
Canada is doubling down on dairy tariffs ahead of talks with Trump
Trump often rails against Canada's prohibitively high dairy tariffs. He's about to get angrier.
That's because last week, the Canadian Senate passed new legislation, years in the making, which bars the government from negotiating away its dairy protectionism in future trade agreements.
The bill's timing was no accident. Canada wants a carve-out from Trump's tariffs and hopes to renew the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement next summer. Trump will demand a lot from Ottawa in exchange. Concessions on Canada's tariff-rate quotas on dairy will be at or near the top of the list.
Canada's new bill takes these tariff-rate quotas off the table. This is misguided. Not just because it will frustrate the U.S. and other trade partners, but also because supply management isn't in Canada's national interest.
A lot of ink has been spilled trying to make sense of supply management. The system, which dates to the 1970s, sets provincial quotas, establishes minimum prices and imposes steep tariffs.
Proponents argue it stabilizes prices and farm incomes. Critics say it results in higher prices for Canadians, stifles industry innovation in agriculture and has caused serious trade tensions long before Trump.
Both sides agree on something: Supply management is the third rail of Canadian politics.
That's because the system's quotas mostly advantage dairy farmers in Quebec and Ontario. Since these provinces are essential to winning federal elections, Canada's political parties are loath to touch supply management.
But Trump's tariffs have given Canadian elected officials the political cover needed to shake up supply management. Under the cloud of unprecedented trade policy uncertainty, big questions loom about the country's economic future. It's a moment of nation-building. It's a time of seriousness.
Instead of rising to the occasion, the House of Commons unanimously approved its protectionist dairy bill.
What comes next? The writing is on the wall. Trump has raged against Canada's dairy tariffs for years. He vowed that the USMCA would fix things, but it gave Canada 14 tariff-rate quotas on products from milk to cheese and butter that have further complicated things.
Canada's tariff-rate quotas give U.S. dairy farmers tariff-free access on up to, say, 50 million metric tons, for example, but then subject them to punitive tariffs for anything more than this. The rates, ranging from 241 percent on milk to 298 percent on butter, are the ones that Trump likes to talk about.
But U.S. dairy farmers aren't actually paying these exorbitant rates because they have never exceeded the quotas. Which invites the all-important question: Why?
The Biden administration argued that Canada's quotas favor domestic 'processors' of dairy products, as well as so-called 'further processors' that use dairy as inputs used by other products. This keeps high-value-added U.S. exports worth hundreds of millions of dollars out of the Canadian market.
In 2021, the U.S. brought a case against Canada's tariff-rate quotas under the USMCA and won. In a second case, however, Canada was deemed to be in compliance with its obligations. This ruling frustrated the Biden administration. Now, Trump wants to use tariffs to make things right.
The U.S. isn't alone in complaining about Canada's dairy tariff-rate quotas. Just Last year, New Zealand filed a similar case against Ottawa under the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership. The U.S. and New Zealand have also sued Canada over its tariff-rate quotas at the World Trade Organization.
Given this, it should hardly be surprising that there's domestic opposition to the bill.
The Canadian Cattle Association called it 'bad trade policy.' The Canadian Agri-Food Trade Alliance said it was 'a flawed piece of legislation that sets a troubling precedent, undermining Canada's longstanding commitment to the rules-based international trading system.'
Trump's tariffs inspired Canada to take bold steps to remove inter-provincial trade barriers, despite age-old political hurdles. Getting out from under the country's supply management should have been prioritized with the same level of urgency and commitment to creative problem-solving.
Canada's new dairy protectionism bill isn't that.
