logo
Reddit's (RDDT) Rollercoaster Ride Enters Buy-the-Dip Territory

Reddit's (RDDT) Rollercoaster Ride Enters Buy-the-Dip Territory

Reddit Inc. (RDDT) stock has been on a wild ride since its IPO last March, soaring from $34 to a dizzying $230 before pulling back at $103 today. The bullish moment has been fueled by Reddit's jaw-dropping growth, tempered by whispers of doubt about whether it can keep the momentum going. I'm betting it can. With its unique platform and skyrocketing metrics in both the top and bottom lines, I see Reddit's dip as a rare chance to buy into a social media giant poised for a big rebound.
Confident Investing Starts Here:
Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions
Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter
Surging User Engagement Fuels the Fire
Reddit's strength lies in its vibrant, sticky community. In Q1, daily active users (DAUs) on the platform hit 108.1 million, a 31% year-over-year increase, while weekly users totaled 401 million. Millions of people are now exploring all kinds of subreddits for everything from niche hobbies to breaking news. I would argue that, along with X, Reddit is one of the best places to go to feel the pulse of what the 'conversation' is for any given topic.
In the meantime, Reddit's 'Reddit Answers' feature, now at 1 million weekly users, has made it easier for people to find solutions, boosting engagement and keeping users hooked longer. This should prove to be a strong short to medium-term catalyst for Reddit to sustain sticky user metrics. And this stickiness translates into real staying power.
The platform's ability to connect users over hyper-specific interests creates a network effect that's hard to replicate. As more users join, the content becomes richer, attracting even more people. It's a virtuous cycle that drives growth and makes it a magnet for advertisers seeking to tap into passionate, engaged audiences.
Advertising Revenue Takes Flight
Speaking of Reddit's advertising business, it is firing on all cylinders, with Q1 ad revenue soaring 61% to $359 million. I really like how Reddit's ads are sneaky but effective. You're deep in a thread about camping gear, and suddenly there's a sponsored post for a tent that fits the conversation perfectly.
That's a superb delivery system that has advertisers lining up. Notably, over 50% more advertisers joined the platform year-over-year, indicating that brands view Reddit as a valuable channel for delivering high return on ad spend (ROAS).
The Hidden Gem of Data Licensing
Reddit's data has emerged as a highly valuable asset, and the company is beginning to effectively monetize it. In the last quarter, revenue from data licensing and related sources rose by 66% to $34 million. This growth is largely driven by the increasing demand for high-quality, user-generated content to train artificial intelligence models. Reddit's extensive and diverse dataset, covering a wide range of topics, makes it particularly well-suited for this purpose.
Additionally, Reddit's partnership with Google (GOOGL), aimed at enhancing the platform's visibility in search results, has significantly increased its online presence. As a result, Reddit content is now more prominently featured in searches ranging from consumer advice to home repair solutions.
Looking ahead, this revenue stream is likely to become a more significant part of Reddit's overall business. As AI technologies continue to evolve, the value of Reddit's comprehensive dataset is expected to grow. The interest shown by companies like Google underscores just how compelling and insightful this data can be—it provides a unique window into the breadth of human curiosity and conversation.
RDDT Remains Pricey but Poised to Deliver
Following a significant decline from its $230 peak, the stock now trades at approximately 11x sales and 81x earnings per share (EPS), based on 2025 consensus estimates. While these valuation multiples may appear elevated, they are more justifiable than they seem.
Reddit's revenue is expected to grow by 42% this year, reaching record levels as the company anticipates its first profitable year. Moreover, analysts forecast an 83% increase in EPS for fiscal year 2026—from $1.24 in FY2025—highlighting Reddit's rapid scaling and improving profit margins.
Is Reddit a Buy, Sell, or Hold?
Following the stock's extended sell-off, Wall Street now seems rather optimistic about Reddit. RDDT stock features a Moderate Buy consensus rating, with 12 analysts currently bullish, eight neutral, and just one bearish. Reddit's average stock price target of $149.35 indicates a significant upside potential of almost 37% over the coming twelve months.
A Bet on Reddit's Bright Future
Reddit's evolution from a grassroots online forum to a publicly traded company with a $19 billion market capitalization is truly impressive. The recent pullback to $103 appears to be more of a temporary pause than a long-term setback. Backed by strong user growth, a robust advertising business, and an increasingly valuable data licensing segment, Reddit is positioning itself for long-term success.
My positive outlook is rooted in the fact that this is more than just a traditional social media investment, though that's a space I continue to believe in, as reflected in my conviction in Meta Platforms (META). Reddit represents a broader opportunity centered on community engagement, data monetization, and platform innovation. In my view, the current dip presents a compelling entry point ahead of what could be the company's next phase of growth.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gen Z is increasingly turning to ChatGPT for affordable on-demand therapy, but licensed therapists say there are dangers many aren't considering
Gen Z is increasingly turning to ChatGPT for affordable on-demand therapy, but licensed therapists say there are dangers many aren't considering

