Polish election frontrunner speaks Europe's language
"He was very well known, not only because he was very talented," Paulo Rangel said during a break from campaigning for his own country's election, referring to their time together as EU lawmakers from 2009.
"He really became very popular... because he was a very easy-going person but at the same time he could speak five languages," he added.
Trzaskowski can communicate in English, French, Spanish, Russian and Italian. His supporters hope his friendships with high-ranking European policymakers like Rangel can further Poland's growing influence in Europe since Prime Minister Donald Tusk succeeded a eurosceptic nationalist in 2023.
But it is also part of the reason some Poles going to vote in the first round of a presidential election on May 18 view him as part of a liberal metropolitan elite whose concerns are far removed from their own.
Trzaskowski paints the vote as a choice between Western liberal values and the rising nationalism across central and eastern Europe, where eurosceptic parties have already won power or are poised to do so.
"These elections are about whether we will be part of the West or part of the East," he told a rally in the northern port city of Szczecin.
"Look where Slovakia is today, where Hungary is, what's happening in the Balkans. Look - this very same battle is happening in Romania... These parties are either pro-Russian or repeat Russian propaganda. They simply don't feel at home in Europe. Why? Because Europe is too positive for them."
His rivals are fighting back.
"He is so European he has forgotten he is Polish," said Marek Suski, a lawmaker from the nationalist opposition Law and Justice (PiS) party.
PiS backs conservative historian and amateur boxer Karol Nawrocki to become president, a role with limited executive powers but the right to veto legislation, in the election, which is likely to go to a second round.
Outgoing PiS President Andrzej Duda has used his power of veto to block many of Tusk's pro-European reforms.
After studying in Oxford and Paris, Trzaskowski wrote a PhD thesis in Warsaw called "The dynamics of reforming the decision-making system of the European Union". He worked as an adviser and an elected member of the European Parliament before becoming Poland's Minister of Administration and Digitalisation and then Deputy Foreign Minister.
As mayor of Warsaw since 2018, he has gained a reputation as a supporter of liberal causes such as LGBT rights.
His critics say he is a deeply polarising figure in a country where many Poles, especially outside the big cities, hold socially conservative views, and they are scathing about his perceived rightward shift during the presidential campaign.
His rivals also say his pro-European stance means he will put the interests of other countries above those of Poland.
His supporters say he is trying to reach out to all sides of the political spectrum.
"His goal is to reduce the polarisation we see in Poland," said Agnieszka Pomaska, a lawmaker from the ruling Civic Coalition (KO) and a member of Trzaskowski's campaign team.
"He's definitely not someone who rejects ideas just because they come from another political camp."
Rangel said Trzaskowski could cement Poland's place as a major player at the heart of European policymaking over the twin challenges of Russia's invasion of Poland's eastern neighbour Ukraine and U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs.
Trzaskowski's international track record "will open a lot of doors," Rangel said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
36 minutes ago
- Sky News
Starmer to meet European leaders for 'coalition of the willing' talks on Ukraine
European leaders who make up the 'coalition of the willing' are set to hold a conference call on Sunday - ahead of crunch talks between Donald Trump and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy next week. The coalition - co-chaired by Sir Keir Starmer, France's President Emmanuel Macron and Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz - has the aim of bringing countries together to protect a peace deal in Ukraine. Top of the agenda at Sunday's meeting will be securing a concrete commitment from Mr Trump on a security guarantee that would act as a powerful backstop in any Russia-Ukraine peacekeeping arrangement. European leaders seemed buoyed by the US president's most recent hints on the subject, in the knowledge that US military might is likely to deter Vladimir Putin from advancing in the future. They will also discuss how to bring Mr Zelenskyy into talks after Mr Trump and Mr Putin's Alaska meeting saw him left out in the cold. In coordinated statements, European leaders said Mr Zelenskyy must play a greater role in future talks, and that peace cannot be achieved without him. The hard bit will be to persuade the unpredictable US administration to change its approach, something that has proved almost impossible in the past. 5:55 When Mr Trump re-entered the White House and made it clear the US would no longer provide a blank cheque to protect peace in Europe, others decided they had to step up, and the 'coalition of the willing' was thrown together in March. Since then, information about the allied peacekeeping effort has been patchy, but we know it includes over 30 countries, which have been asked to pledge whatever military support they can, including troops. 2:21 What has been forthcoming from the group though, has been consistent attempts to use their limited leverage to put pressure on the US. That will continue ahead of crunch talks between Mr Trump and Mr Zelenskyy, which are set to take place in Washington on Monday.
