logo
Will Supercars Really Go Electric? Maserati COO Ficili Thinks Not Yet

Will Supercars Really Go Electric? Maserati COO Ficili Thinks Not Yet

Forbesa day ago
Despite some negative predictions, electric vehicle sales are still growing. The targets may have slipped due to a few unexpected global shocks, but the long-term trajectory is clear: most personal vehicle markets are heading inexorably towards electrification. However, one type of EV isn't selling as well as expected – electric supercars. A particularly telling sign of this was when premium Italian brand Maserati cancelled the electric version of its flagship supercar, the MC20. I talked to Maserati COO Santo Ficili about why this happened and what it means for the future of premium performance EVs.
Enter The Maserati MCPura
Instead of an electric MC20, at the Festival of Speed in the UK in July, Maserati launched an updated version of the existing car called the MCPura. 'The world is changing, so we need to serve our customer,' says Ficili. 'At this moment, we don't see particular demand for an electric supercar. The project is stopped for the moment, but we started already with the investment, so we will see in the future.' Ficili still considers caring for the environment as important and worthwhile with other models in its range. 'We have the Grecale, GranTurismo and GranCabrio Folgore.'
However, even the GranTurismo and GranCabrio Folgore are meeting with a tepid sales reception. In a separate conversation, Maserati's European Head Luca Parasacco told me that customers were not convinced about choosing either over their similarly priced fossil fuel-powered versions, even though these are not as powerful. 'This is a unique selling proposition,' says Filici, referring to the fact you can buy a Maserati GranTurismo or GranCabrio with either electric power or a V6. 'We are the only automaker offering this choice to our potential customers. I'm sure that we can improve the mix of BEV. But following the specific request of our customers is fundamental. We can't force them to move from internal combustion to BEV.'
Electrification can make for a thrilling driving experience, despite the lack of noise. I've been lucky enough to get behind the wheel of the two million Euro ($2.3 million) Rimac Nevera and it's the best car I've ever driven. Maserati's own GranTurismo and GranCabrio Folgore also provide an incredible driving experience, with immense power and handling allied with comfortable grand touring, depending on your mood at the time.
However, once you get into the territory of car buyers where money is no object, green credentials aren't really the point. A Rimac Nevera with 2,000hp that can hit 60mph in under 1.8 seconds is not there to save the planet, and neither is a Maserati GranTurismo with 760hp that takes 2.7 seconds. This is perhaps why Mate Rimac, the man behind the Nevera, who is now CEO of Bugatti, created a car that still has a combustion engine with the forthcoming Tourbillon. If you've got millions to spend on a car that you probably won't drive that much, it's all about the experience, rather than emissions – another point made by Maserati's Parasacco.
'Maserati is a luxury brand, and there is a difference between a premium brand and a luxury brand,' argues Filici. He explains that while the driving experience of the GranTurismo and GranCabrio is excellent, even on a track, their 'autonomy' (ie freedom to go anywhere, rather than meaning self-driving) is constrained by the amount of battery that can be installed due to space and weight limitations, and the still patchy charging network in many countries. This is a drawback for cars aimed at grand touring, even if they also offer extremely fast charging, as the Maseratis do. 'Our customers pay a lot of money, and we need to ensure the right autonomy. We are working on this.'
Should A Maserati Be A V8?
It's not just electrification that is proving problematic. Even Maserati's switch from its traditional V8 to the excellent V6 Nettuno met with concerns from purists. 'Customers are asking for the V8, but we need to respect the environment, and moving from the V8 to V6 goes in this direction. We need to develop engines continuously, and the V6 Nettuno is a good engine coming from Formula One. Everything is related to the performance of the car, in the soul of the Maserati brand. You can drive the MC20, like the GranTurismo and GranTurismo, in a grand tourism way. The cars are easy to drive, but as soon as you want power, you can push the throttle and have the power you need. People are complaining about the lack of a V8, but the V6 is not a step backwards.'