Marc L. Busch is the Karl F. Landegger Professor of International Business Diplomacy at the Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sporting goods retailer Decathlon to close its Toronto-area stores this summer
TORONTO — French sporting goods retailer Decathlon says it is closing its five Greater Toronto Area stores this summer. The locations slated for shutdown are in Brampton, Burlington, Markham, Scarborough and Vaughan. The retailer did not offer a reason for the move or say how many staff will lose their jobs, when stores close on a yet-to-be-announced date. In place of running its large-scale GTA stores, the company says it is considering opening smaller locations or using a wholesale distribution model. The GTA closures will leave just one Ontario store located in Ottawa. There are 14 others across Alberta, B.C., Nova Scotia and Quebec. Decathlon entered the Canadian market in 2018 with a Brossard, Que., store. The company expanded steadily ever since, going head-to-head with established domestic players like Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. and its Sport Chek banner. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 25, 2025. Tara Deschamps, The Canadian Press


The Hill
18 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump slams intel report, hits Spain at NATO summit
Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here Happy Wednesday! It's another hot day in D.C., so stay hydrated and don't forget your sunscreen!: In today's issue: The White House has spent today disputing several news outlets' reporting that the U.S. strikes against Iran did not decimate the country's nuclear program. If you missed the reporting: CNN, The New York Times and NBC News all cited an internal preliminary classified report that determined Saturday's bombing only set Iran's nuclear program back by a few months, challenging President Trump's assessment that the strikes set the country back years or destroyed it entirely. 💡 Why this matters: Carrying out the strike against Iran was a sophisticated maneuver in foreign policy. Even if the initial report is correct in that it pushed back Iran's nuclear program by just a few months, that's still a win for the White House. But Trump has set the bar incredibly high by suggesting the U.S. strikes decimated Iran's nuclear materials, setting Tehran back by decades. Trump closed out the NATO summit this morning with a wide-ranging press conference but spent much of it pushing back on the reporting. He even equated the Iran strikes to WWII: Trump compared the U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear sites to dropping atomic bombs in Japan near the end of World War II. 'It was so devastating. Actually, if you look at Hiroshima or if you look at Nagasaki, you know, that ended a war, too,' Trump said. 'This ended a war in a different way, but it was so devastating.' ^ Keep in mind that roughly 200,000 people were killed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He also dismissed the report's assessment that Iran moved its nuclear materials before the strike: 'If you knew about that material, it's very hard and very dangerous to move,' Trump said. Earlier this morning, Trump bashed the news outlets as 'scum.' From Trump: 'This was an unbelievable hit by genius pilots and genius people in the military, and they're not being given credit for it because we have scum that's in this room. And not all of you are … CNN is scum. MSDNC is scum. The New York Times is scum. They're bad people. They're sick,' Trump said. 'And what they've done is they're trying to make this unbelievable victory into something less.' 📹 Watch Trump vent about the reporting His team publicly backed him up: The president's national security team strongly disagreed with the reporting on the initial internal assessment. ➤ Vice President Vance posted a scathing critique of American media, arguing it is 'full of the least curious, least insightful people in our country.' 🔎 Read Vance's criticism ➤ Secretary of State Marco Rubio argued to Politico that Iran is now 'much further away from a nuclear weapon.' ➤ Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth says there is an investigation into how the report was leaked. During Trump's NATO news conference, Hegseth stepped up to the microphone and accused the media of trying 'to find a way to spin it for their own political reasons to try to hurt President Trump or our country.' ^ Oh, by the way. Trump referred to Hegseth as 'Secretary of War,' noting the position used to be called that. 'We feel like warriors,' Trump said. 📹 Watch For what it's worth: An Iran Foreign Ministry spokesperson says that Saturday's bombing 'badly damaged' its nuclear installations. Keep in mind: The report's conclusion could easily change — it is an early assessment, after all. Without any inspections on the ground, it's hard to know how successful the strikes were. Here's a helpful Brookings Institution explainer on measuring the strike's success. President Trump wrapped the NATO summit with a press conference. While that Iran report was on the top of his mind, he had plenty of other matters to discuss. 🗨️ Follow today's live blog ➤ TIDBIT — UH, NO COMMENT: NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte referred to Trump as 'Daddy' this morning after the president used harsh language to bash Israel and Iran for continuing strikes despite a fragile ceasefire agreement. 