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gen Z is increasingly turning to ChatGPT for affordable on-demand therapy, but licensed therapists say there are dangers many aren't considering

Examples of people using ChatGPT for therapy have proliferated online, with some claiming that talking to a chatbot every day has helped them more than years of therapy. Licensed professionals say that while AI could be helpful in aiding work with a licensed therapist, there are countless pitfalls to using ChatGPT for therapy. ChatGPT has turned into the perfect therapist for many people: It's an active 'listener' that digests private information. It appears to empathize with users, some would argue, as well as professionals can. Plus, it costs a fraction of the price compared to most human therapists. While many therapists will charge anywhere from up to $200—or even more—per one-hour session, you can have unlimited access to ChatGPT's most advanced models for $200 per month. Yet, despite the positive anecdotes you can read online about using ChatGPT as a therapist, as well as the convenience of having a therapist that's accessible via almost any internet-enabled computer or phone at any time of day, therapists warn ChatGPT can't replace a licensed professional. In a statement to Fortune, a spokesperson for ChatGPT-maker OpenAI said the LLM often suggests seeking professional advice to users who discuss topics like personal health. ChatGPT is a general-purpose technology that shouldn't serve as a substitute for professional advice, according to its terms of service, the spokesperson added. On social media, anecdotes about the usefulness of AI therapy are plentiful. People report the algorithm is level-headed and provides soothing responses that are sensitive to the nuances of a person's private experiences. In a viral post on Reddit, one user said ChatGPT has helped them 'more than 15 years of therapy.' The patient, whose identity could not be confirmed by Fortune, claimed that despite previous experience with inpatient and outpatient care, it was daily chats with OpenAI's LLM that best helped them address their mental health. 'I don't even know how to explain how much this has changed things for me. I feel seen. I feel supported. And I've made more progress in a few weeks than I did in literal years of traditional treatment,' the user wrote. In a comment, another user got to the root of AI's advantages over traditional therapy: its convenience. 'I love ChatGPT as therapy. They don't project their problems onto me. They don't abuse their authority. They're open to talking to me at 11pm,' the user wrote. Others on Reddit noted that even the most upgraded version of ChatGPT at $200 per month was a steal compared to the more than $200 per session for traditional therapy without insurance. Alyssa Peterson, a licensed clinical social worker and CEO of MyWellBeing, said AI therapy has its drawbacks, but it may be helpful when used alongside traditional therapy. Using AI to help work on tools developed in therapy, such as battling negative self-talk, could be helpful for some, she said. Using AI in conjunction with therapy can help a person diversify their approach to mental health, so they're not using the technology as their sole truth. Therein lies the rub: Relying too heavily on a chatbot in stressful situations could hurt people's ability to deal with problems on their own, Peterson said. In acute cases of stress, being able to deal with and alleviate the problem without external help is healthy, Peterson added. But AI can, in some cases, outperform licensed professionals with its compassionate responses, according to research from the University of Toronto Scarborough published in the journal Communications Psychology. Chatbots aren't affected by the 'compassion fatigue' that can hit even experienced professionals over time, the study claims. Despite its endurance, an AI chatbot may be unable to provide more than surface-level compassion, one of the study's co-authors noted. AI responses also aren't always objective, licensed clinical social worker Malka Shaw told Fortune. Some users have developed emotional attachments to AI chatbots, which has raised concerns about safeguards, especially for underage users. In the past, some AI algorithms have also provided misinformation or harmful information that reinforces stereotypes or hate. Shaw said because it's impossible to tell the biases that go into creating an LLM, it's potentially dangerous for impressionable users. In Florida, the mother of 14-year-old Sewell Setzer sued an AI chatbot platform, for negligence, among other claims, after Setzer committed suicide following a conversation with a chatbot on the platform. Another lawsuit against in Texas claimed a chatbot on the platform told a 17-year-old with autism to kill his parents. A spokesperson for declined to comment on pending litigation. The spokesperson said any chatbots labeled as 'psychologist,' 'therapist,' or 'doctor,' include language that warns users not to rely on the characters for any type of professional advice. The company has a separate version of its LLM for users under the age of 18, the spokesperson added, which includes protections to prevent discussions of self-harm and redirect users to helpful resources. Another fear professionals have is that AI could be giving faulty diagnoses. Diagnosing mental health conditions is not an exact science; it is difficult to do, even for an AI, Shaw said. Many licensed professionals need to accrue years of experience to be able to accurately diagnose patients consistently, she told Fortune. 'It's very scary to use AI for diagnosis, because there's an art form and there's an intuition,' Shaw said. 'A robot can't have that same level of intuition.' People have shifted away from googling their symptoms to using AI, said Vaile Wright, a licensed psychologist and senior director for the American Psychological Association's office of health care innovation. As demonstrated by the cases with the danger of disregarding common sense for the advice of technology is ever present, she said. The APA wrote a letter to the Federal Trade Commission with concerns about companionship chatbots, especially in the case where a chatbot labels itself as a 'psychologist.' Representatives from the APA also met with two FTC commissioners in January to raise their concerns before they were fired by the Trump administration. 'They're not experts, and we know that generative AI has a tendency to conflate information and make things up when it doesn't know. So I think that, for us, is most certainly the number one concern,' Wright said. While the options aren't yet available, it is possible that, in the future, AI could be used in a responsible way for therapy and even diagnoses, she said, especially for people who can't afford the high price tag of treatment. Still, such technology would need to be created or informed by licensed professionals. 'I do think that emerging technologies, if they are developed safely and responsibly and demonstrate that they're effective, could, I think, fill some of those gaps for individuals who just truly cannot afford therapy,' she said. This story was originally featured on