Nevertheless, the MCPura appears to be a reassertion of traditional Maserati heritage. 'We worked a lot around the name, because in the past, we had the MC12, referring to the kind of engine,' says Ficili. 'The MC20 refers to the fact that we launched the car in 2020. Now we want to do something different. An MC is the pure Maserati. Pura is the perfect name to represent the sense of the peak of our MC20.'
This is all part of a reinvigoration of the Italian brand. Ficili has been COO of Maserati for less than a year and is also CEO of Alfa Romeo. On arrival, he restructured his team. 'Then we immediately began looking at the current range, starting from the Grecale, GT, GC, MC, to MCXtrema,' he says. 'What can we do immediately? So new color, new interior, new wheels, everything that is easy to do. Next, we work on the competitiveness. The situation is not easy right now due to tariffs. We are trying to understand what is going to happen.'
The tariff uncertainty in America has been as problematic for Maserati as for other luxury brands selling into this lucrative region. 'The American market is fundamental for us,' says Ficili. 'We are delivering something close to 50% of our volume there, so we are paying a lot of attention to understanding the future following the decisions of President Trump.'
'In parallel, we are creating the future of Maserati,' Fucili adds. He currently won't reveal any details on this future other than that he has confidence in Maserati's plans. 'We need to keep Maserati where this brand deserves to be, considering the glory, the story, the legacy, that is unique in the world,' he says. 'Together with Alfa Romeo, we have this fantastic narrative. We need to start from this, imagining, dreaming a new future.'
Does Maserati Still Have An Electric Future?
This still leaves a big question mark over Maserati's plans for electrification, considering how negative the current US administration is towards EVs and anything to do with sustainability. 'We don't know what is going to happen the future,' says Ficili. 'I'm not sure that the transition from the current situation to BEV will be so fast as we were imagining two or three years ago, but that's still the direction. We don't have any other choice.'
Some parts of the luxury market seem like a more natural fit for EVs than sports cars. An electrified Rolls Royce like the Spectre is perfect – smooth, quiet, and effortlessly quick. Most buyers of this kind of brand don't purchase them to hear engine noise. Even with the internal combustion versions, you can barely detect the motor.
Ficili thinks the current range of engine choices is confusing for buyers. 'We need to change the brain of the potential customer, because now they must understand the difference between BEV, HEV, MHEV, plugin hybrids, internal combustion, diesel,' he says. 'If you test the GranTurismo Folgore compared with the IC, it's mostly the same. It's a question of how you are going to use the car. There is a question of residual value, too. Because no one knows what the future value of BEVs will be.'
There was some talk of Maserati being spun off parent company Stellantis again, but Ficili is quick to deny these rumors. 'Maserati will be part of Stellantis range,' he says. 'It's the only real Italian luxury brand in the group. Everything is done in Italy. Design, production, everything in Modena. This will be forever the heart of Maserati. That's the reason why we are moving the production of GranTurismo and GranCabrio from Torino to Modena, coming back home, where we have the competencies of our people - blue collar and white collar. That will be forever the lineage and positioning in the brand. Coming back to our glory story, our legacy of racing that is part of the DNA of Maserati. We need to start from this story to create the future of this brand – our heritage. We do need to fix the economics first and make money. After that, the sky's the limit.' How much of that sky will be electric remains to be seen.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘No sign' Trump tariffs on Scotch whisky will increase, says Ian Murray
‘No sign' Trump tariffs on Scotch whisky will increase, says Ian Murray

