Tribes say the U.S. misappropriated funds to pay for Native American boarding schools
In the lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, the Wichita Tribe and the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California said that by the U.S. government's own admission, the schools were funded using money raised by forcing tribal nations into treaties to cede their lands. That money was to be held in trust for the collective benefit of tribes.
'The United States Government, the trustee over Native children's education and these funds, has never accounted for the funds that it took, or detailed how, or even whether, those funds were ultimately expended. It has failed to identify any funds that remain,' according to the lawsuit.
The lawsuit was filed against Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Bureau of Indian Education. A spokesperson for the Interior declined to comment on pending litigation.
In 2022, the U.S. Department of the Interior, under the direction of Secretary Deb Haaland, the first Native American to run the agency, released a scathing report on the legacy of the boarding school era, in which Native children were stolen from their homes, forced to assimilate, and in many cases physically, sexually and mentally abused. Countless children died at the schools, many of whom were buried in unmarked graves at the institutions.
That report detailed the U.S. government's intentions of using the boarding schools as a way to both strip Native children of their culture and dispossess their tribal nations of land.
The tribes are asking the court to make the U.S. account for the estimated $23.3 billion it appropriated for the boarding school program, detail how that money was invested, and list the remaining funds that were taken by U.S. and allocated for the education of Native children.
Last year, President Joe Biden issued a formal apology for the government's boarding school policy, calling it 'a sin on our soul' and 'one of the most horrific chapters' in American history. But in April, the administration of President Donald Trump cut $1.6 million from projects meant to capture and digitize stories of boarding school survivors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
DailyMail+ unmasks Trump's true inner circle... and names the 'confidant' who holds the most power
From Cabinet secretaries to Oval Office advisors and Mar-a-Lago confidants, capturing the attention and approval of the world's most powerful man is a daily battle. Donald Trump has surrounded himself with steadfastly loyal family members and obedient allies during his meteoric rise to the White House. Your browser does not support iframes. Your browser does not support iframes.
Times
20 minutes ago
- Times
Has Trump pulled off an amazing deal, or is the worst yet to come?
The Trump administration's flurry of eleventh-hour tariff agreements will raise US protectionism to the highest level in a century. The effective tariff applied on goods entering America will jump from an average of just above 2 per cent at the start of the year to around 18 per cent, according to the Yale Budget Lab. Before its August 1 deadline, the White House signed off tariff agreements that will apply a basic 15 per cent tariffs on goods from the European Union, Japan and South Korea, a higher 35 per cent rate on some Canadian goods, and 39 per cent rate on Switzerland. The UK will be subject to a 10 per cent minimum, while scores of other countries — around 70 — that failed to agree new terms will fall back on the 'reciprocal' levies announced in April. • FTSE 100 slides as markets retreat on new Trump tariffs The expiry of President Trump's deadline marks an unprecedented four months of upheaval in the global economy, where the world's economic superpower has picked apart the rules of globalisation through daily threats of punishing import taxes, de facto capital controls, and financial sanctions on its trading partners. Yet for all the noise about what Trump will announce or un-announce on the rest of the world, the US and global economy enter August in a position not too dissimilar from where they started before Trump's 'liberation day' taxes were unleashed in April. The US economy and labour market have not been plunged into recession, interest rates continue to fall in most advanced economies, and equity markets have reversed their April wobbles to touch record highs in the US, UK, and Europe. This relatively benign outcome has led some to conclude that Trump has won the first battle in his trade war: the US is dismantling the global trading system and dictating humiliating terms to its erstwhile allies with minimum damage to its economy or financial stability so far. • Investors fleeing US equities boost unloved London market To add to the euphoria, the effective 18 per cent tariff rate on the rest of the world will generate around $450-500 billion in federal tax revenues for Trump — worth more than 1.25 per cent of the US economy and significant source of fiscal relief in a country where the budget deficit was on course to stick at 7 per cent of GDP. 'The US has emerged as a clear winner in the trade war at this juncture,' Mark Dowding, chief investment officer at RBC BlueBay Asset Management, said. 