BARC research into vine stress and water usage. U.S. Senator Chris Van Hollen, a Maryland Democrat, also slammed the plan. "You have a lot of people who have invested their time and effort in research for farmers across the country, and this plan would destroy that ongoing research," he said. Three staff at the facility, who requested anonymity out of fear of retribution, said the co-location of many labs at BARC allows for economies of scale and cost savings, and that the proximity to Washington enables researchers to easily brief lawmakers or other parts of the USDA. The USDA did not immediately respond to questions about the criticisms. Rollins said in a July memo outlining the relocation effort that the BARC facility would be closed over several years to avoid disruptions to critical research. The USDA on July 25 told the House and Senate agriculture and appropriations committees that it did not have data or analysis underpinning its reorganization plan to share with members of Congress or their staff, according to a letter sent from Democrats on the House Agriculture Committee to Rollins on August 14. "Ostensibly they're saying it would save money, but I haven't seen any study that suggests that's the case," said U.S. Representative Glenn Ivey, whose Maryland district contains the BARC site.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store