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘No sign' Trump tariffs on Scotch whisky will increase, says Ian Murray

The Scottish Secretary of State has said 'there is no sign at the moment' tariffs imposed on Scotch whisky will increase to 25% as he expressed his 'disappointment' in the current US deal arrangement for the sector. Ian Murray also told BBC Radio Scotland's Sunday Show that Donald Trump's admiration of Scotland should be 'exploited' for the sake of the 'national interest'. The US President has so far agreed a 10% tariffs on UK exports and 15% on EU ones. Across the Scotch whisky sector, there are concerns that this deal - which is believed to be costing the industry £4m a week - will lead to significant harm for businesses. READ MORE: Scotch whisky hopes rise after Trump pledges to talk tariffs Trump talks of 'great love' for Scotland during visit 'Scotland must switch whisky exports from America to Canada' The Secretary of State is currently leading a UK Government delegation to Germany this week to 'increase economic ties' with the EU. Mr Murray said it was important to point out that trade deals with the likes of EU and India, the largest growing economy in the world, will provide a 'great opportunity' for Scotch whisky. Yet, earlier on the programme, Scotland's public finance minister Ivan McKee warned that 25% tariffs could be imposed next year as a deal previously reached with America on temporary duty reliefs could be lifted. Between October 2019 and March 2021, the tariff imposed as a result of the Boeing dispute resulted in £600 million in lost Scotch whisky exports. A deal was eventually reached in 2021 to take the 25% tariff off the industry. However, Mr McKee said: 'That was done on a temporary basis and that runs out next year so it's really important that it is taken out of the picture permanently because when that was in place, that was a significant hamper to Scotch whisky exports. 'As the UK Government concludes the deal with the US Government, we would expect it to be 10% tariffs on whisky which is clearly something we wish wasn't there.' Mr McKee said he would hope this was not re-imposed but added: 'There's nothing but unpredictability when it comes to Donald Trump and tariffs so who knows what's happening.' However, Mr Murray insisted it is unlikely this would happen. Asked how likely it would be for 25% tariffs to be re-imposed on Scotch whisky, Mr Murray said: 'There is no sign of that at the moment.' He added: 'It's 10% tariffs on Scottish whisky. Yes, we would rather that was as close to zero as possible but ten percent is as low as anybody else in the world right now." Mr Murray said the Prime Minister Keir Starmer has been able to 'reset international relationships' to do a deal with the US on tariffs. He said: 'Many, including the First Minister, wanted us to walk away from the US president but it was really important in the national interest and in the Scottish national interest for us to have that relationship to do that deal. '10% is the lowest tariff in the world. We did the first trade deal it saved the steel industry, the car industry. 'Yes, 10% tariffs on Scotch whisky is disappointing and we will continue to champion the cause for the really unique position of whisky. "We don't want it to be subject to historic trade wars as it has been in the past. It is a really thriving industry.' Speaking about the US president's visit to Scotland, Mr Murray said it was a 'great privilege' to when he landed in the country last week. He said he was in 'no doubt' of Mr Trump's 'great love of Scotland', adding: 'That is something we should exploit in the national interest.' During his visit to Scotland, President Trump promised to 'take a look' at tariffs on Scotch whisky during his meeting with Starmer as he said he wanted Scotland "to thrive". Since then, however, no changes have been made to the current arrangement. Speaking on the radio today, the Secretary of State also said Mr Trump suggested he should join him at the press conference beside Air Force One when he arrived in the country, however, the Secretary of State declined. Mr Murray said: 'He did tap me on the shoulder and said, 'let's go and do this press conference together' which I declined…because it's not for me to do so. 'I don't think it was for me to speak to the American press pack who is travelling on Air Force One with the President of the United States.'

Why Keir Starmer is outdoing the EU when it comes to dealing with Donald Trump