'There is a feeling that Trump has extracted pretty much every concession he would have hoped for in the trade negotiations conducted to date. In the absence of material retaliatory tariffs, this has been viewed as a great result for the US.' Dowding added that then 'worries that Trump was undermining US policy credibility have been replaced by a grudging sense of respect for the negotiator-in-chief'. This reassessment is best reflected in the value of the dollar which is heading for its strongest week in three years. The US currency, which has been the chosen market proxy for worries about US policy credibility, has recovered 1.5 per cent from the trough hit at the end of June. The greenback remains around 9 per cent weaker against major currencies this year and is still having its worst year since the dollar became a free-floating currency liberated from gold in 1972. • Copper price drops a fifth after Trump waters down tariff The performance of the US stock market has been even more striking. After the worst start to a new presidency in a century, US equities have outperformed all main peers since April 21, reflecting the 'Goldilocks' state of an economy that is 'not too hot, and not too cold', Will Denyer at Gavekal Research said. Trump's tariffs strategy has been emboldened by 'hard' economic data this week which showed the US the economy bounced back strongly with a 3 per cent annualised GDP expansion in the second quarter, after a 0.5 per cent contraction at the start of the year. Signs of tariff-induced inflation are also scarcely showing up in monthly price data, and while the labour market is slowing, demand for workers remains far above historical averages. The tariffs deadline also coincided with another bumper week of corporate earnings for American tech and AI giants that has charged up US market bulls. It's not just investors who are relieved at the state of the world at the start of August. The International Monetary Fund this week gave modest growth upgrades to most developing world economies, including the US, acknowledging that after the burst of tariff fears, the probable landing spot for American protectionism is likely to be lower than first feared. Even the US Federal Reserve, the country's beleaguered central bank, is inclined to think that tariffs are likely to have a one-time impact on raising American consumer prices, rather than marking the start of a new burst of inflation that triggers higher wages. • How Trump is delivering his pledges after 200 days Outside the US, growth forecasts for big economies that capitulated to Trump's demands are not being revised down drastically. The EU economy could still outperform forecasts as Germany's mass spending counteracts part of the hit from Trump's trade war. Goldman Sachs this week revised up Europe's GDP projections by 0.1 percentage points to 1.2 per cent this year and 1.3 per cent in 2025, after the bloc agreed to a broad 15 per cent tariff rate that will initially cover pharmaceuticals. Economists, however, are still divided over whether the resilience of the US and world economy means the tariff pain has simply been delayed, or whether there are other factors at play that will lead to an altogether more benign outcome for America and its trading partners. The widely held assumption among most forecasters is still that American households and businesses will suffer the brunt of higher import taxes, supply chain disruption, and the frozen investment as a result of the barrage of protectionism. On the flip side, the White House points to the 2018 tariffs episode as 'proof' that levies have no lasting effect on consumer prices and they did not prevent the US becoming the fastest growing economy in the G7 for the past two years. Freya Beamish, chief economist at TS Lombard, thinks market exuberance will come to a halt as US 'data over the next six months will be a rude awakening'. • Trump announces 90-day pause to higher tariffs on Mexico 'Inflation dynamics are deteriorating. Right now, it's as if the market actually believes that tariffs are going to be paid by the rest of the world and that Trump has pulled off some amazing deal. We've heard hitherto serious economists making such claims and can only assume they have taken leave of their senses. Unfortunately, the stock market reaction is likely to embolden the administration into further damaging policy moves,' she said. Looking ahead, few trade experts or diplomats expect Trump to stick to his word on his set tariff rates as the likes of the EU and Japan have been bounced into making investment pledges — like buying fanciful amounts of US energy — that they simply cannot meet. Even more worryingly, the president has shown he is willing to use the tariff stick against countries over any policy disagreements — over security, foreign policy, and in the case of Brazil, domestic court procedures against a former president. 'These are very high level deals that have been announced. A lot of work is going to have to go into filling the blanks,' Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas, chief economist at the IMF, warned.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
US judge whose son was murdered voices dismay as threats to jurists rise
