logo
US Congressman Joe Wilson Officially Introduces Bill to Designate Polisario as Terrorist Group

US Congressman Joe Wilson Officially Introduces Bill to Designate Polisario as Terrorist Group

Morocco World6 hours ago

Marrakech – Republican Congressman Joe Wilson, alongside Democratic Representative Jimmy Panetta, has submitted a bipartisan bill to the US Congress seeking to classify the Polisario Front as a foreign terrorist group.
The congressman formally submitted the legislation titled 'Polisario Front Terrorist Designation Act' to the House of Representatives on June 24. It now sits before both the Foreign Affairs and Justice Committees for thorough examination.
Wilson revealed the initiative through his X account, labeling the Polisario as 'a Marxist militia backed by Iran, Hezbollah and Russia providing Iran a strategic outpost in Africa and destabilizing the Kingdom of Morocco, a US ally for 248 years.'
The congressman, who fulfilled a promise he had repeated many times, expressed gratification at introducing this cross-party legislation with Rep. Jimmy Panetta to brand the Polisario as a foreign terrorist organization.
The comprehensive bill directly implicates the separatist movement in extensive arms and drug trafficking networks throughout the Sahel region, deliberate violations of established ceasefire agreements with Morocco, and calculated attacks targeting Moroccan civilians in Saharan border territories.
The legislation meticulously documents connections between the Polisario and various extremist organizations operating in the region, bolstered by support from Iran, Hezbollah, and Russia – relationships that pose direct threats to regional and international stability.
The Polisario is a Marxist militia backed by Iran, Hezbollah and Russia providing Iran a strategic outpost in Africa and destabilizing the Kingdom of Morocco, a U.S. ally for 248 years.
Grateful to introduce bipartisan legislation with @RepJimmyPanetta to designate the Polisario… pic.twitter.com/ESQjgwefLo
— Joe Wilson (@RepJoeWilson) June 26, 2025
Should this bill receive approval, it would trigger a fundamental shift in American foreign policy regarding North Africa, as Washington considers Morocco's position vital for international security frameworks.
The legislation would expose the Polisario Front to stringent sanctions, severe economic restrictions, and complete diplomatic isolation, effectively categorizing it alongside notorious terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda, Hezbollah, ISIS, and FARC.
US under Trump's leadership propels push for final resolution of the Sahara dispute
This decisive congressional action follows only two months after Washington's firm reaffirmation of support for Morocco's sovereignty over the Western Sahara.
During an April 8 meeting in Washington, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita that the United States unequivocally recognizes Morocco's sovereignty over its southern provinces and backs the autonomy proposal 'as the only basis for a just and lasting solution to the dispute.'
The statement dealt a heavy blow to the Cold War relic narrative and its chief sponsor, Algeria, which had mocked Trump's initial recognition as 'just a tweet,' only to watch it solidify even further under the second Trump administration, leaving no doubt about Washington's unwavering commitment.
The State Department subsequently reinforced this position in an official diplomatic communiqué, stating: 'The United States would contribute to any progress toward achieving this goal.'
Observers described the declaration as a pivotal moment that closed the door on any illusions of a reversal. With Trump back in power, Washington's endorsement has shifted from symbolic recognition to an institutional pillar of US foreign policy, and is now pushing decisively to resolve the decades-long fabricated Western Sahara dispute.
A Spanish think tank report published by Instituto Coordenadas de Gobernanza y Economía Aplicada on June 11 noted that this firm American stance, coupled with pressure on Algeria to dismantle the Tindouf camps, marks the beginning of the end for the separatist narrative.
This momentum could draw a definitive close to one of Africa's most unnecessarily prolonged and politically manufactured territorial falsehoods, long sustained by external agendas rather than historical legitimacy.
A resolute ally who honored his word
Wilson has consistently criticized external support for the Polisario Front. During a public session of Congress in January, he directly accused several nations of enabling the separatist group: 'War criminal Putin, Iran, and Cuba are actively destabilizing West Africa by supporting the Polisario Front, a threat to the Kingdom of Morocco,' Wilson declared, while powerfully reaffirming Morocco's role as a steadfast and indispensable American ally.
In the same address, he reminded colleagues that 'President Donald Trump stood with Morocco, recognizing Western Sahara as Moroccan,' and noted his role as chair of the US-Morocco Caucus.
He also denounced, at the time, Algeria's provocative hosting of 'terrorist-designated Kurdish separatists to meet with Polisario militia in Tindouf,' specifically referencing the 'notorious PKK and YPG' visit to the camps.
Wilson had repeatedly telegraphed his intentions regarding this legislation and consistently vowed to hold those enabling the separatists accountable.
Following his April 9 meeting with Bourita, Wilson wrote , 'Grateful to meet with Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita to discuss our long-standing partnership and commitment to peace in the region, including the stability of Western Sahara from Polisario terrorists. The U.S. stands with Morocco for peace.'
