logo
Immigration raids in Los Angeles hit small business owners: 'It's worse than COVID'

Immigration raids in Los Angeles hit small business owners: 'It's worse than COVID'

Hindustan Times17-06-2025
*
ICE raids hit Hispanic small businesses
*
Street vendors, restaurant workers, too afraid to buy supplies
*
Trump crackdown threatens local economies
LOS ANGELES, - Juan Ibarra stands outside his fruit and vegetable outlet in Los Angeles' vast fresh produce market, the place in the city center where Hispanic restaurateurs, street vendors and taco truck operators buy supplies every day.
On Monday morning, the usually bustling market was largely empty. Since Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials began conducting immigration raids more than a week ago, including at a textile factory two blocks away, Ibarra said business has virtually dried up.
His street vendor customers are at home in hiding, while restaurant workers are too scared to travel to the market to pick up supplies. Most of the market's 300 workers who are in the U.S. illegally have stopped showing up.
Ibarra, who pays $8,500 a month in rent for his outlet, which sells grapes, pineapples, melons, peaches, tomatoes and corn, usually takes in about $2,000 on a normal day. Now it's $300, if he's lucky. Shortly before he spoke to Reuters he had, for the first time since the ICE raids began, been forced to throw out rotten fruit. He has to pay a garbage company $70 a pallet to do that.
"It's pretty much a ghost town," Ibarra said. "It's almost COVID-like. People are scared. We can only last so long like this - a couple of months maybe."
Ibarra, 32, who was born in the U.S. to Mexican parents and is a U.S. citizen, is not alone in seeing President Donald Trump's crackdown on immigrants in the country illegally devastate his small business.
It's happening across Los Angeles and California, other business owners and experts say, and threatens to significantly damage the local economy.
A third of California's workers are immigrants and 40% of its entrepreneurs are foreign-born, according to the American Immigration Council.
The Trump administration, concerned about the economic impacts of his mass deportation policy, shifted its focus in recent days, telling ICE to pause raids on farms, restaurants and hotels.
The ICE raids triggered protests in Los Angeles. Those prompted Trump to send National Guard troops and U.S. Marines into the city, against the wishes of California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom.
Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman, said violent protesters in Los Angeles had created an unsafe environment for local businesses. "It's the Democrat riots - not enforcement of federal immigration law - that is hurting small businesses," Jackson told Reuters.
RESTAURANT SLUMP
The recent shift in focus by Trump and ICE has been no help for Pedro Jimenez, 62, who has run and owned a Mexican restaurant in a largely working class, Hispanic neighborhood in Los Angeles for 24 years.
Many in his community are so scared of ICE they are staying home and have stopped frequenting his restaurant. Jimenez, who crossed into the U.S. illegally but received citizenship in 1987 after former Republican President Ronald Reagan signed legislation granting amnesty to many immigrants without legal status, said he's taking in $7,000 a week less than he was two weeks ago.
Last Friday and Saturday he closed at 5 p.m., rather than 9 p.m., because his restaurant was empty.
"This is really hurting everybody's business," he said. "It's terrible. It's worse than COVID."
Andrew Selee, president of the non-partisan Migration Policy Institute, said the Trump administration began its immigration crackdown by focusing on people with criminal convictions. But that has shifted to workplace raids in the past two weeks, he said.
"They are targeting the hard working immigrants who are most integrated in American society," Selee said.
"The more immigration enforcement is indiscriminate and broad, rather than targeted, the more it disrupts the American economy in very real ways."
Across Los Angeles, immigrants described hunkering down, some even skipping work, to avoid immigration enforcement.
Luis, 45, a Guatemalan hot dog vendor who asked to be identified only by his first name for fear of being targeted by ICE, said he showed up this weekend at the Santa Fe Springs swap meet - a flea market and music event. He was told by others that ICE officers had just been there.
He and other vendors without legal immigration status quickly left, he said.
"This has all been psychologically exhausting," he said. "I have to work to survive, but the rest of the time I stay inside."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MFIN seeks credit guarantee support from govt to boost bank lending to sector
MFIN seeks credit guarantee support from govt to boost bank lending to sector

