Thought control: AI model transcribes thoughts from brainwaves
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) Released its CUDA-Q version 0.12
NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) is one of the . On August 4, NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) released CUDA-Q version 0.12, a new tool to speed up research in quantum computing. One of the key features of CUDA-Q is the new run API, which allows users to get detailed data on each run in a quantum simulation. This shot-level data helps researchers analyze noise, select precise results, and benchmark circuits more effectively. Moreover, the updated version also improves the CUDA-Q dynamics backend and now supports better multidiagonal sparse matrix operations and batching of quantum states. CUDA-Q is an open-source platform that integrates classical and quantum computing. A close-up of a colorful high-end graphics card being plugged in to a gaming computer. NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) is a leading tech company that develops advanced computing technologies focused on accelerated computing and graphics. While we acknowledge the potential of NVDA as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Major EV warning as true battery range for big brands like Tesla and BYD exposed: 'Aussies deserve to know'
Australians considering buying an electric vehicle (EV) have been warned about the real-world battery range on some of the most popular models. Range anxiety has been a thorn in the side of the electric vehicle market for years as Aussie drivers fear they'll run out of juice on a long journey. Major strides have been made to push the maximum battery range for many EV manufacturers; however, these limits have been put to the test on our roads. The Australian Automobile Association grabbed popular models from Tesla, BYD, and Kia to see if they could go as far as they claimed. RELATED Electric vehicle warning as BYD records biggest month of sales in Australia Little-known Centrelink perk offers Australian students free flights ATO warning over $485 billion deadline for thousands just weeks away The AAA's investigation was part of a $14 million Real-World Testing Program to see how cars (including petrol and hybrid models) really performed in the wild. The Program recently discovered 25 out of 30 petrol and hybrid vehicles tested consumed more fuel than their lab results, and more than three-quarters failed to meet expectations. The next round of testing saw EVs taken on urban and rural roads, as well as on a motorway, and they had to contend with real-time traffic. They were also driven inside a lab to see how far the battery would last under perfect circumstances. Carmakers happily boast their vehicles can go certain distances on a single tank or full battery, with the latter used as a huge competitive edge in the EV world. Five electric cars were tested in AAA's program: BYD Atto 3 Tesla Model 3 Tesla Model Y Kia EV6 Smart #3How long did popular EV car batteries last? For the two Teslas, the Model 3 was able to go 513km in the lab, but only 441km on real roads, a 14 per cent difference. The Model Y had an 8 per cent difference, with the car driving 533km in the lab and only 490km outside. The BYD Atto 3 had the biggest inconsistency of 23 per cent, with the lab results showing a battery range of 480km, but a real-world result of just 369km. Kia's EV6 notched 528km in the lab and 484km on real roads, and the Smart #3 had the lowest variation of just 5 per cent, with 455km in the lab and 432km real-world battery range. "Australians deserve to know how vehicles perform on roads," the AAA said. "This testing provides accurate and relevant information to enable more informed decisions for consumers, businesses and fleets buying new light vehicles." Australian Electric Vehicle Association national president Chris Jones blamed the difference in battery range on multiple factors, including high or low temperatures, headwinds, steep terrain, and whether the driver uses air conditioning or heating features during their journey. He said EV makers needed to be more upfront about how far their cars could go so that buyers didn't shy away from them in the future. "It is frustrating that manufacturers are inflating the values when they really ought to be a bit more conservative," Jones said. "I would have thought a 10 per cent difference was reasonable but 20 per cent is pretty bad." Yahoo Finance has approached Tesla, Kia, and BYD for comment. EV subsidies could soon be axed under major overhaul The revelation could serve as a huge blow to the EV industry at a time when subsidies that won over many buyers are on the chopping block. The Productivity Commission is investigating the country's goal of achieving net zero carbon emissions by 2050 and highlighted the generous handouts given to those who buy an electric car. It has recommended to dump the Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) exemptions and state-based stamp duty discounts for the EV market. 'Now that the Australian Government has implemented the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES), it should phase-out the exemption of electric vehicles from the Fringe Benefits Tax,' the interim report said. The NVES was implemented earlier this year and it gives every car manufacturer a CO2 target that they either have to meet or beat each year. That target is lowered each year until 2029, which will put increased pressure on brands to have zero or low-emissions vehicles in their fleet. 