Just two days later, he confirmed on X: 'I will introduce legislation to designate the Polisario as terrorists. Iran & Putin are gaining a foothold in Africa via Polisario. Connect the dots: axis of aggression.'
The congressman has maintained unwavering determination, vowing on May 22: 'The legislation is coming soon,' while adding the pointed assurance that 'Trump will fix it.'
Proof that eradicates all ambiguity surrounding the Polisario's true nature
Multiple prestigious American think tanks have assembled overwhelming evidence supporting the terrorist designation. The Hudson Institute's comprehensive analysis has shattered the Polisario's self-portrayal as a liberation movement, instead revealing it as 'a destabilizing militia' steeped in arms smuggling and youth indoctrination, while 'aligning itself with the strategic agendas of Iran, Russia, and China.'
The report, authored by Zineb Riboua, meticulously documents how the Polisario's activities 'go far beyond the standard for a terror designation.'
According to the Hudson Institute's analysis, the Polisario Front conclusively meets all three statutory criteria for designation as a Foreign Terrorist Organization under US law.
Most alarmingly, the institute confirms the separatist group 'receives drones from Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) through transfers facilitated by the Algerian regime' and 'smuggles arms to jihadist insurgencies that threaten American forces across the Sahel.'
The report specifically highlights the case of Adnan Abu Walid al-Sahrawi, who reportedly held a role in the Polisario before becoming the emir of the Islamic State in the Greater Sahara (ISGS). Under his leadership, ISGS carried out numerous attacks across the Sahel, including a 2017 ambush in Niger that killed four US soldiers.
This trajectory 'underscores how militant ecosystems in the region overlap and evolve' and demonstrates that 'the Polisario's political infrastructure in Tindouf has long facilitated radicalization, trafficking, and terrorist mobilization.'
In a landmark May 21 analysis for The Daily Signal titled 'Why the US Must Confront Terror Proxy Polisario Front,' Robert Greenway, director of the Allison Center for National Security, and Amine Ghoulidi, visiting fellow at the Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy, presented devastating evidence of the group's terrorist activities.
'Today, Polisario fighters field Iranian-type drones, share desert corridors with Russian proxies' supply convoys, and tax smuggling routes that feed Sahel jihadists. All this takes place within missile range of the Strait of Gibraltar, one of the world's most critical maritime choke points,' they write.
The experts remind Washington of a troubling precedent: 'In 1988, Polisario missiles brought down two U.S. Agency for International Development aircraft, killing five Americans—and the U.S. failed to respond with sanctions.'
The analysts warn that since the 2020 unilateral withdrawal from the UN-brokered ceasefire, Polisario has declared the Western Sahara a 'zone of war,' resumed rocket attacks along Morocco's defensive berm, and explicitly warned that 'foreign consulates, airlines, and companies were 'legitimate targets.''
Their analysis identifies the three pillars supporting Polisario's operations: 'Iranian military assistance, a growing Russian influence network, and a mature trans-Sahel illicit economy that overlaps with jihadist financing streams.'
The authors note that Algeria's sanctuary allows Polisario to 'stockpile ordnance, experiment with new systems, and cultivate external sponsors at minimal risk,' while maintaining a force of roughly 8,000 fighters with potential to mobilize up to 40,000 – 'a manpower pool that Polisario commanders can draw on and which jihadist recruiters have already probed.'
The National Interest published a comprehensive analysis on June 9, stressing that more countries are adopting Morocco's security approach to safeguard its southern provinces and prevent the region from becoming home to a 'jihadist government.'
The publication stated, 'The Polisario has, in recent years, aligned itself with some of the most radical actors in the region,' recalling how Tindouf has become a breeding ground for 'jihadist recruitment and a nexus for extremist networks operating across the Sahel.'
The Washington Post has published explosive revelations documenting hundreds of Polisario mercenaries dispatched by Iran to fight alongside the Syrian regime.
In its April 12 edition, the newspaper stated: 'Iran has trained fighters from the Polisario Front, a rebel group based in Algeria that is fighting for Western Sahara's independence from Morocco. Hundreds of these fighters are currently detained by the new Syrian security forces.'
The report cited direct testimony from these security forces and Western diplomats stationed in the region, providing incontrovertible confirmation of long-standing Moroccan assertions regarding the dangerous nexus between Iran, Hezbollah, and the Polisario, facilitated through Algerian channels.
The proposed legislation would impose crippling consequences on the Polisario terror group, including complete asset freezes, absolute prohibition of financial or political interactions with its supporters, and implementation of targeted sanctions.
This designation would also significantly complicate diplomatic relations with Algeria, the primary state sponsor and sanctuary provider for the violent separatist movement.
Mounting evidence and a surging global consensus are isolating the Polisario. With the UK joining the US, France, and Spain in recognizing Moroccan sovereignty, over 120 nations now back the Autonomy Plan as the only credible path to end the conflict.
Read also: Is this the end of the Polisario?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Four Projectiles Land Near Es-Smara, No Casualties Reported
Four Projectiles Land Near Es-Smara, No Casualties Reported