The Guardian
39 minutes ago
- The Guardian
A UK headline wealth tax? It may be simpler to put up existing taxes
Pressure to go further on wealth taxes – by creating new modes of clawing at hoards of hard-to-reach cash – is mounting. For starters, the fiscal picture is looking fairly bleak, with economists estimating that Rachel Reeves must raise £20bn – or even as much as £50bn – to meet her goal of balancing day-to-day spending against the revenue raised from taxation. On the government backbenches, meanwhile, MPs want the chancellor to squeeze the richest in society harder. They even put forward an early day motion last month calling for a 2% annual tax on individual assets over £10m. Yet introducing these kinds of taxes is often not straightforward, with the behaviour of the wealthy being hard to monitor and harder still to predict. The first significant problem is working out where the assets are and who holds them. That has always been difficult and has become even more challenging after one of the most important economic surveys, the household wealth data series, was suspended by the Office for National Statistics because of its low quality. The upshot is that HMRC simply does not know how many millionaires or billionaires there are in the UK. Without reliable figures, it is extremely hard to write policies, cost them and administer them. There is also a battle to be had with an 'old guard with set views' in Whitehall. Whitehall sources paint a picture of a Treasury led by figures influenced by economists whose thinking was prominent at Oxford University in the 1980s and 90s – such as James Mirrlees, Christophe Chamley and Tony Atkinson – leading to something of an orthodox view. In a nutshell, that position is that if you tax capital too much, it will stop investment and hamper growth. Or, in Chamley's words: 'Tax rate on capital income tends to zero in the long run.'. Since this era, the debate within economics has become more nuanced. A growing body of research suggests that some taxation on capital, even at relatively high rates, could lead to greater investment. As it becomes less attractive to hoard wealth because of taxation, risk appetites would then increase in pursuit of higher returns. You might be less tempted to keep your money in a vanilla savings account that can be taxed hard and easily if you can get a much better rate of return – even with a bit more risk – elsewhere. Treasury insiders argue that Reeves has followed the more modern logic, having already taken steps to widen the scope of inheritance and capital gains tax (IHT and CGT). They posit that her reluctance to pursue a headline wealth tax does not mean she has pulled her punches when it comes to taxing wealth. Hostile backbenchers, on the other hand, suggest she follows the old orthodoxy too closely. They often cite her decision to go for relatively small changes in the amounts of tax paid via CGT, rather than bring it more closely in line with income tax at the last budget, which also upset more senior political colleagues. What the debate about how to handle changes to IHT (which have been fiercely opposed by farmers) or CGT illustrates is that if the government really wants to tax wealth more effectively then it has all kinds of ways to do so before opting for a politically – and potentially economically – sensitive route with a headline wealth tax. Yet even changing existing mechanisms might not be easy, when the UK already has one of the highest rates of tax on property and wealth among developed economies, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Political pressure may make it harder to maintain a more gradualist approach, however. Figures on the left of the Labour parliamentary party are attracted to totemic wealth taxes of the kind introduced in Spain – its so-called solidarity tax – and Switzerland. They see it as part of showing a commitment to rebalancing the economy. Reeves is critical of international examples, saying that Switzerland does not have IHT, and that Spain's wealth tax is so riddled with exemptions that it raises too little money. Some developed economies that had comparable wealth taxes have dropped them, too. 'We have inheritance tax. We have capital gains. We've just got rid of the non-dom tax status that doesn't exist anymore in our tax system. So we do have taxes that tax the wealthy,' Reeves said in a recent interview with LBC. Other measures that go further are not yet proven to work, she claims, saying that those who 'come up with simple solutions' must do more to 'explain exactly how it would work, whether it's an ongoing tax, what it would do to tax avoidance, what it would do about people moving or changing the way that their wealth is stored'. Economists argue that the government should focus its energies on raising existing taxes, such as equalising CGT with income tax, for example, or changing gifting rules around IHT first, rather than introduce a novel wealth tax. The Treasury is already examining gifting rules among other possible IHT changes. Yet while Reeves might agree with some of these arguments, it's less clear whether her cabinet colleagues will tolerate a slow and steady approach, particularly if the fiscal picture sours.
