Is Ukraine planning to hit Moscow? Major threat to Putin as Trump promises Zelensky deadliest long-range weapons, secretly orders....
UK outlet Financial Times published the bombshell, citing sources familiar with the matter. According to the report, Trump quizzed Zelensky about whether Ukraine could strike inside Russia. The conversation allegedly occurred on July 4 — U.S. Independence Day — when Trump directly asked Zelensky if Ukraine could attack Moscow and St. Petersburg. Zelensky answered, 'Absolutely.' The Financial Times reported the incendiary conversation occurred a day after Trump spoke to Russian President Vladimir Putin, a call Trump later described as 'bad.' Where could Ukraine potentially strike inside Russia?
Earlier on Tuesday, Trump announced fresh military support for Ukraine and threatened sweeping tariffs on Russia's trading partners, in a bid to pressure Moscow into ending its war within 50 days, The Hill reported. As per The Hill, Trump unveiled the plan during an Oval Office meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, stating that Europe would bear the cost of advanced American weaponry, including Patriot missile systems, which are vital to defend Kyiv from intensified Russian air assaults.'These weapons can move quickly to Kyiv,' Trump said, while stopping short of offering specific timelines. The move follows NATO's recent decision to boost collective defense spending, the outlet noted. What are Trump's new demands regarding Russia and its allies?
Trump offered a blunt ultimatum. If Russia does not take any steps toward a ceasefire or a peace agreement in the next 50 days, the U.S. will impose sanctions on countries that continue to buy oil and gas from Russia, which includes countries like China and India. As per a joint statement by Graham and Blumenthal, China, India, Brazil, and other nations 'that prop up Putin's war machine' by purchasing 'cheap Russian oil and gas', which that claim is fuelling Putin's effort in the conflict with Russia. It called for the imposition of tariffs as high as 500 per cent on any country that helps Russia. Trump announced 'secondary tariffs' on Russia during his meeting with NATO General Secretary Mark Rutte on Monday (US local time).
Experts believe that Trump's request for Ukraine to hit hard behind Russian lines demonstrates his frustration and rage that he cannot stop Ukraine from the war, and push Russia beyond its ability to wage further conflict against Ukraine. Why could Russia's retaliation lead to NATO invoking Article 5?
Trump has strenuously suggested that he was going to end the war. However, now he is speaking of supplying Ukraine with long-range missiles to hurt Russia and push it back to the negotiation table. Two high-level sources told the Financial Times that there is increasing support from U.S. officials to give Ukraine the long-range missiles.
However, experts caution that if the U.S. were to provide weapons to Ukraine that could strike deep inside Russia and particularly target cities such as Moscow, the situation could become very serious.
Zelensky has wanted to attack inside Russia from the beginning, and America's backing could only propel the world into a catastrophic war. Russia could not only respond to all major Ukrainian cities in retaliation, but it could also target military bases of NATO allies like Poland and Romania. This could create serious discussions within NATO about invoking Article 5, which declares that an attack on one member is an attack on all.