Morocco World

time31 minutes ago

  • Morocco World

Four Projectiles Land Near Es-Smara, No Casualties Reported

Rabat – Four projectiles reportedly landed today near the city of Es-Smara in southern Morocco. According to local media and eyewitnesses, the ordnance fell in an uninhabited area close to a military camp used by the UN MINURSO mission. No injuries or damages have been reported. The loud explosions frightened nearby residents, who rushed to the scene after hearing the blasts. Videos and photos shared on social media show what appeared to be the remains of the projectiles scattered in the area. photos shared on social media show what appeared to be the remains of the projectiles scattered in the area. The Polisario Front is believed to be behind the attack, especially with the separatist group's suspected involvement in similar incidents in the past. In 2023, four explosions killed one person and injured three others in the southern Moroccan city. The explosions occurred in two residential neighborhoods and an industrial area in the city. Soon after, Morocco launched an official investigation into the incident. The General Prosecutor at the Laayoune Court of Appeals ordered technical and ballistic analysis to determine the origin and nature of the explosive projectiles. Morocco's Permanent Representative to the UN, Omar Hilale, said that MINURSO had confirmed the explosions hit civilian neighborhoods, and that the Polisario had issued a statement indirectly taking responsibility. 'There were no military installations at any of the sites,' Hilale said in a press conference after the incident, adding that 'targeting civilians is a terrorist act under international law, and those responsible will not go unpunished.' Hilale also emphasized that those behind the attacks, as well as those who arm and support them, must be held accountable. He specifically referred to Algeria, which has hosted and financed the Polisario for decades. This new incident comes amid growing international scrutiny of the Polisario. US Republican Senator Joe Wilson and Democratic Representative Jimmy Panetta recently introduced a bipartisan bill that calls for the group to be designated as a foreign terrorist organization. The bill references the group's targeting of civilians and its return to violence following the collapse of the ceasefire in 2020. If passed, the bill could reshape how the US and other allies deal with Polisario and its supporters. Tags: Es SmaraexplosionPolisario