Economic Times

time24 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

MFIN seeks credit guarantee support from govt to boost bank lending to sector

Microfinance Industry Network (MFIN) has sought credit guarantee support from the government to ensure that banks get comfort in lending to the sector. There is a need for a "leap of faith", which will ensure funding to MFIs and start a virtuous cycle that will help economic activity as well, the self-regulatory organisation's (SRO) chief executive Alok Misra told reporters here. Misra said NBFC-MFIs are dependent on bank lending for almost two-thirds of their resources, and added that banks are showing some reluctance to lend to the sector, leading to "severe liquidity constraints"."Once (bank) funding starts, disbursements (by MFIs) will improve," Misra said, pointing out that the gross loan portfolio for all microlenders has declined by nearly 17 per cent in the three months to June to Rs 3.53 lakh crore, and the number of borrowers has fallen 6 per cent to 7.5 crore. MFIN has written to the government in mid-July seeking a Rs 15-20,000 crore credit guarantee scheme for the sector, where the government guarantees up to 75 per cent of an MFI's borrowings from banks and the banks get the comfort to lend, he said. Pointing out that a similar scheme was implemented successfully during the Covid period in 2021, he said the Rs 7,500 crore fund for the purpose by the government was not utilised as all the MFIs paid their said that MFIs will be meeting top Finance Ministry officials next week to discuss the proposals and follow up by meeting bank also said that the refinance by state-owned Sidbi and Nabard has not been very high in the sector lately and appealed for help on that the MFI sector has had a challenging time for the last year, Misra said there are improvements in the sector lately, with the gross non-performing assets ratio of loans overdue for over 90 days reducing to 3.2 per cent in June from 3.5 per cent in March this collection efficiencies are also improving, he said, pointing out that MFIs' collections have gone up to over 98 per cent now from 95 per cent in January this year. He said there are no issues in Tamil Nadu, despite the state moving an ordinance, which was feared to impact the sector, and added that in the case of Karnataka that undertook a similar move, there is an improvement, with the proportion of loans overdue for up to 180 days, declining to 6.08 per cent from 9 per cent six months ago. Denying the RBI's charge of the sector indulging in usurious interest rates from borrowers, Misra said the weighted average lending rate was 23.66 per cent in June and has been "range-bound" for the last few that sometimes statements are made, which are not in line with the facts, Misra claimed that even the outlier MFI will not charge an interest rate of over 27.5 per return on equity is a low 10 per cent because of the interest rates charged, due to which investors can become wary of entering the sector, he said, welcoming the faith shown by some investors by putting fresh equity in the problems faced by the sector are neither cyclical nor structural, he said, stressing that the sector plays a very important role in the overall economic activity and contributes upwards of 2.5 per cent to the gross value added. He dismissed concerns about the upcoming state elections in Bihar, one of the biggest states for the industry, that may affect the industry in any way.

IN-SPACe picks Google-backed PixxelSpace for satellite constellation
IN-SPACe picks Google-backed PixxelSpace for satellite constellation

Business Standard

time26 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

IN-SPACe picks Google-backed PixxelSpace for satellite constellation

The PixxelSpace-led consortium won the project, outbidding Indian defence equipment makers Astra Microwave and Bharat Electronics Reuters India's space regulator has picked a consortium led by Google-backed startup PixxelSpace to build a commercial home-grown constellation of earth observation satellites, with an investment of more than 12 billion rupees (nearly $137 million) over the next five years, it said on Tuesday. The consortium, comprising local space tech firms Piersight Space, Satsure Analytics India and Dhruva Space, will design, build, and operate the satellites, the Indian National Space Promotion and Authorisation Centre (IN-SPACe) said. The PixxelSpace-led consortium won the project, outbidding Indian defence equipment makers Astra Microwave and Bharat Electronics. The Indian government wants to reduce its dependence on foreign systems, including the widely used U.S. Global Positioning System (GPS), and says its regional navigation satellite system, called NavIC (Navigation with Indian Constellation), provides more accurate domestic navigation and that its use would benefit the economy. This is in line with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's drive for self-reliance, which has also expanded the use of NavIC. India has also been pushing tech giants to make smartphones compatible with its home-grown navigation system within months, worrying the likes of Samsung, Xiaomi and Apple. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Why Donald Trump is wrong to take over the DC police
Why Donald Trump is wrong to take over the DC police