Telegraph
39 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain's chemical sector at ‘very high risk', claims credit insurer
Britain's entire chemical sector has been branded 'very high risk' by a leading credit insurer after soaring energy costs triggered a wave of collapses. Coface, a leading global credit insurer, said high energy costs were hammering companies' profit margins and leaving them struggling to pay bills and repair vital equipment. Jonathan Steenberg, Coface's UK economist, said: 'We're seeing slow payments in certain sectors and insolvencies are about 60pc higher than they were before the pandemic. 'To a large degree, energy costs have been the root of this quicker deterioration. It has both first and second order effect, obviously starting with the increase in energy prices, which is also pushing up labour and other costs. It means we have taken the decision to move the chemicals sector up to a very high risk.' Coface specialises in insuring companies against non-payment when selling goods, especially across borders, and in commercial debt collection. The need to assess risk means it also analyses the potential for payment defaults across various industries. Mr Steenberg said it was still offering credit insurance to chemical companies. Britain's chemicals sector employs around 138,000 people directly across 5,000 companies, and supports another 360,000 indirect jobs with exports totalling £61bn. It is also a crucial supplier to other industries, providing the raw materials from which many final products are created. Last week the industry was dealt another major blow after the UK's largest bioethanol plant said it would close following Sir Keir Starmer's trade deal with the Donald Trump. Vivergo Fuels, near Hull, warned that the deal, which meant a 19pc tariff on bioethanol imports from the US to the UK was removed, would make its factory uneconomic because it faced much higher energy costs than US competitors. On Friday the Government said it had 'taken the difficult decision not to offer direct funding as it would not provide value for the taxpayer'. Other plants could follow – all linked to energy bills that now typically comprise more than 50pc of their total costs. Bosses at Sir Jim Ratcliffe's Ineos petrochemicals plant in Grangemouth, Falkirk, said last week it had not made a profit for five years because of the taxes and levies imposed on the gas it consumes both for energy and as a feedstock for making plastics. CF Industries has also ceased ammonia and fertiliser production at its plant in Ince, Cheshire, in 2021 and then at its plant in Billingham, Teesside, in 2023. Steve Elliott, the chief executive of the Chemical Industries Association, said the high cost of industrial energy was because of government policy rather than global markets. He said: 'The Government has put multiple levies on power and gas prices while also rejecting supplies from the North Sea and from fracking. It means energy has become a huge proportion of overall costs and makes it difficult to remain competitive.' Andrew Griffith, the shadow business secretary, said: 'The UK chemicals sector is foundational to much other manufacturing but is being crippled by high energy costs and penal carbon taxes. It's bonkers policy as when British firms die, the same chemicals are simply imported from overseas.' In June, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) published a report on the impacts of high energy prices, describing how, between 2021 and 2024, industrial electricity costs rose 75 pc and gas prices by 108pc. 'Collectively, the volume of output in [heavy] industries has fallen by one third since the start of 2021, and is now at its lowest level since the start of the available time series in 1990,' the ONS said. Mr Steenberg said: 'When it comes to chemicals the main inputs are energy, specifically gas. If you're not competitive in that, there's no reason to have an industry.' A Government spokesman said: 'We inherited a difficult economic situation, with businesses facing some of the highest industrial energy prices in Europe. That's why we have announced measures to support sectors across the UK as part of our Plan for Change, ensuring that decarbonisation doesn't mean deindustrialisation.'