Why Keir Starmer is outdoing the EU when it comes to dealing with Donald Trump

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why Keir Starmer is outdoing the EU when it comes to dealing with Donald Trump

As Ursula von der Leyen left Scotland last weekend with the ink still drying on the US/ EU trade deal she had just signed with Trump, the reception in European capitals was beyond gloomy. After all the posturing, threats of counter tariffs, Ms von der Leyen had signed a deal which was roundly criticised by a long line of leaders including German chancellor Friedrich Merz, who said the agreement would "substantially damage" his nation's finances, and French prime minister Francois Bayrou, who described it as tantamount to "submission". Hungary's Viktor Orban, an outspoken critic of the EU leadership, said Trump "ate von der Leyen for breakfast". But there was one question which diplomats and government heads were asking all over Europe: 'How did Keir Starmer get a better deal than us?' Not only is the EU still paying 15 per cent tariffs, but it now has agreed to spend billions purchasing energy resources from the US. This compared to the 10 per cent tariffs for the UK. 'Featherweight' Ursula von der Leyen A seasoned diplomat of an EU member state told The Independent that there was 'anger' about what had happened. The fact that the UK 'appears to be rewarded for Brexit' also really stung. But what was more worrying was that the EU supposed collective muscle had failed to produce the goods. Much of the blame has fallen on Ms von der Leyen herself and she is now being referred to as 'the featherweight'. 'She was just not strong enough to take on Trump,' said the diplomat. 'People are just remembering that she was a weak defence minister in the German government, now she is weak as a negotiator.' An insider at Trump's Turnberry golf resort described how the US president was 'in no hurry' to conclude the talks on Saturday. 'He wanted to spend more time talking to paying guests and getting pictures with them,' The Independent was told. 'He was incredibly gracious to everyone there including the staff.' Respect for Starmer But it was a different story with Sir Keir. The insider noted: 'He spoke very warmly of Starmer. He genuinely likes him. I think he respects Starmer for standing up for himself and being straightforward and honest. Trump does not like a complete sycophant. 'In Keir he sees a decent man which the public in the UK don't seem to see at all.' This seemed to not only touch on trade issues but also the problems in the Middle East. When Emmanuel Macron declared France would recognise a Palestinian state he was savaged by Trump's secretary of state Marco Rubio. When Canadian PM Mark Carney did the same Trump himself said it would threaten their trade deal. But when Starmer did it, Trump effectively greenlit the decision and said he was fine with it. The personal relationship between Starmer and Trump was vital in getting that done. But there was more. One Washington insider close to the White House told The Independent: 'Trump does not want any trouble with the UK until after he had a successful state visit in September.' They predicted: 'The relationship with Starmer will eventually fall apart over censorship – online harms bill, digital services taxes, illegal migration, Palestine, and Labour's capitulation to Islamism.' However, that might not be the case. The key to UK diplomacy with the US is King Charles III and the Prince of Wales, with the US president's reverence of the royal family keeping the show on the road. One source said: 'The King and Trump are actually very close.' Meanwhile he 'has spoken a lot' to Prince William, who he met at the reopening of Notre Dame cathedral in Paris. Mandelson works the room Added to that though has been the work of Lord Mandelson as the UK's ambassador in Washington DC. Having almost had his credentials rejected over links to China, Mandelson has been 'working hard to meet everyone and build relations'. 'He is one of the big reasons the UK did well out of the trade deal,' a source said. He is also been central to ensuring that the state visit in September by Trump is 'a big success'. One DC insider said: 'Currently Lord Mandelson is probably the most effective ambassador in Washington at the moment. He seems to know everybody.' Sir Keir will be hoping that this will all prove to be enough to maintain the preferential treatment he seems to be enjoying as a world leader with the US at the moment.