'The EV purchase subsidies and the NVES overlap, as they both promote the purchase of low-emissions vehicles," the Productivity Commission said. 'EV tax discounts subsidise car buyers to opt for EVs, while the NVES is a broader-based policy that aims to increase purchases of low-emissions light vehicles, including both EVs and more fuel-efficient fossil fuel cars.' The suggestion sparked outcry from the EV industry, with Electric Vehicle Council (EVC) CEO Julie Delvecchio saying the incentives proposed to be axed were "finally helping everyday Australians afford an electric car". 'Suggesting we end incentives just as Australia finally catches up to the rest of the developed world with an efficiency standard is short-sighted. We need both - they work together, not in isolation," she while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data
WebMD
3 hours ago
- WebMD
Back Pain Relief From This Therapy Can Last for Years
back pain treatments that offer lasting relief, or any relief. That's why a surprising new study, published Wednesday, is drawing public and clinical attention, showing that adults with disabling low-back pain who completed just eight sessions of a novel therapy saw sustained improvements in their pain and activity levels – even after three years. The treatment, called cognitive functional therapy (CFT), blends physical therapy with a psychology-based approach. CFT "teaches patients how to manage their own symptoms, what their pain experience means, and how they can move forward without injuring themselves," said Chad E. Cook, PT, PhD, a pain researcher at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina. (Cook was not involved in the study.) Teaching people to self-manage pain is the cornerstone of the approach, Cook said. It's "why the authors saw improvements at three years – which is very uncommon." The study included 312 adults in Australia with an average pain level of 4 or more on a 10-point scale – enough to interfere with daily living and work activities. Of those who completed the CFT (which included seven 30- to 60-minute sessions over 12 weeks, plus an eighth "booster" session at 26 weeks), more than 40% saw improvement in their activity level – and maintained that improvement after three years, compared to 17% in a comparison group who received usual care. Pain scores dropped by an average of 2 points in the CFT group, compared with less than 1 point in the usual care group, and that was also sustained after three years. The average age of people in the study was 48, but benefits were seen among a wide range of ages, said study author Mark Hancock, PhD. Here are three things to know about CFT for low-back pain, a condition that affects more than 1 in 4 U.S. adults. CFT helped the people that nothing else worked for. Most people in the study did not expect the treatment to work, likely because other treatments they'd tried had failed. "The poor outcomes of mainstream approaches are one of the reasons the authors created CFT," Cook said. "Before giving up, it is worth speaking with a CFT clinician to determine if the approach is right for you." People with the most severe low-back pain have the most to gain: They're the ones who tend to reap the greatest benefit from CFT, the research showed. CFT is low risk and can be done anywhere. There's no clear go-to therapy for low-back pain, and many options – like surgery or opioids – carry high risks. Research on most treatments shows mixed results, and scientists haven't yet figured out how to tailor them to individual patients. But anyone can do CFT, anywhere. Many of the people in the study did their sessions via virtual appointments, although Hancock recommends doing the first session in person. It's movement and psychotherapy combined. A course of CFT is highly personalized, but it might include: Tailoring therapy based on what's causing your pain – an old back injury or past surgery, for example – and your experiences from treatments that didn't work Tracking exactly when and where pain shows up – like if it worsens while sitting, climbing stairs, or after certain movements Challenging unhelpful beliefs about pain, such as "I will never be able to work again" or "my posture is wrong" Practicing specific movements and psychological strategies with the therapist – like learning to move despite discomfort, training your body not to respond by tensing up (known as muscle guarding), and focusing instead on relaxing the muscles (which can ease pain) Relearning everyday movements that matter to you – such as standing or sitting without pain, walking the dog, or getting back on the bike – along with strength training and lifestyle habits that support recovery Developing helpful internal monologues, like "I became mindful to my response to pain" or "I don't fear my pain anymore" How Do You Get Started with CFT? Because it's an emerging therapy, you may not readily find a CFT-trained physical therapist. If you can't find one close to you, Hancock suggested searching for a physical therapist who describes themselves as "more of a coach, helping you to understand your back pain and giving you skills and confidence to return to activity." In the meantime, Hancock, a professor of physiotherapy and back pain researcher at Australia's Macquarie University in Sydney, offers these tips: Try to keep moving during pain, rather than resting or avoiding activity. Relax and try to move normally. View your pain as a warning sign, but not as message that damage is happening. If you gradually do more, the pain usually is reduced.