Star Cement Ltd. (STARCEMENT): New Buy Recommendation for This Basic Materials Giant
Star Cement Ltd. (STARCEMENT): New Buy Recommendation for This Basic Materials Giant

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

Star Cement Ltd. (STARCEMENT): New Buy Recommendation for This Basic Materials Giant

Phillip Securities analyst maintained a Buy rating on Star Cement Ltd. (STARCEMENT – Research Report) yesterday and set a price target of INR270.00. The company's shares closed last Friday at INR217.37. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Star Cement Ltd. has an analyst consensus of Hold. The company has a one-year high of INR247.75 and a one-year low of INR171.55. Currently, Star Cement Ltd. has an average volume of 20.75K.

Elara Securities downgrades Samvardhana Motherson International Limited (MOTHERSON) to a Sell
Elara Securities downgrades Samvardhana Motherson International Limited (MOTHERSON) to a Sell

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

Elara Securities downgrades Samvardhana Motherson International Limited (MOTHERSON) to a Sell

Elara Securities analyst Jay Kale downgraded Samvardhana Motherson International Limited (MOTHERSON – Research Report) to a Sell on May 30 and set a price target of INR129.00. The company's shares closed last Friday at INR153.12. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter According to TipRanks, Kale is a 2-star analyst with an average return of -1.7% and a 33.33% success rate. The word on The Street in general, suggests a Moderate Buy analyst consensus rating for Samvardhana Motherson International Limited with a INR154.67 average price target, which is a 1.01% upside from current levels. In a report released on May 30, Citi also maintained a Sell rating on the stock with a INR130.00 price target. The company has a one-year high of INR217.00 and a one-year low of INR107.30. Currently, Samvardhana Motherson International Limited has an average volume of 1.09M.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store