A judge whose son was murdered by a disgruntled lawyer posing as a pizza deliveryman voiced anguish that the crime has spawned a spate of copycat threats against other jurists. Esther Salas, a US district judge for New Jersey, fought back tears on Thursday after being asked to respond to a trend of judges receiving home pizza deliveries with the name of her late son attached as a means of intimidation. Salas's son, Daniel, then aged 20, was shot dead on his doorstep on 19 July 2020 by a man who had ostensibly been delivering a pizza to his family's home. Her husband, Mark, survived critical injuries after being shot multiple times in the attack. The suspect, Den Hollander, an attorney who was subsequently found dead from a self-inflicted gunshot wound, had earlier appeared in Salas's court in a case which he lost. 'I'm probably a little more emotional today than ever, because we're in July,' she told a webinar, titled Speak Up for Justice, discussing the rising tide of violent threats against judges. 'July is a hard month because Daniel would have been 25 on July 13, and we celebrated his murder – not celebrated, had to endure the anniversary of his murder, his fifth anniversary, on July 19.' 'Then to hear that my beautiful son's name, everything that Danny stands for is love and light – and to hear people using it as a weapon, weaponizing his name to inflict fear,' she added. Thursday's forum was held to address an intensifying atmosphere of menace and intimidation that judges describe facing since Donald Trump returned to the White House in January. It included judges who had been threatened directly after ruling against some of Trump's most contentious policies and executive orders. Several participants called the current hostile environment 'unprecedented'. Salas was speaking after two fellow judges, John McConnell, a US district judge from Rhode Island, and Robert Lasnik, who sits on the western district of Washington, said they had both received pizzas in Daniel's name. McConnell described receiving a threatening voice message calling for his assassination after arousing anger among Donald Trump's supporters with a ruling that blocked the president's attempt to freeze funding to states. The expletive-laden recording was played to the webinar. McConnell's ruling led to articles being lodged in Congress calling for his impeachment. A wanted poster with his face and name on it was placed inside the US Capitol, apparently by a member of Congress. McConnell said his court had received about 400 or 500 'vile phone' calls following the ruling – which triggered a formal complaint by America First Legal, an advocacy group founded by Trump's deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller as well as six credible death threats. He was initially puzzled by the unexplained pizza deliveries until the US marshalls, which protect members of the federal judiciary, explained it, prompting him to call Salas. 'They wanted to let us know that they knew where we lived,' McConnell said. 'The most devastating, the most heartbreaking call I've ever had to make was when the marshals called me and told me that a pizza had been delivered in … Daniel's name. I didn't want to make that call. But I called my friend Esther because I thought she needed to know what was going on and we had a good cry over it.' He added: 'Someone was on the dark web, searching for my home address, because - this a quote, 'He wanted Smith and Wesson to pay me a visit at my home.'' Lasnik said pizzas had been delivered to his home in Seattle while two of his adult children, who lives in different cities, had also received deliveries – all in Salas's son's name – after he went on national media to criticize the climate of intimidation aimed at judges. 'What's the message to Judge Lasnik? We know where you live. We know where your children live and they could end up dead just like Judge Salas's son. That's a pretty cruel thing to do.' Pizzas had been sent to 'upwards of 50' judges, he told the forum. Referring to the threats against judges generally, he said: 'They would make a ruling, they would be bombarded with hate mail and hate emails and threats. And it's so discouraging to a young judge to suddenly not only worry about, how do I do this job, right, but how do I keep my family safe?' John Coughenour, also a judge from Washington and who issued a preliminary injunction against Trump's executive order limiting birthright citizenship, described how local sheriff's officers arrived at his home with weapons drawn following a 'swatting' call falsely stating he had murdered his wife. John Roberts, the chief justice of the US supreme court has twice spoken out against threats against judges in recent months, warning that it is undermining the rule of law. He warned against the trend in his end of year report in 2024, and reiterated it at a forum in North Carolina last month, voicing fears that it could lead to violence. While there have been past criticisms of Democratic rhetoric against rulings – notably against Chuck Schumer, the party's leader in the Senate – Trump and his supporters have raised the ante since his inauguration in January. Judges have been repeatedly assailed as 'radical', 'Marxists', or faced calls for their impeachment over rulings that stymied administration policies. Salas said the current climate went beyond previous threat levels. 'We've seen it come from both sides, but now it's at a level that I have to honestly say … is different,' she said. 'We're seeing things coming out from the top down, from White House spokespeople calling us crazy leftist, unconstitutional judges. That's the difference. We are nonpartisan, but we have to speak the facts. 'And the facts are that we have political leaders with large social platforms, with power calling us deranged and idiots. It's wrong whoever does it, whatever side you sit on.' Additional reporting by Sam Levine