Controversy Mares Rabat Sociology Forum as Moroccan Academics Reject Israeli Participation
Controversy Mares Rabat Sociology Forum as Moroccan Academics Reject Israeli Participation

Morocco World

timean hour ago

  • Morocco World

Controversy Mares Rabat Sociology Forum as Moroccan Academics Reject Israeli Participation

Marrakech – A fierce controversy has engulfed the upcoming World Sociology Forum in Morocco as academic organizations and activists across the country demand the immediate exclusion of Israeli researchers from the event. The prestigious fifth World Sociology Forum, set for July 6-11, at Mohammed V University in Rabat, now faces a mounting crisis after multiple Moroccan academic bodies called for a complete boycott of Israeli participants in direct protest against the ongoing genocide in Gaza perpetrated by Netanyahu's government, which faces international arrest warrants. The Moroccan Campaign for Academic and Cultural Boycott (MACBI), operating within the BDS Morocco movement, has formally demanded that the International Sociological Association (ISA) cancel all participation by Israeli academics at the forum. In a strongly worded statement released Wednesday, the BDS Morocco coordination condemned 'the participation of Israeli academics from complicit institutions' of the occupation, without 'respect for fundamental ethical conditions.' The movement pointed out that while Gaza continues to suffer under genocide since October 7, 2023, the ISA still plans to include three speakers from Israel. One presenter reportedly characterizes Hamas as a 'terrorist organization' and references the 'displacement' of Israelis following Hezbollah attacks. MACBI forcefully reminded that 'in 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that the Israeli occupation of Gaza and the West Bank was illegal and constituted apartheid.' When confronted by MACBI regarding presenters whose communications allegedly promote the occupation's narrative, the ISA defended its stance, claiming it would 'not cancel these participations' because of its 'commitment to academic freedom' and desire to 'offer a platform for dialogue as open as courageous.' The dispute has mobilized Moroccan academics nationwide. The Progressive Current of Professors and Researchers within the National Union of Higher Education (SNE-Sup) declared 'deep concern about the repercussions of the announcement' by the ISA. The union's secretariat stated that 'the universities of the Zionist entity are partners and strategic actors in the occupation and institutionalization of apartheid, providing academic cover for ethnic cleansing policies, developing repression and espionage tools in cooperation with the occupation army.' They added that these institutions 'host military bases and security research centers, institutionalize racial discrimination against Palestinian students, and justify crimes against humanity, including famine, massacres, and genocide perpetrated in Gaza.' For the union, holding this forum in Morocco with academics from institutions 'involved in these crimes' represents 'an attack on the image of the Moroccan university, its moral and academic credibility.' Respecting national values and regional solidarity principles The Moroccan Sociological Association has issued an unequivocal rejection of Israeli participation in the forum. The association firmly stated that hosting the event in Rabat must come with 'the necessity of respecting Moroccan values and related positions, especially concerning vital issues for Morocco.' The association asserted that 'the barbaric practices committed against Palestinian civilians, which Israeli authorities intend as material and moral extermination of the Palestinian existence, drive us […] to not welcome those belonging to the usurping entity even within scientific and academic activities, out of respect for national commitments and the feelings of Moroccans, and to preserve the ties that unite us with components of the region to which we belong.' The association strongly condemned 'the Israeli attack on all the foundations of the Palestinian people' and denounced 'all forms of extermination practiced against their right to exist within an independent homeland where they can exercise their sovereignty and live with dignity.' It demanded that the international community 'take the necessary measures to stop these crimes committed against the Palestinian people, and guarantee their legitimate rights in service of global and regional peace.' The association further insisted that adherence to the academic ethics underlying the ISA's laws is 'necessary and obligatory with regard to respecting international charters and relevant resolutions, especially those related to the Palestinian cause during the selection and programming of participations.' 