Hindustan Times

time26 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Why Donald Trump is wrong to take over the DC police

AMERICA'S CAPITAL city was designed as a showcase for its democracy: sweeping boulevards, white-marble palaces of administration, monuments aplenty. This week, however, Washington, DC has become a manifestation of something less inspiring: the grandstanding instincts of the current president. This time, Donald Trump's preoccupation is violent crime. Mr Trump has been banging this drum for decades. 'Roving bands of wild criminals roam our neighbourhoods dispensing their own brand of twisted hatred,' warned Mr Trump nearly 40 years ago. The occasion then was the rape and assault of a white woman in New York's Central Park, for which five black and Hispanic men were later wrongfully convicted. On August 11th Mr Trump all but quoted himself: 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people,' he said from the White House briefing room. Then he deployed the National Guard to Washington; took control of its police force; and promised to 'get rid of the slums' and clear out its homeless population. This is not the president's first use of the armed forces for civilian law enforcement in a city that reviles him and that he reviles right back. Earlier this summer Mr Trump sent National Guard troops to protect federal property during protests over immigration raids in Los Angeles. In 2020 he ordered them to disperse Black Lives Matter demonstrators in Washington. In neither instance did local Democratic leaders ask for his intervention. Now Mr Trump hints that the Washington deployment could be a blueprint for other troublesome (ie, Democratic-run) places. That will be easier said than done, however. The capital has an unusual legal status as a territory of the federal government granted qualified home rule. Elsewhere the president would face more legal impediments. The practical impact of the president's order may be modest. He has authorised the DC National Guard—which is tiny—to act as cops. About 200 troops will support law enforcement. By law his control of the city police can last for only 30 days; after that Congress would need to extend it. It is a far cry from a federal takeover of Washington. Seeking to justify his order, Mr Trump cited several awful attacks against government workers. In early August carjackers beat up and bloodied a former DOGE staffer. In June stray gunfire killed a congressional intern. Last year an official at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission was shot to death in a carjacking. In 2023 a Senate aide was stabbed and a congressman was robbed at gunpoint. 'It's becoming a situation of complete and total lawlessness,' said Mr Trump, likening the capital to Baghdad and Bogotá. The president is right that violent crime in Washington surged in 2023 and that it numbers among the most dangerous cities in America. He neglected to say that crime there has since tumbled. This year's murder rate is falling towards the pre-pandemic trend. The number of carjackings, which doubled between 2022 and 2023, is declining too, though they are still more frequent than they were before the pandemic. Overall the capital is considerably safer than it was in the 1990s, when it had the highest murder rate in the country, and it is a bit less dangerous than it was a decade ago. Mr Trump's action will irk the 700,000-odd citizens of Washington, whose elected government is being sidelined. And it is hypocritical. Mr Trump and his fellow Republicans in Congress have been impeding the city government, preventing it from spending the taxes it has raised and forcing cuts to services like policing. Republicans have thus exacerbated Washington's crime problem. Mr Trump's focus on the city over more violent ones is not just because he can see it from his bedroom window. It is because the federal government retains more authority over the capital than over states or even other federal territories. The president commands the DC National Guard—in states, governors have that job—and he can take temporary control over the police department. Washington's unique status means these same tactics cannot easily be replicated outside the capital. To 'federalise' the National Guard for arrest purposes elsewhere—to empower troops to act as cops—Mr Trump would have to invoke the Insurrection Act. Only then can the armed forces legally be put to use to quell a domestic uprising. The act was last used in 1992. Invoking it again would be immensely controversial. Mr Trump's approach in Washington, then, is clever when viewed through a lawyer's lens. Which is not to say that his order is justified or good policy. Stay on top of American politics with The US in brief, our daily newsletter with fast analysis of the most important political news, and Checks and Balance, a weekly note from our Lexington columnist that examines the state of American democracy and the issues that matter to voters.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store