Trump stated that Ukraine would receive weapons worth billions of dollars. He mentioned advanced weapons would be manufactured and sent to NATO as well. He added that Washington's NATO allies would pay for them. These weapons are for Patriot air defense systems to protect Ukraine from counterattack by Russia. Trump also said that the system was a full system with batteries.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
21 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump expected to fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell soon after lawmakers' support
In an unprecedented move that is bound to rattle investors and sow fundamental questions about the independence of monetary policymaking, US President Donald Trump is expected to soon fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. read more In an unprecedented decision that will kill the independent monetary policy of the United States, President Donald Trump is expected to soon fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and replace him with a puppet who would cut interest rates to his liking. Multiple media reports said that Trump has asked Republican lawmakers whether he should fire Powell and indicated to them he wanted to fire him. The New York Times reported that Trump showed a group of Republican lawmakers a draft of a letter firing Powell and asked them if he should go ahead with it. Sources said that he indicated in the meeting that he wanted to go ahead with firing Powell. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Separately, Bloomberg reported a White House official as saying that Trump is likely to fire Powell soon and discussed the matter with Republican lawmakers. For months, Trump has been trashing Powell for not cutting interest rates to his liking. On his part, Powell has insisted that the Fed would cut the interest rate at an appropriate time on the basis of economic metrics and would not follow political directives. Any decision to fire Trump will likely disrupt the markets and shake faith in the US economy. In its history of more than a century, no Chair of the Federal Reserve has been fired by any president. The independence of the Federal Reserve in setting the monetary policy of the country irrespective of the prevailing political environment is the bedrock of the central bank. Undoing the independence could disrupt the markets and set the stage for disastrous monetary policy that prioritises the president's whims and fancies and not economic prudence. The Bloomberg reported that Republican lawmakers with whom Trump discussed the matter supported his move to fire Powell. Under the law, the president may only fire the Federal Reserve Chair for 'cause'. While the law does not define what cause means, legal precedent states that cause compromises inefficiency, negligence of duty, and malfeasance in office, and states that policy disagreements is not a cause for firing. Even though Trump's cause is clearly policy disagreement, he could announce the firing of Powell anyway. He would be confident that any legal challenge to the firing would be dismissed by the conservative majority of the Supreme Court that he has in his pocket. Trump himself appointed three of the Supreme Court judges in his first term who have almost always done his bidding on the bench. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
21 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Donald Trump signals over 10% tariffs in India-US trade deal framework
United States (US) President Donald Trump has said that a trade deal with India would be on the 'same line' as that with Indonesia, which will face a 19 per cent tariff – thus suggesting that India, too, may have to brace for tariffs exceeding the 10 per cent threshold under the proposed interim agreement. On Tuesday, Trump said the bilateral trade pact with Indonesia would result in tariff- and non-tariff-barrier-free access for US goods to the Indonesian market. In exchange, Indonesia will face a 19 per cent tariff on its exports to the US, down from the 32 per cent initially proposed last week. 'We have a couple of those deals that are going to be announced. India basically is working along that same line (as Indonesia). We're going to have access to India; and you have to understand, we had no access into any of these countries. Our people couldn't go in. Now we're getting access because of what we're doing with the tariffs,' Trump told reporters. Trade economist Biswajit Dhar said the 10 per cent base tariff is likely to remain, and India should prepare for higher duties. 'I don't think the 10 per cent tariff will go away. That's the bottom line, with which Trump is negotiating. The rest is up to the President,' he said. 'We should get a deal which doesn't include our sensitive sectors, such as agriculture and dairy. We need to protect our main cereals and the (US) push for exporting GM (genetically modified) crops.' Ajay Srivastava, a former trade ministry official and founder of the Delhi-based think tank Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), warned against rushed negotiations and emphasised the importance of transparency. India must negotiate transparently, guard against one-sided outcomes, and not succumb to pressure for quick, symbolic agreements that compromise its long-term economic interests, he said. 'India must insist on a jointly issued, written statement before acknowledging any agreement. Verbal assurances or informal understandings --especially those announced on social media -- are no substitute for formal, verified commitments.' A team of officials from New Delhi is currently in Washington to negotiate an interim trade agreement ahead of the August 1 deadline. India has been pressing for an exemption from Washington's proposed 26 per cent reciprocal tariff and the existing additional 10 per cent duty. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said that as part of the deal, Indonesia has committed to buying $15 billion in US energy, $4.5 billion in American agricultural products, and 50 Boeing jets, including several 777s. 'For the first time ever, our ranchers, farmers, and fishermen will have complete and total market access to the Indonesian market of over 280 million people,' Trump wrote. 'If there is any transhipment from a higher tariff country, then that tariff will be added on to the tariff that Indonesia is paying,' he added.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