Professor Coin: What Gives Bitcoin Its Value?
Professor Coin: What Gives Bitcoin Its Value?

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Professor Coin: What Gives Bitcoin Its Value?

Professor Andrew Urquhart is Professor of Finance and Financial Technology and Head of the Department of Finance at Birmingham Business School (BBS). This is the eighth installment of the Professor Coin column, in which I bring important insights from published academic literature on cryptocurrencies to the Decrypt readership. In this article, I discuss what gives Bitcoin value. In just over a decade, Bitcoin has gone from a niche innovation in cryptography to a globally traded asset with a market capitalization in the hundreds of billions. Yet despite its prominence, a persistent question remains: what gives Bitcoin its value? Bitcoin doesn't generate cash flow like a company, isn't backed by physical reserves like gold, and has no central authority guaranteeing its worth. So why are people willing to pay tens of thousands of dollars for a digital token? Recent academic research points to several factors. Scarcity and Monetary Policy The first pillar of Bitcoin's value is its programmed scarcity. Bitcoin has a fixed supply: only 21 million coins will ever be created. This limit is enforced by the network's consensus rules and is viewed by supporters as a bulwark against inflation. Academic studies have likened Bitcoin to gold because of this scarcity. Pagnotta and Buraschi (2018) model Bitcoin as a decentralized network whose value stems from user adoption and security, both of which are underpinned by the incentives embedded in its monetary policy. In their equilibrium framework, scarcity plays a key role in sustaining long-term value. Why is Bitcoin's supply limit set to 21 million? Scarcity makes Bitcoin attractive as a hedge against inflation, particularly in a world of expanding money supply. A number of economists have investigated whether Bitcoin's scarcity can explain its valuation with Kruger, Meyer, and Withagen (2022) showing the widely discussed stock-to-flow model fits historical data reasonably well, reaffirming the importance of scarcity as one component of Bitcoin's perceived value. Network Effects and Utility Scarcity is not sufficient without demand—and Bitcoin's demand comes from its use as a peer-to-peer digital asset and from the belief that others will accept it in the future. This is where network effects come into play. According to Cong, Li, and Wang (2021) Bitcoin's value grows with its user base. Their tokenomics model shows that the more people adopt and trust Bitcoin, the more valuable the network becomes. This dynamic helps explain why Bitcoin has survived multiple boom-and-bust cycles. Furthermore, Bolt and van Oordt (2016) argue that the value of a virtual currency arises if users expect it to retain value and be accepted in transactions. Their model formalizes how expectations of acceptance can stabilize a volatile asset like Bitcoin. Cost of Production and Network Security Bitcoin is also underpinned by a real-world cost: mining. To secure the network and process transactions, Bitcoin relies on a system called proof-of-work, where miners compete to solve cryptographic puzzles using electricity and hardware. This energy-intensive process is not without controversy, but researchers such as Hayes (2015) have shown that the cost of production provides a fundamental floor for Bitcoin's price. He finds that Bitcoin rarely trades below the marginal cost of mining, reinforcing the idea that energy and security provision matter for valuation. Moreover, the work of Pagnotta and Buraschi (2018) supports this by showing that mining incentives and the strength of the network's security are central to Bitcoin's equilibrium value, not just supply and demand in the traditional sense. Speculation, Sentiment, and Attention In practice, however, Bitcoin's price also reflects investor sentiment and speculation. A surge in media coverage or social media buzz can trigger price rallies or sharp selloffs. Studies by Urquhart (2018) and Shen et al (2019) demonstrate that Bitcoin prices are strongly correlated with online search trends and that trading volume in turn, drives investor attention. Similarly, Liu and Tsyvinski (2021) show that cryptocurrency returns are significantly predicted by investor attention proxies. Unlike traditional assets, Bitcoin lacks ties to macroeconomic fundamentals, so sentiment and belief play an outsized role. Macroeconomic Role and Portfolio Demand Bitcoin's value is also shaped by its role in the broader financial system. In a low-interest-rate environment and amid concerns about fiat currency debasement, investors have turned to Bitcoin as a non-sovereign store of value. This is demonstrated by early work by Baur et al (2018) who show that investors are holding Bitcoin for long periods, but is supported by followup work by Jahanshahloo et al (2025). Recent research has reassessed Bitcoin's role in portfolios, particularly in times of market stress. Corbet, Larkin, and Lucey (2020) find that Bitcoin behaves more like a speculative asset than a traditional safe haven, but it can act as a weak diversifier under certain market conditions. In a similar vein, Ji, Bouri, Lau, and Roubaud (2021) use time-varying spillover models and show that Bitcoin's hedging properties fluctuate significantly, with greater hedging effectiveness during tranquil periods rather than during crises. Professor Coin: Can Bitcoin Replace Gold? Conclusion: Value from Code, Community, and Belief Bitcoin's value emerges from a blend of engineering and economics: scarcity enforced by code, utility derived from decentralized consensus, and demand shaped by sentiment, costs, and macro conditions. It behaves like a commodity, a tech stock, and a speculative token—often all at once. That complexity is what makes Bitcoin both so fascinating and so difficult to value with traditional models. In the end, Bitcoin's worth is anchored not in what it does today, but in what its users believe it can become tomorrow. And as long as that belief persists—backed by utility, adoption, and incentives—the value may persist too. References Baur, D. G., Hong, K-H., Lee, A. D. (2018). Bitcoin: Medium of exchange or speculative assets? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 54, 177-189. Bolt, W., & van Oordt, M. R. C. (2016). On the Value of Virtual Currencies. Journal of Financial Stability, 17, 81–91. Cong, L. W., Li, Y., & Wang, N. (2021). Tokenomics: Dynamic Adoption and Valuation. Review of Financial Studies, 34(3), 1105–1155. Corbet, S., Larkin, C., & Lucey, B. (2020). The contagion effects of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from gold and cryptocurrencies. Finance Research Letters, 35, 101554. Hayes, A. (2015). A Cost of Production Model for Bitcoin. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1308–1321. Jahanshahloo, H., Irresbeger, F., Urquhart, A. (2025). Bitcoin under the microscope. British Accounting Review, forthcoming. Ji, Q., Bouri, E., Lau, C. K. M., & Roubaud, D. (2021). Dynamic connectedness and integration in cryptocurrency markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 74, 101670. Kruger, P., Meyer, C., & Withagen, P. (2022). Is Bitcoin's Stock-to-Flow Model Valid? Finance Research Letters, 48, 102956 Liu, Y., & Tsyvinski, A. (2018). Risks and Returns of Cryptocurrency. NBER Working Paper No. 24877. Pagnotta, E., & Buraschi, A. (2018). An Equilibrium Valuation of Bitcoin and Decentralized Network Assets. Review of Financial Studies, 31(9), 3498–3531. Shen, D., Urquhart, A., Wang, P. (2019). Does twitter predict Bitcoin? Economics Letters, 174, 118-122. Urquhart, A. (2018). What Causes the Attention of Bitcoin? Economics Letters, 166, 40-44. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store