'An ideological and dangerous drift' However, Moroccan sociologist Jamal Fezza has criticized what he called an 'ideological and dangerous' drift. In a social media post, Fezza argued that 'sociology is a universal knowledge shaped by both Jewish and Christian thinkers, and no identity dogma can dictate its boundaries.' He added that 'the most important tools that a sociologist should be armed with is the axiological neutrality that Max Weber called for, without which sociology mixes with opinion and belief.' Expanding on his position, Fezza stated that the call to boycott the forum due to Israeli participants 'reflects a profound ignorance of the tasks entrusted to sociology, and an attempt to involve science and scientists in ideological and political polemics far removed from the nature of this science and the goals it aspires to.' 'For the person who calls for boycotting the World Forum with that argument to be fully consistent with himself, he needs only boycott sociology itself, because it is simply a science produced by Jews and some Christians. From Durkheim and Simmel through Levi-Strauss and Ezra Park, you will not find the name Ahmed or Ismail leaving their mark in the history of this great science,' Fezza concluded. Equating 'the criminal and the victim' Even so, a petition has gained momentum among Moroccan researchers rejecting the participation of Israeli academics in the forum. Researchers are withdrawing en masse from the event, with both Moroccan and international academics pulling out in a powerful show of solidarity with Palestine. Within hours of the petition's circulation, numerous participants canceled their presentations, creating a ripple effect that threatens the forum's viability. The researchers stated: 'We, researchers in social sciences, Moroccans and from the rest of the world, express our boycott of the Fifth Sociology Forum of the International Sociological Association, due to the participation of Zionist institutions involved, in one way or another, in the ongoing genocide war on Gaza, and the programming of interventions that appear from their summaries to promote the colonial narrative.' The petition signatories accused the ISA of 'violating' ethical and research standards by equating 'the criminal and the victim' on the same platform through programming topics that 'beautify the ongoing genocide war on the Palestinian people.' According to official information, more than 30 Israeli academics and researchers are scheduled to attend, representing Israeli universities that the boycott movement classifies as institutions involved in the occupation and apartheid system, including the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Ben-Gurion University, Bar-Ilan University, Tel Aviv University, and the Open University of Israel. Academic cooperation between Morocco and Israel began in February 2021, when the education ministers of both countries agreed to launch a program for exchanging student delegations and conducting educational competitions in Arabic and Hebrew in both countries. Despite strong opposition from Moroccan anti-normalization groups, the Moroccan Minister of Higher Education, Abdellatif Miraoui, and his Israeli counterpart, Orit Farkash-Hacohen, signed the first cooperation agreement between universities and research centers in May 2022. Morocco announced the renewal of diplomatic relations with Israel on December 10, 2020, after they were suspended in 2000 following the outbreak of the Second Palestinian Intifada.

Sahara : Polisario fires five projectiles on Es-Smara
Sahara : Polisario fires five projectiles on Es-Smara

Ya Biladi

timean hour ago

  • Ya Biladi

Sahara : Polisario fires five projectiles on Es-Smara

On Friday, June 27, armed militias of the Polisario launched five missiles on the city of Es-Smara. «The projectiles caused no casualties or material damage. They landed a few kilometers from the Rbite neighborhood, prompting an immediate state of alert across the city», a Moroccan security source told Yabiladi. A media outlet affiliated with the Polisario claimed there were «explosions at Moroccan military positions in Es-Smara». The attack comes just 48 hours after a bill was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives to designate the Polisario as a terrorist organization. The last Polisario attack targeting civilians in Morocco dates back to November 8, 2024, in Al Mahbes. On that day, four projectiles were fired near tents sheltering Sahrawi civilians celebrating the 49th anniversary of the Green March. No casualties were reported.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store