📹 Watch— it's around the one-minute mark. Cuomo bested in NYC primary: Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) conceded to 33-year old New York State Assembly member Zohran Mamdani (D) on Tuesday night in the city's mayoral primary, delivering an absolute stunner. Nearly every poll consistently showed Cuomo in the lead, despite Mamdani closing the gap in several surveys. Cuomo also had a stacked list of Democratic endorsements, including former President Clinton and former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg. Meanwhile, Mamdani landed a few high-profile progressive endorsements — like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) — but was still considered an underdog against the New York powerhouse. Votes are still being tallied, but Cuomo didn't wait to concede, telling supporters 'tonight was Assemblyman Mamdani's night.' Why this matters: Democrats have struggled to find their footing while trying to repair their damaged image after the 2024 elections. Mamdani is a democratic socialist and ran as an anti-establishment Democrat. He called for free buses, free childcare, a rent freeze and tax increase on wealthy taxpayers. What to know about Mamdani His win is notable because progressives have had some big losses over the last year, including several high-profile progressives, like former Reps. Cory Bush (D-Mo.) and Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.) losing their primaries. 📝Five takeaways Related, via The New York Times: 'Why Ranked-Choice Voting Could Have a Pivotal Effect on the Mayor's Race' ➤ TIDBITS: 📹 Wow: Watch Former New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio (D) react to Cuomo's loss. He railed on Cuomo. 📹 Watch the clip There was an ~outlier~ poll predicting this outcome: The Economist's Mike Bird posted a screenshot of 'the single best poll for Zohran in the run-up to the election, discounted as a wild outlier at the time, undershot his actual first-round percentage of the vote by about eight percentage points.' The House and Senate are in. President Trump has left the Netherlands. (All times EST) This afternoon: Trump leaves the Netherlands and returns to Washington. 4:15 p.m.: Two Senate votes. 📆Today's agenda 4:15 p.m.: First and last House votes. 📆Today's agenda 🍓 Celebrate: Today is National Strawberry Parfait Day. 🥤 Tbh, the Dubai chocolate craze is not overhyped: Shake Shack is leaning into the craze over the combination of pistachio, toasted kataifi shredded phyllo and chocolate. It has created a shake with those flavors. 🎸 I would simply faint: Taylor Swift made a surprise appearance at a charity concert in Nashville. 📹 Watch Because you made it this far: If you aren't craving a mozzarella stick already, this record-breaking cheese pull will surely change that.


The Hill
18 minutes ago
- The Hill
Fed's Powell repeats warning about tariffs as some GOP senators accuse him of bias
WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said Wednesday that President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs will likely push up inflation in the coming months, even as some Republican senators suggested the chair was biased against the duties. On the second day of his twice-yearly testimony before the House and Senate, Powell said that consumers will likely have to shoulder some of the cost of the import taxes. Most Fed officials support cutting rates this year, Powell added, but the central bank wants to take time to see how inflation changes in the months ahead. 'There will be some inflation from tariffs coming,' Powell said under questioning from members of the Senate Banking Committee. 'Not yet, but over the course of the coming months.' Powell noted that the duties would likely cost hundreds of billions of dollars annually, and 'some of that is going to fall on the consumer. We're just kind of waiting to see more data on that.' Some GOP senators criticized Powell, however, for characterizing tariffs as a potential driver of inflation. Sen. Pete Ricketts, a Republican from Nebraska, argued that the duties could simply act as a one-time increase in prices that wouldn't fuel inflation. And Sen. Bernie Moreno, a Republican from Ohio, echoed some of Trump's complaints about Powell's reluctance to cut rates and accused Powell of political bias. 'You should consider whether you are looking at this through a fiscal lens or a political lens because you just don't like tariffs,' Moreno said. Powell didn't respond. But the Fed chair reiterated that most central bank officials do support cutting the Fed's key rate this year. And Powell added that it is possible that tariffs won't increase inflation by very much. Trump has sharply criticized Powell for not reducing borrowing costs, calling him a 'numbskull' and a 'fool.' Trump has pushed for rate cuts in order to reduce the interest costs the federal government pays on its debt. Yet some Fed officials have pushed back against that view, saying that it's not their job to lower the government's borrowing costs. So far, inflation has steadily cooled this year despite widespread concerns among economists about the impact of tariffs. The consumer price index ticked up just 0.1% from April to May, the government said last week, a sign that price pressures are muted. Compared with a year ago, consumer prices rose 2.4% in May, up from a yearly increase of 2.3% in April. Yet most economists on Wall Street expect that Trump's tariffs will lift inflation this year, to about 3% to 3.5% by the end of this year.