India-US trade deal: India wants Donald Trump administration to offer tariff rate lower than Indonesia; eyes competitive advantage
A negotiating team is in Washington for another round of trade deal talks, with both nations working towards finalizing a tariff rate below 20%. (AI image) India-US trade deal: US President Donald Trump has said that America is eyeing market access into India, on the same lines as the one Indonesia has granted it as part of the trade deal. However, India is looking to seal a trade deal with the US that entails tariff rates lower than the one imposed on Indonesia. On Tuesday, Trump announced an agreement with Indonesia that reduces the tariff rate from 32% - threatened in the tariff letter - to 19%. 'We made a deal with Indonesia. I spoke to their really great we made the deal. We have full access to Indonesia, everything. As you know, Indonesia is very strong on copper, but we have full access to everything. We will pay no tariffs. They are giving us access into Indonesia, which we never had. That's probably the biggest part of the is basically working along that same line,' Trump told reporters. Also Read | Trump tariff war: Deal or no deal - why it won't matter much for India 'We're going to have access into India. You have to understand, we had no access to any of these countries. Our people couldn't go in and now we're getting access because of what we're doing with the tariffs…,' he added. India-US Trade Deal: What Will Be The Tariff Rate? According to a Bloomberg report, Indian officials are working to negotiate a trade agreement with the Trump administration, aiming to secure a more favourable tariff rate than Indonesia's deal before the August 1, 2025 deadline. India is looking at tariff rates more advantageous than both Indonesia's agreement and Vietnam's proposed 20% tariff, officials were quoted as saying. Currently, a negotiating team is in Washington for another round of trade deal talks, with both nations working towards finalizing a tariff rate below 20%. Indian officials believe their position warrants preferential treatment compared to regional counterparts. They maintain that the US distinguishes India from Vietnam and other Southeast Asian countries, which are often viewed as transhipment hubs. Current negotiations suggest India might receive more beneficial tariff terms than these nations, a source familiar with the matter told Bloomberg. Soumya Kanti Ghosh, who serves as the chief economist at State Bank of India, and is part of the prime minister's Economic Advisory Council, indicated that negotiations aim to reduce the tariff to under 10%. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Most Successful Way of Intraday Trading is "Market Profile" TradeWise Learn More Undo "And in the bargain, the US will expect significant concessions for its goods when they decide to enter India," he said. Also Read | 'Going to have access into..': Donald Trump shares update on India-US trade deal after Indonesia tariff agreement; says 'working on same line...' India maintains its stance against opening up its agricultural and dairy sectors, though it might offer concessions in other industrial segments, Ghosh was quoted as saying. The Indian government has put forward a proposal to eliminate tariffs on US industrial products, provided the US reciprocates similarly. Additionally, New Delhi has extended improved market access for select US agricultural products and has suggested increasing its purchases of Boeing Co. aircraft. Trump's Trade Deals Trump has secured trade agreements with the UK and Vietnam, alongside a truce with China, and now Indonesia. The agreement with Jakarta includes commitments to purchase US energy worth $15 billion, agricultural products valued at $4.5 billion, and Boeing aircraft. The US President has sent out tariff letters to over 20 countries warning of new reciprocal tariff rates effective August 1, 2025. According to Brian Tan, an economist at Barclays Plc in Singapore, tariff rates are settling between 15%-20%, aligning with Trump's preferred range. He suggests that the tariff notifications to trading partners serve as a strategic approach to encourage improved offers for the US, enabling the administration to achieve more advantageous agreements. The Star reported that Malaysia's trade minister is awaiting details of the Indonesia agreement whilst continuing negotiations with the US regarding their tariffs. Tengku Zafrul, minister of investment, trade and industry, emphasised in the newspaper: "Most importantly, we must ensure that this is a negotiation beneficial to both countries. It must be win-win." Also Read | India-US trade deal: Will Donald Trump go for less than 20% tariff rate for India? Top 10 developments to track Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
